A Mild Aussie Summer
So Grant Balfour's Aussie heat was registering about as hard as James Shield's on Thursday night. Lets take a look at how the drop in Balfour's velocity has declined this year and try to find some answers to the following questions:
* How much of the decline can be attributed to the Trop gun?
* Does the number of days rest affect how high the fast ball registers?
* Does the number of pitches thrown in the previous outing affect Balfour's fireball?
* Does greater velocity have an impact on control?
* What effect does the inning and score margin impact Balfour's fastball?
* Does Balfour's velocity tail off in extended outings?
First, let’s take a look at Balfour's home and road splits to test for the variance on the Trop's speed gun. We will look at the performance in away games at
|
Grant Balfour |
Avg Avg |
Avg Max |
Min Avg |
Max Avg |
Min Max |
Max Max |
|
Road |
93.34 |
94.47 |
92.49 |
94.35 |
93.3 |
95.3 |
|
Home |
91.85 |
93.11 |
91.22 |
93.32 |
91.6 |
94.5 |
The average velocity at home has been 1.49 MPH slower than on the road. The average maximum fastball registered 1.36 MPH slower at the Trop. The Trop gun is slightly less than 1.5 MPH slower than the average park the Rays have played in to date.
In order to effectively measure for variable trending is to use a static gun so we will only use the home games for the purpose of this analysis. If we sort by average velocity this is what the first table looks like:
|
Date |
IP |
K |
BB |
Strikes |
Pitches |
Strike % |
Avg FB |
Max FB |
Game |
|
5/16/2009 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
10 |
17 |
58.82% |
93.32 |
94.5 |
Cle |
|
4/16/2009 |
0.2 |
2 |
1 |
9 |
15 |
60.00% |
92.46 |
93.4 |
Chi |
|
4/30/2009 |
1.1 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
21 |
57.14% |
91.93 |
93 |
Bos |
|
4/18/2009 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
11 |
22 |
50.00% |
91.62 |
93 |
Chi |
|
5/2/2009 |
0.1 |
1 |
2 |
17 |
29 |
58.62% |
91.59 |
93.6 |
Bos |
|
5/14/2009 |
2.1 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
28 |
71.43% |
91.37 |
92.4 |
Cle |
|
5/4/2009 |
1.1 |
1 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
66.67% |
91.25 |
93.4 |
Bal |
|
4/15/2009 |
0.1 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
9 |
66.67% |
91.22 |
91.6 |
NYY |
As you can see, the three games where he pumped the most strikes there was a direct correlation to a slower velocity. Not surprisingly his K rate was higher when he was throwing harder, but so were the walks. In today’s game while there were no walks, there was a hit batsman.
Lets take a look at another set of variables including the inning entered, score margin at the time of insertion, WPA, # of days rest prior to appearance, and the number of pitches in the previous outing::
|
Date |
Avg FB |
Max FB |
Game |
Inning |
Margin |
WPA |
Days Rest |
Prev Pitches |
|
5/16/2009 |
93.32 |
95 |
Cle |
8 |
1 |
0.124 |
1 |
28 |
|
4/16/2009 |
92.46 |
93 |
Chi |
9 |
-2 |
0.028 |
0 |
9 |
|
4/30/2009 |
91.93 |
93 |
Bos |
8 |
8 |
0 |
2 |
16 |
|
4/18/2009 |
91.62 |
93 |
Chi |
6 |
-5 |
-0.025 |
1 |
15 |
|
5/2/2009 |
91.59 |
94 |
Bos |
6 |
-1 |
-0.1 |
1 |
21 |
|
5/14/2009 |
91.37 |
92 |
Cle |
6 |
-9 |
-0.028 |
1 |
23 |
|
5/4/2009 |
91.25 |
93 |
Bal |
8 |
-4 |
0.009 |
1 |
29 |
|
4/15/2009 |
91.22 |
92 |
NYY |
7 |
1 |
-0.102 |
2 |
24 |
Balfour has a slight trend of throwing harder in the late innings of close games. Until today’s game he seemed to throw slower following extended prior outings. He also had been slowing down in May compared to April until today. With all the recent coverage of the Ray’s pitching staff’s decline in velocity, I’m curious if there was pressure to recalibrate the gun before today’s game. Or perhaps Balfour’s early season control issues caused him to hold back a little until he felt in better control of his fastball.
Matt Garza averaged 92.29 and topped out at 94.6 today compared to 90.68 and 93.3 in his previous home start. I would not discount the likely scenario that the gun was recalibrated prior to today’s game as both pitchers were about 1.5 MPH north of usual.
What conclusions can you draw? As a reminder, the complete table of all variables is published for further study at Balfour's Velocity
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think it has been a combination of things. You summed it up well.
Trop gun has been looking like it is a “slow” gun.
On Thursday its was his third apperence in as many nights when the entire bullpen was taxed.
As we all know he seems to thrive in high-leverage situations, his velocity takes a step upward and starts pumping strikes.
That I do not know
but all this data is pitch/fx
by FreeZorilla on May 17, 2009 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions
I assume he was hitting 113 on the fox gun
Until Next Time,
The Sports Chief
by Top Gun Numba 1 on May 17, 2009 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions
Yes. The PItchFx machine isn't actually a radar gun.
by R.J. Anderson on May 17, 2009 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions
you would think they use a series of radar guns and average it out.
by walkoffwalk on May 18, 2009 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions
I'd think they're using lasers, not radar guns for PitchFX
"Where we all wait in earnest with pudding in hand for the Upton comet to sail through the roofed skies, so that we may meet Him."

by 


























