Community Projections: Evan Longoria
Next up we have Evan Longoria :
| Longoria | BA | OBP | SLG |
| 2008 | 0.272 | 0.343 | 0.531 |
| James | 0.280 | 0.358 | 0.534 |
| Marcels | 0.280 | 0.351 | 0.515 |
Marcels projections him for only 454 plate appearances while Bill James has him down for 599.
As always, post your "projections" in the following format:
BA/OBP/SLG
0 recs |
244 comments
|
Comments
I think it is hard
to come up with projections without knowing who will be hitting infront and inback of Longoria
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 8:42 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
.282/.365/.550
33 homers
good D
If only that man had better wheels, he would be the ultimate 5 tool machine.
Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart
by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 9:28 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
.278/.350/.540
890 OPS makes a tent in my pants
Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.
~George Costanza~
by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 9:48 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
The breakout continues
40 bombs. There, I said it..
by rglass44 on Dec 23, 2008 10:02 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
well I think he would of gotten 35 this season if he didn't get injured
So 40 seems very possible to me.
What is the max steals you see out of Evan in a season?
Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart
by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:07 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He stole 7 this year w/o getting got.
This would seem to mean he might steal upwards of 10, but I’m not sure. He stole 8 in his 2 seasons in the minors. I wouldn’t think he’d get much higher than 8-10, but as he gets better on the basepaths who knows. Hell, Lance Berkman and Adam Dunn have 18 and 19 in a season respectively.
by rglass44 on Dec 23, 2008 10:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i dunno
I was thinking 10-15 a year max but I can see him getting 20 steals and more than 20 homers in a season. 20/20….well he can be 40/20 but that’s if everything goes his way.
Nothing to laugh at, I would say.
Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart
by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:18 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
hey on the subject
Evan Longoria has never been caught stealing in his career!
Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart
by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:11 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That's why I included the Bill James projections
Marcels has him for 20 something homers and 70 or so RBI. James has him 37 and 116 or so.
by Erik Hahmann on Dec 23, 2008 10:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Want to see Longo hit 40 HR?
Go get Manny
4/$80 million
Do it—Payroll still below $70 mil, which is bottom third in MLB
by Raymondo on Dec 23, 2008 10:21 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Oh Manny
If only he would play here just to spite the rest of the bEAST. 2 yr/20M sounds about right.
Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.
~George Costanza~
by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 10:25 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He just might
if the Yankees don’t step up, go get him
BJ
CC
Manny
Carlos
Longo
Aki
Navi
Joyce
Bartlett
by Raymondo on Dec 23, 2008 10:31 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought about Manny and Tex for a few seconds the other day
Realize it only happens if we trade Kazmir or CC and a lil more or Pena and a lil more
We can’t afford to have all those great hitters and unless everyone has given up on Kazmir, I don’t want him going anywhere.
Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart
by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It can be done--and keep
payroll around $70 mil
Trade Bradford or Wheeler
The problem arises in year 3 and 4 of the deal, when our other players will need to be bumped up
by Raymondo on Dec 23, 2008 10:37 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Are we really talking about Tex to the Rays?
Come on now.
by Erik Hahmann on Dec 23, 2008 10:37 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nah, just what it would take
And trading a a star, even if it means to get a star is not something that intrigues me. Plus he would be a 8-10 year commitment. Even Manny would be 3 or 4 and he could be Manny at any given point.
Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart
by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:39 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Even 'Manny being Manny'
is better than anything we have
The window won’t be open forever
Do it Andrew
by Raymondo on Dec 23, 2008 10:41 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Why not think big?
Hell the Nats are offering Tex $184 mil, and it won’t get them out of last place
Sign Manny and this team can win the WS or be in position for the next 3-4 years
by Raymondo on Dec 23, 2008 10:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We worked too hard to climb this mountain
I don’t think we are going to 180 the course that got us here at this juncture.
Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.
~George Costanza~
by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 10:48 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
we were 3 wins away with Gross and Hinske playing all year
I think Bradley/Burrell/Dunn/Giambi would be enough.
Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart
by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:49 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
the window was never open for Manny
If it is needed, MAYBE Friedman can spend 15 mil this offseason
Manny wants 25 mil a year.
Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart
by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:43 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
so lets say he gets 20 mil a year
He would only accept that in a 4 year deal.
Think the Rays will guarantee ANYONE 80 million?
Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart
by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:47 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Beej 10 year 150M FTW
Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.
~George Costanza~
by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 10:48 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Bossman doesn't count towards any rules
We will hopefully give him a blank check as long as he knows its for 8+ years
Think big. Think crazy.
Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart
by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:50 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Andrew needs to keep a pulse
on the Manny saga—you never know
by Raymondo on Dec 23, 2008 10:49 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We can talk about what it WOULD take all day
Anything COULD happen. I COULD start dating Marissa Miller tomorrow. Sure, it would take some big sacrifices on her part, but it COULD happen. Sadly, it won’t.
by Erik Hahmann on Dec 23, 2008 10:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
if you start dating her, please ask her to send the Rays some money for Manny
So he can piss all over the Red Sox for us.
Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart
by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
IF we had a chance, then we have to give 3 years
because no other team has been willing
and 3/30 sadly wont do it. Talk about settling since right now he wants 3/75
Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart
by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:35 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think it would cost that much to sign Manny Aybar
because surely you don’t think the Rays are going to pay Manny Ramirez 80 million dollars over 4 years.
by Tommy Rancel on Dec 23, 2008 10:42 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Protection is bullshit. Your brain is bullshit.
Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.
by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 10:50 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Whoa where did that come from?
Who pissed in your corn flakes this morning?
Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.
~George Costanza~
by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 10:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sick. -_-
Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.
by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 10:52 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sick of you being so weak.
Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.
~George Costanza~
by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 10:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It's just a head cold. :(
Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.
by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 10:56 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
HAHAHA
just giving you shit P.
Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.
~George Costanza~
by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 11:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No. No. No.
Manny’s last three WARs: 5.5, 1.9, 4.1. You’d be paying him for 4 WAR, he’s averaged 3.8 WAR. He’s 36 and you want to pay him until he’s 40? And for a DH? Come on.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 11:32 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
^^ as a DH those are his WARs, so I'm being generous.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 11:32 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It's only a 7.5 positional adjustment from LF to DH
Surely his defense is much worse than -7.5.
Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.
~George Costanza~
by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 12:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
His defense until last year was constantly -20 or lower.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 12:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wasn't he league average when he got out of Fenway?
Tools Whore
Sign Bonds!
by Tyler on Dec 23, 2008 12:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't have the splits available.
But he was better last year, yes. Whether that’s a fluke, due to positioning, or whatever else? No idea.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 12:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Most of his horrendousness was Fenway effect
Due to the wall out there, all the LF defensive stats look awful in Fenway. On a rate level, Bay was much worse than Manny once he got traded there, for instance. IIRC, his defense wasn’t that far below average in LA.
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He did harp quite a bit at the beginning of the year that he had been working on his defense.
I’d give him the benefit of the doubt, putting aside the rolly-polly episode.
by kericr on Dec 23, 2008 2:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly so he gains a ton of value moving to DH.
Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.
~George Costanza~
by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 12:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, definitely.
-7.5 – 19.3 (three year average) is -26.8, so he loses an additional win as a LFer.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 12:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not necessarily
He probably gained more value by moving away from Boston, if anything.
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
How so?
The monster probably inflated his XBH’s slightly and hid some of the fact that he doesn’t move very well.
Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.
~George Costanza~
by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 1:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
NM I saw what you put above and that makes sense.
Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.
~George Costanza~
by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 1:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Eventually someone will learn how to properly adjust for Fenway effect
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Or they could just tear that rodent-infested house of disease down.
Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.
~George Costanza~
by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 1:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Manny's numbers looked awful
last season with LA
I’ll keep track of him v our DH
Just sayin
by Raymondo on Dec 23, 2008 2:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
.264/.338/.497
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 10:26 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Well that's not very supportive of young Mr. Longoria
by Erik Hahmann on Dec 23, 2008 10:39 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
maybe he is one of those guys
who expects the worst so he can get what he expected or be pleasenty surprised
Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart
by joeybw on Dec 23, 2008 10:41 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It's not unreasonable to predict a sophomore slump
Especially after his major league statistics outperformed his MLEs?
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 11:09 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
.275/.350/.530
Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.
by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 10:48 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
How can anyone make a legit "prediction" ....
when they have no idea where he will be hitting in the lineup, who will be hitting infront of him and who will be hitting behind him
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 11:03 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
With that logic you would wipe out half of ESPN's programming and half of the internet sports stories.
Predictions are part of sports it’s fun, not scientific.
by Tommy Rancel on Dec 23, 2008 11:10 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Because none of those things are relevant to Longoria's production.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 11:14 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
They arent?
So if 2002 Barry Bonds is hitting behind of Longo you are saying he would have the same numbers as if 2007 Dioneer Navarro was?
And i would say Bill James “predictions” are scientific
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 11:18 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes his are, but his are meant to be true predictions
by Tommy Rancel on Dec 23, 2008 11:20 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
but how can he come up
with true predictions when all the factors arent calculated into the equation yet?
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 11:22 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No, they aren't.
Read a damn book.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 11:26 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
read a book?
So I am guessing you are saying i am not educated enough on the topic? So player X will put up the same numbers regardless of who hits behind him?
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 11:31 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm saying read a book so you can stop spewing ignorant crap.
The Baseball Economist devotes a chapter to the Bonds cases. In fact, read these:
http://www.sabernomics.com/sabernomics/index.php/2008/10/more-evidence-that-protection-doesnt-exist/
http://www.sabernomics.com/sabernomics/index.php/2008/08/manny-ortiz-and-protection/
http://www.sabernomics.com/sabernomics/index.php/2007/04/espn-lineup-protection/
http://www.sabernomics.com/sabernomics/index.php/2007/04/it-doesnt-matter-who-hits-behind-ryan-howard/
http://www.sabernomics.com/sabernomics/index.php/2004/09/the-protection-externality-it-doesnt-exist/
Then come back and tell me protection exists.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 11:35 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Since I know you won't read these:
The moral of the story is this: a good on-deck hitter lowers the likelihood of a batter walking, but it does not translate into more offensive production.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 11:40 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
so you are telling me
That pitchers do not pitch to hitters differently depending on who is on base and what batter is up next?
Wow, go watch an National league game when the number 8 hitter is up and there are 2 outs. They will try thier hardest not to walk him and through fatter pitches to make him put the ball in play so they can get a third out so the pitcher leads off the next inning. That is just one example.
Have any of you stat heads ever played a game and or managed a game?
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 11:41 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No, I have never played a game I've wrote about nearly everyday for the past three years.
Please go back to RBB, you make this entire community’s intelligence level drop everytime you comment.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 11:43 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Played baseball all throughout high school
Here is a case of the “protection myth” in the NL
by Tommy Rancel on Dec 23, 2008 11:45 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I spend my time trying to have sex with my iPhoneand playing D&D.
Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.
by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 11:47 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
multi-tasker
Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.
~George Costanza~
by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 12:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There have been numerous studies
of the effect of lineup on hitters’ production, and I am quite sure they all conclude that the effect is negligible at best. The hitters around him will affect his RBI and Runs Scored totals but not his BA/OBP/Slugging % line.
Referring to experience watching games or what appears to be common sense or malarkey your little league coach or the color men in the booth have always told you does not comprise either logic or evidence. The point of the stats is to see whether the traditional wisdom is confirmed or invalidated, and in this case it has been pretty clearly invalidated. Either batters are helped or harmed by who bats before and after them or they are not affected, and that is a question that only statistics can provide an answer to.
It is certainly possible there is some psychological affect on pitchers, managers and batters, but apparently that effect does not show up in the actual play on the field.
by bobr on Dec 23, 2008 11:59 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
RBI numbers are inflated because of who's on base in front of you
But your base stats, BA/OBP/SLG are not effected at all by the lineup.
by Erik Hahmann on Dec 23, 2008 11:39 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
.275/.350/.540
"And you just don't get it, you keep it copacetic..."
by Blicks on Dec 23, 2008 11:30 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
here are my Longo predictions
With the 2002 Barry bonds hitting behind him .290/.330/.540
with the 2007 Dioneer Navarro hitting behind him .265/.420/.470
and he will get lots of tail
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 11:36 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
No, because protection is a myth.
Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.
by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 11:37 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
.265/.420/.470
so… He’s going to lead the league in BB’s next year?
by Vin on Dec 23, 2008 12:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Even if it did have an effect it would not be so large
-.025 BA, +.090 OBP, -.070 SLG this just makes you look dumb.
Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.
~George Costanza~
by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 12:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
okay first
I received a WARNING for my actions. Can anyone please tell me why i received a warning? Was it due to me using the term “stat head”? The last time i checked that wasnt an insulting term?
RJ would you like to explain how “stat head” is offensive but telling me “Please go back to RBB, you make this entire community’s intelligence level drop everytime you comment.” isnt offensive? So i cant have a different opinion then you??? Wow
back to the topic at hand if RJ allows me to…
So Longo comes up with 1 out……. Upton is on first
Is the pitcher more likely to try and throw pitch that will result in a ground ball for DP. Yes he will. So he is trying to throw a pitch that will result in a ball in play. With Uptons speed the second baseman will have to cover second, leaving a hole open on the right side. Longo grounds a single through the hole.
Result, due to defensive alignment, Longo now has a single.
First and second with one out and Pena is up. Will they be more likely to throw him fatter pitches due to not walking him?
So due to Uptons speed, it left a whole open…now Pena has benefited from this and should see better pitches.
If Navi is up after Longo, they might not be as afraid to walk Longo and instead face Navi and hope to get the DP and get out of the inning.
Dont try to tell me it doesnt matter….go ask ANY ML manager and they will laugh at you if you said it didnt matter who hit infront or behind a hitter.
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 11:55 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
No, you're allowed to have different opinions, but you're fighting against fact.
And losing.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 11:58 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
RJ - Instead of just being terse and pricky, try engaging in discussion
He’s a lot more likely to see your point that way. As it is, you’re just alienating him more. Frankly, you’ve been turning me off lately with this new standoffish demeanor (over about the last 3 or 4 months), and I even agree with you on this point.
