The Brawl
Hat tip to Awful Announcing :
I'm not at all proud of this. Shields and the Rays needed to handle this better -- not at all perhaps -- and on top of a stupid fight and sure to be coming suspensions they got their butts beat on the field and lost first place. This is truly the lowest moment of the season, and for more than the result in the boxscore.
0 recs |
216 comments
Comments
I disagree
We needed to do this. Builds team spirit and I love how we have each others back. Take a look at the Red Sox. Their players allow Crisp to get beaten up by numerous players. And then a few innings later they are getting in yelling match amongst themselves. Now I would have rather have done this later in the game if the game is decided.
by matthan on
Jun 5, 2008 10:08 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Come on, Manny probably forgot what team he was on.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 5, 2008 10:09 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Oh please…..I am a glass is half full type of guy. The fight wasn’t all bad. Of course I would have rather have had Shields throw 6 or 7 innings. But i can see the positives.
by matthan on
Jun 5, 2008 10:12 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You missed my joke.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 5, 2008 10:13 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, I think it was a team building exercise
watching Navi hold down Coco while 3-4 guys beat the shit out of him.
by Albertrayon on
Jun 5, 2008 10:14 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bullshit
It doesn’t build anything. You really think this fight is going to be the difference in the rays season? Do you have anything to show teams that get in brawls do better, play better for the rest of the season? You’re just repeating what the mouth breathers keep repeating without anything to back up the nonsense.
And you do realize the sox were in the dugout, right? You do realize that’s why rays players were on coco before the sox players could help. I mean, are you that dense?
Also, SCOREBOARD.
by gs on
Jun 5, 2008 10:18 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Gerald Williams v. Pedro really helped us build something special.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 5, 2008 10:18 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Or Gathright v. Tavarez.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 5, 2008 10:19 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Welcome to the site
Trolly Mc-Trollerson
by GomesSweetGomes on
Jun 5, 2008 10:34 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Varitek's mitt and A-Rod's face, 2004
A-Rod had just been hit by a pitch, and varitek was escorting him to first when all hell broke loose. It’s been widely noted over the years since that the midseason scuffle between the Sox and the Yankees united the Red Sox on their run to the title that year.
I think Navi needs to take a page out of Varitek’s book and start escorting disgruntled hit batters to avoid this in the future. The fight was nice, but a W would have been better.
by rayweaver on
Jun 6, 2008 5:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hell Yes!
Shields lived up to the “code.” I just wish he could have cracked Crisp with the haymaker he threw. Kudos to Gomes, CC, Aki for attacking. You must protect your players. I am 100% behind James “Right Hand” Shields and hope it teaches the pansies from New England a lesson. If nothing else, the Red Sox now know the Rays will not back down and are here to fight. June 30th, I’ll be there baby! I just hope Johnny Gomes MMA training is in full gear when they get back down to the “Pit of Dispair.”
by John 63 on
Jun 6, 2008 9:07 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Totally agree.....
We lost this series but I bet those guys in that locker room feel pretty good about themselves even though they got swept (twice…UGH). I liked seeing Aki in there getting some swings, I would have loved to hear the audio on him during that scuffle…like him cussing guys out in Japenese. That would have been sweet. Seriously though, I like the fact that Navi, CC, and Gomes pounced on Coco. That was great. I suppose we’ll never see Coco Crisp in a Rays uniform anytime soon now will we?
by Rays Rule on
Jun 5, 2008 10:14 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I disagree to a point
Shields has to back up his teammate. Hitting the guy in the leg is fine. After that, it was handled poorly. Shields never should have swung at him. Once Navi got him on the ground, Gomes and the others piling on was unacceptable. MLB will come down hard on that so we’ll be suffering from these suspensions for awhile as they have to stagger them out.
Hit the guy, and then get him down to the ground if he goes after the pitcher. Punching is never acceptable and we deserve to get slammed by MLB for it.
by Jason Collette on
Jun 5, 2008 10:14 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
In most cases I'd agree with you...
But the circumstances leading up to this should be considered. Let’s not forget that Cocoa started the whole thing with an incredibly dirty slide into Aki’s private parts. That’s assault. When you just saw Cocoa do that to Aki and then charge Shields with fists raised, you really expect Shields to not defend himself?
by floridaroar on
Jun 6, 2008 10:02 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Shields had his haymaker in position...
before Crisp started his. Crisp didn’t get his dukes up until after Shields missed wide with the knuckler. Never throw the first punch in a basebrawl. I don’t want our 2nd best pitcher punching a bum in the face and breaking his hand.
by Jason Collette on
Jun 6, 2008 2:20 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Coca started this by charging the mound
The code states he should have taken his base.
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind.
by Sandy Kazmir on
Jun 6, 2008 12:59 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
surprisingly
Mike Silverman of the Boston Globe agreed with that. He was on the Baseball Beat show with Charley Steiner on XM today and said Coco Crips was out of line charging the mound but also went onto say that Gomes and Crawford were over the line from joining the fight as they did and pounding on a guy while he was on the ground.
by Jason Collette on
Jun 6, 2008 2:21 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bottom line.
You stick up for your teammates. Anything less is unacceptable.
CC, Aki, Gomes, and Shields are all going to be suspended. Luckily only one suspension at a time will be served.
www.citadel-insurance.com
by SeanDubbs on
Jun 5, 2008 10:15 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Exactly. And the Red Sox didn’t stick up for their teammate. Heck I bet Youk and Manny were fighting over that. I have a lot of respect for Youk (really the only Red Sox player I have respect for), and I wouldn’t be surprised if he was pissed off that one of his players basically got pummeled with no help from his “teammates”
by matthan on
Jun 5, 2008 10:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wow, you really are an idiot.
Or 12, I can’t figure it ou.
by gs on
Jun 5, 2008 10:19 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and no one cares what you think.....
Top Josh Paul Pornos- Big Navi Stroking, 2pitchers1cup, BJ to the Balls
BELIEVE in 08!
by SRQman on
Jun 5, 2008 10:21 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He's not a Sox fan...
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 5, 2008 10:22 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
doesn't mean
I listen to some sox fans but he just comes in to cause trouble and look at his other 3 posts
Top Josh Paul Pornos- Big Navi Stroking, 2pitchers1cup, BJ to the Balls
BELIEVE in 08!
by SRQman on
Jun 5, 2008 10:32 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m guessing you either have no friends and have never played a team sport. I suggest you try it out.
by matthan on
Jun 5, 2008 10:23 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You comment like your in POWW.
www.citadel-insurance.com
by SeanDubbs on
Jun 5, 2008 10:31 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Great, we can fight better than the Sox.
At the end of the night they hit Carl and Aki, and buzzed Cliff and beat our asses, taking first.
Congratulations we got a few punches in.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 5, 2008 10:20 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Jason....this ain't tennis man.
I wouldnt be suprised if the guys respond well in Texas
by Rays Rule on
Jun 5, 2008 10:16 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I hope Kazmir goes out and pitches well tomorow
and the offense needs to come alive. Aybar hit real well today and Longoria is looking more confident, hope that carries over.
Top Josh Paul Pornos- Big Navi Stroking, 2pitchers1cup, BJ to the Balls
BELIEVE in 08!
by SRQman on
Jun 5, 2008 10:22 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And if they don't
will you admit you could be entirely wrong?
by nyyfaninlaaland on
Jun 6, 2008 3:50 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm shocked nobody has made the "Shields didn't have a good grip on his knuckler tonight." comment
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 5, 2008 10:23 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
私達はちょうどあなたのろばを蹴った
Means We just kicked your ass in Japenese. Even if it wasn’t in the box score!
by Rays Rule on
Jun 5, 2008 10:25 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Impressive
Guys whuppin on a guy held down by another. In other circumstances that’s called assualt. Here apparently it’s teamwork.
Look, Coco started this, so he’s culpable too. Plenty to go around. I’ve got no problem with Shields swinging – Coco’s rushing him. And Navi was likely just trying to take Coco down. For me Gomes (with Coco) is the guy who should get whacked hardest on this one. It was commented that the Sox were slow to arrive because they were in the dugout – so was Gomes. I don’t call that back getting, I call it being a goon.
by nyyfaninlaaland on
Jun 6, 2008 4:01 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You're just mad
Because Gomes beat Shelley Duncan’s ass too. ;)
by floridaroar on
Jun 6, 2008 10:06 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I was joking by the way.
I think if anyone out of this whole incident could be classified as a goon it’d be Crisp.
by floridaroar on
Jun 6, 2008 10:09 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
what you guys think suspensions will be?
length wise…
Top Josh Paul Pornos- Big Navi Stroking, 2pitchers1cup, BJ to the Balls
BELIEVE in 08!
by SRQman on
Jun 5, 2008 10:26 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Shields – 6 Games
Gomes – 5 Games
CC – 3 Games
Aki – 3 Games
www.citadel-insurance.com
by SeanDubbs on
Jun 5, 2008 10:27 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
how long for Crisp?
and how anyone else on Sox?
Top Josh Paul Pornos- Big Navi Stroking, 2pitchers1cup, BJ to the Balls
BELIEVE in 08!
by SRQman on
Jun 5, 2008 10:28 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m guessing 5 Games for Crisp.
www.citadel-insurance.com
by SeanDubbs on
Jun 5, 2008 10:30 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No way Shields gets a longer suspension than Crisp
No chance in hell
by GomesSweetGomes on
Jun 5, 2008 10:38 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He will
Only because he plays once every 5 games, not because he deserves a longer suspension.
www.citadel-insurance.com
by SeanDubbs on
Jun 5, 2008 10:39 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Until you consider
Crisp was likely looking at a 1-2 game suspension before tonights game even started.
by GomesSweetGomes on
Jun 5, 2008 10:46 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I wouldnt be at all surprised if Crisp draws 10
by GomesSweetGomes on
Jun 5, 2008 10:54 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Additional
I think Edwin Jackson is gonna get tagged for a few games too; he was in the Shields pile, you catch him trying to put his shoe back on; if you watch that pile earlier, you see him taking a handful of swings into the pile trying to get at some Red Sox player.
by kericr on
Jun 6, 2008 12:29 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
How do suspensions work for pitchers does it go by starts?
by Rays4ever on
Jun 5, 2008 10:28 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
No
It goes by games. Typically they’ll give a starter a 6 game suspension to throw off the rotation and have it become some type of burden to the team.
www.citadel-insurance.com
by SeanDubbs on
Jun 5, 2008 10:29 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Niemann or Hammel take that start I guess.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 5, 2008 10:38 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not necessarily.
If you appeal then take the suspension when there is an off day in there you can just slide everyone.
www.citadel-insurance.com
by SeanDubbs on
Jun 5, 2008 10:39 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
More bad than good
I guess now we know why Shields was so upset when he hit Pedroia, he knew that he was still planning to hit Crisp. Crisp obviously took things to a level that the Rays weren’t expecting. But somehow this brawl just looked hackish, on the Rays part. Even though Crisp charged, and started the actual fight, it didn’t have the valiant team building feel like the pre-season fight against the yanks. Probably because we lost so badly and got swept. On another note, it was a bit disheartening to see CC keep swinging at those high fast balls.
by pcbredemeier on
Jun 5, 2008 10:40 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
oh hell no....
on bbtn coco just called the rays (the ones who beat the shit out of him) girls for srcating him and trying to pull his gay looking hair wat a douchebag i now hate coco more than anyone else in baseball, i wish that shields wouldve connected on that haymacker and knocked coco’s ass out
by RaysOfHope on
Jun 5, 2008 11:03 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Well I have a player to heckle next time Boston comes to town
Top Josh Paul Pornos- Big Navi Stroking, 2pitchers1cup, BJ to the Balls
BELIEVE in 08!
by SRQman on
Jun 5, 2008 11:04 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not to mention an excuse to go buy some D batteries.
My guess is CF seats are jammed next time we play these fags
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind.
by Sandy Kazmir on
Jun 6, 2008 1:04 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What the Hell did he expect?
That he would charge the mound, and everyone would bump shoulders and pretend to be angry. He brought this on himself.
by GomesSweetGomes on
Jun 5, 2008 11:17 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The bottom line here....
Is that we significantly decreased our chances of winning an important, intra-division game with this stupid brawl, and that’s all that matters to me. I don’t care about any of this intangible “it fired the team up” crap. It sure as hell didn’t spur us on to victory today. Crisp is an idiot, and his actions yesterday and in quotes reflect that. There was no need to let this incident carry on into another day, however. Any rationale human being could see who was in the clear going into today.
But no, everyone had to get their testosterone set high, and the team’s performance suffered as a result. Our starting pitcher threw at an individual we knew was too dumb to think better of the matter, and to make it worse, he started throwing punches at him with his pitching hand. What happens if one makes contact and you break something? And then, on top of the strictly pragmatic elements of this brawl, you have the denigration of our image to deal with. Watching punches getting thrown, players getting ejected, and the Rays clearly placing a greater value on “getting even” then winning. We reduced ourselves to their level. When you reduce yourself to their level and start playing in the mud, the pig always wins.
And let’s take a look at where this incident left us. Our starting pitcher was gone from the game, and so we had to use nearly every available member of our bullpen in his place for the remaining seven innings of the game. So, having lost two straight games to our closest division rival and on the verge of a sweep, we are for all purposes going to give up on the third game and cede the division to Boston. That’s essentially the choice that was made, because you aren’t going to win replacing you No. 2 starter with seven innings of bullpen work. We put the “good feeling” of getting in a few punches on Crisp above the results on the field. That’s the type of decision losing teams make, not prospective playoff teams. We’re above that amateurish garbage.
Then, to top it all off, the consequences don’t end there! We have a taxed bullpen for a weekend road series in Texas, having strained every pitcher in three ineffective rotation outings. Then we have the suspensions of key players to look forward to, further taking away from our chances to win future games.
But more than anything else, we lost our class today. We had the moral superiority on the Duncan incident, and while Gomes’ actions in that case were similarly inadvisable, at least he was alone in that regard. The entire team as a whole didn’t partake in similarly classless actions, and the brawl was relatively peaceful compared to today’s. The consequences ended with Gomes being out for a couple days, and that was it. And we drew the most sympathy from the matter, having stuck up for a clean baseball play. That wasn’t the case here. Seeing four players ganging up on another (admittedly idiotic) player and punching that player with malice. Having complete disregard for actually winning the game at hand. Just overall, we lost our class. And that was the biggest loss of the day.
by Patrick L. Kennedy on
Jun 5, 2008 11:50 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Most people's reactions to this incident
Will be based solely on team allegiance, and nothing more.
As for the fight itself, of course it wasn’t justified, and took us out of our game. At the same time, I think there is something to be said for the fact that the Rays players minds tonight will be on how much they hate the Red Sox (and in particular Crisp), rather than sulking about getting swept.
It’s not that I don’t agree with most of what you said. I just don’t think it’s going to be a big deal in the grand scheme of things.
by GomesSweetGomes on
Jun 6, 2008 12:13 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This was the biggest series of our season
And we needed to go at each game with the best team we could put forth, and we failed to do that. To me, that is a big deal. Whatever the mental result of this is, I can’t speculate. All I know is that whatever positives we took mentally out of the game will be at least partially offset by the personnel deficits and weaknesses that the brawl will cause the team.
by Patrick L. Kennedy on
Jun 6, 2008 12:38 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Patrick, I basically agree with your approach
But shouldn’t you be hoping this wasn’t the biggest series of the season? It’s June after all.
I’m sure you’re thinking to date, of course. The missing players will have an impact, but it won’t be catastrophic. And it may even play that the Rays are sticking up for each other as bad as it looked. GSG may have a point there.
by nyyfaninlaaland on
Jun 6, 2008 4:15 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We still have three series against the Red Sox
This wasn’t our biggest series of the season.
Do not think that what is hard for you to master is humanly impossible; but if a thing is humanly possible, consider it to be within your reach.
by Orlando Rays on
Jun 6, 2008 5:54 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thus far it was
I can’t prognosticate into the future, so maybe I phrased my comment wrong, but we were assured of this being our biggest series of the season to date. I don’t know what the future will look like. Semantics aside, it was an important game that we (more or less) tanked.
by Patrick L. Kennedy on
Jun 6, 2008 7:40 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I disagree....
A baseball clubhouse is a unique thing, and most people who have been around one knew that Crisp had to catch one. You look out for your teammates, and that was Shields job. It is the equivalent to an enforcer in hockey, If you followed the Lightning, you saw what happened to Lecavalier when Torts benched Roy. Shields did it the right way, below the waist. I was surprised that it took Lester as long to retaliate, but for your teammates to keep your teammates’ respect you have to. Baseball rule one: You hit one of our’s, we hit one of your’s.
By the way, the denigration of our image? You do know that we have finished in last place every year but one. We don’t have a great public image.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 12:42 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This isn't hockey
Fighting is an inherent part of the NHL; not so in baseball. We don’t have “enforcers”, because that’s a stupid waste of a roster spot. You are arguing the benefits of this emotionally, but take a look at the pragmatic side to this. Was what we lost worth it? That is the ultimate question, and though some will disagree, I say absolutely not. I am opposed to all of these types of things, but especially ones that are as malicious and premature as this. That it occurred in the second inning is ridiculous timing that puts you at a severe personnel disadvantage. I’m not going to speculate on clubhouse politicking, but this did not have to happen in the second inning. That’s primarily where I find fault with the matter. By doing that, you do sacrifice the win. That should be of paramount importance.
As for the image matter, we had a reputation for losing. The organization tried very hard in the off-season to shed that image with image and personnel upgrades, and so far it’s working. We have a surprisingly good record that is shocking a lot of people, and we were winning fans with our young, exciting players. Everything was going fine. Now, we jeopardized the image. Not just because of the ill-timed brawl, but also the ridiculously thuggish way the team reacted to it.
by Patrick L. Kennedy on
Jun 6, 2008 12:49 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We don’t have "enforcers"?
Could have fooled me. By me, I mean Gomes.
by GomesSweetGomes on
Jun 6, 2008 12:54 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Frankly he’s no better than Duncan for punching Crisp while he’s being restrained and really making things erupt.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 1:02 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well
Right now with the way he’s playing, that’s essentially what his usefulness is.
by Patrick L. Kennedy on
Jun 6, 2008 1:04 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Right now with the way how often he’s playing, that’s essentially what his usefulness is.
Fixed.
by GomesSweetGomes on
Jun 6, 2008 1:07 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The brightside
is that given his limited pt, they might be able to stagger the suspensions in such a way that he only misses one start.
by GomesSweetGomes on
Jun 6, 2008 1:11 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If you choose to wait...
to hit Crisp, it’s chicken shit. Can you really say that you didn’t expect Shields to drill him when he led off the second?
As far as the image goes, the image of the Rays is perennial losers. A baseball fight changes nothing about any strides that the Rays have made in the wins department. Crisp could have said that he went into second trying to dislodge the ball and saved this whole incident from happening, Instead he said that he was trying to hurt someone, and he comes off with some half-ass racist comment about if he really wanted to hurt Aki, he would have jump kicked him (which contradicts his previous statement).
You’re right it’s not the same as hockey, but if you let someone get away with that shit, everyone will.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 12:59 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If you choose to wait...
To hit crisp, it’s another thing. Smart baseball. I honestly did not expect Shields to hit him because I thought he was smarter than to hamper severely the team’s chances of taking back first place just to fulfill his mythical idea of “revenge”.
The fact of the matter is, a baseball fight does change the strides the Rays have made in the win department. In fact, it damages them. As I pointed out, the team not only gave up the game this evening to brawl, it will likely be hampered in future games due to the suspensions and bullpen overtaxing that result from this game. It further engenders an image of our team as a bunch of immature brats intent on brawling at the drop of a hat, substantiated with the Yankees incident in spring training.
Quite frankly, I don’t care about Coco Crisp. He’s a two bit motormouth who said and did stupid things. But by responding to him, you are stooping to his level and giving him exactly what he wants. I’m sure he absolutely loved to incite this brawl, because it meant the removal of the other team’s No. 2 starter. That’s what it comes down to. He wasn’t worthy of further attention, given that the incident resulted in no lasting consequences after last night. Instead, we get to revel in the aftermath of responding to him for many days more, and likely for as long as he remains a Boston Red Sock. Congratulations, we “win”. It isn’t a matter of letting him get away with it, it is a matter of putting your team in a position to win and proving yourselves ready for primetime. On both counts, we came up short.
by Patrick L. Kennedy on
Jun 6, 2008 1:17 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
it's one game,
and it didn’t cost us a chance of winning that game. we had many chances to win it, we just didn’t.
by davidsmarch on
Jun 6, 2008 10:52 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Saying It's One Game Is a Poor Argument To Justify A Brawl
Not only that, every game counts. Ask the Mets last year if they wish they had one more regular season win.
by floridaroar on
Jun 6, 2008 11:22 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
to the Devil Rays
Sure, yuck it up about taking a few cheap shots at Coco but he injured his thumb the previous night because some jerk*ff blocked 2nd base on his steal. Totally unnecessary. Later he slid feet first to get the base.
He probably shouldn’t have run to the pitcher’s mound but apparently the D-rays “team spirit” consists of ganging up 5 to1 on the guy?! With that attitude, we will send you further back in the standings as the season goes on. Oh, and in case you forgot, you just got SMOKED 3 games in a row. So, who really “won” the fight after all?
Enjoy 2nd place again.
-Harry Onara
by HarryOnara on
Jun 6, 2008 12:20 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Some jerkoff, as you put it, was trying to prevent Crisp from stealing second. That’s completely germane to the goal of preventing the other team from being successful over the course of the game. Bartlett blocked the base to prevent a steal. On his eighth inning slide, Crisp reverted his whole body around to take out Iwamura. This was not in an attempt to steal successfully, but rather to injure the opposing player. There is a stark difference.
