DRaysBay: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:





Jake Takes on Bill Chastain

This is one of a few Q&A sessions that I'm in the process of posting. First up is some Q&A with Rays.com beat writer Bill Chastain. Enjoy!
---

Jake: Good Morning, Bill. How's the Winter Break going for you? For Rays bloggers, like myself, the winter is one of the hardest times to write because you can go days or weeks without anything really eventful happening. What does someone like yourself do when you encounter something like that?

Bill: We really don't have too many of those lull periods, even during the offseason. In addition to providing content for the site, we also provide content for the Sporting News. If I do encounter such a problem I usually call the manager or one of the players just to catch up. Something worthwhile to write about usually comes up within the conversation.

Jake: Before you became the Rays official site beat writer/columnist, what did you do? Did you write for a newspaper, were you in college at that time? Mainly, what did the Pre-Rays timeline look like for one Mr. Bill Chastain?

Bill: I started as a freelancer writing for many different publications. Of note, I wrote for SPORT, Inside Sports and The Sporting News. I began in the newspaper business as a correspondent for the St. Petersburg Times and Evening Independent. Later I wrote columns and covered baseball for the Tampa Tribune. I left the Tribune in 2001 and wrote several books before getting hired by MLB.com in April of 2005.

Jake: On a weekly or bi-weekly basis, you have a "Mailbag" article in which you answer Rays fans' questions. How do you go about choosing the questions?

Bill: One of the most startling things upon taking the job at MLB.com was the amount of email I receive on a daily basis. I receive at least 300 emails a week. I do the best I can to answer some and use others in the mailbag, but the amount of email makes it impossible to respond to all.

Jake: This offseason has been a lackluster one, of sorts, with us only making one somewhat "big" signing in Iwamura and full of minor signings/trades. Should Rays fans expect anything big to happen (a trade or signing of a MLB veteran Free Agent)?

Bill: I think we still might see a trade or a free-agent reliever, but I don't think the organization feels any pressure to do either. They would like to see their youngsters develop this year.

Jake: It's pretty much a given that the Rays will give Iwamura a substantial amount of At-bats, what position should we expect most of those ABs to come from?

Bill: I think he'll be at third base.

Jake: This Spring Training seems to have the makings of a huge "First Base Battle Royal" with at least 4 or 5 candidates for the position, who do you perceive as the odds-on favorite to win the 1B job? Who is the "Dark horse" candidate?

Bill: I would expect Ty Wigginton and Greg Norton to spend most of the time at first with Joel Guzman being a darkhorse candidate.

Jake: What is your personal opinion of all the trade rumors that have swirled this offseason? Is there any that you've heard that just made you confused or laugh out loud? Do you expect the Rays front office to trade Rocco before his long-term deal with us has expired? Do you expect any other trades to be made before the season begins?

Bill: Some of the proposed trades for Carl Crawford have been worth a laugh. This guy is one of the best players in baseball. I think some teams feel they can trade for anybody on the Rays' roster just because they have not been a winner.

Jake: Any ideas on the possible name/color scheme changes that have been hinted at for the Rays in 2008?

Bill: Judging from what the ushers were wearing in 2006, I'm guessing blue will be a major part of the color scheme.

Jake: Any prospects that you think that we should keep an eye on in Spring Training?

Bill: Guzman and Evan Longoria.

Jake: When should Rays fans expect the radio show with Andy & Dave (among others) to start doing their "Countdown" shows?

Bill: I would expect that to begin shortly before the start of spring training.

0 recs | Comment 23 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

Re: Jake Takes on Bill Chastain
Nice interview, good to see the folks at the main site don't have Chastain too clustered with work.

by R.J. Anderson on Jan 17, 2007 2:33 PM EST   0 recs

Re: Jake Takes on Bill Chastain
So the blue shirts are an indication of the new color scheme....interesting...and to think it was on this blog just mere days ago.

by R.J. Anderson on Jan 17, 2007 2:39 PM EST   0 recs

I maintain
That the shirt Friedman is wearing makes no difference. The ushers have entirely different uniforms than do the employees. Rays shirts come in many different colors, green, red, blue, the one Friedman happened to wear made no difference. The ushers uniforms is a whole different matter. Personally, I do believe they will move towards a blue color scheme, but I doubt that Friedman's shirt gives that away.

by Patrick L. Kennedy on Jan 17, 2007 9:27 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Re: I maintain
Patrick you're inferring I meant Friedman, however remember that one of our great (shameless kissup) readers actually commented about the usher's shirts.

by R.J. Anderson on Jan 17, 2007 9:57 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Indeed
However I thought you meant the thing about Friedman. My apologies for the misunderstanding.

by Patrick L. Kennedy on Jan 17, 2007 10:21 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Re: Indeed
No big deal, I should've mentioned the reader, as I'm in understand that of course there are multi-colored Rays shirts.

by R.J. Anderson on Jan 17, 2007 10:23 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Re: Indeed
:-D

Now can I start a Dukes-and-Guzman-for-Billingsley rumor?

by das411 on Jan 18, 2007 1:07 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Not gonna happen
Colletti doesn't believe in prospects.

by Jacob Larsen on Jan 18, 2007 7:55 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Re: Not gonna happen
I wouldn't give up both for Bills...no thanks.

by R.J. Anderson on Jan 18, 2007 2:28 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Re: Not gonna happen
It wouldn't happen anyways, Colletti wouldn't admit defeat by trading a prospect that he originally traded.

by Jacob Larsen on Jan 18, 2007 8:22 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Re: Not gonna happen
is right, but you're insane if you wouldn't trade Dukes and Guzman for Billz.  In fact, I would be willing to bet that the DRO would give up Baldelli for Billz.  He's exactly the type of pitcher they're asking for.  A guy with big league experience, ace potential, and hasn't reached arbitration.

by Tyler on Jan 18, 2007 10:01 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Not gonna happen, Part Deux
If you don't remember, the Dodgers were once listed in the list of teams inquiring about Rocco.

