Read this then think of Rocco
Curt Schilling posted this on his blog - http://www.38pitches.com - in support of Varitek. I think what he's saying parallels in a lot of way with Rocco's situation with the Rays, and might make some of us stat heads think for a second:
Comments like this make it easy to understand, from an athletes standpoint, why and how the media, no matter how good, can never fully grasp what you do, and how hard what you do is for a living.
“Please, spare me the Dr. Phil nonsense that Varitek’s personal problems somehow affected his performance this season. If anything, they would affect his mental preparation, not his ability to connect with a fastball traveling above 87 mph.”
In talking about Jason, much has obviously been said and he has a pretty passionate group of supporters on the staff. But to imply the above is a borderline admission of ignorance. To say that there is little to no connection with your mental state of mind, and your physical performance, tells me the person talking has never been asked to, or able to, perform a physical activity at a level few others in the world can.
Jason would be the last, and likely never would, to make any excuses for the poor offensive year and a half he has had. I will tell you that what he had to endure physically and mentally absolutely impacted him in a negative way performance wise. People don’t know that he twice last year had a serious viral sickness. He was completely wiped out on two different occasions. Both times he lost significant weight and strength and he did so in the midst of playing. Back on the field in a time frame I would guess was NOT in his best health interest. The other ’stuff’ are a very big deal here because regardless of what tabloid journalism might have said this guy lived for his children and was and always will be the best father he can be, of that I have no doubt. I’ve lockered next to him for 5 years, he’s as good a man and human as I’ve known. Sure that paints severe bias into the picture but that doesn’t make it false either.
The more important piece to this, and one that was in full view for the pitchers, was the fact that never once did he allow his offensive woes to follow him behind the plate or affect his pre-game preparation, and planning, two crucial elements we as ‘his staff’ valued so highly. The reason I make that statement is that over 20 years of playing at this level that makes him incredibly rare at his position. Few catchers, well none really, that I ever played with put the initial time and effort into game prep he did, but fewer still ever had the ability to separate their offensive woes from their defensive responsibility. As their average went, so did their defensive commitment.
I know the ‘anti’ Tek camp is big, and that’s fine, but at the end of the day his value is far beyond a measurable statistic and I think that’s what rubs so many wrong. You’ll know it when it’s gone, it will be a visibly absent thing.
Do you pay him 15 a year for 4 years, I don’t know but who gives a 36 year old catcher a 4 year deal? If there was ever a guy to get that deal you could argue this was the guy because you know beyond a shadow of a doubt he’ll be in better shape than any catcher in the game for however many years he gets. It really comes down to someone understanding how much of his contract is being paid for those ‘intangibles’ so many argue for, or against.
This guy is the consummate team first, play the game right 24/7 pro. Many don’t care about that aspect, and that’s fine too, there are a ton of utility players that play the same way, but they aren’t worth 15×4 or whatever. But those things matter inside a clubhouse where you inherit a family for 9 months a year. Those things, when absent, can wear a team down fast, but when present they are the things that help a team over the hump as well. This clubhouse has gained, in addition to immense young talent, an incredibly good and deep roster of players with many of those same traits. That bodes well for the coming years, and I would argue Jason is a huge part of that.
I am not saying sign him regardless, or let him walk at a certain price, what I am saying is that there is value here beyond AVG/OPS/HR/RBI that writers like the one quoted above will never comprehend, appreciate or acknowledge.
0 recs |
23 comments
Comments
Here's the difference:
Varitek likely won’t encounter viral illnesses next season. That’s simply bad luck that’s unsustainable.
Rocco’s not going to magically cure his illness anytime soon, if ever. That’s simply bad luck, but sustainable bad luck.
by R.J. Anderson on
Nov 18, 2008 11:32 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Also
Rocco isn’t a catcher. Not nearly as many purported interaction effects with a DH/RF as with a catcher, who has to deal with the entire pitching staff and who serves as the link between the dugout and the bullpen.
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on
Nov 18, 2008 1:57 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Curt Schilling is a dickbag. I have no desire to read anything that waste of talent has to say.
by rglass44 on
Nov 18, 2008 11:38 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
We're Stat Heads
We don’t have feelings, sir.
by Erik Hahmann on
Nov 18, 2008 11:39 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Tek Sucks, Schilling's a dbag
End of story.
by Erik Hahmann on
Nov 18, 2008 11:42 AM EST
reply
actions
1 recs
I'm beginning to wonder...
Perhaps the only way to combat this blind Rocco Baldelli lovefest is not with a reasonable explination as to why he’s dangerous to rely on, but with pure, unfettered, unreasonable Rocco Baldelli hatred. Apparently, nobody wants to try to justify his presence with his performance, only with his heart and will.
Plain and simple. If you think the Rays should take Rocco Baldelli back but should get rid of Jonny Gomes, you are being a hypocrite. You are ignoring performance and history for what YOU think he does for the team, never mind the fact that he has an illness that prevents him from being reliable, increases his chance of being injury prone, is no longer above-average defensively and has a track record of less than 100AB for performance with his current state of health. If you’re going to try to explain why Rocco Baldelli should be back, you should be explain
by kericr on
Nov 18, 2008 1:28 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
ok gomes sucks ass and can only fight
rocco was at least successful this year when he came back
everything Rays,Marlins,Twins and Reds
by RaysOfHope on
Nov 19, 2008 3:47 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Gomes had bad luck.
Career wise he hits lefties better than Rocco.
by R.J. Anderson on
Nov 19, 2008 1:52 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
im pretty sure that gomes career is done with the rays
i love the gomer for his power and his fighting ability/sticking up for aki but i just dont see him being on the team next year
everything Rays,Marlins,Twins and Reds
by RaysOfHope on
Nov 19, 2008 10:56 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
something girls say about something in your pants rj
everything Rays,Marlins,Twins and Reds
by RaysOfHope on
Nov 21, 2008 11:51 PM EST
up
reply
actions
1 recs
That doesn't really work. Still, rec'd.
Indie.
by Taylor H on
Nov 22, 2008 12:58 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thank you. Agreed.
I love Rocco.
Loving a player and wanting him on the team are two different things though.
I know that's a pisser, baby.
by Blicks on
Nov 18, 2008 2:22 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
How much did Scott Boras pay Curt Schilling to write that?
I know that's a pisser, baby.
by Blicks on
Nov 18, 2008 2:22 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Schilling is his own agent, and a Red Sox apologist.
Lay off the stadium, Iwamura
by Orlando Rays on
Nov 20, 2008 10:41 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Point being, he probably didn't do this for Bore-Ass.
Lay off the stadium, Iwamura
by Orlando Rays on
Nov 20, 2008 10:41 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
also i didnt read 1 word what curt schilling wrote, i have no respect for him to read his dumbass rants
curt maybe you hurt your shoulder typing too much or maybe from patting your self on the back for all your great blogs that you have done!
everything Rays,Marlins,Twins and Reds
by RaysOfHope on
Nov 19, 2008 3:52 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
So, Boston needs another outfielder.
by R.J. Anderson on
Nov 19, 2008 1:53 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
If Baahstin signs Rocco, I will laugh.
We all know he can’t/shouldn’t be playing CF.
If something were to happen to Ellsbury (DL, pulling a Melky Cabrera), that would force J.D. Drew into CF. That’s just entertaining.
I know that's a pisser, baby.
by Blicks on
Nov 19, 2008 4:33 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs












