Minor League Profile: Jeremy Hellickson
5'11'' 165 LB, Jeremy Hellickson has taken AAA by storm following his 21 swinging strike performance over the weekend vs. the AAA Yankee affiliate. Hellickson has largely been brilliant ascending through the Rays farm system culminating in a mid-season AAA callup in 2009. The 22 year old right hander has displayed masterful command flashing 3 above average pitches, a fastball, change up, and curve ball.
As far as his stuff, you'll be hard pressed to find a better report than, Kiley McDaniel's from 2008: Scouting Jeremy Hellickson
Fastball -55/55
Worked 91 to 93 and kept the velocity late into the outing. Worked off of this pitch traditionally, getting ahead by using it aggressively early in the count and then going to the breaking ball for K's, but would mix in the changeup to keep hitters on their toes. Flashed above-average life and command of the pitch, mostly as late run in on the hands of right-handers. Also showed some solid sink at times. Hellickson's approach with the fastball was very impressive for a young guy with a smaller frame; to come after hitters with a big boy's fastball and approach.
Curveball -50/55
His breaking ball is a little tough to figure out, but I identified it as a 73-75 mph loopier early-count curve with 10-to-4 slider action and a hard 77-79 mph curve that had sharper downward bite and was more of an 11-to-5 break.
The slower version had flatter break and was thrown exclusively to the arm side, indicating Hellickson wasn't following through, making it more of a get-me-over, show pitch.
The harder version was used more often and was a late-count chase pitch that was frequently buried and was easily above-average when on. The pitch would back up and come out flat a few too many times, so the feel isn't completely there, but over half of them were late, sharp, and overmatched FSL hitters.
Changeup - 50/55
The changeup was also advanced, and elicited some weird swings as well. It is solidly average right now and flashed above with late fade and depth with excellent deception. Like the curveball, the changeup isn't quite there yet as he wasn't getting both the fade and depth consistently and sailed way out of the zone at times, but the deception and potential is there, and when it's in the zone, Hellickson again is hitting spots. It was a clear third pitch by usage, mostly to keep hitters off of expecting all fastballs before the hard curve comes out.
The word on Hellickson has always been that he has outstanding command for such a young pitcher, but his little projection left to improve his stuff. While he dominated the lower levels, some scouts felt the more advanced hitters in AAA and MLB would catch up to his stuff. For this reason, his prospect ranking rarely reflected a pitcher with his performance numbers.
So what are those numbers?
|
Season |
Team |
IP |
K/9 |
BB/9 |
K/BB |
HR/9 |
FIP |
|
2006 |
A- |
77.2 |
11.12 |
1.85 |
6 |
0.35 |
2.08 |
|
2007 |
A- |
111.1 |
8.57 |
2.75 |
3.12 |
0.57 |
3.11 |
|
2008 |
A+ |
76.2 |
9.74 |
0.59 |
16.6 |
0.82 |
2.57 |
|
2008 |
AA |
75.1 |
9.44 |
1.79 |
5.27 |
1.79 |
4.37 |
|
2009 |
AA |
56.2 |
9.85 |
2.22 |
4.43 |
0.64 |
2.88 |
|
2009 |
AAA |
30.1 |
8.6 |
2.97 |
2.9 |
0.89 |
3.86 |
We will talk more about ball and strikes in a bit. For now, let's concentrate on batted ball data. Minor league batted ball data is pretty well recognized as unreliable. In an attempt to offset that, I averaged out Statcorner.com's numbers with minorleaguesplits.com's. One of the knocks on Hellickson has been a propensity for allowing the long ball. This worry grew larger after his 1.79 HR/9 in his first season in AA. You can see he has fared better in 2009.
|
Year |
Team |
Level |
GB/FB |
HR/FB |
|
2007 |
BGR |
A |
1.29 |
5.3% |
|
2008 |
CHA |
A+ |
1.55 |
9.3% |
|
2008 |
MON |
AA |
1.27 |
19.2% |
|
2009 |
MON |
AA |
0.93 |
6.0% |
|
2009 |
DUB |
AAA |
1.04 |
8.3% |
It appears 2008 was an anomaly as a 19.2% HR/FB is more than twice that of any other of Hellickson' stints.
