Pitch count/Inning count
Fellas,
Don't shoot the messenger, its going to be a course of discussion. Its the same old same old. I am happy the team won to break the schneid, but Maddon didn't put his club in the best position to win this game. In my opinion, you owe it to Kazmir to give him a chance to win the game rather than hold him to 6 innings and 97 pitches. It rues of an ulterior motive and anyone can say anything they want, but Kazmir was very, very upset to be taken out of that game. I won't pose that question, but I will go out on a limb and say Kazmir was not just a little upset, but VERY unhappy. The game against New York and Clemens after the break, I accept him being pulled because he was fighting hitters and getting deep into counts too much.
But this was a 0-0 game against an exceptional opponent who he was geared up to face and normally pitches well against and in my mind, had the floor and plug removed prematurely. Glover bailed the team out, but if you played Boston 10 times, you are going to lose that game 8 out of 10 times. I do not understand why Kaz was not allowed to pitch the 7th to try to get him a W and another feather in his cap. My two cents, and I could be somewhat off track.
0 recs |
22 comments
Comments
::yawn::
Kazmir does need a pitch/inning count, he racks up too many pitches trying to strikeout every batter.
Who gives a damn if he's upset/unhappy, he hasn't shown much except for 4-5 starts this year. At least he's appearing to start to pull his head out of his ass.
by Jacob Larsen on Jul 29, 2007 6:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: ::yawn::
In the context and course of THIS game, he earned another inning.
by joedobr on Jul 29, 2007 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: ::yawn::
by R.J. Anderson on Jul 29, 2007 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: ::yawn::
I think Magrane made a telling point that he believe that Kazmir will NEVER be super efficient in his pitches per inning. If that is the case he can't be a top of the rotation work horse getting deep into games on a consistent basis. I honestly don't see the fault with in this instance him getting a chance not to have an ND.
I just wonder where and how Kaz is channeling that anger. Webb pitches deep, Harang pitches deep and has tons of innings. I don't disagree with style and action, but its worth noting.
by joedobr on Jul 29, 2007 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: ::yawn::
by Jacob Larsen on Jul 29, 2007 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: ::yawn::
by joedobr on Jul 29, 2007 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: ::yawn::
by R.J. Anderson on Jul 29, 2007 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: ::yawn::
by joedobr on Jul 29, 2007 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: ::yawn::
Kaz: (Innings pitched / pitches)
5 107
7 111
8 113
4 102
6.2 108
7 104
6 105
6.1 117
4 109
5 96
7 105
7 105
5 103
6 117
6 114
6 116
5.1 114
6 113
5 105
6 117
7 94
6.2 113
6 97
Webb (innings pitched / pitches)
5 96
7
7 96
8 101
8 115
7 107
6 106
9 90
6 98
7 118
7 88
8 113
7 99
7 116
7 104
5 99
7 105
6 87
7 115
5.2 97
7 91
7 116
Webb is throwing around the same amount, only with 1-2 more innings, and he's not throwing tired since he's using breaking stuff and movement to get his outs, Kaz depends on a mix of velocity and movement.
Also note Kazmir is 5'11" in high heels, Webb is 6'2".
Maddon likely didn't want Kaz going out, getting into trouble (remember last start?) and turning a spectacular outing into crap within 10-20 pitches.
That or managment has told Joe don't allow him to go past 6 if it's risking 110+ pitches.
by R.J. Anderson on Jul 29, 2007 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, you see
Felix Hernandez, on the other hand, was coddled in his first couple of seasons and went on limited workloads and pitch counts because Seattle knew that he had to be slowly turned into an innings eater. He's also got a projectable body who is going to support the workload that's given to him.
Kaz hasn't earned, pardon my french, shit. He can whine, piss and moan all he wants, but guess what...he's still a guy who needs to learn how to become economical with his pitches and not try to burn his arm out going for strikeouts. Maybe he'd decrease his walks if he did that, huh?
Let him hit arbitration, he hasn't proven he's worthy of a long-term deal. If he has, Wade Davis and Jake McGee need to be locked up. David Price needs to be given a lifetime deal, if that's the case.
by Jacob Larsen on Jul 29, 2007 6:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Well, you see
97/6 equals 16 in my mind. That means he's throwing 2 balls to every hitter in an inning on average and/or putting runners on base and pitching out of the stretch. Bottom line, I agree, you take Kaz to an arbitration hearing and if you have to go year-to-year until he does what he is supposed to do.
by joedobr on Jul 29, 2007 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Well, you see
Kazmir's season goal should be to reach or get close to hitting 200 innings.
Simple as that, the Ks will come if his "stuff" is really that good and the walks will go down.
by Jacob Larsen on Jul 29, 2007 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Well, you see
I'd take issue with your analysis of how to handle him contractually, however. The motivation in signing a guy to a long term deal is payroll predictability. The arbitration process can be very unpredictable. It's also a 2-way street - the player can choose to go down it if he (and his agent) feel that it could be more lucrative, or they don't feel a sense of long-term committment to their current organization. Teams typically try to lock up players through their arb years to increase payroll predicability and hopefully to save money versus the arb process - the tradeoff is financial security versus short term maximization for the player. There is going to be a strong market for a pitcher like Kazmir (23, power lefty starter) for the foreseeable future, so getting stuck with a bad contract is less likely here. And I'd argue that over the past 3 seasons he's more than earned the committment. It's in the Rays interest to lock him up. And doing so sends the message that the organization is in for the long haul, not on a year to year lease.
He's proven much more than any of your 3 prospects. I'm sure you're writing from a sense of frustration with Kazmir's seeming headstrong behavior here. Patience, eye on the goal, and a willingness to make financial mistakes (not disasters) is required.
by nyyfaninlaaland on Jul 31, 2007 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Pitch count/Inning count
by joedobr on Jul 29, 2007 6:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Kazmir
by TomT on Jul 29, 2007 7:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Kazmir
by R.J. Anderson on Jul 29, 2007 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Kazmir
by New Hit Show on Jul 29, 2007 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Kazmir
by R.J. Anderson on Jul 29, 2007 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Kazmir
by Jacob Larsen on Jul 29, 2007 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Pitch count/Inning count
I think Kazmir is still the Ace and hopefully he can finish the season strong.
by Flabull on Jul 29, 2007 7:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Pitch count/Inning count
by R.J. Anderson on Jul 29, 2007 7:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Pitch count/Inning count
by JWallace on Jul 30, 2007 12:33 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















