Report: Player to be Named Later for Kelly Shoppach is Either Mitch Talbot or Joseph Cruz
This from MLB.com:
Any speculation on who we're going to get for Kelly Shoppach?
-- Kevin K., Independence, OhioThough the Indians won't confirm who they have to choose from on or before the Dec. 20 deadline, I'm hearing it will be one of two right-handed pitchers -- Mitch Talbot or Joseph Cruz
This comes down to whether the Indians want immediate help in the form of Talbot or higher upside with a higher chance of burn out in Cruz. I'm a big fan of Talbot and he's out of options. I'd hate to lose him, but I think it's a matter of when rather than if. Talbot has roughly three seasons of Triple-A under his belt now, and during his time with Durham he's posted FIP of 4.0, 3.03, and 3.55. He is right-handed and his fastball sits in the low-90s, but his change-up is reportedly an above average pitch. He throws strikes and he'll be cheap for a number of years to come.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
At this point, I rather keep Cruz and let Talbot go.
We have enough immediate depth and Cruz is coming off a nice season at age 21. He’s always showed + control which I really like, and gets over a K per 9. He also gets GB% at like 50% clip. Hopefully the Indians opt for the help now with Talbot.
www.draysbay.com, www.beyondtheboxscore.com, Twitter @trancel
by Tommy Rancel on Dec 15, 2009 2:49 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Any thought behind the idea that they know there's a good chance that we have make a Hammel-type desperation move
with Talbot so he may be available later on anyway?
I'm a writer.
by Andy Hellicksonstine on Dec 15, 2009 2:52 PM EST up reply actions
Either way, Shoppach is a win
As for which I’d part with? Given our relief depth at Durham, I’d keep Cruz. Shoppach-Talbot is a win fot both sides who were up against a rock and a hard place.
Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla
The only problem
with Talbot and his option status for the Indians is that they have a big back-log of young pitchers that are major league ready to sort through too. Options for the 2010 rotation include:
Westbrook
Carmona
Huff
Laffey
Sowers (also out of options)
Carrasco
Masterson
Rondon
Lewis
I think they’d be better off gambling with and waiting for Cruz.
Rondon and Carrasco aren't MLB ready
Wetbrook a big if and who knows if Carmona will ever come back
Masterson is probably best suited for relief and Lewis is best suited for another career
Sowers is a #6 on a five man rotation
Take Talbot
If this is the choice, Cruz should be a no-brainer
Although I’d rather they take Talbot. Maybe right now Talbot helps them get another win or two, but who cares if they’re a 70-win team or a 72-win team. I’d rather have the guy who has a chance to help more down the road at a point where the team is contending.
Then again, I’ve never thought as highly of Talbot as some here.
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
Interesting you see Talbot ready and Carrasco not
Carrasco already has more Majors IP than Talbot – albeit neither has many. And Carrasco has always been viewed as more of a prospect – except perhaps in Tampa. Do agree Rondon’s likely not there yet,but coming on strong.
Do think Talbot would stick on the 25 man there, but good chance it’s just as he would in Tampa, as the long man. Kinda between him and Sowers due to lack of options. This may the decider, if they want to keep Sowers, that makes it Cruz not Talbot.
by nyyfaninlaaland on Dec 15, 2009 7:50 PM EST up reply actions
I see them taking Talbot
Carrasco needs a 1/2 year at Columbus and then may still not have what it takes
Outside a rash of injuries to the starters Talbot is not going to get a chance here.
The Rays have no room for Talbot. Mitch is out of options so even though he has a good changeup I hope they pick him especially since the Rays plans to add another relief pitcher.
I would bet Cruz
I just don’t see a compelling reason for the Indians to get an inexperienced starter who’s out of options. Talbot’s an interesting talent, but he doesn’t really fit the Tribe’s 2010 gameplan.
by fleerdon on Dec 15, 2009 11:20 PM EST reply actions
Reasons to Love Friedman
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2009/12/next-years-free-agent-class.html
THIS, THIS
Why do you kill threads????
Of those free agents, Carl Crawford is the most attractive to me.
And I do mean that in a sexual way.
by staplemaniac on Dec 16, 2009 11:53 AM EST up reply actions
Good thing that the free agent 1B class is strong again next year
Considering that’s the biggest hole we’ll need to fill, maybe we can get someone good for below what market would be in a year without so many free agent 1Bs.
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."

by 






















