DRaysBay: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook

Why Talbot Is The New Hammel

A majority of focus from the Aubrey Huff trade has been centered on Ben Zobrist for the past year and a half, and rightfully so.  His hard swinging, OBP machine, super-utility man routine took baseball by storm in 2009; even going as far as getting him more than the token MVP vote (8th place!).   If Zobrist comes anywhere close to duplicating his 2009 numbers in the team-controlled seasons left on his contract then that will go down as one of the bigger trade coups in recent memory.  Getting lost in all of the Zobrist hoopla is the other player involved in that trade, Mitch Talbot.  
 
When the deal took place it was Talbot, not the light hitting shortstop Zobrist, who was the more prized ‘get’.  Here are Talbot's FIPs for each season in the Rays' minor league system:

2006(AA):  2.81

2007(AAA): 4.00

2008(AAA): 3.03

2009(AAA): 3.55 


The numbers are pretty good, but in an organization that was/is as pitching rich as the Rays there was never room for him.  He wasn’t polished enough to earn a shot with the 2007 rotation, 2008 saw the additions of Matt Garza and Andy Sonnanstine to fill two vacancies, while David Price, Jeff Niemann, and Wade Davis filled the voids in 2009.  The 2010 rotation looks to be the Rays strongest yet.  In another organization with less pitching depth Talbot would surely have been given a substantial shot in the Major Leagues by now. 
 
With Spring Training approaching faster and faster the annual rosterbation games that we all play begin to creep up. What free agents are signed? Who gets traded? Who makes it? Who doesn’t?  In the case of Mitch Talbot, unfortunately the answer appears to be the latter.  Talbot is out of options, and will need to make the 25 man roster to avoid being put on waivers, where he would be plucked off rather quickly.  He’s not making the rotation, so we can skip that and move to the bullpen.  Since it appears the Rays will go with a four man bench that leaves them with a seven man bullpen.  Let’s take a look at the candidates:
 
Howell
Wheeler
Cormier
Balfour
Sonny
Chavez
Thayer
Talbot
LOOGY
 
 
The first four are virtual locks.  Cormier is arb1 eligible, so theoretically they could non-tender him, but he’s not likely to get a big raise in arb anyway (h/t Tommy).  There are some reverse split guys in that grouping, but Joe Maddon enjoys his LOOGYs, making R.J. Swindle or Brian Shouse (should he accept arbitration) prime candidates for that role.  After that you have five pitchers for two spots, and with Sonnanstine, Chavez, and Thayer having options remaining it makes Talbot look that much less attractive.  That’s without bringing into the equation the high likelihood of the Rays signing one or more free agent relievers, which they’re wont to do. 
 
If you add all of that up, barring some major injury, the forecast for Talbot being in a Rays’ uniform next season looks grim at best.  The team was in a similar situation last off-season with Jason Hammel, and ended up trading him to Colorado where he turned in a pretty decent season.  I would imagine Talbot will have the same fate.  Where Talbot and Hammel differ is their MLB experience.  At the time Hammel was dealt he had served over a year at the Major League level; Talbot has about ten innings.  Even though they’ll have no leverage, the front office will not let an asset walk away for nothing.  They don’t have that luxury.  They’ll move him for a low to mid-level prospect who will provide more organizational depth.  Then Talbot will merely be an answer to a trivia question, the "other guy" in the Aubrey Huff trade, a feint memory to most Rays fans.  I always liked Talbot and believe he still has a future in the league somewhere; that somewhere just doesn't appear to be here.

0 recs  |  Comment 32 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Shapiro is an early bird

All things being equal, I’d probably rather lose Talbot at this point just to keep the waves of talent thing level. However, we are likely to lose Aneury in the Rule Five anyhow, possibly for good.