Listen, I agree with you. I’m ashamed of the way the Rays acted on the field today, and we will get exactly what we deserve. Crisp should get what’s coming to him, but there are no excuses for how we acted on the field. We were thoroughly dominated in that series.
by Patrick L. Kennedy on
Jun 6, 2008 12:34 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
To be fair
The argument has been made that while Bartlett has done this before (and Maddon noted such in discussing his pickup by the Rays), it’s not what’s normally done in the game at 2B since it could increase the risk of injury to the slider’s hands. Is this true ? Iv’e no idea. But frankly, given Bartlett’s tactic, I see no reason why players shouldn’t go in feet first to dissuade him. Coco took that too far mind you, and his follow on comments just heightened things.
Just trying to point out there is another position on this particular issue (as there was re running a catcher in ST).
by nyyfaninlaaland on
Jun 6, 2008 4:27 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
May Seattle give us a few of these.

"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 12:41 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs

Do not think that what is hard for you to master is humanly impossible; but if a thing is humanly possible, consider it to be within your reach.
by Orlando Rays on
Jun 6, 2008 10:07 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And whose fault is it that Crisp had no one to back him up?
Isn’t that what Youks and Manny Being Manny were fighting about?
by GomesSweetGomes on
Jun 6, 2008 12:56 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The only reason Cocoa was getting a 5 on 1 beat down is because his fellow Red Stockings players were slow to help him out. Maybe they’d have been quicker to help out if they felt he was justified in his actions, or maybe they think he’s just a d-bag and deserved a beating.
by floridaroar on
Jun 6, 2008 10:21 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Alright
Let’s see that this doesn’t turn into a flame war.
by Patrick L. Kennedy on
Jun 6, 2008 12:35 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I think a user at Over the Monster summed this up perfectly:
bad move on the Rays partThey hit Coco, but got their starting pitcher ejected, that was really, really dumb on Tampa Bay’s part, now they have to taxed their bullpen. If they are going to give a green light to hit Crisp, do it in the later innings. it is sort of like giving up the queen to get a rook in a chess game.
by Patrick L. Kennedy on
Jun 6, 2008 12:42 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
You have to hit him as soon as he comes up
That’s how it works in baseball. That’s why I was surprised that it took so long for Lester to drill Carl. And he threw an off speed pitch.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 12:44 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No, you don't
There are scores in baseball that aren’t settled for years, I think that since we face these people 18-19 times a year, we can afford to wait if it is indeed THAT necessary. By choosing an inopportune time to plunk Crisp and instigate a brawl, we sacrificed the game. And that is more important that any stupid sacred cows associated with clubhouse politicking.
by Patrick L. Kennedy on
Jun 6, 2008 12:50 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But they are sacred cows...
that’s why you have to do it. There is a code whether you want to believe it or not. That’s why Shields did everything right. When he hit him it was first time up, below the waist; Crisp knew what was coming. he made three decisions that caused the brawl. 1. Going after Aki 2. Popping off to the media 3. Running out after he got hit.
One game is not going to be the difference between a division title or making the playoffs period. However, there is more damage to be done by players feeling like their teammates don’t have their back. That’s why Elijah and Delmon are gone.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 1:05 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Winning the game does more for chemistry than acting like warriors.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 1:08 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's assuming that you can guarantee...
a victory, at a place that is the hardest to win at in the Majors, and they already had the game winning runs. Where’s the hate for pitching to Manny with first base open?
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 1:10 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't know about you, but two runs with Shields pitching doesn't feel like an impossible feat.
7-1, yes.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 1:13 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I would counter...
that they lost better offensive players over the course of the game than the Rays.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 1:14 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Even if they did.
We lost run prevention and overexposed the bullpen.
Hopefully Kazmir can help out with another good start tomorrow.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 1:16 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's why I was...
disappointed with how much we used Hammel yesterday.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 1:17 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It wasn't bad foresight really.
That was absolutely the right call yesterday just to give us the best chance to win today. You might be right that one game won’t cost us a playoff spot, but the 2 or 3 games lost from suspensions and a tired pen could. Or we could go on a 10 game winning streak and forget all about this until the next Sox series.
It’s just a disappointing series capped off with something that most of us were hoping to avoid for the second time this year.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 1:20 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Assuming he hit Pedroia intentionally
That hurt us a lot more than hitting Crisp.
by GomesSweetGomes on
Jun 6, 2008 1:14 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I thought it was at the time.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 1:16 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What the hell is the point of this "code" you cite
If it undermines your ability to win baseball games? It seems to me that this “code” is merely the refuge of immature teams that do something stupid in an effort to boost their machismo. Where he hit him is irrelevant, that he hit him is bad enough since it forced him from the game. I don’t care that he did it the “right way” or that Crisp “knew it was coming”. This isn’t feudal Europe, we need to get over the whole “code of chivalry” garbage. Once again, Crisp is a little runt who needed to STFU, but this incident should have taken care of itself last night. At the very least, it shouldn’t have been taken care of in the second inning of a two run baseball game.
One game is not going to be the difference between a division title or making the playoffs period.
How do you know? You’re telling me that divisions are never decided by a game? Much less an intra-division game against a team you trail by 0.5 game in the standings? Come on, every game is important and not one should be given up just to “prove something”. And it’s never just one game. One thing leads to another, and the consequences of your actions can be extrapolated over more than just a game. If we had won the game instead of getting into this stupid brawl, I imagine that no one on the team would have a problem. And if someone still did have a lingering grudge, they need to get over themselves.
by Patrick L. Kennedy on
Jun 6, 2008 1:25 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Revenge is a dish best served cold
Make the punk wonder everytime he comes up to bat against the Rays “Will this be the time I get nailed?”
Dibble and Kennedy were talking about that today on The Show. Dibbs mentioned how Piniella would often wait a long time before getting back at somebody.
by rayweaver on
Jun 6, 2008 5:41 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree with the poster at Over The Monster
Except Cocoa is more like a Pawn than a Rook.
by floridaroar on
Jun 6, 2008 10:23 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Unbelievable.
Let me just get this out of the way by saying, Yes, we could of handled it better than we did. However, if you think this one series was the definitive series of the season you are mistaken. Boston is what, 23 and 5 at home now? Nobody can beat them at fenway. The part that gomes and CC played was wrong. The part Navi played, wasn’t. In fact, I have more respect for Navarro because of it. This series sucked. It was the biggest series this season SO FAR but certainly not enough to say it is the end of our success.
Another note, look at the likely suspension of CC as a blessing. He’ll get to rest his legs and Ruggiano will get some playing to show what he can do. Hopefully he’ll be that missing piece in Rf?
by Thermacold on
Jun 6, 2008 1:31 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Nobody is saying that it was the definitive series of the season
All I’m saying is that these were three extremely important games against our closest divison rival, and we plum gave up on one of them. That’s very frustrating. More than that, the consequences of our actions in this game will likely impact personnel availability negatively well into the month. That is unacceptable. It isn’t a definitive series, and the losses are understandable. I’m not upset about losing a game in which we take maximum advantage of our personnel in trying to win, I am upset about the fact that this loss was clinched due to self-inflicted damage.
To be sure, I too don’t necessarily blame Navarro. Looking back at the incident, he seemed to merely be trying to prevent further calamities.
by Patrick L. Kennedy on
Jun 6, 2008 1:40 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed.
I just wish it was time for tomorrows game so we could quickly put this ugliness behind us.
by Thermacold on
Jun 6, 2008 2:36 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This game is going have more of an impact than just last night alone
The Rays are now staring a 2-7 or even a 1-8 road trip right in the face, and considering the next two home opponents, 3rd place by the time they see the road again. These 15 games (this road trip followed by the next home stand) appear at this point to be the toughest stretch of games on the Rays schedule. I would have been happy with 8-7 or 7-8 over these 15 games, but we could very easily be looking at 5-10 now.
by kericr on
Jun 6, 2008 9:39 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Umm....
isn’t that EXACTLY what you just said? You can’t discount the effect that having your teammate’s back has on the team’s psyche just because there isn’t a metric to measure it.
This was the biggest series of our season And we needed to go at each game with the best team we could put forth, and we failed to do that. To me, that is a big deal. Whatever the mental result of this is, I can’t speculate. All I know is that whatever positives we took mentally out of the game will be at least partially offset by the personnel deficits and weaknesses that the brawl will cause the team.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 9:54 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You're arguing semanitcs
I made a mistake in phrasing my remark, but the intent was clear and you know it was.
You keep using “the code”, “team psyche”, “clubhouse chemistry”, and all of these other intangible traits to back up your assertion, when you really don’t know any more about them then I do. I simply look at the results on the field. A moral victory doesn’t matter if your team doesn’t have the personnel to capitalize on it.
by Patrick L. Kennedy on
Jun 6, 2008 7:45 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We all wish it worked out in a different way. But if Shields didn’t hit Crisp sometime in the game yesterday, which I wish it happened a tad later, then we would have lost more then just the game. We would have lost the clubhouse and the whole team atmosphere. It could be argued that the Rays are finally playing well partially because they are finally acting like a real live major league baseball team. This is something real baseball teams do. They protect their teammates. They love their teammates.
I will gladly take 1 loss in a 162 game season if it continues to build that bond in the clubhouse. That alone will more than make up for 1 loss in the loss column.
The clubhouse does matter. I know there is no fancy stat you can put to it. Forging a bigger team identity and a strong bond is more important than anything a Jason Bay or Brian Giles could give us. Now could it have happened later and at a better time? Yes. But did it have to happen? Yes. There is no question about it. It is not a matter of being the “better” man. It is about showing your friends and your teammates that you are in fact their friend and their teammate.
by matthan on
Jun 6, 2008 4:51 AM EDT
reply
actions
1 recs
The brawls every other year with the Sox since 2000 sure have helped in the clubhouse and standings. You want to show them up, win the damn game and take back first place. That’s the biggest F.U. and clubhouse building exercise I can think of. Save the BS for trash time.
Longlorious.
by RATW on
Jun 6, 2008 10:28 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Those teams were bad though
You can’t expect a bad team to win more games because they get in a fight
by rglass44 on
Jun 6, 2008 10:29 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But good teams win more because of fights? It has nothing to do with actually being good? I seriously can’t wait to see the numbers which prove this theory.
Longlorious.
by RATW on
Jun 6, 2008 10:37 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
By that reasoning....
Bad teams would win more by not fighting. Fighting has nothing to do with the result on the field. Team unity does.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 10:59 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Being good creates team unity
Being bad doesn’t.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 11:07 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Also what needs to be remembered is Shields did it the right way. Now some of us (myself included) believe that he should have waited a few more innings, but he did it the right way. He hit Crisp on the side waist high. Crisp is the one who charged the mound. What do you expect Shields to do? Not fight? What do you expect his teammates to do? Not protect their teammate? Everybody on this planet knew Crisp HAD to get hit.
Also I don’t think the suspensions will really hurt us that much. Losing the one Shields start will, but the position players won’t. The one that will get the longest is Gomes, and he barely plays anyways. Other than that Maddon benches guys enough that we can just make the suspensions essentially our “rest” days so it won’t be that big of a deal. CC needs a little bit of time to rest anyways so that is not the end of the world.
by matthan on
Jun 6, 2008 4:59 AM EDT
reply
actions
1 recs
Agreed on CC
I also hope Navi doesn’t get any suspensions but We’ll see today maybe. Crawfey as I like to call him(yeah, lame nickname but I like it!) does in fact need the rest. It’s just dissapointing to give him the rest with this type of excuse.
Side Note: I’m curious as to what the reason Manny and Youkilis were fighting about. It seems we are not the only ones going to take flack for this brawl. Ellsbury might be out a couple days with his wrist. (Reminded me of vernon wells. OUCH) And with Ortiz out, Crisp is actually needed. So, it isn’t like the sox won’t be hurt by suspensions as well.
And again I say, Come on Gametime! I’m ready to start talking about a Kazmir start instead of this stuff! :p
by Thermacold on
Jun 6, 2008 5:26 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Shields made the mistake when he threw a punch.
Do not think that what is hard for you to master is humanly impossible; but if a thing is humanly possible, consider it to be within your reach.
by Orlando Rays on
Jun 6, 2008 5:57 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A little surprised at the reaction
First time posting on here. Go easy on me.
I’m a bit surprised at some negativity here on the brawl. Listen, this was just one of those series where it just wasn’t going to happen… big mo was working against the Rays, the good guys like completely lifeless, Pena lost, regression by Garza and Jack, Devil Rays-esque offense… just general badness. But Coco did the Rays a favor. The flight to Dallas was likely spirited, and a tight team became just a bit tighter. Got to look at the bigger picture than just this game and series. I sure wish Shieldsy had landed that shot… it just became my desktop wallpaper.
by gatorman2k2 on
Jun 6, 2008 8:27 AM EDT
reply
actions
1 recs
I'm not one of those who think this is going to sink our season
I knew this was going to be hard no matter what. The Red Sox are extremely hot in Boston right now, for whatever reason. No problem. We still have three series, including two in the Trop.
I myself think he should have stayed on the mound and put him in a headlock.

Do not think that what is hard for you to master is humanly impossible; but if a thing is humanly possible, consider it to be within your reach.
by Orlando Rays on
Jun 6, 2008 8:38 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What you say is true about the first two games, but my outrage is that we never even had a chance once Shields threw at Coco in the 2nd. We’ve seen this before, and I keep pointing to the Williams/Martinez game because this was pretty much a carbon copy. We go out there to make a statement by beating up the other team, the other team responds by beating us soundly in the game. And to top it off, the Red Sox did exactly what I said the Rays should have done. They had the game securely in hand, Lester was reaching the end of his time on the mound, and he used that time to throw at the players he felt were deserving of payback. The Red Sox didn’t suffer by waiting until they had a 7-1 lead and Lester was on the virge of coming out of the game yesterday.
There’s an old saying in hockey; “If you can’t beat ‘em, beat ‘em up.” This is the approach the Rays took, and it was wrong.
by kericr on
Jun 6, 2008 12:47 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Or the approach is...
“You are not going to try and hurt one of our player’s become of some perceived shady play, then go tell the media that you did it on purpose, then change your story and say something racist about the guy you tried to hurt, then come out after getting hit below the waist in the thigh with your fists up and expect nothing to happen”
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 1:01 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I just want to say one thing about the whole thing
Shields should have waited until later in the game, because you just knew if he plunked Crisp that the crap would hit the fan.
You have to try to win the game!!!! Asking your bullpen to go 8 innings is not wise.
With that said… Coco Crisp is a straight up poser-thug. Shields hit him with a slow pitch below the waist- If Crisp just takes it like a man and jogs to 1st (knowing he was going to get drilled at some point) the whole thing ends and we can play baseball. Instead he has a chip on his shoulder and thought he was going to go and “prove” himself a man. Once that all happened irrationalness took over from there, and you get what you get.
