Trivial Rays Note About Steals
Digging through assorted Rays history in a database, I wanted to find out how often Carl Crawford attempted a steal. More specifically, I wanted the percentage of times on base that Crawford ran. If you recall I figured something similar a few weeks ago, but I wanted to also see where he ranked in Rays history.
Much to my surprise, when I lowered the times on base threshold to 10 (SSS, I know) Nathan Haynes name popped up. Haynes reached based 13 times this season, and attempted five steals. Of course, that doesn't account for Haynes pinch running, and I don't have the play-by-play database abilities to filter that down, so take it for what it is.
After my near Haynes experience, I turned back to the original question. You shouldn't be surprised to learn that Crawford dominates the list, with his highest being 33.5% in 2004. Here's a list of the top 10:
| Player | Year | SB | CS | H | BB | HBP | TOB | SBA | SBP |
| Crawford | 2004 | 59 | 15 | 185 | 35 | 1 | 221 | 74 | 0.3348 |
| Crawford | 2003 | 55 | 10 | 177 | 26 | 1 | 204 | 65 | 0.3186 |
| Winn | 1998 | 26 | 12 | 94 | 29 | 1 | 124 | 38 | 0.3065 |
| Crawford | 2006 | 58 | 9 | 183 | 37 | 4 | 224 | 67 | 0.2991 |
| Tyner | 2001 | 31 | 6 | 111 | 15 | 3 | 129 | 37 | 0.2868 |
| Crawford | 2007 | 50 | 10 | 184 | 32 | 5 | 221 | 60 | 0.2715 |
| Cairo | 2000 | 28 | 7 | 98 | 29 | 2 | 129 | 35 | 0.2713 |
| Upton | 2008 | 44 | 16 | 145 | 97 | 2 | 244 | 60 | 0.2459 |
| Crawford | 2005 | 46 | 8 | 194 | 27 | 5 | 226 | 54 | 0.2389 |
| Crawford | 2008 | 25 | 7 | 121 | 30 | 2 | 153 | 32 | 0.2092 |
On the other hand, how about the guys who got on base 100+ times, aren't catchers, and got the steal sign the least? Here you go:
| Player | Year | SB | CS | H | BB | HBP | TOB | SBA | SBP |
| Canseco | 1999 | 3 | 0 | 120 | 58 | 7 | 185 | 3 | 0.0162 |
| Trammell | 1999 | 0 | 2 | 82 | 43 | 1 | 126 | 2 | 0.0159 |
| Cantu | 2006 | 1 | 1 | 103 | 26 | 3 | 132 | 2 | 0.0152 |
| McGriff | 2001 | 1 | 1 | 109 | 40 | 0 | 149 | 2 | 0.0134 |
| Pena | 2008 | 1 | 1 | 121 | 96 | 12 | 229 | 2 | 0.0087 |
| McGriff | 2000 | 2 | 0 | 157 | 91 | 0 | 248 | 2 | 0.0081 |
| Boggs | 1999 | 1 | 0 | 88 | 38 | 0 | 126 | 1 | 0.0079 |
| Cantu | 2005 | 1 | 0 | 171 | 19 | 6 | 196 | 1 | 0.0051 |
| Pena | 2007 | 1 | 0 | 138 | 103 | 10 | 251 | 1 | 0.004 |
| McGriff | 1999 | 1 | 0 | 164 | 86 | 1 | 251 | 1 | 0.004 |
Cantu is the only one of these players who was not in the latter stages of his career (or at least older than 28), yet somehow he was listed twice. God blessed that Human Lawn Statue, just not with speed.
0 recs |
3 comments
Comments
Hey R.J.
Love your work both here and at BTB. But just wanted to ask, wasn’t Crawford on significantly more than that? When you consider errors and fielder’s choices (and as you said, pinch-running) it seems there would be a significant number of extra times on base not included in the table. Also, while unlikely, Crawford may have attempted to steal both second and third a couple of times. Also, a couple of uncontrolled variables, but this method penalizes power hitters, because you’re much less likely to steal after an XBH, and guys in offenses, because there will be other guys on base “clogging the bases”.
Also, I think you should subtract HR’s, since you cant exactly steal after those. Well, maybe Jason Bartlett could. He’s THAT valuable. ;-)
But keep up the interesting analysis. When you can get a Dodger fan on a Rays blog, you’re doing a good job. Oh, and STOP taking our prospects!!! ;-)
by Brendan Scolari on Dec 1, 2008 5:16 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
*Meant to say it penalizes guys in good offenses
because there will be more guys on base “clogging the bases”
by Brendan Scolari on Dec 1, 2008 5:18 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I definitely unerstand your point.
Unfortunately the database I’m using doesn’t have RBOE statistics.
Perhaps subtract triples too? Although Crawford has stolen home before…
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 1, 2008 8:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