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Dec 4, 2009 8:33 AM EST up reply actions  

That's why it's better for the Indians and Rays if Shapiro selects Aneury

We only lose one player and the Indias don’t have to keep him on MLB roster all season

Watch, it ’ll probably be Johnson

by sternfan1 on Dec 4, 2009 8:37 AM EST up reply actions  

That would be excellent

Then there would be a chance Aneury would come home to roost at some point

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Dec 4, 2009 8:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Confusing

but my interpretation is that if the Indians select Aneury in the Rule 5 draft, he could only be traded to the Indians after they had exposed him to waivers and the rest of the league passed on him. If the Indians select him and have to keep him on the 25 man all year then they effectively got nothing for Shoppach because they could have done that anyway. That’s why I don’t think it’s Aneury. I’m not an expert on this stuff so correct me if I’m wrong.

by MickS on Dec 4, 2009 9:39 AM EST reply actions  

Here's what i think. The reason Aneury

is eligible for the Rule 5 is because we didn’t place him on the 40 man. I’m suggesting that if the Indians before the Rule 5 draft select him and place him on their 40 man, they can option him to the minors

However, i’m not sure this is correct

by sternfan1 on Dec 4, 2009 9:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Not correct

He can’t be traded or taken off the Rule 5 selection list until after the Rule 5 Draft. Rule 5 players are frozen on the list now. And if he was selected by the Indians in the draft, the Tribe has to add him to the active (25 man) roster. To be able to send him down to the minors he has to clear waivers and then offered back to the Rays. Only then could the Rays use him to fulfill the PTBNL for Shoppach, an unlikely scenario.

by MickS on Dec 4, 2009 12:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I believe he could be optioned down and remain on the 40 without going through waivers

James Skelton was a rule 5 selection who was traded after the fact to the team that selected him.

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Dec 4, 2009 9:55 AM EST up reply actions  

One difference between Hammel and Talbot...

Hammel brought his gastank with him every trip he made to the mound for the Rays in ‘08. That probably hurt his stock a bit and made the Rays less likely to keep him around in the BP. I’d prefer to keep Talbot and put him to use in the BP. Ideally, the BP will be constructed like this (from highest to lowest leverage):

Howell
Sonny
Balfour
Wheeler
Cormier
Chavez
Talbot

by rglass44 on Dec 4, 2009 9:52 AM EST reply actions  

That was such a crazy game

Percival walks em loaded and then unlikely hero prevails.

I'm a writer.

by Andy Hellicksonstine on Dec 4, 2009 10:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Yup

Almost mentioned it.

by rglass44 on Dec 4, 2009 10:29 AM EST up reply actions  

I almost think that was his turning point.

After that performance, Maddon started sending him out in higher-leverage situations where he didn’t pitch all that poorly outside of a game in Detroit. It was only about 8 performances, but he seemed like a different pitcher the rest of the season. I don’t miss him, but that’s still my favorite non-playoff memory from that season.

I can't wait until we trade him for a reliever.

by kericr on Dec 5, 2009 11:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Tony Lastoria

The guy who originally posited that it could be Aybar, has been talking to someone and threw this out there on his message board:

No surprise, but got confirmation that Aybar is indeed not in consideration. In an attempt to clear the matter up more, I am now even more confused as I was told there is a reason December 20th was chosen and it ties in with arbitration somehow (but was told I cannot be told why). Also was told ANY player is available.

And added:

Yeah, definitely a mystery. Though I was pointed in the right direction and told that it is “likely” a prospect deal and for a pitcher. We’ll see where it goes from there.

As to my comment about anyone being available, I didn’t mean it that we could get any of their top prospects just that from what I was told anyone is available meaning there are no rule restrictions on who we can get (like the PTBNL rule). It wasn’t explained more since they did not want to get deeper into why and could not tell me….but I am puzzled by it. Maybe there is a way to circumvent some of the roster rules.

And finally, when I sent him an e-mail trying to flesh it out:

I know I am curious as to who the PTBNL ends up being, sounds like it could be for an interesting pitcher. There were several teams in on Shoppach, so the Indians settled for this deal because they had to like their two options they had to choose from. We’ll see.