But- you have to try and win the game first, settle the score second, with a crappy relief pitcher, late in a game, not necessarily yesterday….
by Hazleton Jason on
Jun 6, 2008 9:10 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Not upset by the brawl
As much as it got out of hand, I bet the Sox and Yanks will think twice about sliding hard in 2nd base to retaliate (ala Crisp and Duncan) from now on.
Poor Aki, this is twice now he’s has been the one who has received the retaliation…he deserved to get in a shot or two.
Crisp is such a punk, if his hairline recedes anymore his weak dreads will simply fall off.
Jamie DeLuca
by JDeLuca on
Jun 6, 2008 9:32 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Aki did get his shots in
He got in there right after Gomes. He was pushed back a bit because Crawford kamakazied the pile, but Aki will get a few days off.
by kericr on
Jun 6, 2008 9:42 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Too bad...
Crisp isn’t a middle infielder. I’m sure he wouldn’t slide like that if he knew he could possibly take a spike to the thigh at second. I guess he’ll let Pedroia and Lugo worry about that stuff.
by rayweaver on
Jun 6, 2008 5:48 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
OT: Can someone get Beckham the right hat?
I can’t copy and paste the picture here for some reason, but Becks has an “old-school” Rays hat on in his picture on ESPN.com, I wonder if Friedman will fine him a dollar for wearing it… =)
by Hazleton Jason on
Jun 6, 2008 9:46 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
they should plunk Coco everytime they play
the sox from now on and stomp on his head when he charges the mound.
by Gator80 on
Jun 6, 2008 10:00 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
“We’ve been getting stomped around the last 10 years and that’s not going to happen any more”
It’s a nice sentiment, but if you want to do something about that 10 years of getting stomped, you can start by beating the team ahead of you in the division (a good start would be to not get your #2 pitcher ejected after one inning), not try to win a silly brawl war.
Longlorious.
by RATW on
Jun 6, 2008 10:18 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Even if Shields didn't give up another hit
we still would have lost…
by rglass44 on
Jun 6, 2008 10:23 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can’t argue with that.. seeing alternate futures is beyond my abilities.
Longlorious.
by RATW on
Jun 6, 2008 10:25 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My Take
I liked what Shields did. Even the Rem-dawg said it was the right move. I might have waited a litlle while, but the team was flat so maybe he wanted to inject some life into them. I was shocked that CoCo didn’t take his poison like a man, and trot down to first and try to steal second. IT SHOULD HAVE ENDED THERE. But, CoCo tried to be a bad-ass (I think his team was a bit unhappy with that) and charged the mound.
I disagree with what Gomes and CC did, but it is somewhat understandable. When somebody comes after your pitcher you teach them a lesson. The suspensions won’t hurt that bad because we can stagger them, and sit guys that wouldn’t play anyway.
Will this boost morale? Probably not. Will it make us a better team? Probably not? Would we have won the game had the brawl not happened? Probably not. I think one thing this did was assert that we are not gonna lay down. We’re gonna fight in the standings and on the field. You can’t walk all over us.
2 other things: What’s the deal w/ Ellsbury? How badly did he hurt his wrist? Do ya’ll think the Manny-Youklis fight will have any lasting effect on the clubhouse? The Idiots are gone from that clubhouse now. I hate Youks so much. Manny gets 5 Ribeyes in his first two ABs so Youks gets in his face. He’s such a douche.
by rglass44 on
Jun 6, 2008 10:23 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Somebody needed
to defend Aki, and Crisp is a punk who admitted that he was headhunting for Bartlett. Something needed to be done and the only regret is that Shields was the one who will be suspended (though i doubt his suspension will be over 5 games so he wont miss a start). Sometimes things like this helps a team’s morale and give them more of a sense of team unity which could be used as a catalyst to get us back into 1st. I’m sorry that you thought this was disgusting but this is part of baseball, maybe you should switch it up to badminton or curling if you don’t like it.
by ams05g on
Jun 6, 2008 10:25 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Per Buster Olney
The Rays and Red Sox brawled, in Day 2 of incidents between the teams, and Rays manager Joe Maddon said he was very happy with the way his team responded.
Some observations:
1. It was a little surprising to see Coco Crisp charge the mound, given that he had about 20 hours to prepare for the possibility. He had to know James Shields was probably going to plunk him. So long as Shields did not throw up by his head and instead hit him at the waist or lower, you figured he might jaw a little at the pitcher, jog to first base and then let his pitchers respond on his behalf later in the game. Instead, he's probably going to get suspended for five games, at least. The fight may win Crisp some friends, writes Rob Bradford.
2. Bob Watson, Major League Baseball's discipline chief, should throw the book at Jonny Gomes. The Rays' DH sprinted from the dugout intending only to harm, pigpiling onto Crisp from behind and throwing punches. In these situations, the hitter who is plunked is vastly outnumbered by opposing players on the field, which is probably part of the reason why MLB does not have a rule against players coming off the bench. But this should be exhibit A for a crackdown on third parties jumping into a brawl in the way Gomes did. MLB should give Gomes anything from six to eight games in a suspension, and make it clear that going forward, any third party jumping into a fight as aggressively as Gomes did will get 10 games. As salaries spiral upward, teams are being more and more protective of their talent, handling injuries cautiously, spending millions on medical treatment -- and it seems silly that some player might suffer a injury in a brawl, like Bill Lee in the Red Sox-Yankees fight of 1976 or Mike Mussina in a Seattle-Baltimore fight in 1993. Coming down hard on the actions of third parties in these fights is a good step toward cleaning up this stuff.
Shields all but acknowledged that he threw at Crisp intentionally, and you wonder if his honesty will cost him an extra game or two in his suspension. The Rays need to hold off on retaliation, writes Gary Shelton.
by rglass44 on
Jun 6, 2008 10:30 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
ehhh
The Rays and Red Sox brawled, in Day 2 of incidents between the teams, and Rays manager Joe Maddon said he was very happy with the way his team responded.
Some observations:
1. It was a little surprising to see Coco Crisp charge the mound, given that he had about 20 hours to prepare for the possibility. He had to know James Shields was probably going to plunk him. So long as Shields did not throw up by his head and instead hit him at the waist or lower, you figured he might jaw a little at the pitcher, jog to first base and then let his pitchers respond on his behalf later in the game. Instead, he’s probably going to get suspended for five games, at least. The fight may win Crisp some friends, writes Rob Bradford.
2. Bob Watson, Major League Baseball’s discipline chief, should throw the book at Jonny Gomes. The Rays’ DH sprinted from the dugout intending only to harm, pigpiling onto Crisp from behind and throwing punches. In these situations, the hitter who is plunked is vastly outnumbered by opposing players on the field, which is probably part of the reason why MLB does not have a rule against players coming off the bench. But this should be exhibit A for a crackdown on third parties jumping into a brawl in the way Gomes did. MLB should give Gomes anything from six to eight games in a suspension, and make it clear that going forward, any third party jumping into a fight as aggressively as Gomes did will get 10 games. As salaries spiral upward, teams are being more and more protective of their talent, handling injuries cautiously, spending millions on medical treatment—and it seems silly that some player might suffer a injury in a brawl, like Bill Lee in the Red Sox-Yankees fight of 1976 or Mike Mussina in a Seattle-Baltimore fight in 1993. Coming down hard on the actions of third parties in these fights is a good step toward cleaning up this stuff.
