Blocking Waivers is dumb
So it seems like the Devil Rays tried to block the Red Sox trade of Adam Stern for Javy Lopez by claiming Stern. Does the Devil Rays Front Office feel like they have too few OF's in the minors? Why would they claim Adam Stern, who has to fall behind numerous guys in the majors and minors?
I guess the popular theory is that they were pissed that the Red Sox asked Julio Lugo's agent whether he'd play second base. How can you be pissed off at that after the Alfonso Soriano debacle this Spring? It's ridiculous that the Rays would block this sort of due diligence - and it's harmful for both the team they were negotiating with (Red Sox) and the player (Julio Lugo) they were tring to trade.
Terrible job, Devil Rays Front Office. Terrible job.
0 recs |
5 comments
Comments
How do you say?
First, by placing a claim on Stern, we'd force Boston to place another player on waivers or kill the trade altogether.
Next, if Boston did in fact "tamper" with Lugo still under our control...this is against the rules in Major League Baseball. However, MLB wouldn't discipline one of their highest money-making teams for tampering.
Stern is probably better of an option than Tomas and probably Hollins and Branyan.
If Rocco's injury forces him to go on the DL, we're going to have to call-up Delmon. Placing a claim on Stern wouldn't stop that.
by Jacob Larsen on Aug 6, 2006 3:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
"Tampering"
And no, blocking Stern only changes the money configuration of the deal.
Stern is not better than Hollins or Branyan. Look at his minor league stats from this year (age 27) and compare them to what Branyan and Hollins did in the minors.
And he's very certainly not better than Delmon.
This is one of those situations where the Devil Rays Front Office is doing things just to mess things up for others, and that's not going to help things in the long run when they actually need to make a trade with the Sox or the Orioles.
by delmonfan on Aug 6, 2006 9:15 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Seriously...
I'd probably guess the same with Baltimore...
by Jacob Larsen on Aug 6, 2006 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well....
At some point if you want to compete, you are the ones that lose leverage and you can't overcharge.
by delmonfan on Aug 6, 2006 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, but this would be 1 time
Blocking a possible waiver-trade wouldn't backfire in our face.
However, I doubt you'll see it the same way...so consider this diary closed.
by Jacob Larsen on Aug 6, 2006 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















