FJM on Barty MVP
There's a reason I've ignored this, and that's because I'm waiting for the voters to yell "April Fools!" If that's not the case then lord help us all.
9 months ago
R.J. Anderson
113 comments
1 recs |
Comments
It doesn't look like they linked it
until we get corroboration I’m going to assume it is a sick joke. I’m pretty torn between Shields, Pena, Upton, and Longoria (in no certain order).
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind.
by Sandy Kazmir on
Sep 23, 2008 2:48 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
No, it's real.
I’m just hoping the Tampa BBWAA are the funniest bastards in the land. Otherwise they might be the dumbest.
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 23, 2008 3:05 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
why is this so far off?
Do we make the playoffs with Brendan Harris as our starting short stop?
Rays 2009 Slogan: "Come back with your shield or on it"
by PriceMultiCyYoungs on
Sep 23, 2008 3:32 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Because Jason Bartlett isn't our most valuable player...?
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 23, 2008 3:32 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I dont know that he should win the award
but calling it a joke is a bit much, no?
Rays 2009 Slogan: "Come back with your shield or on it"
by PriceMultiCyYoungs on
Sep 23, 2008 3:33 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Joe Maddon admitted it himself
at the all star break he said JP and Barty were the team’s MVP. There’s got to something else about the guy that we’re not seeing.
by atlantaray on
Sep 23, 2008 4:51 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
it's not funny, but it's also stupid
Barty’s missed serious time. He hasn’t hit all that well. And his fielding has been good, not phenomenal. Any replacement-level shmuch would have been an upgrade over Harris, so giving Barty extra credit for replacing him is a poor idea. Shields, Pena, Longoria and Upton have all been in the +4 wins range this year. Bartlett’s like +1.5 wins. Floyd, Hinske, Gross, and Aybar are all in that neighborhood. Gross for MVP!
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on
Sep 23, 2008 8:17 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Meh,
personally, I would have give it to Pena.
by Vin on
Sep 23, 2008 3:00 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
You cannot go wrong if you vote for Pena/Longoria/Upton.
Bartlett is just about the worst choice to make.
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 23, 2008 3:06 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Crawford
Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.
by P Brady on
Sep 23, 2008 3:07 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Crawford's been just as valuable, maybe a tick more so
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on
Sep 23, 2008 8:18 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
actually, no
if by “just about the worst choice” you actually mean one of the top five choices along with longo, pena, upton, and Navi then you would be right.
While I won’t argue that Pena deserved it more, arguments can be made for JB. In fact, Maddon named him one of the first half MVPs.
FJM is a depressing site to read. Also, Longo, Upton, Pena, and Navi have all missed games this year. So there goes one of his arguments out the door. Also, why dismiss JB’s defense. A good defensive shortstop should not be underestimated in run prevention. This is an MVP award, not a best offensive player award.
by RaysTheRoof on
Sep 23, 2008 3:12 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
1 recs
Just to clarify
I’m not saying JB deserved it over Pena or Longo, but to act like its a “joke” or some kind of “atrocity” is just foolish and one-sided. Defense is a major part of baseball people.
by RaysTheRoof on
Sep 23, 2008 3:13 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes but aren't Longo/Pena/Upton just as solid on defense?
by steve-o1285 on
Sep 23, 2008 3:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe
But shortstop is a position that is more difficult to play. CF is the only other position that compares.
by RaysTheRoof on
Sep 23, 2008 3:21 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yes, but 3B is only a half-win behind and the corner OF spots are a win behind.
I’m as big of a fan of defense as anyone, but Bartlett’s advantage there isn’t all that big (like, nothing over BJ, half a win over Longoria, and a win over Pena) and there’s a gigantic gap on offense.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on
Sep 23, 2008 8:20 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Actually what I meant was what I said.
The triumvirate are all equal or better at defense and far superior offensively.
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 23, 2008 3:20 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"Bartlett is just about the worst choice to make."
That statement is simply erroneous. He is worse than Aki, Gross, Gomes, Ruggi, Floyd, etc etc?
Bottom line: He has been one of the 5 best position players on the team this year. Thus, not one of the worst choices.
by RaysTheRoof on
Sep 23, 2008 3:23 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Based on what has he been one of the five best?
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 23, 2008 3:24 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Who are you arguing over him?