Shields all but acknowledged that he threw at Crisp intentionally, and you wonder if his honesty will cost him an extra game or two in his suspension. The Rays need to hold off on retaliation, writes Gary Shelton.
by rglass44 on
Jun 6, 2008 10:31 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
there we go
you just have to get rid of the tabs…
by rglass44 on
Jun 6, 2008 10:31 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
gimme a break,
umm, it’s a fight, the intent is to do harm, right? not like catastrophic harm, but some harm at least. getting on a bench player for intending to do harm in a fight” is a little moronic.
by davidsmarch on
Jun 6, 2008 10:50 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No
Bench players should come out to break up the fight. Coming out with the the intent to harm IS moronic. If everyone came out with intent to do harm you’d have a riot on your hands.
by floridaroar on
Jun 6, 2008 11:08 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
it's a "bench clearing brawl", meaning the benches clear too,
it’s not a “field players only brawl” or a “pitcher vs batter” brawl, it’s a team brawl. the whole team has to be involved, hell half the time even the bullpen guys run in from the pen, if the fights lasted long enough i’m sure they’d jump in too. just b/c you’re on the bench doesn’t mean that it’s not just AS IMPORTANT to show that you care just as much, i.e. notice how pissed off Youklis was last night that Manny took forever to get on the field?
by davidsmarch on
Jun 6, 2008 11:11 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Right.
Bench clearing means the players leave the bench to intervene, not to participate and throw blows. I think the word to describe the scenario you’re hoping for is “riot”.
by floridaroar on
Jun 6, 2008 11:15 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
no,
no one took bats, no one took chairs, no one took helmets. it’s wasn’t a riot, it was a fight, plain and simple, the way baseball fights are. it takes the same amount of time to get to the mound from the rays bench as it does from the sox bench, there is nothing wrong with participating in a fight when a fight is going on.
by davidsmarch on
Jun 6, 2008 11:29 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
there is nothing wrong with participating in a fight when a fight is going on.
That’s about the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. “Oh look a fight! I gotta get in on that!”
Also, you don’t need to use a bat or chair in a fight for it to be a riot. If everyone came out of the dugout with the mentality that there is nothing wrong with participating in a fight if a fight is going on then you’d have a riot on your hands. It wouldn’t take long until it spilled over into the stands and then well… you’d have a basketball game.
Here’s the definition of riot according to Merriam Webster:
a: public violence, tumult, or disorder b: a violent public disorder; specifically : a tumultuous disturbance of the public peace by three or more persons assembled together and acting with a common intent
Let’s see… Gomes+Crawford+Aki, all trying to harm Coco = Riot. No chairs needed.
by floridaroar on
Jun 6, 2008 1:06 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ellsbury's wrist
I really hope he is sidelined for a couple of weeks.
PS This isn’t cheering an injury, it is merely hoping they give a young player the proper rest he deserves.
If he hits the DL they will be banged up pretty bad.
by rglass44 on
Jun 6, 2008 10:34 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I wouldn't want that to happen to any of our guys.
He’s a hell of a defensive player.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 10:36 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"PS This isn’t cheering an injury, it is merely hoping they give a young player the proper rest he deserves."
So is charging the mound or cheering for the Sawx.
by rglass44 on
Jun 6, 2008 10:47 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You're wrong,
this is not in any way a low point, or a disgrace. this is a high point, and should be looked at as another step to building up this teams camaraderie and self-image. I know some of the mods on this site are against even bean-ball retaliation, so i don’t expect you all to be for a full out brawl, but this was indeed necessary. if what this team needs to to feel disrespected, to have that chip on their shoulder, then they need to be able to stand up for each other whenever the players see it as necessary, to build that brotherhood, that trust, that bond. we all know that the game is a very high percentage mental, retaliating to a dirty play is part of that mentality, and absolutely the correct thing to do.
by davidsmarch on
Jun 6, 2008 10:48 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Definitely my opinion is wrong.
And hell, all those teams in the past wouldn’t have won 60 something games if the fights didn’t occur, they may have only won 50.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 10:58 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If you let players....
take shots at your teammates and do nothing, it will lead to a fractured clubhouse. That is something that is permanent. Suspensions are temporary but can be overcome.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 11:03 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Winning is the best mender for bruised egos.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 11:07 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ask the Yanks about that
They had a lot of issues because the players felt that they could be hit w/o any retaliation from their pitching staff.
by rglass44 on
Jun 6, 2008 11:11 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
1 recs
It really hurt their performance.. all the way to the playoffs
Longlorious.
by RATW on
Jun 6, 2008 11:15 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You mean Shane Spencer didn't do stuff like this?

"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 11:23 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
great teams can win with a fractured club house,
but good teams need a united team in order to succeed.
by davidsmarch on
Jun 6, 2008 11:13 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
1 recs
Suspensions are temporary but can be overcome.
But loses are permanent.
What if one of our guys got seriously injured? Could we overcome that?
I have no problem with Shields throwing at Cocoa. It’s the mob mentality and piling on afterwords that I take issue with. I think most here feel the same way.
by floridaroar on
Jun 6, 2008 11:11 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If Shields tears something we're done. That simple.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 11:17 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You can't guarantee his health.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 11:18 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Death and taxes brother...
No use worrying about what could’ve happened. It will be years before something like this involving the Rays happens.
Can we get back to an EJax vs. Sonny debate, or do everyone agree that right now they both suck?
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 12:23 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So wait
If you jump off the Skyway bridge, and don’t die, was it worth it because you somehow survived in the face of all the risks? That’s an absurd proposition, you absolutely worry about what could have happened because some risks just aren’t worth taking. They’re not smart.
by Patrick L. Kennedy on
Jun 6, 2008 7:52 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And they lost the game...
when they pitched to Manny with first base open. Those were the game winning runs.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 11:17 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Those were the game winning runs when we had to go to our pen for 8 innings.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 11:19 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Was Shields....
going to be able to get runs taken off the board?
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 11:20 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He wouldn't have allowed four more.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 11:20 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That wouldn't...
have changed our lack of runs.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 11:22 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It may have changed the fact that we quit last night.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 11:23 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Shields line from his last start at Fenway
3.2 IP, 7ER, 10 H, 3 BB, 3 K, L
by rglass44 on
Jun 6, 2008 11:26 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
RIght. That has zero bearing.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 11:31 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"He wouldn't have allowed four more."
My point was that he allowed 7 his last time out in Boston, so how can you say he wouldn’t do it this time?
by rglass44 on
Jun 6, 2008 11:34 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I have confidence in Shields.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 11:54 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
2nd and 3rd...
1 out in the 4th, and we can’t get them in doesn’t seem like we quit. Couldn’t hit with RISP, yes.
And the score was 4-1, not out of reach.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 11:26 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
8 innings of pen work isn't helpful.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 11:31 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
that may be the only valid point you are making,
but still a very weak one.
by davidsmarch on
Jun 6, 2008 11:33 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good response
And I especially like how you substantiate your conclusion.
by Patrick L. Kennedy on
Jun 6, 2008 7:53 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It isn't helpful...
but the walks out of the pen are what hurt more than the ejection. Well that and next to zero offensive production.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 11:36 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Meaning less pen = less walks.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 11:54 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ah, yes… wasn’t that when Cliff Floyd came up to bat.. in Jonny Gomes spot.. vs. a LHP, and struck out on three pitches.. perhaps Gomes would have done better.. we’ll never know.
Longlorious.
by RATW on
Jun 6, 2008 11:48 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I would say it's abour 50/50...
on the mob mentality. Coco ran out to hurt Shields.
Winning would have been great, but you can’t gaurantee a win.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 11:15 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Coco ran out to make a point and show his clubhouse that he's willing to stand up for himself and nobody is punking him.