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Dec 4, 2009 10:06 AM EST reply actions  

I really wouldn't like to see talbot moved like Hammel was

I felt that our depth made moving Hammel an obligation, because he wasn’t really a high-leverage reliever type (his pitching style lends him much more to starting). Talbot, I think, could be pretty good in the BP. I think it’s worth it to give him a realistic shot there, if for no other reason than to give the Rays some negotiation room with other teams about trading him.

by staplemaniac on Dec 4, 2009 11:37 AM EST reply actions  

Agreed

I think he could be very good out of the BP. I doubt anything we get for him right now provides the impact he will to this team. Short term returns are worth more than long-term.

by rglass44 on Dec 4, 2009 11:40 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm not sure I buy Talbot as a 'worse' option by not having options.

I also don’t think that Sonny would have to pitch very well in spring training to earn a spot on this team. That’s how bad his last year was.

I can't wait until we trade him for a reliever.

by kericr on Dec 5, 2009 11:51 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Founded in 2005. DRaysBay is home to "Progressive statistical analysis and reasoned argument."
Start posting about the Rays »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Converse5vp3_small
The Trade Deadline Thread
Zorilla_small
A Fanpost on the Clutch Stat

Recent FanPosts

Andy_samberg_jimp_small
Jeremy Hellickson to make his Major League debut on Monday versus the Twins
4287_559112511892_1101386_33047121_2807872_n_small
Hanley for Hellickson, Brignac, Moore, & Barnese?
Charzissou_small
OTTOTD 7/30/10: The Poor Matthew Hall Edition
Rays_small
Carlos Pena Breaks Rays' All-Time HBP Record
Mod_target_small
7/29/2010 OTTOTD We're All Suckers!
Small
TRADE TARGET: CRAIG BRESLOW
Jamesshields_small
OTTOTD: We are all Gentle Path A-Listers
Small
Manny Ramirez as Rays DH
Mod_target_small
7/27/10 OTTOTD: Shoop da woop

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Rays acquire Chad Qualls for a PTBNL according to...
I mean... isn't this the Rays' problem right here? A guy cheering Matt Joyce's clutch home run in a freakin' Yankees T-shirt. YOU FAIL, SIR.
Adam Dunn said he would be comfortable becoming a DH for the rest of this...
Very Rich Guy to Buy Yankees
Red Sox sell-out streak revealed as scam
Garza: "Becoming the first Rays player ever to pitch a no-hitter has been a great experience.  I really couldn’t have done it without the support from my team.  To thank them for their nine innings of hard work, I decided to give them a personalized embroidered bag and bottle of Crown Royal Black.  That way, we can all celebrate together when enjoying the new whisky."

Classy.
Hellickson pulled after three scoreless innings
Nice outing by Matt Moore against the Yankees
Desmond Jennings now the latest Boras client
Selig: 2011 MLB season to begin sooner, end earlier

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

ST. LOUIS - MAY 18:  Ryan Ludwick #47 of the St. Louis Cardinals rounds third base after hitting a game-winning homerun against the Washington Nationals at Busch Stadium on May 18, 2010 in St. Louis, Missouri.  The Cardinals beat the Nationals 3-2.  (Photo by Dilip Vishwanat/Getty Images) +3 updates

Padres, Cardinals, Indians Complete Three-Way Trade Involving Ryan Ludwick, Jake Westbrook

SEATTLE - JULY 08:  Alex Rodriguez #13 of the New York Yankees hits an RBI single in the ninth inning to give the Yankees a 3-1 lead against the Seattle Mariners at Safeco Field on July 8 2010 in Seattle Washington. (Photo by Otto Greule Jr/Getty Images) +15 updates

Yankees' 9th-Inning Win Completely Overshadowed By A-Rod's Ongoing Homer Drought

Colorado Rockies' Carlos Gonzalez connects on a triple against the Chicago Cubs in the third inning of a baseball game at Coors Field in Denver, Colo. on Saturday, July 31, 2010.  (AP Photo/ Matt McClain) link

Carlos Gonzalez Completes Cycle With Walkoff Homer; Rockies Beat Cubs, 6-5

More from SBNation.com >


Baseball Operations

Rays_small Steve Slowinski

Big_pun--300x300_small Tommy Rancel

Zorilla_small FreeZorilla

Price_small Erik Hahmann

Pro Scouting

P6090001_small mslowins

Player Development

52376727_small rglass44

Flying-car-m400_small RZ

Small PGP