Thinking About Ramon Castro
The Mets are going to have a decision to make as the week comes to a close. Brian Schneider is expected to finally return from the DL. A back strain landed him in the trainers' room in mid-April and the Mets have turned to Ramon Castro and Omir Santos in his absence. If you discount the two starts Castro made prior to Schneider's injury, then Castro has started only 18 out of the Mets 37 games since, and only 6 of the past 15. Both are right-handed hitters to contrast with the southpaw Schneider.
One of those two has to go when Schneider returns, and it just might be Castro. He makes 2.5 million through the end of this season and figures to fetch a bigger return than Santos. The Mets lineup is in complete disarray right now. Angel Pagan and Fernando Martinez are fielding the left side of the outfield until Carlos Beltran can return. Jose Reyes and Carlos Delgado are also hurt. Ramon Martinez is playing shortstop. Francisco Rodriguez had to be taken to the hospital in an ambulance after a severe case of backs spasms and so on. The Mets are experiencing a cluster of disappointment and could use some relief.
This is where the Rays can pop in and take someone like Castro off their hands. I don't know what it would take or if the Rays can afford to take on the ~2 million on the contract. I do know that Castro projects to finish with a wOBA around .330, or a league average hitter who happens to play catcher. Castro walks and hits for power. His batting average is never going to look pretty outside of small stretches, but he's a functioning hitter without too many flaws. The catch-22 involved is Castro's defense. Over the last three years his caught stealing rates have been 35%, 10%, and 22%. By comparison, Dioner Navarro's have been 29%, 30%, 38%.
Obviously this would be a move for the now, but one that should not harm us in the future. The question would be whether the Rays are willing and should to slice into Navarro's playing time in acquiring Castro. The plan is to compete this year and stay competitive in future years, Navarro's projected wOBA for the entire season is down to .298 and the defensive difference may or may not make up for that difference. If you think Navarro ends up with around another 300 plate appearances and you give those to Castro with his projected wOBA, the difference is about eight runs, or nearly an entire win.
Even if it's not Castro, someone like him could make sense for the Rays. Especially if the only long-term affects are the next few months of low-end salary.
0 recs |
23 comments
|
Comments
Shrek?
I don’t know I think I’d rather just have Navi and Michel. Although Castro could be good if someone decides to fart on Navarro’s catchers mask again. We still have to wait for Riggins to come back.
by Matt0611 on May 28, 2009 7:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Castro is better than Hernandez and Riggans hands down.
And right now better than Navarro. Whether that’s the case heading forward is the question.
by R.J. Anderson on May 28, 2009 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
See if Castro > Riggans and Michel
Then I think they should get him. Play him and Navi about equal, gives Navi more rest, or play Navi more and have a better back up.
Swav or Die
For the lulz
by SRQman on May 28, 2009 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Honestly, can anyone list a reason as to why they would prefer Riggans or Michel over Castro through the rest of this year?
Money? Defense, maybe? Although Riggans doesn’t have a great history of throwing runners out and I’m not convinced Hernandez defense is anything special.
by R.J. Anderson on May 28, 2009 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Castro finds himself on the DL
at least once every year without fail.
by s125405 on May 28, 2009 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
For extended periods of time
www.draysbay.com
by Tommy Rancel on May 28, 2009 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Backup catcher market
Should have a few options. With Wieters coming, Zaun becomes expendable, but he’s not that good and makes over a milli. Henry Blanco is the reverse Castro. Good defense not so much on offense, but cheaper. However, Navi’s defense at least in terms of throwing out runners isn’t a problem. Jeff Mathis or Jeff Clement would be nice, but both would cost more interms of trades, however, both would have years of team control.
www.draysbay.com
by Tommy Rancel on May 28, 2009 7:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Clement has a knee problem.
Are we looking for a back-up or a starter?
by R.J. Anderson on May 28, 2009 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
back-up with option to start?
www.draysbay.com
by Tommy Rancel on May 28, 2009 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure I want someone like Blanco or Zaun starting most of the time.
by R.J. Anderson on May 28, 2009 7:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well not them, but Mathis or Clement
www.draysbay.com
by Tommy Rancel on May 28, 2009 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You see the O's ditching Zaun rather than Moeller?
I think they keep Zaun as the backup / tutor when Wieters comes. That seemed to be the plan, with Moeller as the short term fill-in.
by nyyfaninlaaland on May 28, 2009 8:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I almost see Navi as embodying a different market inefficiency
Catchers are cheap, making young starting C’s going through arb – especially inconsistent ones like Navi – a good possibility to be overpaid in arb.
I almost wonder if they shouldn’t swap Navi for Castro if the Rays can get another prospect piece like a good upper level reliever (?) in the deal in return for the lesser salary and age difference. The Mets have no C (except Santos) locked up for ’10, though they have a kid killing it in AA.
Of course, then the Rays would still have to find a young C in another deal for the future.
by nyyfaninlaaland on May 28, 2009 8:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This might not be the right deal
was just thinking of how Navi might be a good piece to move given his salary position. The Mets might not have the right add-in piece inventory.
by nyyfaninlaaland on May 28, 2009 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really wanted the Rays to get Castro
eight years ago when he was stuck behind Charles Johnson with the Fish.
I guess he’s fine as a short-term upgrade as long as he doesn’t cost much of anything in talent going the other way and there is no commitment beyond this season. Beyond that, a 33-yr-old defensively suspect catcher doesn’t sound like a recipe for longer-term success or a wise use of limited resources.
Today, we are all Honkballers.
by RATW on May 28, 2009 8:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I'm not advocating giving up much at all for him nor re-signing him.
Just for this year and only as a “here you take him” type deal.
by R.J. Anderson on May 28, 2009 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm still on board with the Navi era
save the dough
by FreeZorilla on May 28, 2009 10:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
But what about next year?
Navi’s going to cost way more in ‘10 than Castro, even if Navi continues to struggle. He only costs 400K less now, and he’s arby while Castro is an FA as a backup. Even if Navi continues as now, he’s looking at a decent raise in arb.
With the Rays looking for salary cuts in 2010, perhaps a solid defensive C (say Jose Molina) paired with Jaso’s bat in a platoon (assuming Jaso gets at least his bat going) will be a lot cheaper than Navi plus a possible super 2 Riggans pairing. Trading Navi for Castro plus something attractive – no, not F-Mart – might be a valid approach.
by nyyfaninlaaland on May 29, 2009 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think this would help very much.
As poorly as Navi has played so far this season, we don’t seem to need help on offense. If the Rays are going to pick up additional salary on an almost maxed-out payroll, I think they need to get pitching. Frankly, I can’t believe I’m saying this after last year, but this staff is almost totally dysfunctional right now. Awful.
My father was six foot four when he left for Japan. When he came back he was five foot even. The Japanese blew off his shins and the doctor told him he would never walk again. He never gave up. He walked right to that doctor, looked up, and punched him... in the kidneys.
by Deepdoodle on May 29, 2009 7:46 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Bad idea, imo.
Yes it is, yes it is, yes it is, oh yes it is, yeah.
by zeng8r on May 29, 2009 8:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















