Tampa Bay Rays Face Several Decisions On Player Options; Carl Crawford, Gregg Zaun
One of the first orders of business to take care of during the hot stove league is squaring away options. So far 11 options have been accepted or declined since the end of the World Series with several more looming. Around these parts the Tampa Bay Rays have three options of their own to take care of.
Two of the three options seem like slam dunks. One is an obvious pick-up and one is a simple decline. The third option, however, is 50/50 and will probably determine the course of who is our catcher next season.
The Rays hold a $1.9 million dollar option (plus performance bonuses) on left handed specialist, Brian Shouse. Overall, his 5.17 FIP was far from impressive and his -0.1 WAR made him a negative value. However, it wasn't his fault that manager, Joe Maddon, had him face nearly as many righties (52 PA) as lefties (70 PA). Shouse did the job expected of him in 2009, and held left handed batters to a line of .224/.246/.373. Righties continued to crush him at a .356/.442/.622 clip. Nonetheless, Shouse just didn't pitch enough to justify picking up his nearly $2 million dollar option A left elbow strain sidelined him for 63 days, and while he made 45 appearances, he threw just 28 innings. With that being said, the $200k buyout is the likely course of action in this case.
The Rays are more likely to go with fellow side-winding lefty, Randy Choate, who was nearly as effective and will cost probably half of what Shouse will. There is always the possibility of signing former Ray (for 24 hours) and sabermetric wunderkind, R.J. Swindle on a minor league deal. The Rays could also go without a traditional lefty and turn to reverse split righties like Lance Cormier and newly acquired Jesse Chavez to serve as LOOGY's.
The next option is just as simple; the Rays will exercise the $10 million dollar option on left fielder and franchise player, Carl Crawford. This is a no-brainer and regardless of what CC's future holds, he will remain Rays' property for the time being. According to fangraphs, Crawford has made $13.1 million dollars in his career with the Rays. The nice $10 million raise is well overdue considering the fact that he as given the team $104.7 million dollars worth of production during his career.
CC is easily worth the $10 million dollar tag, but with some scouts saying Desmond Jennings could give you the same production right now for the league minimum, it doesn't look likely CC will finish his career with the Rays. Despite that fact, stranger things have happened, and both sides have expressed interest in a long term deal. Either way, the Crawford decision will be the biggest and most emotional decision in the franchise's history.
The final option because to leader of the Zaunbie nation, Gregg Zaun. Hailed as the veteran savior to our catching woes, Zaun didn't disappoint in the final two months of the season. Brining his veteran savvy and his reputed ball blocking ability, Zaun also swung a mighty stick in his near 100 plate apperances with the Rays. Small sample size rules apply, but Zaun hit .287/.323/.489 for the Rays. That earned him a 0.7 WAR or $3.2 million dollars in value. This means he has essentially covered his potential 2010 $2 million dollar option in production.
He is hardly the answer at catcher alone, and ZiPs has him projected for a .237/.335/.367 line in 2010. More likely, Zaun would be the left handed batter in a catcher platoon; picking up most of the at-bats against right handed batters. The problem with that is the Rays have a very similar situation with their other catcher Dioner Navarro. Navi is arb2 eligible and will make something in the neighborhood of ~$2 million dollars next season. I doubt the Rays will tie nearly $4 million dollars in two platoon players. There is also the question of Zaun playing 100-120 games behind the plate at 39. I could see the case for both sides of this option and honestly have no inclination of which way it will go. However, once the option is picked up or declined, we will have an answer to which way the Rays are intending to go.
0 recs |
28 comments
|
Comments
Zaun is an option--CC is a 'no-brainer'
Not picking up CC option, would be a marketing implosion
by sternfan1 on Nov 7, 2009 8:50 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Yep the option isn't the question it's what the Rays do with CC after its excercised
Do you trade him before the season? Do you wait until deadline? The team is likely to be in contention come July 31. I can’t imagine the backlash of trading CC at the deadline with a winning team. Then there’s extending him or letting him walk and taking the picks. An argument can be made for all sides. Im just glad I don’t have to make the choice because either way people will be unhappy.
www.draysbay.com
by Tommy Rancel on Nov 7, 2009 9:27 AM EST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Zaun can play 180 games a season if you ask him.
He > Brent Favor
by Marky Mark's Third Nipple on Nov 7, 2009 9:23 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Interesting dilemma
Can’t imagine the package the Rays could get for CC, but you have to think they’ll eventually do the deal at some point. Have to agree with Tommy that either way people are going to be unhappy.
by FLBoy84 on Nov 7, 2009 10:38 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
CC And Barty or Brignac
for Madison Baumgardner and Buster Posey. That solves that.
by raysfaninminnesota on Nov 7, 2009 11:54 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Crawford in most eyes should be enough if not more than enough for Posey right?
and if not add in a spect like jaso,rollins,or talbot.that should be enough right for Posey right?
Then again I never said I was a genius.....
by thedudeofdudes on Nov 7, 2009 12:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The Giants have zero interest in moving Posey.
And one year of Crawford is not worth six of Posey.
by R.J. Anderson on Nov 7, 2009 12:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
of course it's worth it
how silly of you to think otherwise. (If we believe it will happen, it will happen)
by raysfaninminnesota on Nov 7, 2009 1:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The only way Sabean could justify moving Posey is if he pulled off some crazy "all-in" trade
In context of the Rays, it’d have to be something like of Crawford+Pena+Bartlett for Posey/Bumgarner/Neal/Wilson/Noonan
Something insane that would almost certainly never happen, and if it did, would in almost all situations end horribly for the Giants.
Aaron King is still my homeboy... iffy mechanics and all
McFAQ for all you newcomers out there.
GET THAT VORP AND WHIP SH!T OUTTA HERE!!!
by baetown415 on Nov 7, 2009 1:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I like me some Noonan
If they were willing to make that trade, God bless em.
I'm not really a NUMBERS guy!!
by Andy Hellicksonstine on Nov 7, 2009 6:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I partly blame the Rays for this,
they should have drafted Posey in the 1st place
Then again I never said I was a genius.....
by thedudeofdudes on Nov 7, 2009 5:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I wish they would've drafted Matt Wieters so all the "Shoulda drafted Buster Posey" comments wouldn't pop up every month.
by R.J. Anderson on Nov 7, 2009 5:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It wouldn't have helped.
The same people would have been complaining that the Rays did not pick Brian Matusz. Or Aaron Crow or Justin Smoak or their little brother.
by bobr on Nov 7, 2009 5:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Would agree with a move that would bring us a quality catcher in return.
I agree, Posey is their catcher of the future. Can’t see us doing a straight-up swap with CC for a catcher, but maybe a package deal. The Twins have some catching depth, maybe Ramos & Young (LOL) in exchange for CC.
by FLBoy84 on Nov 7, 2009 1:02 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
why would the twins want another OF
Then again I never said I was a genius.....
by thedudeofdudes on Nov 7, 2009 1:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Betters
Why would we want another OF?
Why do you kill threads????
by Some other guy who does not care on Nov 8, 2009 9:36 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
NOOOO
Get a reliever if that and a catcher
Why do you kill threads????
by Some other guy who does not care on Nov 8, 2009 9:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The DY comment was included for entertainment purposes only.
Was just thinking off-the-cuff of teams with quality catching depth. A catcher/closer/prospect(s) combo would be a nice return for CC. Another thing to address is how does trading him affect the team chemistry, which has been a highly discussed issue of late.
by FLBoy84 on Nov 7, 2009 1:32 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Please try to use the reply button in the future.
Thanks, bud!
by Suttree on Nov 7, 2009 2:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
R.J. Swindle is real?!
I thought that was R.J. Anderson’s pretend GM name!
by B Ray on Nov 7, 2009 2:04 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Yes
Why do you kill threads????
by Some other guy who does not care on Nov 8, 2009 9:35 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Do you think Seattle would take Crawford if we offered?
Maybe a return of Aumont,A.Moore,and maybe one other prospect
Then again I never said I was a genius.....
by thedudeofdudes on Nov 7, 2009 3:03 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Really want to doubt it
Why do you kill threads????
by Some other guy who does not care on Nov 8, 2009 9:35 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















