6/22: HOU (34-41) at RAYS (44-30)
Houston @ Tampa Bay
![]() |
|
![]() |
Pitching Matchup:
| IP | ERA | + | K/9 | BB/9 | K/BB | HR/9 | OPS | WHIP | G/F | P/IP | ||
| HOU | RH B. Backe |
83.0 | 4.99 |
84 | 6.18 | 4.01 | 1.54 | 2.06 | .882 | 1.58 | 0.87 | 16.49 |
| RAYS | LH S. Kazmir |
56.1 | 1.76 |
235 | 9.75 | 3.20 | 3.05 | 0.32 | .528 | 1.01 | 0.80 | 16.58 |

RH Brandon Backe, Houston-Former Ray Brandon Backe makes his triumphant return to Tropicana Field after a five year wait, and the Rays just couldn't be happier to see him. Despite his shortcomings this year, however, Backe's performance over the last several years with the Astros definitely makes them the winners of the 2003 trade that brought IF Geoff Blum to the Rays. Incidentally, Blum is now back in Houston by way of San Diego as Backe's teammate, but good riddance to him. Backe, on the other hand, has turned in some decent years for Houston and has proven to be quite the value for an 18th round draft pick.
Not that I possess any great deal of nostalgia for the guy, but his story is the perfect encapsulation of Chuck LaMar's tenure. He always was excellent at scouting out talent, but once those players signed on the dotted line, they were mishandled all the way to the major league level, if they got there at all. And at that point, following their inevitable failure, they were shipped out for pennies on the dollar. Take Backe, for instance. He was drafted in '98 as a position player, without much success, and was converted to a pitcher before the 2001 season. Only a little more than a year later, he was in the major leagues, having been sped through A- Charleston, A+ Bakersfield, and AA Orlando all in the course of 2001. He was called up straight to the majors from Orlando in 2002, and predictably failed. He spent some time in Durham during the 2003 season before being getting called up to the majors for his longest stint as a Devil Ray.
Backe was and is nothing special. That is obvious. In fact, he probably wouldn't even have a place on the present Rays pitching staff. But the terrible way the Rays handled him, and the haste in which they dealt him squandered value needlessly. Backe wasn't a top prospect, and he never had an ERA under 4.64 in the Rays' system above A-ball, yet the team's brass felt the need to rush him to the major league level in some absurd quest to not lose 100 games. In the grand scheme of things, losing Backe was not the end of the world. Furthermore, the incompetence that marked LaMar's tenure is well-known, and he has long since departed from the organization. Still, Backe is coming off of two straight above-average years with the Astros. That's nothing to sneeze at, and his departure was regrettable.
Still, for all of the regrets we may have about the past, Backe is sure doing nothing in the present, and that he has kept his ERA under 5 while pitching so poorly this year is nothing short of incredible. Surrendering more than two homers per nine innings as he is doing is not all that surprising when you are a flyball pitcher in a bandbox. Add in a walk rate of 4.01 per nine, and you have a guy who will put men on and give you a chance to drive them home with the gopher ball. Hopefully the Rays can take advantage of Backe's obvious weaknesses and take the series today.

LH Scott Kazmir, RAYS-Kazmir makes his first career start against his hometown Houston Astros, a fact that is entirely unimportant given that the game isn't even in his hometown. Still, I needed a filler to transition in, and so having dispensed of that useless factoid, let's move on to the actual point: Scott Kazmir is really, really good, especially at home where he has a 0.59 ERA this season in 30.2 innings of work.
Kazmir has been achieving success this year by working in his off-speed pitches more frequently and with better timing to complement the increased usage of his fastball. He has also adjusted his approach on the mound. Instead of running up high pitch counts trying to retire batters on strikeouts, Kazmir has been willing to pitch to contact when the need hits him, and he's been able to do that very well. While Kazmir did recede back into his inefficient ways last time out against the Cubs, more broadly he has been a changed pitcher this season, and the results are positive.
Another thing that I've noticed is that Kazmir finally seems to be back fully healthy from the shoulder injury that forced him to miss the first month of the season. It was obvious watching Kazmir in his first couple starts off the DL that he wasn't at full strength and that he didn't quite have his entire repertoire with him. Over his last six or so starts, you've seen him get back to normal though. His pitch counts have stood at 106 or higher in each of his past four starts, and his strikeout rate over his last six starts generally mirrors the Kazmir that we're used to.
Certainly Kazmir has not been infallible this season. While his strikeout and walk rates are encouraging for the power pitcher that we've come to expect, he is getting far too lucky on fly balls. While his G:F stands at a decidedly unimpressive 0.80, he has given up just two home runs thus far in the season. Flyball pitchers to that extreme do not sustain that rate for very long, so one of two things will happen. Either Kazmir will start getting groundball outs, or he will start giving up more home runs. It's that simple. And given that opponents are hitting line drives off of him at a greater rate than any other year in his career, I'd say that Kazmir is due for regression on multiple fronts.
Still, with Tropicana Field playing like a pitcher's park, there is hope that Kazmir can stave off a lot of the regression coming to his core statistics, at least for now. I wouldn't bank on that as a plan, however, with the Trop's history of playing fairly neutral over the long haul. Kazmir will need to make adjustments to sustain his current success. He might be able to keep it up against teams that have Michael Bourn leading off, and for our sake hopefully he will, but you can't count on this run of luck to continue for the rest of the season.
Starting Lineups:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- The lack of B.J. Upton in the batting order is not a positive development for a team going into a game with the expectation of winning. Nonetheless, Joe Maddon chooses to give the otherwise-durable center fielder the day off today, which is understandable. Hopefully he'll come back fresh and ready for the Marlins' series. The move puts Gabe Gross in center for the Rays, which should be interesting, while Eric Hinske flashes his "defensive" "prowess" in right. You definitely lose something on defense when you take a good corner outfielder and move him to center, opening up a spot for a defensively-inept right fielder. Of course, playing Carl Crawford in center would be the best choice, but we all know that won't happen. Elsewhere, let's just hope Willy Aybar's respite from a slump last night continues into today, as he's batting in the No. 3 hole.
GO RAYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0 recs |
543
comments
Comments
upton!
thank god kazmir is pitching, that lineup looks ugly
by joeybw on Jun 22, 2008 1:23 PM EDT 0 recs
This is a horrible start
Plus we have a horrible lineup and a horrible defensive alignment
by matthan on Jun 22, 2008 1:45 PM EDT 0 recs
I mean Gross in center
Christ I’d much rather take a “slight” hit offensively and have Ruggs play center and Gross play in right.
by matthan on Jun 22, 2008 1:46 PM EDT 0 recs
I just don't like Hinske and Gross playing in the OF together. Gross is solid, but not nearly enough to make up for Hinske
by matthan on
Jun 22, 2008 1:48 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Fine. I could care less whether Gross plays CF or RF with Ruggs. The point is getting Hinske out of the lineup
I like Ruggs more in center, but Hinske is just pathetic in the field. That was the point.
by matthan on
Jun 22, 2008 1:52 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Has Longoria gotten any days off yet since his promotion?
by matthan on Jun 22, 2008 1:49 PM EDT 0 recs
I LOVE KAZMIR
If I was a woman/homo, I would marry that man
by joeybw on Jun 22, 2008 1:50 PM EDT 0 recs
This lineup is worse.
Ichiro RF
Willie Bloomquist 2B
Raul Ibanez LF
Jose Vidro 1B
Jeremy Reed CF
Yuniesky Betancourt SS
Jeff Clement C
Miguel Cairo 3B
Carlos Silva P
by R.J. Anderson on Jun 22, 2008 1:52 PM EDT 0 recs
Yeah, but CC fouls off pitches sometimes
Normally he tries to end it in one pitch
by td32 on
Jun 22, 2008 1:54 PM EDT
up
0 recs
His at-bats go like this:
Swinging strike
Foul
In play, out(s) recorded
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 22, 2008 1:57 PM EDT
up
0 recs
they were both strikes,
you want him to lay off??
by davidsmarch on
Jun 22, 2008 1:54 PM EDT
up
0 recs
well that was a shit inning.
are these guys in a rush to get home?
by GenghisJohn on Jun 22, 2008 1:55 PM EDT 0 recs
Remember
apparently the team parties real hard saturday nights…
by matthan on
Jun 22, 2008 1:56 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Was it Mantle or DiMaggio who got serviced under the bleachers?
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 22, 2008 1:58 PM EDT
up
0 recs
There was a letter somewhere online about some event at Yankee Stadium
75 years maybe? I think it was DiMaggio, and it asked for their favorite moment, well he wrote about that time behind the bleachers.
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 22, 2008 1:59 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I have no problem with them having fun
They are young guys. Thats what they should do.
by matthan on
Jun 22, 2008 1:58 PM EDT
up
0 recs
As long as it doesnt adversely affect their performance
by td32 on
Jun 22, 2008 1:59 PM EDT
up
0 recs
True
I’m sure they do it fairly intelligently. I have no problem with it. They shouldn’t get hammered Sat nights with a Sunday afternoon game. But I have no problem with them getting blitzed on Friday night for example.
by matthan on
Jun 22, 2008 2:02 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Which really makes you appreciate the 20 K games within 9 innings.
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 22, 2008 2:01 PM EDT
up
0 recs
It seems Kaz is throwing harder and harder every game
At least on a more consistent basis.
by matthan on Jun 22, 2008 2:03 PM EDT 0 recs
Hinske will match the amount of pitches Backe threw in the first.
by R.J. Anderson on Jun 22, 2008 2:04 PM EDT 0 recs
I think that has more to do with Backe being very wild this inning instead of Hinske being patient
by matthan on
Jun 22, 2008 2:05 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Hinske sees right around 3.9 pitches per P/A.
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 22, 2008 2:05 PM EDT
up
0 recs
That wasn't what I was saying. I was talking about that specific at bat.
Even CC would have walked that at bat. The pitches weren’t even close.
by matthan on
Jun 22, 2008 2:06 PM EDT
up
0 recs





