J.C. Romero Cheated
NEW YORK -- Philadelphia Phillies reliever J.C. Romero and New York Yankees minor league pitcher Sergio Mitre were suspended for the first 50 games of next season after testing positive for a banned substance.

Mitre is with the Yankees' Scranton/Wilkes-Barre Triple-A team.
The arbitrator ruled Romero was guilty of negligence. The penalty will cost the left-hander $1.25 million in salary, ESPN.com said.
"I still cannot see where I did something wrong," Romero told the website. "There is nothing that should take away from the rings of my teammates. I didn't cheat. I tried to follow the rules."
The Philadelphia Inquirer also reported Romero's suspension on its website early Tuesday.
"If I'm guilty of something, you know what? I will face it. But I'm not guilty, and I'm not letting people that don't really know me judge me over something and accuse me of something that I didn't do," Romero told the newspaper.
"We strongly disagree with the commissioner's discipline and with the arbitrator's decision," MLB Players Association general counsel Michael Weiner said in a statement.
Romero was the winning pitcher in Game 3 of the World Series and the clinching Game 5 for the champion Phillies.
"We can't comment on the specific facts of the case," Phillies general manager Ruben Amaro Jr. said in a conference call Tuesday. "What we can tell you is that we're very supportive of what Major League Baseball has done and the policies it has implemented."
Romero, a key member of Philadelphia's strong bullpen, served in a setup role for closer Brad Lidge for most of last season. He went 4-4 with a 2.75 ERA and 52 strikeouts in 59 innings. He appeared in 81 games and had one save.
In the postseason, Romero was outstanding. He didn't allow a run and only two hits in eight appearances, spanning 7 1/3 innings.
Romero is expected to report to spring training with the Phillies next month and is allowed to pitch in exhibition games. He'll likely stay in Florida for extended spring training and could be ready to rejoin the team once his suspension is up.
"The fact of the matter is we're supportive of J.C.," Amaro said. "It's an unfortunate event. We'll deal with it, and we'll move forward from it."
ESPN.com said the pitcher was tested Aug. 26 and Sept. 19, then informed by the players union Sept. 23 of the result. Romero said he immediately stopped taking any supplements. He was tested again Oct. 1 and that test came back negative, according to ESPN.com.
Weiner said the union regards the decision as final but insists the players were treated unfairly.
"Their unknowing actions plainly are distinguishable from those of a person who intentionally used an illegal performance-enhancing substance," he said.
0 recs |
30 comments
Comments
THE WORLD SERIES SHOULD BE TAKEN AWAY FROM PHILLY AND GIVEN TO US
RIGHT NOW!!! AHJGSJH
by Roc on
Jan 6, 2009 8:33 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
That does explain a lot
Romero sucked with the Red Sox.
Mother---- him and John Wayne!
by MerryGoByeBye on
Jan 6, 2009 10:16 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
i have to defend him right?
he took a weight gain supplement from a GNC in august that wasn’t deemed (by awesome bud selig) ‘illegal’ to baseball until november. he ran the ‘drug’ (6 OXO-EXTREME) by his team trainer (who told him to get a 2nd opinion) AND his personal nutritionist who both said it was fine… the MLB had 3 products available at GNC that were on their ‘banned list’, 6 OXO-EXTREME was not one of those three, it wasn’t until AFTER the World Series even took place that it was deemed illegal! IMO, JC is the ‘fall man’ for Bud Selig and his need to exert pressure on anyone using any banned substance… they offered JC a 25 game but the MLBPA lawyers told JC that they could beat the thing in arbitration… they were wrong… either way this does not look good for Bud Selig (as per usual)…
by PHIGHTINPHILS on
Jan 7, 2009 10:08 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
From Neyer:
I clicked the “Label” tab and found that 6-OXO is loaded with Vitamin B-6 and that “Use of this product may be banned by some athletic or government associations (including military).”
Here’s a crazy idea: Read the label, and if the label says the product may be banned by an athletic association and you’re a professional athlete subject to drug testing … don’t take that drug.
by rglass44 on
Jan 7, 2009 10:21 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
reading and comprehension in philly?
highly unlikely.
5 dollar foot loooooong
by HAHAHA OH WOW on
Jan 7, 2009 12:29 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The bottle of the supplment that MLB provided as evidence contained a warning that it may be a banned substance. His bottle that he provided lacked this warning.
The fact is it looks like Romero tried to do a decent amount of due dilegence between checking with the players union and two nutritionalists, but in MLB’s eyes, he should have called the hotline. It sucks for him, but I doubt he’s a cheater.
by kericr on
Jan 7, 2009 1:27 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
BUT
The players get a list from MLB each year of the brand names all the supplements that are banned, and this one wasn’t on the list. I doubt that will get them out of the suspension, but it makes it tougher to say that he and the others knowingly cheated. Like 5 minor leaguers have been busted for taking the same thing as well. It’s just annoying that MLB doesn’t own up to their mistake at all.
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on
Jan 7, 2009 12:35 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Neyer again:
It’s OK to feel sorry for Romero. But as I wrote Tuesday in the comments, it’s simply a fact that any sort of rigorous drug policy — the sort of policy that was overwhelmingly supported by fans, writers and broadcasters — will inevitably ensnare violators who make at least some efforts to comply with the policy. Maybe Romero did his best or maybe he didn’t, but in the end, that matters only to him. Because you can’t ask an arbitrator to read someone’s mind. The guy tested positive for a banned substance.
by rglass44 on
Jan 7, 2009 12:42 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That has nothing to do with what I said
What I said is that MLB should own up that they screwed up. At least apologize and say they’ll try to be more careful in the future.