He is an everyday player at the most challenging defensive position in baseball.
by RaysTheRoof on
Sep 23, 2008 3:27 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i've mentioned this above, but he has NOT been better, overall, than Aki, Gross, or Floyd.
go here. it’s pretty good. disagreeing with the numbers (especially the fielding numbers) is fine, but at least we’ve got a starting point:
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pfk_WuYpfdux2FC_hs6ROEQ&gid=1
(yes, I realize it’s almost three weeks old, but still)
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on
Sep 23, 2008 8:22 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Gross only plays against righties
If Jb only played against lefties his numbers would be better too. But he plays everyday. You can’t compare a platoon guy to an everyday guy.
by RaysTheRoof on
Sep 23, 2008 11:22 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
his rate stats would be better, but you accumulate value by playing time, too
as long as you’re hitting above replacement value as a lefty hitter, you’re adding value to the team. and as long as your fielding makes up for hitting below replacement level as a lefty hitter, you’re still adding value.
if JB only played against lefties, he’d have like 150 plate appearances, which would not increase his value.
i agree there are issues with platoon players. and perhaps Gross isn’t as valuable as Bartlett because he’s been able to check out against many lefties. but it’s still close.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on
Sep 23, 2008 11:59 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Why don't you guys see Bartlett's true value on the infield?
I’m assuming we’ve all watched the team with and without Bartlett. I’m not going to preach because I’ve done it before, and it apparently fell on deaf ears. Bartlett is the glue to that defense. Some people don’t believe that one guy can affect the play of the entire defense, but to those people and the douche on FJM, I say, “Watch the team with Bartlett, and then watch the team without him.” It’s obvious how much he kicks ass.
by rayweaver on
Sep 23, 2008 3:16 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Okay, so because Bartlett's replacements suck we should consider him the MVP?
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 23, 2008 3:24 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That would mean he would be a more valuable player...
if we had to start zobrist or aybar there all season then I think that should be factored in.
by RaysTheRoof on
Sep 23, 2008 3:25 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Disagreed completely.
When judging a player’s value I’m looking at what that player does, not what his replacement would do.
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 23, 2008 3:27 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
How do the writers determine an MVP?
What is an MVP to them? They try to determine whether a team would be as good if it didn’t have certain players? Of those few players, they determine who’s absence from the team would most greatly affect the team negatively. For those of you who actually made it to Saturday’s game, when Topkin gave Bartlett the award, he emphasized the defensive aspect of Bartlett’s game. So most likely, the writers felt Bartlett’s defense, not to mention his improved second half hitting, outweighed the value of Longoria’s off/def and Pena’s off/def to this team. It’s not like it was a runaway vote either. Longoria and Pena finished 2nd and third with 33 and 27 points, respectively, to Bartlett’s 40. Most likely, if Pena could have hit better and struck out less over the whole season, or if Longo could have stayed healthy, either one of those guys would have beat out Bartlett.
by rayweaver on
Sep 23, 2008 5:17 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's no slight to the Barty that I consider him 8th-10th in value to this team. #1 certainly not, >10 certainly not
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind.
by Sandy Kazmir on
Sep 23, 2008 3:33 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Defense
Please stop underestimating its importance.
Shortstop: Please stop underestimating its difficulty.
by RaysTheRoof on
Sep 23, 2008 3:38 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
You're talking to the wrong guys about underrating defense.
Perhaps you should look at his numbers yourself. RZR has him as one of the worst starters and his OOZ plays are middle of the road. I love the guy and agree that without him we are not as good of a team, but stop arguing that his defense makes up for his stick enough that he is more deserving than Longo, Carlos, Beej, or Shields
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind.
by Sandy Kazmir on
Sep 23, 2008 3:42 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Dude
I never said he deserved the MVP. All I said was it wasn’t a “joke” and he wasn’t “one of the worst choices.”
by RaysTheRoof on
Sep 23, 2008 3:44 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Okay, one of the worst might be hyperbolic.
But I think you can, and I could, make the case he’s anywhere from 7th-10th.
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 23, 2008 3:45 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I thought joke was a step up from
disgraceful
malicious
repugnant
pathetic
Don’t be so defensive there is a certain amount of exaggeration on this board.
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind.
by Sandy Kazmir on
Sep 23, 2008 3:49 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not trying to be defensive
Just trying to defend my position.
by RaysTheRoof on
Sep 23, 2008 3:50 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
...that sentence gave me a headache.
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind.
by Sandy Kazmir on
Sep 23, 2008 3:51 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Okay, so I ran the #s on SSes with 500+ Innings
And Bartlett is 14th defensively, about 0.27th of a play better than the average SS of the 29. That’s obviously not average, since we’re talking about starters only.