At least that’s how some of you would defend it that would seem.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 11:16 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nope, you can't guarantee a win
But losing your most consistent starting pitcher early in the game and having to rely on shaky long relievers is a good way to guarantee a loss.
by floridaroar on
Jun 6, 2008 11:18 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The offense was essentially intact...
and the Red Sox already had scored the game winning runs.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 11:19 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's not a good reason for us to toss the game.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 11:21 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's not tossing the game...
where are the runs that would have allowed us to win if Shields was in. We didn’t score any. If we had lost 7-4 I could see the point, but we didn’t score.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 11:24 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
agreed,
getting tossed doesn’t throw the game, it hardly affects it, especially when the bullpen doesn’t blow up and give up a ton more runs. we didn’t score runs, plain and simple, lester took care of us.
we didn’t quit, we hit plenty, as many hits as the sox, just not at very good times, or with RISP.
by davidsmarch on
Jun 6, 2008 11:31 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And we should have been able to score some runs...
with that patchwork defense in the outfield.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 11:37 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Do me a favor guys
“Sometimes things like this helps a team’s morale and give them more of a sense of team unity which could be used as a catalyst to get us back into 1st.”
When the rays end the season behind boston, when their season goes down the drain, will you admit this is bullshit? That you’re just talking out of your ass?
by gs on
Jun 6, 2008 11:46 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
You apparently high standards.
Most of us would take an 88 win year as a success.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 11:55 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He's not a Rays fan
He’s a troll that goes around talking ish on other people’s sites. Look at his only post not on this thread. Its inciting Rangers fans.
by rglass44 on
Jun 6, 2008 11:58 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's kinda my point on how losing one game won't affect us...
It’s very unlikely that we will finish out of the playoffs by less than one win. And you can’t pinpoint a season on one game.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 12:31 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This is going to cost us more than one game
Count on that. The Rays have a lot of player suspensions coming. Shields is gone for a start, Crawford, Aki, and Gomes are going to be gone for several games, I’m pretty sure we’re going to lose Aybar and Jackson too if my eyes do not decieve me. The Sox on the other hand, are going to lose Crisp, their 3rd base coach for a game, and Francona and Lester might get fined but not suspended. With Pena, Gomes, Aybar and Crawford all out, we have no outfielders or 1st basemen coming off the bench because Gross and Ruggs and Hinske will have to start every game while they’re all out.
In terms of not pinpointing the season on one game, if the Rays finish this road trip 1-8 or 2-7 and end up out of the wildcard by one or two games, this game will be the catalyst for that result on the road trip.
by kericr on
Jun 6, 2008 12:40 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A lot of assuptions there...
I would be surprised, though not shocked if Aki got suspended. Suspensions are nearly definite for Crawford, Shields, and Gomes. I’ve watched the tape a few teams and have only seen Aybar pulling people off. Shields and Gomes will probably get the same amount of games (I’m think 7 or 8), Crawford 3, and if Aki gets suspended for anything more than a game it’s ridiculous.
The Red Sox are going to be without Crisp (at least as long as Gomes and Shields), they are missing Ellsbury, and Ortiz and Matsuzaka are out.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 12:53 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes I'm making a lot of assumptions
But I’m basing it on history. Yes, this isn’t supposed to be the same team, but yesterday the Rays looked a hell of a lot like the Devil Rays. I’ll be more than happy to admit I’m wrong if I am, but if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, guess what it is?
by kericr on
Jun 6, 2008 1:01 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
How did they look like the old Devil Rays...
by sticking up for a teammate?
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 1:02 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
By doing so at an inappropriate time, then getting thrashed in the game
by kericr on
Jun 6, 2008 1:03 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The appropriate time....
is right away. That’s how it is in baseball clubhouses if you want to keep the respect of your teammates. If you wait till later and the Rays are still losing to 7-1, it looks like they are taking out their frustrations of a series sweep by hitting guys, which is classless.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 1:07 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's not true
First, since you and others keep saying this, there is no way that anybody could possibly know that the Rays would be down 7-1 if Shields doesn’t throw at Crisp in the 2nd. Maybe Shields holds the score closer. Maybe Lester isn’t as focused on the mound and the Rays get to him for more runs. We don’t know. Stop making that assumption, it’s wrong.
Secondly, Crisp, Shields, Maddon, Francona, the Rays announcers, the Sox announcers, and Ted Williams’ floating cryogenically frozen head knew that Crisp was going to get hit. I still contend that you wait until there is an opportunte time in that game to throw at Crisp. If you choose, say the 6th inning to throw at Crisp, whether or not the Rays are up 7-1, the Sox are up 7-1, or if it’s tied 3-3 and Shields is up to around 100 pitches, those are all appropriate times. I agree with you to the extent that Coco had to get hit that game, but not that early.
by kericr on
Jun 6, 2008 1:17 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Clarifying my counterpoint to you
Waiting until the 6th assuming the Rays are down 7-1 and throwing at Crisp indicates that they concede the game is over and it’s payback time. Throwing at someone else, say, Manny Ramierez would have been sour grapes.
by kericr on
Jun 6, 2008 1:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Actually it is true...
all the players and staff’s on both teams knew exactly when Coco was going to get hit. The Sox players didn’t want to get into this all because one of their teammates was acting like a jerkoff. He should have taken the drilling and jogged to first. Watch the videos below and hear what the ESPN color guy says about Coco’s slide. Then watch this one, the guy is chicken shit.
href=”http://blog.masslive.com/redsoxmonster/2008/06/cocos_not_down_with_that_shady.html#more” target=”_blank”>
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 1:41 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No sound at work
But hearing ESPN’s commentators isn’t going to change my opinion, I had the same opinion of what should have went down yesterday before the game as I do right now, all the way down to prediecting how the rest of the game would play out if the Rays didn’t do things the way I thought they should’ve. I understand where you’re coming from as to when, I just don’t agree with you. Let’s just concede to different opinions on this.
by kericr on
Jun 6, 2008 1:53 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Only if you concede first...
J/K. I think it was Sutcliffe, but basically he says that he’s got what’s coming to him, and that Coco is bush for sliding like that. Baseball is very predictable as far as actions go, results not so much. If you’re around baseball players a lot, I was hanging out with some friends who’ve played professionally last night and we were all saying here it comes.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 2:14 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
God, I just watched it again....
Gomes had to have been at the top step. He get’s there the same time as Bartlett and Aki.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 12:57 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Gomes has wheels
And there are several things around these boards about various parts of him composed of concrete.
by kericr on
Jun 6, 2008 1:02 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He definitely had two punches in before Aki got there...
and Aybar threw no punches. He was separating guys.
by WillisDaddy on
Jun 6, 2008 1:08 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Big assumption that this leads to more losses
I’d argue that this brawl will lead the Rays to more victories. An united and strong clubhouse means a heck of a lot more than a few days suspended or one single loss. A heck of a lot more.
by matthan on
Jun 6, 2008 1:15 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
The Sox are the last people who can complain about this, and the first that can claim the benefits

Do not think that what is hard for you to master is humanly impossible; but if a thing is humanly possible, consider it to be within your reach.
by Orlando Rays on
Jun 6, 2008 1:34 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
How many times did they fight last year?
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on
Jun 6, 2008 4:28 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm referring to 2004
Do not think that what is hard for you to master is humanly impossible; but if a thing is humanly possible, consider it to be within your reach.
by Orlando Rays on
Jun 6, 2008 5:24 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs














