DRaysBay: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: A statistical basis for widespread HATE

Community Projections: Evan Longoria

Next up we have Evan Longoria :

Longoria      BA OBP SLG
2008 0.272 0.343 0.531
James 0.280 0.358 0.534
Marcels 0.280 0.351 0.515

Marcels projections him for only 454 plate appearances while Bill James has him down for 599. 

As always, post your "projections" in the following format:

BA/OBP/SLG

0 recs  |  Comment 244 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I think it is hard

to come up with projections without knowing who will be hitting infront and inback of Longoria

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 8:42 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

.282/.365/.550

33 homers
good D
If only that man had better wheels, he would be the ultimate 5 tool machine.

Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart

by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 9:28 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

.278/.350/.540

890 OPS makes a tent in my pants

Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.

~George Costanza~

by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 9:48 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

The breakout continues

40 bombs. There, I said it..

by rglass44 on Dec 23, 2008 10:02 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

well I think he would of gotten 35 this season if he didn't get injured

So 40 seems very possible to me.

What is the max steals you see out of Evan in a season?

Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart

by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:07 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He stole 7 this year w/o getting got.

This would seem to mean he might steal upwards of 10, but I’m not sure. He stole 8 in his 2 seasons in the minors. I wouldn’t think he’d get much higher than 8-10, but as he gets better on the basepaths who knows. Hell, Lance Berkman and Adam Dunn have 18 and 19 in a season respectively.

by rglass44 on Dec 23, 2008 10:16 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i dunno

I was thinking 10-15 a year max but I can see him getting 20 steals and more than 20 homers in a season. 20/20….well he can be 40/20 but that’s if everything goes his way.

Nothing to laugh at, I would say.

Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart

by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

hey on the subject

Evan Longoria has never been caught stealing in his career!

Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart

by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:11 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That's why I included the Bill James projections

Marcels has him for 20 something homers and 70 or so RBI. James has him 37 and 116 or so.

by Erik Hahmann on Dec 23, 2008 10:17 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

.284/.359/.542

Tools Whore

Sign Bonds!

by Tyler on Dec 23, 2008 10:03 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Want to see Longo hit 40 HR?

Go get Manny

4/$80 million

Do it—Payroll still below $70 mil, which is bottom third in MLB

by Raymondo on Dec 23, 2008 10:21 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Oh Manny

If only he would play here just to spite the rest of the bEAST. 2 yr/20M sounds about right.

Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.

~George Costanza~

by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 10:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He just might

if the Yankees don’t step up, go get him

BJ
CC
Manny
Carlos
Longo
Aki
Navi
Joyce
Bartlett

by Raymondo on Dec 23, 2008 10:31 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I thought about Manny and Tex for a few seconds the other day

Realize it only happens if we trade Kazmir or CC and a lil more or Pena and a lil more

We can’t afford to have all those great hitters and unless everyone has given up on Kazmir, I don’t want him going anywhere.

Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart

by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It can be done--and keep

payroll around $70 mil

Trade Bradford or Wheeler

The problem arises in year 3 and 4 of the deal, when our other players will need to be bumped up

by Raymondo on Dec 23, 2008 10:37 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Nah, just what it would take

And trading a a star, even if it means to get a star is not something that intrigues me. Plus he would be a 8-10 year commitment. Even Manny would be 3 or 4 and he could be Manny at any given point.

Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart

by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Even 'Manny being Manny'

is better than anything we have

The window won’t be open forever

Do it Andrew

by Raymondo on Dec 23, 2008 10:41 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Why not think big?

Hell the Nats are offering Tex $184 mil, and it won’t get them out of last place

Sign Manny and this team can win the WS or be in position for the next 3-4 years

by Raymondo on Dec 23, 2008 10:44 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We worked too hard to climb this mountain

I don’t think we are going to 180 the course that got us here at this juncture.

Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.

~George Costanza~

by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 10:48 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

we were 3 wins away with Gross and Hinske playing all year

I think Bradley/Burrell/Dunn/Giambi would be enough.

Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart

by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:49 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

the window was never open for Manny

If it is needed, MAYBE Friedman can spend 15 mil this offseason

Manny wants 25 mil a year.

Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart

by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:43 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

so lets say he gets 20 mil a year

He would only accept that in a 4 year deal.

Think the Rays will guarantee ANYONE 80 million?

Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart

by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:47 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Beej 10 year 150M FTW

Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.

~George Costanza~

by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 10:48 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Bossman doesn't count towards any rules

We will hopefully give him a blank check as long as he knows its for 8+ years

Think big. Think crazy.

Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart

by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:50 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We can talk about what it WOULD take all day

Anything COULD happen. I COULD start dating Marissa Miller tomorrow. Sure, it would take some big sacrifices on her part, but it COULD happen. Sadly, it won’t.

by Erik Hahmann on Dec 23, 2008 10:44 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

if you start dating her, please ask her to send the Rays some money for Manny

So he can piss all over the Red Sox for us.

Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart

by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

IF we had a chance, then we have to give 3 years

because no other team has been willing

and 3/30 sadly wont do it. Talk about settling since right now he wants 3/75

Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart

by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:35 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think it would cost that much to sign Manny Aybar

because surely you don’t think the Rays are going to pay Manny Ramirez 80 million dollars over 4 years.

by Tommy Rancel on Dec 23, 2008 10:42 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Protection is bullshit. Your brain is bullshit.

Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.

by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 10:50 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Whoa where did that come from?

Who pissed in your corn flakes this morning?

Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.

~George Costanza~

by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 10:51 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm sick. -_-

Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.

by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 10:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm sick of you being so weak.

Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.

~George Costanza~

by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 10:53 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It's just a head cold. :(

Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.

by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 10:56 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

HAHAHA

just giving you shit P.

Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.

~George Costanza~

by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 11:17 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No. No. No.

Manny’s last three WARs: 5.5, 1.9, 4.1. You’d be paying him for 4 WAR, he’s averaged 3.8 WAR. He’s 36 and you want to pay him until he’s 40? And for a DH? Come on.

by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 11:32 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It's only a 7.5 positional adjustment from LF to DH

Surely his defense is much worse than -7.5.

Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.

~George Costanza~

by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 12:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't have the splits available.

But he was better last year, yes. Whether that’s a fluke, due to positioning, or whatever else? No idea.

by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 12:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Most of his horrendousness was Fenway effect

Due to the wall out there, all the LF defensive stats look awful in Fenway. On a rate level, Bay was much worse than Manny once he got traded there, for instance. IIRC, his defense wasn’t that far below average in LA.

Vogt early, Vogt often.

by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly so he gains a ton of value moving to DH.

Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.

~George Costanza~

by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 12:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, definitely.

-7.5 – 19.3 (three year average) is -26.8, so he loses an additional win as a LFer.

by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 12:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not necessarily

He probably gained more value by moving away from Boston, if anything.

Vogt early, Vogt often.

by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How so?

The monster probably inflated his XBH’s slightly and hid some of the fact that he doesn’t move very well.

Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.

~George Costanza~

by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 1:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

NM I saw what you put above and that makes sense.

Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.

~George Costanza~

by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 1:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Or they could just tear that rodent-infested house of disease down.

Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.

~George Costanza~

by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 1:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Manny's numbers looked awful

last season with LA

I’ll keep track of him v our DH

Just sayin

by Raymondo on Dec 23, 2008 2:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

.264/.338/.497

Vogt early, Vogt often.

by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 10:26 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

maybe he is one of those guys

who expects the worst so he can get what he expected or be pleasenty surprised

Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart

by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:41 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It's not unreasonable to predict a sophomore slump

Especially after his major league statistics outperformed his MLEs?

Vogt early, Vogt often.

by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 11:09 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

.275/.350/.530

Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.

by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 10:48 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

How can anyone make a legit "prediction" ....

when they have no idea where he will be hitting in the lineup, who will be hitting infront of him and who will be hitting behind him

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 11:03 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

They arent?

So if 2002 Barry Bonds is hitting behind of Longo you are saying he would have the same numbers as if 2007 Dioneer Navarro was?

And i would say Bill James “predictions” are scientific

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 11:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

read a book?

So I am guessing you are saying i am not educated enough on the topic? So player X will put up the same numbers regardless of who hits behind him?

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 11:31 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Since I know you won't read these:
The moral of the story is this: a good on-deck hitter lowers the likelihood of a batter walking, but it does not translate into more offensive production.

by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 11:40 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

so you are telling me

That pitchers do not pitch to hitters differently depending on who is on base and what batter is up next?

Wow, go watch an National league game when the number 8 hitter is up and there are 2 outs. They will try thier hardest not to walk him and through fatter pitches to make him put the ball in play so they can get a third out so the pitcher leads off the next inning. That is just one example.

Have any of you stat heads ever played a game and or managed a game?

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 11:41 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No, I have never played a game I've wrote about nearly everyday for the past three years.

Please go back to RBB, you make this entire community’s intelligence level drop everytime you comment.

by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 11:43 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Dick

Vogt early, Vogt often.

by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I spend my time trying to have sex with my iPhoneand playing D&D.

Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.

by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 11:47 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

multi-tasker

Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.

~George Costanza~

by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 12:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There have been numerous studies

of the effect of lineup on hitters’ production, and I am quite sure they all conclude that the effect is negligible at best. The hitters around him will affect his RBI and Runs Scored totals but not his BA/OBP/Slugging % line.

Referring to experience watching games or what appears to be common sense or malarkey your little league coach or the color men in the booth have always told you does not comprise either logic or evidence. The point of the stats is to see whether the traditional wisdom is confirmed or invalidated, and in this case it has been pretty clearly invalidated. Either batters are helped or harmed by who bats before and after them or they are not affected, and that is a question that only statistics can provide an answer to.

It is certainly possible there is some psychological affect on pitchers, managers and batters, but apparently that effect does not show up in the actual play on the field.

by bobr on Dec 23, 2008 11:59 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Yes

Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.

by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 11:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

RBI numbers are inflated because of who's on base in front of you

But your base stats, BA/OBP/SLG are not effected at all by the lineup.

by Erik Hahmann on Dec 23, 2008 11:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

.280/.355/.525

by RayOfLight on Dec 23, 2008 11:09 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

.275/.350/.540

"And you just don't get it, you keep it copacetic..."

by Blicks on Dec 23, 2008 11:30 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

here are my Longo predictions

With the 2002 Barry bonds hitting behind him .290/.330/.540
with the 2007 Dioneer Navarro hitting behind him .265/.420/.470

and he will get lots of tail

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 11:36 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

No, because protection is a myth.

Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.

by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 11:37 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

.265/.420/.470

so… He’s going to lead the league in BB’s next year?

by Vin on Dec 23, 2008 12:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Even if it did have an effect it would not be so large

-.025 BA, +.090 OBP, -.070 SLG this just makes you look dumb.

Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.

~George Costanza~

by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 12:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

okay first

I received a WARNING for my actions. Can anyone please tell me why i received a warning? Was it due to me using the term “stat head”? The last time i checked that wasnt an insulting term?

RJ would you like to explain how “stat head” is offensive but telling me “Please go back to RBB, you make this entire community’s intelligence level drop everytime you comment.” isnt offensive? So i cant have a different opinion then you??? Wow

back to the topic at hand if RJ allows me to…

So Longo comes up with 1 out……. Upton is on first

Is the pitcher more likely to try and throw pitch that will result in a ground ball for DP. Yes he will. So he is trying to throw a pitch that will result in a ball in play. With Uptons speed the second baseman will have to cover second, leaving a hole open on the right side. Longo grounds a single through the hole.

Result, due to defensive alignment, Longo now has a single.

First and second with one out and Pena is up. Will they be more likely to throw him fatter pitches due to not walking him?

So due to Uptons speed, it left a whole open…now Pena has benefited from this and should see better pitches.

If Navi is up after Longo, they might not be as afraid to walk Longo and instead face Navi and hope to get the DP and get out of the inning.

Dont try to tell me it doesnt matter….go ask ANY ML manager and they will laugh at you if you said it didnt matter who hit infront or behind a hitter.

