DRaysBay: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:





Carlos Pena

I was sitting in my barber shop waiting area today reading a Sporting News  magazine from the beginning of the season. As most sports magazines did, they previewed each team and predicted where they would finish. The trend for the Rays 2008 preview is a little talk about them making it to .500 this year, a little talk about Longoria, and then a tangent about how there is no way Carlos Pena can follow up 2008 with anything close to his 2007 season. While no one could have expected his 46 home runs last season, why is it such a stretch to think he could be just as good this year? Here we are two weeks into the season, and he already has six home runs. And not only that, but it seems like every time he hits one, its tying the ballgame, or giving us the lead. He is like Sammy Sosa's antithesis when it comes to home runs. He is only hitting .209 right now, but thats only going to go up. I'm just trying to understand where all the negativity about Pena's numbers dropping off is coming from. 2007 doesn't look like a fluke for him so far. He just looks like a player who has been a journeyman long enough, and has finally put it together. And I am glad he's done it in Tampa.

0 recs | Comment 12 comments

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

Because talking heads assume he was having a career year simply to get paid and don't know about the other metrics that suggest he'll be fine.

"Baseball fans are junkies, and their heroin is the statistic." - Robert S. Weider

by R.J. Anderson on Apr 14, 2008 4:05 PM EDT   0 recs

people seem to judge almost exclusively on trends. i player has been poor for years, hence he will most likely be poor once again. the same is happening around here regarding edwin jackson. people need to see sustained years long success before they accept that a small sample size of great performance is not an aberration.

by davidsmarch on Apr 14, 2008 4:07 PM EDT   0 recs

It's not the same with Edwin Jackson

Because Carlos Pena was an established major leaguer with some success prior to his having been cut by Detroit. Jackson was just a completely failure in the major leagues and Triple A from 2004 onward. Obviously sustained success is the only way to disprove an aberration, that is entirely correct and it's the way it should be. I don't think Pena will match his 2007 season, but I think he will have a 35-40 homer season and his OPS probably won't decrease by more that .100 points.

by Patrick L. Kennedy on Apr 14, 2008 5:29 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

if you consider Pena prior to TB an established major leager

then you have much lower standards then i do. 4 teams in 5 years, never hitting above .250 when playing a full season, actually only playing 3 what one could consider full seasons, of which only one was respectable (27HR, 82 RBI's), after which he was promptly dropped, and signed by the Red Sox and yankees, playing in the minors for most of the year. I'm sorry, but i don't consider that to be established in any way.

by davidsmarch on Apr 14, 2008 6:04 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

His trend numbers from 2005 showed he was capable of being a very productive major leaguer, and he did have a career OPS+ over 105, including a run of 110+, so he was hardly dog meat.

"Baseball fans are junkies, and their heroin is the statistic." - Robert S. Weider

by R.J. Anderson on Apr 14, 2008 6:16 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Pena

The number of teams doesn't matter. He played with Detroit for three seasons and part of a fourth. He had 1685 at bats going into 2007, and posted OPS+ of 108, 113, and 112 with the Tigers. He had a 106 OPS+ in '02. He was an established player with the Tigers. His numbers weren't great for first base, but he certainly moved into the realm of "established". Jackson hasn't seen anywhere near that much success.

by Patrick L. Kennedy on Apr 14, 2008 6:17 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I'll take 35 to 40 home runs

I said I didn't expect him to hit 46 every year, but theres no reason why he can't averge around 35 for the next few years, especially if Upton is hitting behind him and can really establish himself as a RBI/Power threat. Just consider Pena's 6 RBI, 2 HR game in which he accounted for the first 6 runs against the O's and got the bases loaded walk to give us the lead. He just stands out to me as a clutch individual.

And Edwin Jackson, while he may turn in a pretty good year, is a little different. He gets no respect because he hasn't earned any. Hopefully he will break out this year the way Pena did last year.

by jacksontsmith on Apr 14, 2008 6:15 PM EDT   0 recs

There was no guarantee that Pena would repeat 2007, there never can be with a situation like that, but there were some positive indicators. One, he decreased his strikeout rate a bit which allowed him to hit for a higher average. Two, he was productive within normal variance all season long after the slow start instead of having a really hot few weeks that boosted an otherwise lesser season. Three, he never hit well against lefties before yet over the season he learned and was very productive against them by the end, suggesting that he was developing his game further while having that monster season as opposed to it simply being a flukish increase in his expected production.

We still don't know of course if he'll repeat 2007, that was an incredible year. The signs are positive so far though, he did strike out a lot more than normal over the first two weeks but he was looking pretty jumpy at times and appears to have settled down over the weekend. He's still crushing the ball, making it pretty much inevitable that the singles and doubles will come, and the walk rate is very high. Hell, he has a .324 EqA right now despite the extremely low BA.

by Jim Wisinski on Apr 14, 2008 6:27 PM EDT   0 recs

Edwin v Pena

Edwin fits the profile of a player that could experience a breakout like Pena did last year. Very highly touted recruit that couldn’t figure a certain aspect of their game out (throwing stikes and hitting lefties), and once they figure that out they are very good players.

Re: Pena’s dropoff.

I think must people expect his average to come back down to earth as he has never been a .290 guy.

by rglass44 on Apr 15, 2008 1:41 PM EDT   0 recs

In that regard, Edwin and Pena could be alike

In that they were both touted prospects that were underperforming. Unfortunately the similarities stop there. There is no logical reason to assume that Jackson will follow the dramatic improvement that Pena did. There was a decent chance that Pena would at least turn out to be okay last year when the Rays signed him. Obviously no one could have predicted his outburst, but there was a cange that he would at least be sufficient. With Jackson, there is no statistical basis for prognosticating that.

by Patrick L. Kennedy on Apr 15, 2008 2:16 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Indeed there is

I just don’t happen to have much. Though I do hope that Jackson does succeed and prove me wrong, as I’ve said numerous times. He’s a likable guy.

by Patrick L. Kennedy on Apr 15, 2008 3:30 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Founded in February 2005

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

52376727_small
Just Gas 'Em
Raysav_small
Raymond to Selig: "Where have you been?!?"
Princeton02_small
Red Sox vs. Rays
Small
Below listed are the celestial bodies on which it is conceivable Navarro could successfully steal 2nd base
Napoleon3_small
To our expansion brothers in Tampa Bay:

Recent FanPosts

Bjupton2_small
Are the Rays the new Braves?
2wfm3pjh_small
Im tired of the "are they for real comments"
Small
Right Field
Small
Red Sux fans are insane.....
Small
Riding a hobby horse
3abf195d-ee19-4b54-8c5c-ebfa8b51ea8e_small
What a season!
9d41_1_small
So this is what a natural high is supposed to feel like?
Rutgers-athletics-logo_small
Jeff Niemann wants to be called up, apparently
Newhatmanrays_small
Go Ahead... Celebrate. But Remember... THIS is just the BEGINING!!!
Princeton02_small
Royals vs. Rays

Post New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

This was recorded on the night of June 30, the first win of a 3-game sweep of the Boston Red Sox.

They didn't seem to like this video so much. Of course, I don't like them at all so I really could care less.
Don't ask how I came across this. I'm not proud.
Some Fans Tried To Use Counterfeit Tickets, Rays Say
STAY CLASSY REDSOX FAN.

Recent FanShots

Guess who's #1 on BP's Hot List?
Happy 4th Rays Fans!  I hope you all and the rest of the country enjoy the festivities that will saturate a day that should be recognized for its recognition of declaring independence from Great Britain rather than witnessing Kobayashi, Joey Chestnut and your fat ass neighbor, ingest more hot dogs than should be humanly possible.
     Without further adieu I would like to say thanks for all of the Rays fans for their hospitable attitudes by letting me take part in the blogging / posting of commentary over the past five weeks.  For the most part I've been a small time contributor but I read (the posts) and view (the pics) w/unbridled enthusiasm.  I've read a number of different major league ballclub posts and none come close to the rants, imagination, imagery etc. that Rays fans contribute.
     Yes, yes, yes...I am a true BLUE (and orange) METS fan.  I am dealing w/the current anaemic play / management of the ballclub in the best way I know how.  Anger and apathy.  On many attempts I've tried to assuage the beleagured METS fans of their hopelessness and downright negativity w/creative pics like those I witness on the Rays blog.  Alas, to no avail.  You would think that a fan base that has roots in New York would be up for having some fun during such trying times.  But that ain't the case.  My fellow METS fans are extremely uptight and sometimes downright dull.  That's why I enjoy eavesdropping on the Rays blog.  IT'S JUST SO DAMN FUN!  I think the only team that keeps up w/you in shear numbers of posts are the...CHICAGO CUBS...(and they hate pictures too)...oy veh.
    To the point now.  I believe you will agree w/me when I say that I have had it up to my gonads with all of the pundits and sports talk blatherers (especially Colin Cowherd from ESPN) about why small market baseball is bad for baseball.  The last time I checked, sports were for the players first and then the fans.  Without players there would be no sports to watch and w/out the fans there would be no players playing unless they were playing for free and playing for the fun of it.  (Of course which they all proclaim to do).
     You can provide me w/a bunch of research data if you want to about all of the people who would rather see two dominant (read big market) teams battle each other in a World Series.  For my money, I'm for witnessing David versus Goliath!  I don't want to see the old tired battle of 'has beens' and 'used to be's'.  
     Most recently the Celtics / Lakers championship in the NBA was whipped up into such a frenzy because of what the organizations had done in the past.  There was no way on earth that this years championship was going to play out w/such drama as those epic battles of yesteryear.  The characters on this year's teams weren't as compelling as the players from long ago.  There was no bad blood between them.  Yet big media tried using history to pump up this weak ass championship to do what else?  Drive ratings!
     Anyway, as a pure baseball fan, not some schmuck that doesn't have anything better to do come October, I'll take one small market team (Tampa, Oakland, San Diego, Kansas City, Minnesota etc.) and one medium to big market team in this years World Series than having to witness the same old tired teams play each other just because they have a higher number of people living in their respective city or geographic region.  
     So, for the teams currently w/winning records, the ones that are more compelling than any other; 1) due to history - Chicago Cubs, 2) due to being the new kids on the block and going from worst to first - Tampa Bay Rays.  That's the World Series I want to see.  So, now you've heard it from a "Baseball Fan", not some yuppy, corporate sellout...(That would be you Cowherd).

Good luck Rays fans!
I do an interview
Tips to avoid getting your car towed during Trop games
Sox Blog with poll about the Rays/Sox
Who has the highest Trade Value right now?
Listening to Balfour's postgame interveiw last night was classic. He lo...

Post New FanShot All FanShots Carrot-mini


Editors-in-Chief

Patavatar_small Patrick L. Kennedy

Bjupton2_small R.J. Anderson

Associate Editor

Small Jacob Larsen

ad

Site Meter