GIDP %
|
Player |
GIDP |
1-- |
12- |
123 |
0 out |
1 out |
2 out |
<2 out % |
GIDP opps |
GIDP% |
|
Shields |
16 |
123 |
30 |
4 |
240 |
225 |
223 |
65.12% |
102.2 |
15.65% |
|
Jackson |
22 |
133 |
34 |
6 |
221 |
197 |
192 |
63.77% |
110.3 |
19.94% |
|
Kazmir |
2 |
104 |
17 |
6 |
166 |
156 |
161 |
65.63% |
83.4 |
2.40% |
|
Sonnanstine |
12 |
99 |
34 |
5 |
235 |
208 |
201 |
63.51% |
87.6 |
13.69% |
|
Garza |
19 |
122 |
45 |
12 |
235 |
197 |
192 |
62.34% |
111.6 |
17.03% |
|
Percy |
0 |
26 |
3 |
2 |
52 |
60 |
45 |
66.88% |
20.7 |
0.00% |
|
Miller |
4 |
29 |
9 |
7 |
56 |
46 |
40 |
60.56% |
27.3 |
14.68% |
|
Wheeler |
2 |
36 |
9 |
9 |
67 |
77 |
69 |
68.54% |
37.0 |
5.40% |
|
Howell |
6 |
51 |
17 |
14 |
97 |
100 |
94 |
66.67% |
54.7 |
10.98% |
|
Balfour |
0 |
20 |
15 |
7 |
40 |
56 |
61 |
74.52% |
31.3 |
0.00% |
|
Hammel |
6 |
47 |
22 |
7 |
104 |
98 |
86 |
63.89% |
48.6 |
12.36% |
|
Total |
89 |
790 |
235 |
79 |
1513 |
1420 |
1364 |
64.79% |
715.3 |
12.44% |
|
Team |
103 |
877 |
290 |
100 |
1660 |
1570 |
1520 |
65.05% |
824.2 |
12.50% |
|
League Avg. |
3031 |
26745 |
10530 |
4005 |
50632 |
48776 |
47276 |
65.48% |
27031.1 |
11.21% |
Here is a chart showing the GIDP% from each of our pitchers and the staff as a whole for this year. I included the guys on the roster w/ more than 20 IP.
The formulas are as follows:
<2 outs %=(0 out + 1 out)/(0 out + 1 out + 2 out)
GIDP opps= (Man on first + Men on first and second+ bases loaded) X <2 out %
GIDP % = GIDPs/ GIDP opps.
That is pretty rudimentary because I couldn't find a stat for men on first, first and second, and bases loaded w/ less than 2 outs.
Now that I added the team vs. league average, it is clear that we are above average at turning the DP. Either are pitchers induce more GBs than average or are fielders are more adept at actually turning 2. I'll get on looking at how GB% effects the players later, and maybe I'll look at how are team fares this year compared to last.
This post was written by a member of the DRaysBay community and does not necessarily express the views or opinions of DRaysBay staff.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
good stuff
not a bad estimate of GIDP opportunities, although you’re right that having the actual number is better.
can you add something? how about GIDPs induced compared to average? simply do:
(pitcherGIDP% – leagueGIDP%)*opportunities
I think you could get leagueGIDP% from BPro or at least get a very good estimate from hitters who are right near 0 for normDP with a lot of chances. (simply DP/chances for them).
______________
mildly related note: defense-independent stats that include GB% (like xFIP and tRA) already build in an advantage for groundball pitchers. unless you believe some pitchers have an ability to induce extra groundballs when they need it (and maybe this is a very small effect), then you don’t need to additionally incorporate GIDP data when judging a pitcher. this is just a really good way to see how much it matters.
______________
here’s an idea for a study: compare GIDP% to groundballs across years. see if any pitchers have a GIDP skill that goes beyond GB%.
my blog // calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy // past results do not guarantee future performance
here’s an idea for a study: compare GIDP% to groundballs across years. see if any pitchers have a GIDP skill that goes beyond GB%.
Off-hand I’d assume you’d see a reverse-correlation to Ks.
Last night I fiddled around with it a bit and ran a regression
Then this morning I found stats on BP for DP opportunities. So my plan is to get 3 years of data for GIDP% and run regressions on K-rate, GB-rate, and Defensive Efficiency to see if there is some GIDP skill. I’ll make a fanpost about it in the next couple of days.
looking forward to it
how about the +/- GIDPs compared to average for pitchers?
my blog // calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy // past results do not guarantee future performance
Could you remove Ks from the equation
Take out the instances when a pitcher K’d a batter and see what happened when the ball was put in play?
I imagine it would be a tedious undertaking but may help put strikeout pitchers on a more even ground.
Very interesting stuff.
I don't have firm data for Ks in those situations
So, I am going to look at K-rate as a variable on GIDP%.

by 




















