Nothing Riske
Sadly I have to report the Royals have signed David Riske to a one year deal with an option for a second season. Terms were not disclosed.
I'm not sure what the deal was with the Rays in this situation, possibly the length, or the cash when we find that out later.
More updates as they become available.
0 recs |
16 comments
Comments
No Riske, no reward
But this is a little disturbing. I suppose we won't really know until the numbers come out, but it's hard to believe the Royals were able to outbid us by that much. But then again, they've suddenly been throwing money around like it grew on trees this offseason, and maybe Riske got bedazzled by that. Who knows. But yes, it's a little distressing. Not suicide-inducing, but bothersome.
by Not That Chuck on Dec 20, 2006 11:09 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The Royals
by Patrick L. Kennedy on Dec 21, 2006 12:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Looking at that list
by Jacob Larsen on Dec 21, 2006 12:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Last year
This offseason Moore is in charge and has, it seems been given full control. You can say he's overpaid for players, but how can you not in this market? Their farm system isn't as deep as ours, although they have high ceilings at the top and they're trying to change the culture, so when Gordon, Butler and Hoch get called up, that they're at least competitive and those players have a chance to push them over the top.
by Tyler on Dec 21, 2006 12:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Gordon
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 21, 2006 12:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Gordon
As for Moore, he signed two of the relievers that most Rays fans wanted to sign.
Burgos sucked last year, so did Sisco. I guess to them, getting a starter in Bannister is more important than Burgos. You also don't know anything about his clubhouse interactions either, although I don't particularly like that deal.
As for Sisco, at this point anyway, he's not the high ceiling lefty he was a couple years ago. Not only does he still have control problems, his velocity dropped this year. Then there's this. He got cut from his winter ball team.
by Tyler on Dec 21, 2006 1:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You can not overspend
by Patrick L. Kennedy on Dec 21, 2006 1:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Didn't they do the same thing last year
All and all throwing money at Gil Meche who becomes their ace...okay if you can honestly defend the money spent on GIL MECHE and say they'll be contending with GIL MECHE as their ace, well then either you're Socrates or out of your mind.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 21, 2006 1:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't
by Tyler on Dec 21, 2006 1:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Good stuff, bad results
I highly doubt that Meche has anything near "Ace"-stuff.
by Jacob Larsen on Dec 21, 2006 1:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If GIl Meche posts...
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 21, 2006 2:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't go that far
by Patrick L. Kennedy on Dec 21, 2006 2:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Eh...
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 21, 2006 2:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Excuse me
by Patrick L. Kennedy on Dec 21, 2006 1:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Only thing I can think of...
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 20, 2006 11:27 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
by Patrick L. Kennedy on Dec 21, 2006 12:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