Can you guess why they've stopped?

  1. We're demanding 2 pitchers, which I'm guessing one would be Billz, and a Infielder to boot. While Billz hasn't hit arb, Rocco still has up to 5 years left with the Rays. Not really gonna see the Rays give up Rocc for just 1 pitcher.
  2. Colletti's infatuation with Juan Pierre

by Jacob Larsen on Jan 18, 2007 10:16 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Re: Not gonna happen, Part Deux
Billz, Elbert, and....Laroche anyone? :D

by R.J. Anderson on Jan 18, 2007 10:19 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Re: Not gonna happen, Part Deux
I'd ask for Loney, myself. Pure hitter who is completely blocked, by Colletti's stupidity mostly.

I'd worry that Lil' LaRoche is off-kilter like his brother.

by Jacob Larsen on Jan 18, 2007 10:26 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

I never said they were
I actually said it wasn't going to happen. And that if in fact they were offering Billz, the DRO would be willing to part with Rocco.  Implying that Dukes and Guzman wouldn't be nearly enough.  I didn't bother making a trade proposal, and I understand it wouldn't be a straight up trade.

by Tyler on Jan 18, 2007 10:24 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Knowing our relationship with Ned
I may get some extra visitors from DT for saying this, but I think we'd be able to acquire Billingsley for less than Rocco. Ned seems more and more willing to bypass prospects for vets, unless he's completely out of options(Russ Martin) or it's a player that he personally acquired(Andre Ethier).

by Jacob Larsen on Jan 18, 2007 10:29 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

I'll explain myself a bit, to an extent.
I think that if Billz keeps maintaining a horrible K/BB(which he has) and a high H/9, his ERA will start going up and he'll lose his luster.

If we could somehow manage to acquire Jon Broxton, I'd be happier than I would getting Billingsley.

by Jacob Larsen on Jan 18, 2007 10:32 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Re: I'll explain myself a bit, to an extent.
He's a young guy pitcher.  They struggle with control all the time.  His K rate was low (common for guys making the jump to the big leagues), it will go up, his BB will also goes down, not up as he adjusts.  Kazmir's hit rate and BB rate were both bad his first full year, but he managed to still perform well because he has good stuff.  

Billz has a plus fastball, plus curve and a plus slider.  His change is ok, and as he develops that, he'll continue to get better.

Remember Kaz, 5 or 6 starts in started throwing his change-up and went from promising young pitcher, to legitimate ace.

by Tyler on Jan 18, 2007 10:45 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Re: I'll explain myself a bit, to an extent.
Were Kaz's BB/9 and K/9 both around 5.90?

by Jacob Larsen on Jan 18, 2007 10:52 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Re: I'll explain myself a bit, to an extent.
His BB rate was 5.67 in his first ML experience.  His K rate was 11 but that's an anomaly too.  A lot of guys BB are high and K rates are low during their first season.  

If you notice Verlander's K rate was only 6 this year.  I'd be willing to bet that if he's healthy next year, you'll see that shoot up to at least 8.  

Nothing in Billz past suggest that his 6 k/9 will be long term.  He's been around 10 his entire minor league career.  His stuff is really good, he's got a great work ethic and has been very durable so far.  I see nothing not to like with him.

by Tyler on Jan 18, 2007 11:00 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Re: Jake Takes on Bill Chastain
I think we make at least one deal with the Dodgers this year.

by R.J. Anderson on Jan 18, 2007 8:32 PM EST   0 recs

Re: Jake Takes on Bill Chastain
Not doubting that. My guess is that it would involve one or more of the following: Dukes, Upton, Cantu(Kent is getting old), Fossum(he signed Tomko and has traded for Lurch) and possibly one of our aging relievers.

by Jacob Larsen on Jan 18, 2007 10:17 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Founded in February 2005
Ad-medium-smq

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Raysav_small
GROG
Small
Pre-trade deadline move?
Small
The Lamentations of ManRays - 20080510
1696571775_3b2939f161_o_small
Perhaps some Minor Leaguers Flying under the Radar
Small
MLB Power Rankings
Small
Two Easy Steps to Make the Playoffs This Year
Afterone005_small
Awesome
Kitchrays-sq_small
Uncharted Territory
Bpoe13-poe-fro-1-100x100_small
Price vs. A-Rod?
Small
Should the Rays try to trade for Griffey Jr?

Post New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Ad-banner-faketeams

Editors-in-Chief

Patavatar_small Patrick L. Kennedy

Mcgriff5_small R.J. Anderson

Associate Editors

Small Jacob Larsen

Sumitamaavatar_small Jim Wisinski

Columnists

Raysbbprofilepic_small Matt Bishoff

Small Kevin Gengler

ad

Site Meter