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So you're just going to ignore all the articles we linked for you
All of the analysis that opposes your opinion? Numbers don’t lie.
by Erik Hahmann on Dec 23, 2008 11:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, he is.
Yet we’re the ones who are being ridiculous here.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 12:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So i get a WARNING cause my opinion varies
and i have not said anything offensive. Sorry but i am more oldschool when it comes to my stats and i watch the games to form my views and opinions of what can and will happen.
Still doesnt explain why you would send me a warning for no apparant reason. Why the grudge RJ…do tell?
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 12:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I warned you. Warnings have no bearing, I was basically trying to get you to realize arguing thid probsbly isn't in your best interest.
Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.
by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 12:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Or perhaps not reverting to the "have you ever played the game?" card.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 12:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Damion Easly's batting song
King of the bling come to lay down the evidence//Not George Bush, L-Millz be da president
by Sam Page on Dec 24, 2008 11:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i was a weak hitter
therefor the batters in front of me never saw anything good to hit. But I did have a good eye so I did walk often and that set up a good oppertunity for the hitter behind me
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 12:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But that doesnt make sense...so my opinion varies, i had to reread the terms and conditions and agree to them.
Cause I didnt agree with your OPINIONS. Yes I still say your point of views are opinions. That doesnt mean you are wrong or I am right. Means I also have an opinion about what factors contribute to a sucessful hitter.
You can share all the links about protection and such, but i will go and judge this with my own eyes, playing experience and coaching.
So does this mean I should get WARNINGS?
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 12:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You can share all the links about protection and such, but i will go and judge this with my own eyes, playing experience and coaching.
Oh cool, so you’re ignorant and close-minded!
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 12:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Him, sternfan, and Longo4Prez can go drink tea and talk about the loose change they gathered.
Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.
by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 12:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
go up to Mike Scocsia
And tell him it doesnt matter who hits in front or behind of Vlad and see what he tells you. Bring all the reports you want and being a catcher he will disagree with you. Does that mean he is ignoring all of your facts as well or he has a different perspective on the topic?
I find it amazing all the insults that are coming my way in this thread…cause i disagree. Wow, just wow
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 12:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Mike Scicsia isn't a genius btw.
Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.
by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 12:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Scocsia isnt a genius but he is one of the most respected minds in baseball
and has much more experience than any of us. So would you tell Scocsia he was arguing with facts if he disagreed with your numbers?
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 12:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No, you're getting insulted because you are open about being ignorant and close-minded.
Hint: that crap flies on RBB, not here. You may like it there more.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 12:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow, if anyone was ever trying to be an antagonist...
I would say that calling someone ignorant and close-minded would be the best way to do it.
I am discussing this topic on here. If you want to discuss it on raysbb, then you go over there and discuss it.
You guys can call it facts all you want, but when people who have played the game, managed the game, scouted the game and watched the game their entire lives disagrees with you…well then there is more to your numbers then you think.
You can not tell me that Longos SLG will be the same with DUNN hitting behind him as it would be with Tomas Perez.
You be the pitcher….do you pitch around Longo to get to DUnn…NO
Do you pitch around Longo to get to Tomas Perez…YES
how can you argue with that?
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 12:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The point is you are looking at situations that happen maybe 15% of the time (the runners on arguement)
If you look at the aggregate over a large enough sample size you will see that it does not matter in the longrun.
Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.
~George Costanza~
by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 12:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
asking this in a non offensive way cause i know it would be perceived that way...
But how is it 15% when Upton has a .380 OBP? Even if you take away his HRs his OBP is still around .370 and then if you calculate into the equation fielder choices and errors, I am sure that .370 number goes up. Am i missing something with your 15%
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 12:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And how many times is he stealing?
Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.
~George Costanza~
by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 1:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There's a difference between changing one's approach a bit and the actual results being significantly different.
If protection made a significant difference in the performance of a hitter, shouldn’t that show up in the the data? I mean, if a player’s going to hit better with Bonds behind him, shouldn’t we be able to separate his performance with and without Bonds’ protection and see that he did, in fact, hit better with better protection?
Many people have looked at that information, with thousands of batters and thousands of protectors. And they’ve found very little to support protection.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Dec 23, 2008 1:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You know who played the game of baseball?
John Rocker. Smart fellow. Well thought out opinions.
by acblue on Dec 24, 2008 1:06 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I wanred you because you're arguing with like, 0 facts against the sites admin, questioning their pedigrees.
Usually that isn’s a recipe for success.
Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.
by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 12:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So from what i understand
Me presenting my opinion by stating that great baseball minds such as managers and GM disagree with your theory. And the fact that I wont agree with you, but will agree with them leads to a warning?
While I have not writen anything offensive about anyone on here, havent tried to troll, etc…..yet i have been called “Oh cool, so you’re ignorant and close-minded!”, “Please go back to RBB, you make this entire community’s intelligence level drop everytime you comment.” and "Him, sternfan, and Longo4Prez can go drink tea and talk about the loose change they gathered. " and have been the one who recieved a warning.
Can you explain to me how that makes sense?
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 12:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
BobR, who is the best mind on any Rays site, and has forgotten more baseball than I will ever know has replied to you three or four times.
If you don’t read what we’re saying, read what he’s saying.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 12:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i read everything
I take everything in, but i still feel as though my view is correct (obviously in my eyes), Yes there are numbers to back up your theories, but i dont feel they are as strong as those numbers suggest.
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 12:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
See, this is what makes people angry.
“Sure you have cold, hard, factual numbers to back up your theories, but I think they’re bull shit. So I’m going to go with what my eyes and gut and tradition tells me is true.”
Its like trying to talk to an elderly person about global warming.
by Vin on Dec 23, 2008 12:57 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
ha..im old but not that old vin hehehe
Hey I see the numbers and such….but again can anyone honestly say Longo would put up the same numbers with Tomas Perez hitting behind him versus Adam Dunn?
Lets be serioius, Longo would never see anything good to hit, especially if no one was on base.
Now you put Dunn behind him and they will make him work for hits and try not to walk him
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 1:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't really have time to dive into this but,
I think you would agree that Longo was almost always behind Pena in the line-up right? So that would mean he would have 6-7-8 guys hitting behind him, you follow? If protection really existed (and he seemingly had none last year) how could he put up a line of .308/.368/.636 when leading off an inning?
That’s with no one on base, giving the pitcher no reason to throw him anything worth hitting, and with no protection behind him, giving the pitcher even less reason to throw him anything worth hitting.
Your argument holds no ground man. I’m sorry but yeah, all indications are that he would hit just as well with Tomas Perez batting behind ’em.
by Vin on Dec 23, 2008 1:19 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Can you explain to me how that makes sense?
Its just a really, really old argument that’s been beaten to death way too many times.
Really man, fuck “Eyes vs. Stats.” That shit shoulda been gone the day Edwin was traded.
by Vin on Dec 23, 2008 12:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
See in the case of Jacksons Eyes vs Stats
I was more on the side of stats cause he was much more lucky than his numbers suggested. But I view this differently (obviously)
I just dont think Longo would put up the same numbers with Tomas Perez hitting behind him as he would Dunn
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 12:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I just dont think Longo would put up the same numbers with Tomas Perez hitting behind him as he would Dunn
And that’s fine. I just wouldn’t make that statement without having the phrase “I base this on absolutely nothing” attached somewhere.
by Vin on Dec 23, 2008 1:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Great baseball minds also paid Carlos Lee three bazillion dollars
Great baseball minds continue to use a closer.
Great baseball minds thought the Mariners would be World Series champs and the Rays had no shot.
Great baseball minds have no clue about the value of defense.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Dec 23, 2008 1:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No comment on warnings,
but I do think you have to adjust your notion of “opinions”. It is not an issue of opinions not being respected but rather of opinions having no purpose on a site if they are not supported by information and logic. Should I access a scientific site and argue that the sun revolves around the earth and my evidence is that I have seen it with my own eyes and anyway, that is what I was taught growing up, I doubt my opinion would have much value on that site and could expect some rather nasty responses.
This site encourages all sorts of disagreement, but there are some basic understandings and expectations of what constitutes disagreement and argument and what is simply blathering. If the extent of your evidence and information is “my own eyes, playing experience and coaching”, then your opinions on some issues that directly relate to those factors may be worthwhile (perhaps, for example, clubhouse harmony), but not your opinions about matters that are fundamentally statistical in nature.
This is not a talk radio site that encourages firmly held opinions at the expense of thought. And speaking only for myself, I do not respect opinions simply for the fact they exist. They earn respect by the way they are explained and defended. You could, indeed, develop arguments that in some areas traditional lore is superior to statistical analysis, even that there are serious flaws in statistical analysis itself. I would be interested to read such a posting, but it would require more than simply opinion, quite a bit more disciplined and rational argument.
by bobr on Dec 23, 2008 12:23 PM EST up reply actions 5 recs
.290/.365/.550
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Dec 23, 2008 1:08 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Okay stat heads...
2001 Barry Bonds go crazy and splits time between batting 3rd and batting 4th
Jeff Kent as well splt between batting 3rd and 4th http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/bsplit.cgi?n1=kentje01&year=2002
batting 3rd his stats were
ABS 305 / AVG .333 / OBP .387 / SLG .667 with 22 HRs
Batting 4th
ABS 376 / AVG .297 / OBP .354 / SLG .484 with 15 HRs
So from those numbers he drastically benefited from Bonds hitting behind him…is that fair enough to say?