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on
Jan 7, 2009 1:28 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
When has any sporting body ever done this?
by rglass44 on
Jan 7, 2009 1:38 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Here’s a crazy idea: Read the label, and if the label says the product may be banned by an athletic association and you’re a professional athlete subject to drug testing … don’t take that drug.
…..OR
If your team trainer and personal nutrionist tell you its ok, you should probably assume its ok.
by Rays4242 on
Jan 7, 2009 1:46 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You know what happens when you assume...
…you make an ass out of Uma Thurman. And she’s done nothing to you.
by ReasonableDoubt on
Jan 7, 2009 2:18 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The bottle of the supplment that MLB provided as evidence contained a warning that it may be a banned substance. His bottle that he provided lacked this warning.
by kericr on
Jan 7, 2009 3:18 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This
And, I remember that from when it came up with the minor leaguers a month ago, the bottle doesn’t even say that it contains the banned substance. There was an MLB memo that went around to everyone listing that certain products were mislabeled and contained banned substances even though the labels didn’t say so. This supplement wasn’t in that memo BUT SHOULD HAVE BEEN. It was known to MLB at the time that this supplement contained a banned substance without saying so on the label. Perhaps they had a container with a generic label stating it may contain some banned substances, but fact of the matter is that a number of players plausibly took this supplement with no way of knowing that it was banned. The fact that guys are getting suspended for long periods without pay when it’s at least part of the fault of MLB (and part of the fault of the supplement company) seems absurd to me.
If I were a class action lawyer, I’d be rounding these guys up to sue the supplement company for lost wages and damage to reputation.
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on
Jan 7, 2009 4:44 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's part of the problem
The label didn’t state that it contained the banned substance.
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on
Jan 7, 2009 4:39 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The NFL does it all the time
They constantly apologize when a ref makes a mistake that changes the outcome of a game. The NHL has done the same. Only MLB is so staunch in insisting that it’s always right and never falters.
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on
Jan 7, 2009 4:38 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
it's pretty gay when your team loses the world series
and the pitcher who got 2 wins against you in the series gets suspended right after for using a banned substance. i really hate that guy right now. he’s my new least favorite player.
by dropkicknu on
Jan 7, 2009 3:31 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't be stupid.
Have you noticed the stark contrast between the quality of posts from people who are talking about how unfair it is that he’s getting suspended, versus the people who are accusing him of being a cheater? Do you really want to be a troll, or do you want to contribute to the other conversation, giving possibly more details about Romero’s substance and suspension beyond the quality information that you’ve already provided and providing a local insight that likely none of us here have?
We’re not aknowledging these comments; you shouldn’t either.
by kericr on
Jan 7, 2009 5:14 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
try reading the 5th post on this board...
stark contrast? look at my post earlier (the 5th one) and the first post on this thread… yea that guy’s right, we should give you guys the trophy because JC Romero took a weight gain supplement… and my contribution of factual material earlier must count for nothing…
the hinske comment is a sarcastic remark to the prior post of, “it’s pretty gay when your team loses the world series”… because we all know that baseball, weight gain supplements, hetero/homosexuality have EVERYTHING to do with the PHall classic…
by PHIGHTINPHILS on
Jan 8, 2009 3:56 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sucks
All the Rays need now is a source coming out proving that the umps were paid off during the Series. Which I would welcome such a source, becuase it would make sense with the calls the Rays got, or didn’t get. But, let’s move on. We know what they are. And we know what we are. No one can put an shroud of doubt around the Rays pennett! Woohoo!
In the name of Shinji Mori, we shall win!
by thebaddancingraysfan on
Jan 7, 2009 4:49 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
check this out...
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/sports_blog/2008/10/world-series-um.html
particularly the paragraph that starts out…
“Take nothing away from…”
enjoy!
by PHIGHTINPHILS on
Jan 8, 2009 4:01 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My point is with the Series you don't have a slam dunk case that the Phillies were the better squad.
I read the piece, it was thought provoking. The Phillies won, yes. The Phillies are the World Champions, congrats. But, there will still be doubt my mind and EVERY time i see the game replayed I can’t help but get a little sour.
In the name of Shinji Mori, we shall win!
by thebaddancingraysfan on
Jan 8, 2009 4:57 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i hear ya...
if the tables were flipped i would one hundred percent be in the same shoes… similarly with the eagles in the super bowl (04) against the pats… the cheating pats right?… i think joey porter put it best, “they took two super bowl rings away from me”… and one away from the birds, who deserved to win that game… but i don’t think the outcome would’ve been different in the series, this was our year, now you have our cornerstone locker room guy in pat burrell, let me tell ya, a rematch would be nice but i’d probably rather play anyone else this year than you guys… now you have the taste in your mouth and are going to be hungry all year long, i say at least 95 wins for both of our clubs…
by PHIGHTINPHILS on
Jan 9, 2009 10:23 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
As someone who doesn't care either way on PEDs, this doesn't bother me.
Odds are he wasn’t the only one taking something he probably shouldn’t have been, but J.C. Romero being around isn’t the reason the Rays lost.
by R.J. Anderson on
Jan 7, 2009 8:56 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs