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 11:55 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

RJ - Instead of just being terse and pricky, try engaging in discussion

He’s a lot more likely to see your point that way. As it is, you’re just alienating him more. Frankly, you’ve been turning me off lately with this new standoffish demeanor (over about the last 3 or 4 months), and I even agree with you on this point.

Vogt early, Vogt often.

by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So i get a WARNING cause my opinion varies

and i have not said anything offensive. Sorry but i am more oldschool when it comes to my stats and i watch the games to form my views and opinions of what can and will happen.

Still doesnt explain why you would send me a warning for no apparant reason. Why the grudge RJ…do tell?

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 12:01 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

But that doesnt make sense...so my opinion varies, i had to reread the terms and conditions and agree to them.

Cause I didnt agree with your OPINIONS. Yes I still say your point of views are opinions. That doesnt mean you are wrong or I am right. Means I also have an opinion about what factors contribute to a sucessful hitter.

You can share all the links about protection and such, but i will go and judge this with my own eyes, playing experience and coaching.

So does this mean I should get WARNINGS?

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 12:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Him, sternfan, and Longo4Prez can go drink tea and talk about the loose change they gathered.

Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.

by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 12:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

go up to Mike Scocsia

And tell him it doesnt matter who hits in front or behind of Vlad and see what he tells you. Bring all the reports you want and being a catcher he will disagree with you. Does that mean he is ignoring all of your facts as well or he has a different perspective on the topic?

I find it amazing all the insults that are coming my way in this thread…cause i disagree. Wow, just wow

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 12:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Mike Scicsia isn't a genius btw.

Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.

by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 12:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Scocsia isnt a genius but he is one of the most respected minds in baseball

and has much more experience than any of us. So would you tell Scocsia he was arguing with facts if he disagreed with your numbers?

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 12:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes.

Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.

by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 12:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wow, if anyone was ever trying to be an antagonist...

I would say that calling someone ignorant and close-minded would be the best way to do it.

I am discussing this topic on here. If you want to discuss it on raysbb, then you go over there and discuss it.

You guys can call it facts all you want, but when people who have played the game, managed the game, scouted the game and watched the game their entire lives disagrees with you…well then there is more to your numbers then you think.

You can not tell me that Longos SLG will be the same with DUNN hitting behind him as it would be with Tomas Perez.

You be the pitcher….do you pitch around Longo to get to DUnn…NO

Do you pitch around Longo to get to Tomas Perez…YES

how can you argue with that?

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 12:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The point is you are looking at situations that happen maybe 15% of the time (the runners on arguement)

If you look at the aggregate over a large enough sample size you will see that it does not matter in the longrun.

Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.

~George Costanza~

by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 12:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

asking this in a non offensive way cause i know it would be perceived that way...

But how is it 15% when Upton has a .380 OBP? Even if you take away his HRs his OBP is still around .370 and then if you calculate into the equation fielder choices and errors, I am sure that .370 number goes up. Am i missing something with your 15%

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 12:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And how many times is he stealing?

Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.

~George Costanza~

by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 1:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There's a difference between changing one's approach a bit and the actual results being significantly different.

If protection made a significant difference in the performance of a hitter, shouldn’t that show up in the the data? I mean, if a player’s going to hit better with Bonds behind him, shouldn’t we be able to separate his performance with and without Bonds’ protection and see that he did, in fact, hit better with better protection?

Many people have looked at that information, with thousands of batters and thousands of protectors. And they’ve found very little to support protection.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Dec 23, 2008 1:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You know who played the game of baseball?

John Rocker. Smart fellow. Well thought out opinions.

by acblue on Dec 24, 2008 1:06 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I wanred you because you're arguing with like, 0 facts against the sites admin, questioning their pedigrees.

Usually that isn’s a recipe for success.

Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.

by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 12:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So from what i understand

Me presenting my opinion by stating that great baseball minds such as managers and GM disagree with your theory. And the fact that I wont agree with you, but will agree with them leads to a warning?

While I have not writen anything offensive about anyone on here, havent tried to troll, etc…..yet i have been called “Oh cool, so you’re ignorant and close-minded!”, “Please go back to RBB, you make this entire community’s intelligence level drop everytime you comment.” and "Him, sternfan, and Longo4Prez can go drink tea and talk about the loose change they gathered. " and have been the one who recieved a warning.