For those wondering, from top defensive value, down:
Vizquel
Izturis
Hardy
Aviles
Berroa
Escobar
Wilson
Rollins
Aybar
Pena
Tejada
Guzman
Greene
Bartlett
Cabrera
Ramirez
Tulowitzki
Young
Crosby
Drew
Reyes
Theriot
Keppinger
Jeter
Peralta
Renteria
Lugo
Betancourt
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 23, 2008 3:38 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Note: Aybar is obviously E. Aybar, not W. Aybar.
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 23, 2008 3:39 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Carlos played a little six hole in his day, but this isn't that day, so yes.
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 23, 2008 3:41 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Any metric that says Christian Guzman is a beter SS than Jason Bartlett is a bad one.
Tools Whore
Sign Bonds!
by Tyler on
Sep 23, 2008 4:56 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You're a bad one.
Guzman’s probably got a better RZR, I’d have to double check.
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 23, 2008 4:59 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
WTF is this.
I’m just supposed to believe some random list with no explanation as to its rankings.
by RaysTheRoof on
Sep 23, 2008 3:41 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bro it's the same we've been using all season:
Plays in Zone + Out of Zone Plays/Chances in Zone.
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 23, 2008 3:42 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't believe these rankings, but lets say they are correct
Based on who would be replacing him with internally he is rather valuable. Also, even with this ranking he is one of the five best positional players on the team this season
by RaysTheRoof on
Sep 23, 2008 3:45 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He is very valuable...
But being one of the team’s top-5 fielders is not enough for MVP consideration.
by steve-o1285 on
Sep 23, 2008 3:49 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No trying to be a dick
But I really don’t understand how the out of zone metric is compiled…I can see a huge number of problems with this stat
by RaysTheRoof on
Sep 23, 2008 3:49 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Offensively, ranked by GPA for SSs with 200+ PAs so we have ~30 entrants again.
Ramirez
Reyes
Hardy
Guzman
Aviles
Peralta
Jeter
Escobar
Drew
Rollins
Theriot
Punto
Tejada
Harris
Aybar
Renteria
Izturis
Eckstein
Bartlett
Young
Scutaro
Cabrera
Crosby
Lugo
Wilson
Betancourt
Izturis
Tulowitzki
Greene
Keppinger
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 23, 2008 3:50 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Formula for GPA remains 1.8*OBP + SLG
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 23, 2008 3:52 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Interesting
Surprised Izturis is higher
by RaysTheRoof on
Sep 23, 2008 3:52 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bartlett is an above average fielder and a below average hitter.
That may or may not even out. My point is that the triumvirate is equal on defense (although you have a very good point on positional adjustments) but far better offensively.
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 23, 2008 3:54 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
GPA for JB post all start break
1.11 = solid
admittedly he sucked with the bad the first half.
by RaysTheRoof on
Sep 23, 2008 3:57 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well yeah, you can't just take one half and pretend the other didn't exist.
Although some (perhaps all) of his first half struggles were bad luck. He’s not an offensive powerhouse though but overall an above average SS.
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 23, 2008 4:00 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Interesting I thought
second half GPAs
Upton – 1.079
Pena – 1.35
Longo – 1.201
Gross – 1.12
Navin .944
JB – 1.11
With his position being of high difficulty I would say he is legitimately in the mix for best player in the second half although I would give it to Upton.
by RaysTheRoof on
Sep 23, 2008 4:04 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wait, are you dividing it by four?
I know that part originally got cut off so my mistake.
OBP times 1.8 + SLG / 4
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 23, 2008 4:05 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
shit
didn’t calculate correctly. give me a minute
by RaysTheRoof on
Sep 23, 2008 4:06 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
is that
((OBP*1.8)+SLG)/4
or (OBP*1.8) + (SLG/4)
by RaysTheRoof on
Sep 23, 2008 4:15 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's Navin Johnson right
Prally under 1.00 cuz he just learned to dance
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind.
by Sandy Kazmir on
Sep 23, 2008 4:05 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He hates these cans. Stay away from the cans!!!
by RATW on
Sep 23, 2008 4:59 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Great flick
nice recognition
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind.
by Sandy Kazmir on
Sep 24, 2008 12:44 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm assuming it is the former not the latter equation
upton – .270
JB – .276
longo – .290
navi – .236
pena – .336
gross — .279
so jb compares favorably esp. based on difficulty of his position
by RaysTheRoof on
Sep 23, 2008 4:20 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Oh, and for the rcord? Clutchiness does exist.
/cue another 100 posts
by ReasonableDoubt on
Sep 23, 2008 3:55 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Philadelphians boo Jimmy Rollins
So dumb.
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind.
by Sandy Kazmir on
Sep 23, 2008 4:02 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Somewhere someone is saying the same thing about booing B.J. Upton.
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 23, 2008 4:05 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah but he's lazy what's Jimbo ever done?
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind.
by Sandy Kazmir on
Sep 23, 2008 4:06 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Philadelphians would throw batteries at Jesus for blocking their view
/grew up near Philly
by ReasonableDoubt on
Sep 23, 2008 4:06 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Who are the members of the Tampa chapter of the BBWAA?
Is this public knowledge?
Joe
by joedobr on
Sep 23, 2008 4:10 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
So uh...you guys don't think Bartlett is a good MVP choice?
by kericr on
Sep 23, 2008 4:14 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Plus this.
http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/09/23/bartlett-equals-skippy/
Tools Whore
Sign Bonds!
by Tyler on
Sep 23, 2008 4:58 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
dills (Chicago): Some of those AL MVP voters just voted Jason Bartlett as the Rays MVP… “The Rays improved dramatically on defense this season, and the biggest single reason was shortstop Jason Bartlett. Consequently, Bartlett has been voted the team’s most valuable player by the Tampa Bay chapter of the Baseball Writers Association of America.”
Joe Sheehan: If this isn’t a joke…wow. Bartlett isn’t the MVP of the left side of the infield.
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 23, 2008 4:59 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wow, he's -1 on the Dewan scale?
In the past he’s scored very well on it.
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 23, 2008 5:00 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Am I just as retarded if I say Howell was the MVP
Just curious. He only pitched about 80 innings, and they weren’t the highest leverage of innings, but he’s just about the only player on the team who consistently played at a top level for the full year.
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on
Sep 23, 2008 6:03 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Is there any listing of how the other chapters voted?
Boom. Outta Here.
by WillisDaddy on
Sep 23, 2008 7:10 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Justin's stats as of September 22
includes offense, position, and fielding. these stats might not be what you prefer to use (no clutchiness, for example), but they’re a good start. and if you like to use subjective criteria, you obviously won’t stop with these stats, but they’re a good start. Bartlett ranks 16th. There are nine players who are at least ten runs better.
42 Shields James A TB
41 Longoria Evan TB
41 Pena Carlos TB
38 Sonnanstine Andy TB
37 Upton B.J. TB
31 Garza Matt TB
26 Navarro Dioner F TB
25 Iwamura Akinori TB
25 Kazmir Scott E TB
19 Balfour Grant TB
18 Gross Gabe J TB
17 Crawford Carl TB
17 Aybar Willy TB
16 Jackson Edwin TB
13 Howell J.P. TB
13 Bartlett Jason A TB
12 Hinske Eric TB
10 Floyd Cliff TB
5 Miller Trever TB
4 Zobrist Ben T TB
4 Perez Fernando TB
3 Baldelli Rocco TB
2 Birkins Kurt D TB
2 DiFelice Mike TB
2 Reyes Al TB
1 Johnson Dan R TB
1 Wheeler Dan TB
0 Ryu Jae Kuk TB
0 Glover Gary TB
0 Dohmann Scott TB
0 Cannizaro Andy L TB
0 Jaso John TB
-1 Hernandez Michel TB
-1 Riggans Shawn W TB
-1 Ruggiano Justin M TB
-2 Haynes Nathan R TB
-2 Niemann Jeffrey W TB
-2 Brignac Reid TB
-3 Johnson Elliot T TB
-3 Gomes Jonny TB
-5 Hammel Jason A TB
-14 Percival Troy TB
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on
Sep 24, 2008 12:12 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
if you use ERA instead of FIP for the pitchers, the list looks like this:
45 Shields James A TB
42 Garza Matt TB
41 Longoria Evan TB
41 Pena Carlos TB
37 Upton B.J. TB
29 Sonnanstine Andy TB
29 Kazmir Scott E TB
26 Navarro Dioner F TB
25 Iwamura Akinori TB
23 Balfour Grant TB
20 Howell J.P. TB
19 Jackson Edwin TB
18 Gross Gabe J TB
17 Crawford Carl TB
17 Aybar Willy TB
15 Wheeler Dan TB
13 Bartlett Jason A TB
12 Hinske Eric TB
10 Floyd Cliff TB
4 Birkins Kurt D TB
4 Zobrist Ben T TB
4 Perez Fernando TB
3 Miller Trever TB
3 Baldelli Rocco TB
2 Percival Troy TB
2 Reyes Al TB
2 DiFelice Mike TB
1 Johnson Dan R TB
1 Ryu Jae Kuk TB
0 Cannizaro Andy L TB
0 Jaso John TB
-1 Hernandez Michel TB
-1 Niemann Jeffrey W TB
-1 Riggans Shawn W TB
-1 Ruggiano Justin M TB
-2 Haynes Nathan R TB
-2 Dohmann Scott TB
-2 Brignac Reid TB
-2 Hammel Jason A TB
-3 Johnson Elliot T TB
-3 Gomes Jonny TB
-5 Glover Gary TB
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on
Sep 24, 2008 12:14 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bartlett, in summary
.282 AVG
.323 OBP
.358 SLG
83 OPS+
That’s not very good, even below average for a shortstop. And with only 476 plate apperances, he’s played 70% of a season. On defense, he’s rated as about average as a shortstop by combined zone ratings this year. That might be low, but he’s not a gold glover. As an above-average shortstop, he’s maybe +5 runs in the 70% of the season he’s played. With a 5 run bonus for actually playing shortstop, he’s a step above average as a player overall. But in partial playing time, he’s no better than an average shortstop over a full year.
Take an average shortstop and put him on a playoff team — is he going to be an MVP candidate of the team? No way. The Rays have a handful of hitters who are more valuable and a handful of pitchers who are more valuable. He’s been good and much better than Brendan Harris, but he’s not in the Rays top ten of MVPs this year, by an objective measure of production.
Also, I’m not a Bartlett hater. I believe he can hit better and field a bit better. He can also stay in the lineup all year. He can be much better than average, maybe even a borderline All-Star. He just hasn’t been that guy this year.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on
Sep 24, 2008 12:20 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Does anyone have anything good to say about Bartlett?
Would this team be as successful without him? You can’t compare him to other SS in the league who may be better offensively and/or defensively. That’s not what the team MVP is about. Remove him and replace him with your player of choice from within the Rays system. How is the team then? The writers view the MVP as someone who would be sorely missed and whose absence would hurt the team more than the absence of any other player. So they chose Bartlett? Who gives a shit? Does Pena? Does Longo? Be happy for the guy and realize that he has been important to this team, or continue to bitch because the guy you have a man-crush on didn’t win it. The writers seemed to think that his middle infield defense and improved hitting would be missed more than that of the corner infelders who were also in the running. It is what it is. Get over it.
by rayweaver on
Sep 24, 2008 1:26 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
We've said nice things about Bartlett.
1. It’s our opinions.
2. The facts are in our favor.
3. The writers almost always get stuff wrong, hence why Jimmy Rollins won the MVP and not someone far more deserving last season, and also why Carlos Delgado and not Carlos Beltran is talked up as the Mets MVP.
You cannot say “Well if Pena would’ve hit better early on…” because he didn’t hit for a month, since then he’s been amazing. Bartlett’s second half doesn’t even touch Pena (since May 1st: .912 OPS) .
We may as well just close comments if we can’t discuss anything the team or writers do, that or you could perhaps understand what the point of this site is.
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 24, 2008 8:23 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Get a Clue
Seriously. Did you even read what he wrote.
by RaysTheRoof on
Sep 24, 2008 11:35 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
huh?
I’m not upset because my man-crush didn’t win the vote. I really don’t care anymore who the dumbass writers pick as their MVP — partially because there’s no consistency between voters and seasons and partially because they, in general, really don’t have much of a clue what wins baseball games. And if “it is what it is”, I’ll drop it when the supporters of the vote drop it.
I like Bartlett, he’s a good player and much better than Brendan Harris and other organizational options (although Brignac might be surprisingly tolerable.) I’m really happy he’s on the team and I will continue to root for him and hope he lives up to his potential next year. But he’s missed 1/3 of the season, has been a poor hitter and his defense is good, but overrated.
I believe he’s getting too much team MVP talk because he’s new and replaced an awful player. Going from Dukes/Young in CF to Upton full time in CF was a bigger improvement. Going from Aki to Longo at 3B was a bigger improvement. Going from Navi v.2007 to Navi v.2008 was as big of an improvement. But it’s not about improvement, it’s about production above who you could find on the scrap heap. And Bartlett’s not been nearly as productive as at least a dozen other players on this team.
You can value a player’s contribution without calling him the MVP. I’m trying to do both. It’s just that the second half of that sentence is the point of disagreement right now, so it’s getting more attention.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on
Sep 24, 2008 11:46 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
missed a third of the season?????
he was our for 22 days in july. a third of the season would be 60 games
by RaysTheRoof on
Sep 24, 2008 8:01 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yes, my bad. i stand corrected.
481 plate appearances
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on
Sep 24, 2008 9:58 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
From MLB.com today
"So, in making a multiplayer trade with the Twins in the offseason, Friedman was adamant on including shortstop Jason Bartlett in the deal, which was headlined by the acquisition of right-hander Matt Garza. The Rays’ insistence on Bartlett — a move later lauded by Minnesota manager Ron Gardenhire — has proved to be a critical component in 2008’s revamped infield.
“I said all year that I think [Bartlett] is one of the MVPs of our team,” Rays manager Joe Maddon said. “We have won not because we have out-hit everybody. Obviously, it’s been the defense, and he’s been the glue to the whole thing.”
It’s no coincidence that the first-place Rays went 7-9 when Bartlett was on the disabled list, as the shortstop has affixed into a deadly-double-play combo with second baseman Akinori Iwamura. "
********************************************************************************************
Did anyone enjoy Zobrist’s missed DP’s last night?
by rayweaver on
Sep 24, 2008 1:13 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Results based analysis is stupid.
I enjoyed Zobrist’s triple, didn’t you?
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 24, 2008 1:22 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
the triple was cool...
But then so was Barty’s 2-out RBI single a little later to keep things going.
by rayweaver on
Sep 24, 2008 1:46 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ben edges him out
You forgot how he masterfully fouled a pitch off the plate and then up into his face.
by rayweaver on
Sep 24, 2008 2:14 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
the Rays are 32 games above .500 when Bartlett is not on the disabled list and 2 below .500 when he is
his stint on the disabled list was 16 games, or almost exactly 10% of the season. pro-rating the other 90% down to 16 games is a rate of about 4 games over .500 per 16 games. are we really saying Bartlett’s worth 6 games per 16 games, or 60 games over a full season? um, i hope not.
in other words, it IS mostly coincidence. he’s a good defender, but to give him credit for others’ performances (isn’t this what being the “glue” implies) is silly. to give Bartlett more than his fair share of the credit for the improved defense is silly. he’s NOT the only reason, far from it.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on
Sep 24, 2008 1:35 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My mistake
You’re right. Maddon is silly. He knows better than to make any assessments about players he’s been around damn near every day since March. Bartlett is far from a critical component to this team.
by rayweaver on
Sep 24, 2008 1:53 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
glad we're on the same page, now
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on
Sep 24, 2008 2:13 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Because you would expect Maddon to say,
“He’s not that important, the record is just a coincidence.” That’s what the good managers do right? Ask him about Aki, see if he says something similar.
by steve-o1285 on
Sep 24, 2008 4:25 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Or maybe Maddon wanted to make sure that Bartlett
got the recognition he believes he deserves. Maddon didn’t have to say that Bartlett “has been the glue to the whole thing”. He could have just said that he is a great player, he contributes to the team, and he’s a big part of the success of the defense, but he made it a point to say that he was the one holding the defense together. In addition to the article linked above, you should also reference comments Maddon made when Bartlett was coming off the disabled list as further evidence of how important maddon believes bartlett is to the defense. As for Aki, I have no doubt that Maddon would rave about Aki’s defense because he is constantly flying around the field making plays. Aki is highly valuable, as are Pena, Longoria, and Upton among several others. Maddon will find something good to say about any of his players, and he will always praise them when they have performed well. I doubt this was just lip service for the sake of the media.
by rayweaver on
Sep 24, 2008 5:13 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
reply fail
I meant to reply to steve-o1285
by rayweaver on
Sep 24, 2008 5:14 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
On a related topic that I was just reminded of...
Maddon was on XM a little while ago, and Rob Dibble asked him about the two events that really brought the team together this year and really galvanized the players. One was the spring training Elliot Johnson collision/scuffle with the Yankees, and the second was the brawl with Boston. Guess who was the catalyst for the latter… Thanks again, Barty, for dropping the knee down on Coco.
by rayweaver on
Sep 24, 2008 5:22 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs












