Rays vs Red Sox Game 7 on MLB Network
They are replaying the game at 12:30pm on Saturday.
6 months ago
SeanDubbs
9 comments
0 recs |
Comments
the hell...
On DirectTV MLB Network isn’t showing Game 7 of the ALCS, they’re showing something in black and white from the dump in New York City…some old crappy one I think it’s Don Larsens perfect game…
Kinda sucks was looking forward to watching that and then football all day, damn Yankees.
IF only Harry Carey could be arounde for Kosuke.
by CubFanRaysaddict on
Jan 3, 2009 2:21 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah
They showed the phils clinching over the dodgers but screwed us out of watching our clinching game and then had the nerve to show the phils beating us in game 1 of the series.
by Thermacold on
Jan 3, 2009 4:55 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't buy the World Series DVD
It has about 4 and a half minutes of Rays material.
by GomesSweetGomes on
Jan 3, 2009 5:15 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i know dude!!
i already made that mistake. playstation 2 doesnt fast forward too quickly either. Listen to GSG and dont buy that pos!
2008 Tampa Bay Rays: The Longest of Longshots
by Kenny845 on
Jan 3, 2009 9:22 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Why did you guys get it?
Think it would have a lot of Ray stuff? Epic Fail.
Top Josh Paul Pornos- Big Navi Stroking, 2pitchers1cup, BJ to the Balls, Riggans Your Thingans
by SRQman on
Jan 3, 2009 9:26 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I assume this is
a humorous complaint as that was not only about as exciting a game as ever played, but I thought that Costas did a good job interviewing Larsen and Berra. And I say that as someone who has become very disenchanted with Costas over the past 10 years or so.
Of the things I have seen so far on MLB TV, and there have only been a few, that was the only show I thought really good. Otherwise it seems they are going the same way as ESPN with hagiography in place of history and analysis (“In the Moment”) and groups of talkers trying to be “hail fellow well met” and ending up yelling over each other. (“Hot Stove”) The panel seems good. I think Leiter is a particularly terrific analyst when working as a color man in the booth. And Larkin seems articulate. (Reynolds is just another ESPN cliche.) But it doesn’t seem that they will go beyond typical fluff and sound bites.
I know it’s fantasy but wouldn’t it be nice if a 24/7 baseball network gave even just 1/2 hour at 3:00 am over to a group of sabermetricians or other progressive analysts who would provide something interesting to stimulate thinking.
by bobr on
Jan 3, 2009 5:17 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I know it’s fantasy but wouldn’t it be nice if a 24/7 baseball network gave even just 1/2 hour at 3:00 am over to a group of sabermetricians or other progressive analysts who would provide something interesting to stimulate thinking.
A friend and I were discussing just this. There is no way that a show that did ACTUAL analysis and focused on the latest in sabermetrics would not be widely successful. I have to believe that a large audience of those interested in the channel would have at worst a minimal interest.
Also, I agree that Costas did a good job with the studio aspect of the Larsen broadcast. I also have the same concerns that it is heading toward another northeastern-centric sports channel. Save the Larsen game, and everything else I’ve seen has revolved around the Sox. Bleh.
by rglass44 on
Jan 3, 2009 5:35 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I am with you on this.
Wouldn’t you think that they might consider the more progressive analytical community a worthwhile niche? I recognize the need for TV to appeal to a wide audience and to move things quickly in order to maintain interest, but surely there could be some small concession to fans who want something more and are not so easily bored. Just some small segment that does not pander to the lowest common denominator but instead seeks to elevate the level of discussion and to use its platform to inform, stimulate, challenge and even irritate the complacent.
My son pointed out that a network sponsored by MLB is not going to hand over time to those who are liable to criticize MLB and its masters. But aside from the argument that that sort of courage would be admirable, the segment doesn’t have to focus on the follies of MLB. It could focus instead on other sorts of issues. Ah well. I guess I just refuse to outgrow some of my youthful hopefulness.
by bobr on
Jan 3, 2009 6:32 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Reminds me of this...
Question #4: A journalism student at a prominent college recently told me that he had an interview for a writing internship at MLB.com. The interview promptly ended, however, when he expressed his goal was for mainstream baseball writing to incorporate more analytical tools than just calling someone clutch, saying David Eckstein is a hard-nosed player, and grilling someone with small sample sizes. Of course those reading MLB.com or newspapers aren’t necessarily going to grasp all sabermetrics concepts, but analytical writing excluding the aforementioned issues does not entirely lean towards statistics. What does this tell you about the goals of mainstream writing?
It was passed along by either Cameron, Seidman, or Pizza Cutter, so I’m prone (and disappointed) to place weight towards its legitimacy..
by R.J. Anderson on
Jan 3, 2009 6:48 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs










