DRaysBay: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:





You Can't Walk 10 And Win

You also can't depend on Gary Glover and his now 1.8 WHIP to keep any game close. I know I said I'd make a post about 1,000 pitchers who are/were > Glover, but I'd just copy and paste rosters.

Edwin was also less than impressive today, especially the last few innings where he waked four. Look if he can not walk people, like had before, he'll be a good pitcher, but you give up 10 baserunners in 5.3 innings and expect long term success, it just won't happen. 

This isn't change just for change's sake, but please, either get rid of Glover or bury him like Hammel.

0 recs | Comment 35 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

I agree.

In the name of all that is good and holy, PLEASE get rid of Gary Glover.

by Orlando Rays on May 18, 2008 5:36 PM EDT   0 recs

Getting rid of Glover

is not that hard. We currently have 2 relievers in AAA better than him. 1 is on the 40 man, the other is not. But we have flexibility on the 40 man so calling up Balfor isn’t an issue either.

Plus, if Niemann is only going to pitch a few innings at a time, he’s an upgrade in the pen too.

Tools Whore

Sign Bonds!

by Tyler on May 18, 2008 6:00 PM EDT   0 recs

I actually liked Birkins. Was said to see Glover replace him.

by floridaroar on May 18, 2008 6:03 PM EDT   0 recs

You guys seem to expect Jackson...

To pitch a shutout everytime out. If he doesn’t, you criticize him. If he does, you criticize him and say it was luck. The fact is, in 9 starts, he has 6 where he has given up 1 run or less. That’s much more consistant than you seem to believe and I challenge you to find 10 other pitchers who have done the same. Was he perfect today? No. But was he solid? Yes. I’ll take 5.1 with one earned run anyday. A little short but his last two outings he went 8 and 7 ip.

by save_the_trop on May 18, 2008 6:12 PM EDT   0 recs

It's not "You Guys" So Much as it is RJ

RJ is an Edwin hater. Plain and simple. I know how to stop the hate coming from RJ’s keyboard though…
.
.
.
.
Barry Bonds is Edwin Jackson’s father. Now leave the man alone RJ!

by floridaroar on May 18, 2008 6:20 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Longlorious.

by RATW on May 18, 2008 6:32 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Read the GDT, I was hardly a hater. In fact I was saying he really had improved...

Then he went and walked the world, just like he used to.

"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena

by R.J. Anderson on May 18, 2008 6:33 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

There was improvement

It’s easy saying there wasn’t improvement when he imploded in the sixth, but early in the game you saw strikeout numbers like we haven’t seen from Edwin in a long time. It was a pretty good start.

by tallyray on May 18, 2008 6:42 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Early in the game, yes. But the walks killed that for me.

"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena

by R.J. Anderson on May 18, 2008 6:48 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Which team is Sickels scouting for again?

Give me a reason I should listen to him over the scouts I talk to and I’ll do it.

"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena

by R.J. Anderson on May 18, 2008 7:52 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Because it was Rays related and this is a Rays site that delivers content from other places

Especially on the same network.

"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena

by R.J. Anderson on May 18, 2008 8:00 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

No. I said it had minimal merit to me. It's his opinion v. others opinion.

He very well could be right in the end.

"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena

by R.J. Anderson on May 18, 2008 8:04 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

You would usually at least make a comment on it...

but, since it was pro-Jackson, you just ignored it.

by save_the_trop on May 19, 2008 1:42 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

DRaysBay is a marketplace of ideas

9 = 8

by websterjtc on May 18, 2008 8:40 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Funniest thing I read all day

Thanks Floridaroar

Mound Visit

by Mound Visit on May 19, 2008 2:14 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

"Look if he can not walk people, like had before, he'll be a good pitcher,"

Clearly I’m a hater.

"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena

by R.J. Anderson on May 18, 2008 6:40 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Ahh....

Self realization

Mound Visit

by Mound Visit on May 19, 2008 2:16 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I don't expect him to

But I do think he’s better this year than he was last year. And every pitcher has a bad start every once in a while. He was not part of the problem today.

by Orlando Rays on May 18, 2008 7:36 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

but you give up 10 baserunners in 5.3 innings and expect long term success, it just won't happen.

5+ innings, 6 hits, 7 Ks, 1 ER

Walking guys isnt good, but I think you undervalue the importance of not being hittable. When Jackson is locating his stuff, guys arent hitting it. His walks overall havent been that bad, and when you can pitch well with runners on base like Jackson has been, you have a lot of leeway as long as your stuff is good enough to miss bats, which Jackson’s stuff is.

by blazinrayz on May 18, 2008 11:11 PM EDT   0 recs

Just to break this down a little more:

First 4 innings: 5 hits, 5Ks, 0 walks, 0ER.
Last inning+: 1ER, 1H, 2Ks, 4W.

To me, it looks like he just came apart the last inning, and I’m pretty sure I’ve seen this happen to Kazmir enough times last year (his horrible stats from pitches 76+) to know that this happens. The difference from last year’s Jackson and this year’s Jackson is that when this year’s Jackson begins to fall apart, he has in one way or another, managed to escape the big inning and either limit or avoid the damage inflicted. If we had last year’s Jackson, he would have come apart at the seams in the 5th and the Rays would have been shelled as a result. The reason why he’s getting out of these messes is not just because of our bullpen; to me, he looks like a much better pitcher under pressure than he did last year.

I’m still not all that happy with Jackson, but unless somewhere during the season he turns back into last year’s Jackson, I’d take him as the #4 over anybody in the bullpen or AAA right now.

Also, this games loss falls squarely on our bullpen. It would have been nice if Jackson would have lasted through the 6th, but the bullpen gave up the other 4 runs in that game, not Jackson.

by kericr on May 19, 2008 11:52 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

question

Who is the more productive pitcher? Pitcher A has a 1.30 WHIP but gives up a lot of hits and very little walks. Player B has a WHIP of 1.30 also, but he gives up very few hits and too many walks.

I know walks are the worst thing a pitcher can allow to happen, because they are under his control. BUt dont hits drive in runs? Just saying, if all else is equal and they are giving up the same amount of baserunners, wouldnt you take the guy who gets guys out and just has bouts with control problems at times?

I dont know why the hate for Jackson. Last I checked his ERA is in the 3.30 range and hes our #4 starter. When he pitches great, he barely gets mention around here (I almost completely overlooked the ‘Sickles on Jackson’ post), but when he has a 6 inning 1 ER game he gets criticized.

by blazinrayz on May 18, 2008 11:18 PM EDT   0 recs

Sorry for the 3rd post, but another reason why I take the guy who walks more and gets hit less, is because that is a correctable problem (in Jacksons case he is making noticable improvements). Wheras a guy whos stuff isnt that great and gets hit a lot can’t just make his stuff better

by blazinrayz on May 18, 2008 11:20 PM EDT   0 recs

Give me a reason I should listen to him over the scouts I talk to and I’ll do it.

whatever dude, you have been hating on Jackson since before you talked to any scouts about him. And when you turn on a guy you tend to dig your heels in and rip them to shreds, I doubt anything youve discussed with scouts has altered that.

I’ll take the implied enthusiasm I see out of everyone surrounding Edwin and the continued support he receives from his coaches over some anonymous scouts

by blazinrayz on May 19, 2008 4:09 AM EDT   0 recs

Hate for Jackson?

I think considering R.J.’s comments on Jackson as “hate” is rather hyperbolic. All I read is that he is dubious about the likelihood that Edwin can continue to keep runs off the board given his peripherals.

While I am probably more prone to optimism about Jackson due to a number of factors, including observations about how he appears on the mound, I also am unconvinced that he has turned a corner. It is not a question of WHIP or comparing him to other pitchers, or even of distinguishing between hitability and control.

Rather it is the recognition that it is rare for pitchers who tend to walk so many and strike out so few to continue to avoid giving up hits too. Jackson might be able to do it, but if so he is bucking historical patterns. Some players do buck those patterns, so it isn’t impossible, but given that he has not been an outlier in the past, it still remains likely that we are simply seeing a small sample exception that will correct itself soon enough.

I may be missing some newer rhetoric in the use of the word “hate” here, but if it suggests any personal animus or antipathy I don’t think that applies to what R.J., and certainly not to what I am saying. It is just a matter of trying to delve a bit deeper than ERA to see whether the underlying performance merits optimism, and while in my case I think it may, I don’t think we should ignore the warning signs in many of the numbers.

by bobr on May 19, 2008 5:38 AM EDT   0 recs

Jackson pitched fine

This is my first post here, but I’ve been a long time lurker. I’ve just seen some really flawed analysis lately so I figured I’d speak up. Jackson has a 3.29 ERA, has three outing of 0ER and three outings of 1ER. How is that luck? That looks pretty consistent to me. Does he walk too many batters? Sure of course he does. But lately he has been limiting his hits to singles. WHIP and BB/9 is not the end all of all statistical analysis relating to pitching. XBH/9, HR/9, and K/9 all must be taken into account when scouting Jackson. The fact is nobody is hitting him hard. Nobody is driving in runs. In order to score against Jackson you have to essentially have to essentially string together 3 base runners in an inning. That is very difficult to do even with someone with a slightly higher than desired walk rate.

by matthan on May 19, 2008 11:18 AM EDT   0 recs

If I may use a football analogy

you can only let a team into the redzone so many times before they score 7. There’s not one pitcher in the history of the game that has consistently put a large number of runners on base and consistently gotten out of those jams and lived to tell the story.

still needs more Bonds

by JI on May 19, 2008 4:50 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

However...

Our relievers are dangerously close to the edge. Namely Dan Wheeler. He is being hit very hard. He is one person I’d worry about.

by matthan on May 19, 2008 11:18 AM EDT   0 recs

Nonsense

I need him to continue raking Holds for my fantasy team. I refuse to accept he’s on the brink of disaster, instead I chose to live in DENIAL!

by floridaroar on May 19, 2008 11:28 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

You gotta admit...

He has bumbled through his last few outings.

by kericr on May 19, 2008 11:54 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Founded in February 2005

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

52376727_small
Just Gas 'Em
Raysav_small
Raymond to Selig: "Where have you been?!?"
Princeton02_small
Red Sox vs. Rays
Small
Below listed are the celestial bodies on which it is conceivable Navarro could successfully steal 2nd base
Napoleon3_small
To our expansion brothers in Tampa Bay:

Recent FanPosts

Bjupton2_small
Are the Rays the new Braves?
2wfm3pjh_small
Im tired of the "are they for real comments"
Small
Right Field
Small
Red Sux fans are insane.....
Small
Riding a hobby horse
3abf195d-ee19-4b54-8c5c-ebfa8b51ea8e_small
What a season!
9d41_1_small
So this is what a natural high is supposed to feel like?
Rutgers-athletics-logo_small
Jeff Niemann wants to be called up, apparently
Newhatmanrays_small
Go Ahead... Celebrate. But Remember... THIS is just the BEGINING!!!
Princeton02_small
Royals vs. Rays

Post New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

This was recorded on the night of June 30, the first win of a 3-game sweep of the Boston Red Sox.

They didn't seem to like this video so much. Of course, I don't like them at all so I really could care less.
Don't ask how I came across this. I'm not proud.
Some Fans Tried To Use Counterfeit Tickets, Rays Say
STAY CLASSY REDSOX FAN.

Recent FanShots

Guess who's #1 on BP's Hot List?
Happy 4th Rays Fans!  I hope you all and the rest of the country enjoy the festivities that will saturate a day that should be recognized for its recognition of declaring independence from Great Britain rather than witnessing Kobayashi, Joey Chestnut and your fat ass neighbor, ingest more hot dogs than should be humanly possible.
     Without further adieu I would like to say thanks for all of the Rays fans for their hospitable attitudes by letting me take part in the blogging / posting of commentary over the past five weeks.  For the most part I've been a small time contributor but I read (the posts) and view (the pics) w/unbridled enthusiasm.  I've read a number of different major league ballclub posts and none come close to the rants, imagination, imagery etc. that Rays fans contribute.
     Yes, yes, yes...I am a true BLUE (and orange) METS fan.  I am dealing w/the current anaemic play / management of the ballclub in the best way I know how.  Anger and apathy.  On many attempts I've tried to assuage the beleagured METS fans of their hopelessness and downright negativity w/creative pics like those I witness on the Rays blog.  Alas, to no avail.  You would think that a fan base that has roots in New York would be up for having some fun during such trying times.  But that ain't the case.  My fellow METS fans are extremely uptight and sometimes downright dull.  That's why I enjoy eavesdropping on the Rays blog.  IT'S JUST SO DAMN FUN!  I think the only team that keeps up w/you in shear numbers of posts are the...CHICAGO CUBS...(and they hate pictures too)...oy veh.
    To the point now.  I believe you will agree w/me when I say that I have had it up to my gonads with all of the pundits and sports talk blatherers (especially Colin Cowherd from ESPN) about why small market baseball is bad for baseball.  The last time I checked, sports were for the players first and then the fans.  Without players there would be no sports to watch and w/out the fans there would be no players playing unless they were playing for free and playing for the fun of it.  (Of course which they all proclaim to do).
     You can provide me w/a bunch of research data if you want to about all of the people who would rather see two dominant (read big market) teams battle each other in a World Series.  For my money, I'm for witnessing David versus Goliath!  I don't want to see the old tired battle of 'has beens' and 'used to be's'.  
     Most recently the Celtics / Lakers championship in the NBA was whipped up into such a frenzy because of what the organizations had done in the past.  There was no way on earth that this years championship was going to play out w/such drama as those epic battles of yesteryear.  The characters on this year's teams weren't as compelling as the players from long ago.  There was no bad blood between them.  Yet big media tried using history to pump up this weak ass championship to do what else?  Drive ratings!
     Anyway, as a pure baseball fan, not some schmuck that doesn't have anything better to do come October, I'll take one small market team (Tampa, Oakland, San Diego, Kansas City, Minnesota etc.) and one medium to big market team in this years World Series than having to witness the same old tired teams play each other just because they have a higher number of people living in their respective city or geographic region.  
     So, for the teams currently w/winning records, the ones that are more compelling than any other; 1) due to history - Chicago Cubs, 2) due to being the new kids on the block and going from worst to first - Tampa Bay Rays.  That's the World Series I want to see.  So, now you've heard it from a "Baseball Fan", not some yuppy, corporate sellout...(That would be you Cowherd).

Good luck Rays fans!
I do an interview
Tips to avoid getting your car towed during Trop games
Sox Blog with poll about the Rays/Sox
Who has the highest Trade Value right now?
Listening to Balfour's postgame interveiw last night was classic. He lo...

Post New FanShot All FanShots Carrot-mini


Editors-in-Chief

Patavatar_small Patrick L. Kennedy

Bjupton2_small R.J. Anderson

Associate Editor

Small Jacob Larsen

ad

Site Meter