Rockies Zero In On Jason Hammel
The Rockies are still monitoring the trade market and remain interested in Tampa Bay right-hander Jason Hammel, 26. The Rockies are no longer pursuing the Cubs' Chad Gaudin.
Advantage, Andrew Friedman
about 3 years ago
Tommy Rancel
15 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Amazing!
Even when they should be at a protypical disadvantage (teams knowing we have to trade Hammel or Niemann), this front office finds a way of ending up with the upper hand.
Not sure how much of an upper hand it is
I suspect the reason they stopped chasing Gaudin was because the price was higher.
Vogt early, Vogt often.
Not necessarily
I read a few days ago that they backed off of Gaudin, because the scouts didn’t like his velocity this spring. I guess its down and he seemed to be laboring on the mound. It was written as if they lost interest in trading for Gaudin at all, not the price.
Cormier continues to be awesome
Friedman wont waive a guy like that, come on Rockies, trade us something!
Evan Longoria and David Price - the fight for my heart
With all due respect
to this fantasitc leadership team – I hope we have not created and rift with David Price. I would release Percival rather than demote Price. I understand the options situation and all the yada yada yada, but why piss off a once in a decade prospect like Price?
Is Price really one in a decade?
I mean, Lincecum/Strasburg are probably more highly touted and they’re within a year or two either way.
by R.J. Anderson on Apr 3, 2009 9:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Price was a better prospect than Lincecum coming out
Obviously, Linc’s become a hell of a pro, but he had a lot of questions coming out of college. His control was very erratic for one.
Hello.
I love Price as much as the next guy but
Strasburg is on another level. I’ve only seen him pitch 3 times but WOW. I think he could be a #2 or 3 starter right now. He is going to be amazing.
I'm not under the impression that Price really cares that much
He’s probably disappointed that he’ll be one year further away from arbitration and free agency, but it sounds like he understands why he’s being sent down (both monetary and non-monetary reasons), and chances are that he’ll sign a long-term deal before he hits arbitration anyway.
Vogt early, Vogt often.
IDK if it would be smart to sign him long-term
Maybe buying out his ARB years, but I’m not too fond of long-term deals with pitchers who are unproven (Shields is the exception). Signing Longo was much safer because he’s a position player and less likely to suffer major injury.
Also, I don’t think sending him down has anything to do with delaying arbitration. He’ll be up before that clock would matter anyways I think.
I could be wrong though
by staplemaniac on Apr 3, 2009 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions





