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 1:09 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Thats one guy
What about the other 29 cleanup hitters?
Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.
~George Costanza~
by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 1:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
but that shows that the numbers arent perfect
Earlier in this thread people were telling me that their numbers were 100% fact…but then I show a case where their numbers arent fact and they ignore them and say thats just one guy. You can’t have 100% numbers If i can find an innacuracy that easily
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 1:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nobody said numbers are perfect, but they are more accurate than "my eyes."
by Tommy Rancel on Dec 23, 2008 1:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Because 1 is the smallest sample size possible
Have you taken a statistics class or attempted to learn anything about the field. Statistics is dependent on vast sample sizes that smooth the effects of outliers and random variation.
Anyway, as I was lying in the puddle, I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn't have to give up that much.
~George Costanza~
by Sandy Kazmir on Dec 23, 2008 1:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nothing is perfect in small sample sizes.
You should flip heads 50% of the time, but if you flip a coin once, you can’t flip half a heads.
There’s a difference between observing something and being able to explain why it happened. If I call heads and the coin comes up heads, did I know it was going to be heads? No. If I posit that Player X will have a breakout season because he started dating the love of his life and he goes ahead and has a breakout season, was it because of who he started dating? Probably not.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Dec 23, 2008 3:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Kent's walk rate actually went up when he hit in front of Bonds.
Odd. That’s an outlier.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 1:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
every number of Kents went up when in front of Bonds
And were more along his norm when hitting behind Bonds. Why was that. Was it due to weaker hitters such as Benito Santiago now hitting behind Kent and or no one being onbase since Bonds hit 71 HRs?
In either case, I think it shows that “protection” is a true posibility. Sure Kents situation might not be the norm, but still shows it exists.
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 1:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Okay, so let's see.
We present you with studies of a ton of examples of “protection” in which it shows no correlation and you dismiss it. You find one example that works your way and it weighs more?
Well that’s convenient.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 1:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Even further, we're admitting that having a good hitter behind you is less likely to lead to a walk.
You seem to think that’s an automatic hit. Pitchers are going to throw better stuff to avoid having a man on base for Bonds. Doesn’t that make protection a negative effect?
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 1:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not necessarily
A hit is still more valuable than a walk. If it’s not someone who would normally walk all that much anyway, then the opportunity cost for the chance to get a hit (which might be for extra bases) is greater than the lost opportunity of being thrown balls in the dirt.
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But if the pitcher is gunning his pitches, doesn't the chance for a hit (and especially an XBH) decrease?
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 1:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought the theory
was that more strikes are thrown down the fat part of the plate, not that the pitcher throws harder.
I haven’t read the links above, but do they say that the batter actually hits WORSE? I just thought the data showed there’s no significant correlation one way or the other.
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Here's a quote:
The moral of the story is this: a good on-deck hitter lowers the likelihood of a batter walking, but it does not translate into more offensive production.
If a pitcher doesn’t want a man on to face the next guy, why would he throw strikes down the middle? He’s going to throw his best in order to get the guy out.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 1:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Because when a pitcher misses and they're trying to throw strikes
it’s more likely to end up missing right down the pipe.
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I guess.
The game theory involved really doesn’t mean too much. The protection myth one has a link to the study.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 1:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I gotcha
But the study says no correlation, not does worse. Lower walks but same production must mean that the difference in production to make up from the lower walks must come from somewhere, right? Example:
X is walks
Y is everything else
Z is production
X + Y = Z
If X equals 30, then Y equals 70 for Z to equal 100
If X equals 25, then Y must equal 75 if Z remains 100
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So I guess what I'm saying
Is that based on what I’ve seen, it seems feasible to say that there is some kind of bump in actual hitting, but since it’s offset by a decrease in walks, there isn’t any significant overall effect.
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So a zero sum, but with a reallocation of OPS points, so to speak?
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 1:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
That’s what it seems like. Basically, the two or three extra hits someone might get over the course of the season due to these extra mistake pitches and being able to take advantage of them is offset by the walks.
What might be telling is if BABIP is higher when a batter is ‘protected’. All of this falls under the same unbrella of the theory as to why Sonny’s traditional stats don’t look as good as his theoretical stats (and thus why he’s overrated by FiP but underrated by ERA).
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This.
Let’s forget for a minute if protection exists and think about why it would exist. In front of a great hitter (with power), you want to keep runners off the bases so they don’t score on home runs. So giving up extra bases is an ok trade-off for getting more outs. You want OBP to go down in exchange for SLG going up, so you throw more strikes.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Dec 23, 2008 3:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
When I was a kid
On Christmas Eve there were no presents under my tree and I would leave milk and cookies out for Santa. When I awoke most of the cookies were eaten, the milk was gone and there was a bunch of presents under my tree. Sure there is a possibility that a fat old man in a red suit with flying reindeers delivered these in the middle of the night, but I’m pretty sure it was really my parents.
by Tommy Rancel on Dec 23, 2008 1:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Or fiddle cats
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Or Raptors
Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.
by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 1:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
More links
David Grabiner did a study
involving AL hitters in the 1991 season. He considered a player capable of
providing protection if he had a slugging percentage of .450 and had a “good
reputation.” He then looked at players who had 100 at bats both protected
and unprotected. Of the 25 players who could be tested, 10 of them did
better and 15 did worse. He did not find a statistical link between protection
and slugging average. This would argue for strong protection being false.
Q4 – But when I played in highschool I know I saw protection,
how can it be false?
A4 – Protection in any form may exist at the lower levels of baseball.
All the studies have been performed at the major league level. Protection
could very well be real in highschool and the low minors, but the evidence
at the major league level shows this beast to be a myth.
by Tommy Rancel on Dec 23, 2008 1:27 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Question
Has there been a study of this only looking (over a long period of time) at situations where there’s a man on first? It would seem like there might be a correlation under that limited circumstance which wouldn’t necessarily be caught by an overall study, since it’s probably not a significant part of the sample on its own.
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
66% of Longo's ABs came out of the 5 hole
where he hit .275/.345/.532.
The Rays as a team hit .238/.317/.401 out of the 6 hole.
Longoria leading off an inning (where he would seem to be the most vulnerable) hit .308/.368/.636.
Protection is bogus.
by Vin on Dec 23, 2008 1:37 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Rec'd. Can we stop this?
Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.
by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 1:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
lets look at 2008 Carlos Pena
He was a much better hitter while hitting in the number 3 hole last years versus batting in the 4 hole. Why is that? Was it due to Longo hitting behind or Upton hitting infront of him?
3rd slot
ABS 281 / AVG .245 / OBP .416 / SLG .566
4th slot
ABS 249 / AVG .257 / OBP .349 / SLG .421
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 1:39 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
He hit in the 4th spot most of last year, with Upton in front of him, and God knows what behind him.
Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.
by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 1:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The year before*
Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.
by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 1:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It was probably due to a 0.070 point swing in BABIP.
You can’t trash those studies and then cherry pick examples.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 1:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thats skewed because of Crawford's injury.
They’re really the same numbers since everyone was shifted up when CC got hurt. So, for the most part, Pena always hit between Upton and Longo.
by Vin on Dec 23, 2008 1:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This is going to be the post that never ends
It’s not going to stop. He’s not going to change his opinion, no matter how many facts and studies we throw at him. Agree to disagree and move on.
by Erik Hahmann on Dec 23, 2008 1:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
You weren't around here for Edwin Vs. Sonny. This is nothing
Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.
by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 1:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
lol
Pretty much any Rays site on Edwin vs Sonny, for that matter.
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on Dec 23, 2008 1:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sonny isn't a viable competitor in the majors.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 1:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ugh, And it sucks so much
Having the pleasure of watching Jackson’s 97MPH fastball one night only to turn around and watch that, that junkballer the next.
Pathetic.
by Vin on Dec 23, 2008 1:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, you missed Joe Blanton homering off of Edwin.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 1:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nuh uh.
Thats… for Matt Joyce???
What the fuck is wrong with the Tigers?
by Vin on Dec 23, 2008 1:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
To be fair, Johan gave up a homerun to Felix as well.
But Felix is a bad ass.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 1:48 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Do you have to steal ALL my opinions?
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Dec 23, 2008 3:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
One of the Tigers site was thrilled with Edwin.
Reasons:
- He throws hard.
- Is young.
- Had an improved ERA.
2009 will not be kind to them.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 1:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Must've been the one Tiger's site I didn't read.
I really enjoyed all the freaking out that followed. Apparently they were all worried about Joyce being dealt for Putz… and then THAT happens. Wow.
by Vin on Dec 23, 2008 1:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I like how Navi is set up outside,
and the pitch is middle-in.
Its almost like I’ve seen that happen before.
by Vin on Dec 23, 2008 1:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
In Gameday Form:

Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.
by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 2:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You also missed Upton running on water.

by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 2:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The field is so bad, no one can possibly steal a base.
Tools Whore
Sign Bonds!
by Tyler on Dec 23, 2008 2:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I watched that sequence yesterday.
It made my heart melt with glee.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 2:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I like how 'Not for public use' is watermarked on this image.
Somehow, it seems so appropriate.
by kericr on Dec 23, 2008 2:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He is playing in Detroit
Top Josh Paul Pornos- Big Navi Stroking, 2pitchers1cup, BJ to the Balls, Riggans Your Thingans
by SRQman on Dec 23, 2008 2:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
.279/.353/.527
A 30 homer year
by therayspartyleader on Dec 23, 2008 1:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I am very happy to read all the posts about "santa", "loose change" "raptors" etc
I have stayed focus on this topic, yet it seems that some on here need to resort to name calling or trying to make fun of someone to get their point across.
And no RJ, it is not cherry picking cause just as easily as you guys have posted links, i have found examples to show flaws in your theories.
You (the vast majority of this board) disagree with me and I disagree with you. But does that mean I am some kind of trolling nutcase? No, just that I view this differently than you guys do.
So I will speak to you guys as adults and i would hope you would do the same and not try to use analogies in a way to try to show that “i just dont get it”
by selgy on Dec 23, 2008 1:50 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
"And no RJ, it is not cherry picking cause just as easily as you guys have posted links, i have found examples to show flaws in your theories."
I don’t think you understand how this works.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 23, 2008 1:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We're talking about how much edwin sucks now.
Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.
by P Brady on Dec 23, 2008 1:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yay Sonny, Boo Edwin
See, selgy, this is more fun
by Erik Hahmann on Dec 23, 2008 1:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Remember when he got hit in the face and pitched better?

by Tommy Rancel on Dec 23, 2008 2:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Then came several months of the "someone punch edwin in the face" jokes.
EJAX supporters are so lame.
by Vin on Dec 23, 2008 2:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
.280/.370/.535
I think Evan becomes a more patient hitter this year, looking at his stats it seems like once he becomes comfortable at a “level” of baseball and has a year or so under his belt he starts to rake up the Bases on Balls.
Heeeellllloooooooo .905 OPS.
by twenty5psi on Dec 23, 2008 2:17 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Today we have learned
1- Manny Ramirez sucks
2- Burrell will help os to the WS
3-Manny is 36 yo
by Raymondo on Dec 23, 2008 2:33 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
.285/.360./530
Top Josh Paul Pornos- Big Navi Stroking, 2pitchers1cup, BJ to the Balls, Riggans Your Thingans
by SRQman on Dec 23, 2008 2:36 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
My objection to where some of this thread headed is
that we got into hypotheticals and anecdotes rather than data. It is perfectly legitimate to say that it seems reasonable that someone hitting in front of a tough hitter will do better because he gets more pitches to hit, so I am going to research that hypothesis to see whether it is true. It is legitimate to notice that a particular hitter performs in a particular way and use that as a springboard to investigate if there is some cause/effect relationship. But it is not legitimate to say:
1. Since it is reasonable it must be true.
2. Since I can find a number of cases where it appears to have been a cause/effect relationship, the overwhelming statistical evidence that no such relationship exists is flawed.
3. Because I have a predisposition to a particular view, I will select individual instances that support my view (actually that appear to support my view) and refuse to acknowledge the mass of studies that refute it.
It does not matter how many individual instances of Longoria hitting a particular way in slot 3, 4, 5, 6 or of Kent hitting with or without Bonds in front of or behind him you adduce. You may find 100s of such cases. They may illustrate a point demonstrated by large scale studies, or it might give pause as to the individual applications (Are Longoria and Kent different in some way from the mass of hitters so that the issue does not apply to them? I doubt it, but perhaps you can make some sort of case). But it cannot invalidate the point, which being statistical in nature will naturally include outliers, and you cannot legitimately argue from the exceptions unless you can explain why they are exceptions.
Sorry for prolonging this. But it is frustrating that some rather simple, uncomplicated and fundamental points seem to remain hazy to some people. Discussion is not about hurling opinions at each other. It is about a disciplined approach to issues in which there are generally accepted rules about how to arrive at deeper understandings. When those rules are ignored or violated, the conversation spins out of orbit and loses value. There is no common ground for discussion.
by bobr on Dec 23, 2008 3:27 PM EST reply actions 2 recs
.390/.450/610
Wouldn’t that be something. Seriously though, .293/.360/.530
by Kirkharbaugh on Dec 23, 2008 11:59 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
.313 / .407 / .547
37 HR’s 131 RBI 30 SB’s
Longo will join the 30/30 club during his sophomore season. Barring injury this team will mature into a winning machine with injury and a rancid bullpen the only reasons to slow it down.
Sign Manny or Bradley! Burell sucks donkey dick.
by John 63 on Dec 24, 2008 12:47 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Burrell doesnt suck and a Manny signing will never happen
Unless he takes A LOT less…..and if he does, he will be a Met or Dodger
Bradley would be awesome but Cubs are just making us wait until they throw money at him.
Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart
by joeybw on Dec 24, 2008 1:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
.260/.335/.485
36HR’s,115RBI, 160K’s
The truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off.
by pocket8pin on Dec 26, 2008 9:28 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
and even if it's too late to vote:
Aki: .285/.360/.415
Upton .300/.385/.475—top 5 in AL MVP voting
The truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off.
by pocket8pin on Dec 26, 2008 9:39 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 




