Can you explain to me how that makes sense?

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 12:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i read everything

I take everything in, but i still feel as though my view is correct (obviously in my eyes), Yes there are numbers to back up your theories, but i dont feel they are as strong as those numbers suggest.

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 12:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

See, this is what makes people angry.

“Sure you have cold, hard, factual numbers to back up your theories, but I think they’re bull shit. So I’m going to go with what my eyes and gut and tradition tells me is true.”

Its like trying to talk to an elderly person about global warming.

by Vin on Dec 23, 2008 12:57 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

ha..im old but not that old vin hehehe

Hey I see the numbers and such….but again can anyone honestly say Longo would put up the same numbers with Tomas Perez hitting behind him versus Adam Dunn?

Lets be serioius, Longo would never see anything good to hit, especially if no one was on base.

Now you put Dunn behind him and they will make him work for hits and try not to walk him

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 1:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't really have time to dive into this but,

I think you would agree that Longo was almost always behind Pena in the line-up right? So that would mean he would have 6-7-8 guys hitting behind him, you follow? If protection really existed (and he seemingly had none last year) how could he put up a line of .308/.368/.636 when leading off an inning?

That’s with no one on base, giving the pitcher no reason to throw him anything worth hitting, and with no protection behind him, giving the pitcher even less reason to throw him anything worth hitting.

Your argument holds no ground man. I’m sorry but yeah, all indications are that he would hit just as well with Tomas Perez batting behind ’em.

by Vin on Dec 23, 2008 1:19 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Can you explain to me how that makes sense?

Its just a really, really old argument that’s been beaten to death way too many times.

Really man, fuck “Eyes vs. Stats.” That shit shoulda been gone the day Edwin was traded.

by Vin on Dec 23, 2008 12:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

See in the case of Jacksons Eyes vs Stats

I was more on the side of stats cause he was much more lucky than his numbers suggested. But I view this differently (obviously)

I just dont think Longo would put up the same numbers with Tomas Perez hitting behind him as he would Dunn

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 12:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I just dont think Longo would put up the same numbers with Tomas Perez hitting behind him as he would Dunn

And that’s fine. I just wouldn’t make that statement without having the phrase “I base this on absolutely nothing” attached somewhere.

by Vin on Dec 23, 2008 1:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Great baseball minds also paid Carlos Lee three bazillion dollars

Great baseball minds continue to use a closer.

Great baseball minds thought the Mariners would be World Series champs and the Rays had no shot.

Great baseball minds have no clue about the value of defense.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Dec 23, 2008 1:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

.290/.365/.550

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Dec 23, 2008 1:08 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Okay stat heads...

2001 Barry Bonds go crazy and splits time between batting 3rd and batting 4th

Jeff Kent as well splt between batting 3rd and 4th http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/bsplit.cgi?n1=kentje01&year=2002

batting 3rd his stats were

ABS 305 / AVG .333 / OBP .387 / SLG .667 with 22 HRs

Batting 4th

ABS 376 / AVG .297 / OBP .354 / SLG .484 with 15 HRs

So from those numbers he drastically benefited from Bonds hitting behind him…is that fair enough to say?

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 1:09 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Thats one guy

What about the other 29 cleanup hitters?

Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.

~George Costanza~

by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 1:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

but that shows that the numbers arent perfect

Earlier in this thread people were telling me that their numbers were 100% fact…but then I show a case where their numbers arent fact and they ignore them and say thats just one guy. You can’t have 100% numbers If i can find an innacuracy that easily

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 1:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Because 1 is the smallest sample size possible

Have you taken a statistics class or attempted to learn anything about the field. Statistics is dependent on vast sample sizes that smooth the effects of outliers and random variation.

Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.

~George Costanza~

by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 1:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Nothing is perfect in small sample sizes.

You should flip heads 50% of the time, but if you flip a coin once, you can’t flip half a heads.

There’s a difference between observing something and being able to explain why it happened. If I call heads and the coin comes up heads, did I know it was going to be heads? No. If I posit that Player X will have a breakout season because he started dating the love of his life and he goes ahead and has a breakout season, was it because of who he started dating? Probably not.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Dec 23, 2008 3:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

every number of Kents went up when in front of Bonds

And were more along his norm when hitting behind Bonds. Why was that. Was it due to weaker hitters such as Benito Santiago now hitting behind Kent and or no one being onbase since Bonds hit 71 HRs?

In either case, I think it shows that “protection” is a true posibility. Sure Kents situation might not be the norm, but still shows it exists.

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 1:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Okay, so let's see.

We present you with studies of a ton of examples of “protection” in which it shows no correlation and you dismiss it. You find one example that works your way and it weighs more?

Well that’s convenient.

by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 1:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Even further, we're admitting that having a good hitter behind you is less likely to lead to a walk.

You seem to think that’s an automatic hit. Pitchers are going to throw better stuff to avoid having a man on base for Bonds. Doesn’t that make protection a negative effect?

by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 1:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not necessarily

A hit is still more valuable than a walk. If it’s not someone who would normally walk all that much anyway, then the opportunity cost for the chance to get a hit (which might be for extra bases) is greater than the lost opportunity of being thrown balls in the dirt.

Vogt early, Vogt often.

by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I thought the theory

was that more strikes are thrown down the fat part of the plate, not that the pitcher throws harder.

I haven’t read the links above, but do they say that the batter actually hits WORSE? I just thought the data showed there’s no significant correlation one way or the other.

Vogt early, Vogt often.

by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Here's a quote:
The moral of the story is this: a good on-deck hitter lowers the likelihood of a batter walking, but it does not translate into more offensive production.

If a pitcher doesn’t want a man on to face the next guy, why would he throw strikes down the middle? He’s going to throw his best in order to get the guy out.

by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 1:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Because when a pitcher misses and they're trying to throw strikes

it’s more likely to end up missing right down the pipe.

Vogt early, Vogt often.

by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I guess.

The game theory involved really doesn’t mean too much. The protection myth one has a link to the study.

by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 1:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I gotcha

But the study says no correlation, not does worse. Lower walks but same production must mean that the difference in production to make up from the lower walks must come from somewhere, right? Example:

X is walks
Y is everything else
Z is production
X + Y = Z
If X equals 30, then Y equals 70 for Z to equal 100
If X equals 25, then Y must equal 75 if Z remains 100

Vogt early, Vogt often.

by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So I guess what I'm saying

Is that based on what I’ve seen, it seems feasible to say that there is some kind of bump in actual hitting, but since it’s offset by a decrease in walks, there isn’t any significant overall effect.

Vogt early, Vogt often.

by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

That’s what it seems like. Basically, the two or three extra hits someone might get over the course of the season due to these extra mistake pitches and being able to take advantage of them is offset by the walks.

What might be telling is if BABIP is higher when a batter is ‘protected’. All of this falls under the same unbrella of the theory as to why Sonny’s traditional stats don’t look as good as his theoretical stats (and thus why he’s overrated by FiP but underrated by ERA).

Vogt early, Vogt often.

by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This.

Let’s forget for a minute if protection exists and think about why it would exist. In front of a great hitter (with power), you want to keep runners off the bases so they don’t score on home runs. So giving up extra bases is an ok trade-off for getting more outs. You want OBP to go down in exchange for SLG going up, so you throw more strikes.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Dec 23, 2008 3:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

When I was a kid

On Christmas Eve there were no presents under my tree and I would leave milk and cookies out for Santa. When I awoke most of the cookies were eaten, the milk was gone and there was a bunch of presents under my tree. Sure there is a possibility that a fat old man in a red suit with flying reindeers delivered these in the middle of the night, but I’m pretty sure it was really my parents.

by Tommy Rancel on Dec 23, 2008 1:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Or fiddle cats

Vogt early, Vogt often.

by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Or Raptors

Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.

by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 1:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

More links

David Marasco

David Grabiner did a study
involving AL hitters in the 1991 season. He considered a player capable of
providing protection if he had a slugging percentage of .450 and had a “good
reputation.” He then looked at players who had 100 at bats both protected
and unprotected. Of the 25 players who could be tested, 10 of them did
better and 15 did worse. He did not find a statistical link between protection
and slugging average. This would argue for strong protection being false.
Q4 – But when I played in highschool I know I saw protection,
how can it be false?

A4 – Protection in any form may exist at the lower levels of baseball.
All the studies have been performed at the major league level. Protection
could very well be real in highschool and the low minors, but the evidence
at the major league level shows this beast to be a myth.

by Tommy Rancel on Dec 23, 2008 1:27 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Question

Has there been a study of this only looking (over a long period of time) at situations where there’s a man on first? It would seem like there might be a correlation under that limited circumstance which wouldn’t necessarily be caught by an overall study, since it’s probably not a significant part of the sample on its own.

Vogt early, Vogt often.

by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

66% of Longo's ABs came out of the 5 hole

where he hit .275/.345/.532.

The Rays as a team hit .238/.317/.401 out of the 6 hole.

Longoria leading off an inning (where he would seem to be the most vulnerable) hit .308/.368/.636.

Protection is bogus.

by Vin on Dec 23, 2008 1:37 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Rec'd. Can we stop this?

Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.

by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 1:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

lets look at 2008 Carlos Pena

He was a much better hitter while hitting in the number 3 hole last years versus batting in the 4 hole. Why is that? Was it due to Longo hitting behind or Upton hitting infront of him?

3rd slot
ABS 281 / AVG .245 / OBP .416 / SLG .566

4th slot
ABS 249 / AVG .257 / OBP .349 / SLG .421

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 1:39 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

He hit in the 4th spot most of last year, with Upton in front of him, and God knows what behind him.

Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.

by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 1:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The year before*

Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.

by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 1:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It was probably due to a 0.070 point swing in BABIP.

You can’t trash those studies and then cherry pick examples.

by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 1:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thats skewed because of Crawford's injury.

They’re really the same numbers since everyone was shifted up when CC got hurt. So, for the most part, Pena always hit between Upton and Longo.

by Vin on Dec 23, 2008 1:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This is going to be the post that never ends

It’s not going to stop. He’s not going to change his opinion, no matter how many facts and studies we throw at him. Agree to disagree and move on.

by Erik Hahmann on Dec 23, 2008 1:41 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

You weren't around here for Edwin Vs. Sonny. This is nothing

Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.

by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 1:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

lol

Pretty much any Rays site on Edwin vs Sonny, for that matter.

Vogt early, Vogt often.

by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

One of the Tigers site was thrilled with Edwin.

Reasons:
- He throws hard.
- Is young.
- Had an improved ERA.

2009 will not be kind to them.

by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 1:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Must've been the one Tiger's site I didn't read.

I really enjoyed all the freaking out that followed. Apparently they were all worried about Joyce being dealt for Putz… and then THAT happens. Wow.

by Vin on Dec 23, 2008 1:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He is playing in Detroit

Top Josh Paul Pornos- Big Navi Stroking, 2pitchers1cup, BJ to the Balls, Riggans Your Thingans

by SRQman on Dec 23, 2008 2:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I am very happy to read all the posts about "santa", "loose change" "raptors" etc

I have stayed focus on this topic, yet it seems that some on here need to resort to name calling or trying to make fun of someone to get their point across.

And no RJ, it is not cherry picking cause just as easily as you guys have posted links, i have found examples to show flaws in your theories.

You (the vast majority of this board) disagree with me and I disagree with you. But does that mean I am some kind of trolling nutcase? No, just that I view this differently than you guys do.

So I will speak to you guys as adults and i would hope you would do the same and not try to use analogies in a way to try to show that “i just dont get it”

by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 1:50 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Chill yo

It’s already been dropped.

Vogt early, Vogt often.

by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

.280/.370/.535

I think Evan becomes a more patient hitter this year, looking at his stats it seems like once he becomes comfortable at a “level” of baseball and has a year or so under his belt he starts to rake up the Bases on Balls.

Heeeellllloooooooo .905 OPS.

by twenty5psi on Dec 23, 2008 2:17 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Today we have learned

1- Manny Ramirez sucks

2- Burrell will help os to the WS

3-Manny is 36 yo

by Raymondo on Dec 23, 2008 2:33 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

.285/.360./530

Top Josh Paul Pornos- Big Navi Stroking, 2pitchers1cup, BJ to the Balls, Riggans Your Thingans

by SRQman on Dec 23, 2008 2:36 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

My objection to where some of this thread headed is

that we got into hypotheticals and anecdotes rather than data. It is perfectly legitimate to say that it seems reasonable that someone hitting in front of a tough hitter will do better because he gets more pitches to hit, so I am going to research that hypothesis to see whether it is true. It is legitimate to notice that a particular hitter performs in a particular way and use that as a springboard to investigate if there is some cause/effect relationship. But it is not legitimate to say:
1. Since it is reasonable it must be true.
2. Since I can find a number of cases where it appears to have been a cause/effect relationship, the overwhelming statistical evidence that no such relationship exists is flawed.
3. Because I have a predisposition to a particular view, I will select individual instances that support my view (actually that appear to support my view) and refuse to acknowledge the mass of studies that refute it.

It does not matter how many individual instances of Longoria hitting a particular way in slot 3, 4, 5, 6 or of Kent hitting with or without Bonds in front of or behind him you adduce. You may find 100s of such cases. They may illustrate a point demonstrated by large scale studies, or it might give pause as to the individual applications (Are Longoria and Kent different in some way from the mass of hitters so that the issue does not apply to them? I doubt it, but perhaps you can make some sort of case). But it cannot invalidate the point, which being statistical in nature will naturally include outliers, and you cannot legitimately argue from the exceptions unless you can explain why they are exceptions.

Sorry for prolonging this. But it is frustrating that some rather simple, uncomplicated and fundamental points seem to remain hazy to some people. Discussion is not about hurling opinions at each other. It is about a disciplined approach to issues in which there are generally accepted rules about how to arrive at deeper understandings. When those rules are ignored or violated, the conversation spins out of orbit and loses value. There is no common ground for discussion.

by bobr on Dec 23, 2008 3:27 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

.390/.450/610

Wouldn’t that be something. Seriously though, .293/.360/.530

by Kirkharbaugh on Dec 23, 2008 11:59 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

.313 / .407 / .547

37 HR’s 131 RBI 30 SB’s

Longo will join the 30/30 club during his sophomore season. Barring injury this team will mature into a winning machine with injury and a rancid bullpen the only reasons to slow it down.

Sign Manny or Bradley! Burell sucks donkey dick.

by John 63 on Dec 24, 2008 12:47 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Burrell doesnt suck and a Manny signing will never happen

Unless he takes A LOT less…..and if he does, he will be a Met or Dodger

Bradley would be awesome but Cubs are just making us wait until they throw money at him.

Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart

by joeybw on Dec 24, 2008 1:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

.260/.335/.485

36HR’s,115RBI, 160K’s

The truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off.

by pocket8pin on Dec 26, 2008 9:28 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

and even if it's too late to vote:

Aki: .285/.360/.415
Upton .300/.385/.475—top 5 in AL MVP voting

The truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off.

by pocket8pin on Dec 26, 2008 9:39 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Founded in 2005. DRaysBay is home to "progressive statistical analysis and reasoned argument."
Start posting about the Rays »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Tyler Bortnick Profile with interesting comments
Videos of the Rays Involved in the AFL
MiLB's Organizational Review: Tampa Bay Rays
Revenue Sharing Numbers
Desert Dogs to play in the AFL championship @ 2:30 EST.
Desmond Jennings Makes the Tops AA-All-Stars
ABC Coalition to Vote on Draft Report Today.
Fan page for Dick Bosman, Rays minor league pitching coordinator
Upton's Struggles vs Lefties
Evan Longoria wins the Silver Slugger Award

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


VPs of Baseball Operations

Nando_small R.J. Anderson

Raysring1_small Tommy Rancel

Zorilla_small FreeZorilla

Price_small Erik Hahmann

Ticket Account Executive

Rays_small Steve Slowinski