So how about strikeouts, walks and hittability? Hittability and lack of an out pitch are terms all too familiar in Hellickson scouting reports. You would expect this to show now that he has reached AAA. Let's compare Hellickson's pitch result data to the other pitchers on the Rays staff, as well as some pitchers he has been compared to. Before we do that, I am aware of the sample size issue. Unfortunately, pitch result data is not readily available for AA so we cannot compare across pitchers. I went ahead and calculated Hellickson's 2009 data from milb.com's gameday archive. Here are his AA pitch results to serve as a guideline for AAA.
|
SwStrk |
CallStrk |
Foul |
IP |
Ball |
|
13.3% |
17.3% |
18.3% |
17.2% |
33.9% |
Here are his opponent's swing results:
|
Fair |
Foul |
Whiff |
|
35.2% |
37.5% |
27.3% |
Now lets take a look at those AAA comps:
|
AAA name |
Year |
Age |
IP |
K% |
BB% |
SwStrk% |
CallStrk% |
Foul |
Ball% |
IP |
|
Jeremy Hellickson |
2009 |
22 |
30.3 |
23.2% |
8.0% |
13.3% |
17.6% |
17.8% |
34.9% |
16.4% |
|
2009 |
23 |
34.3 |
23.8% |
10.8% |
9.6% |
19.6% |
15.5% |
38.7% |
16.6% |
|
|
2008 |
25 |
132.7 |
23.2% |
9.2% |
9.1% |
17.6% |
17.1% |
38.4% |
17.7% |
|
|
2007 |
24 |
71 |
23.4% |
4.6% |
11.8% |
17.8% |
18.9% |
32.1% |
19.2% |
|
|
2007 |
23 |
92 |
23.7% |
7.7% |
10.0% |
17.2% |
17.8% |
37.1% |
17.6% |
|
|
2007 |
23 |
133.7 |
20.4% |
3.4% |
10.1% |
17.7% |
22.0% |
29.4% |
20.7% |
|
|
2007 |
21 |
22 |
23.6% |
2.3% |
13.4% |
16.5% |
20.4% |
31.8% |
17.9% |
Right near the top of the leaderboard for Swinging Strikes is Mr. Hittable.
|
Swing Breakdown |
Fair |
Foul |
Whiff |
|
Jeremy Hellickson |
34.5% |
37.5% |
28.0% |
|
David Price |
39.8% |
37.2% |
23.0% |
|
Jeff Niemann |
40.3% |
39.0% |
20.7% |
|
Andy Sonnanstine |
38.5% |
37.9% |
23.6% |
|
Matt Garza |
38.8% |
39.2% |
22.0% |
|
Kevin Slowey |
39.2% |
41.7% |
19.1% |
|
Johnny Cueto |
34.6% |
39.5% |
25.9% |
The fewest amount of swings resulting in fair balls goes to Mr. Hittable.
|
Non-Foul Strikes |
|
|
Jeremy Hellickson |
30.9% |
|
David Price |
29.2% |
|
Jeff Niemann |
26.7% |
|
Andy Sonnanstine |
29.6% |
|
Matt Garza |
27.2% |
|
Kevin Slowey |
27.8% |
|
Johnny Cueto |
29.9% |
The highest percentage of non-contact strikes also goes to Mr. Hittable.
I'm not sure we still need to be concerned about Jeremy Hellickson's hittability. Hitters at all levels have had a tough time making good contact, if at all, against Hellickson's 3 above average pitches.
I know some will point to his 21 swinging strike performance and say the results are skewed. I counter that the following are his swinging strike %'s by game: 15.5%, 8.1%, 15.4%, 12.5%, 19.4%. That is some pretty solid stuff. I was hoping to use matthan's Expected Strikeout formula to show Hellickson's AAA strikeouts are actually lower than his pitch results would lead you to believe but unfortunately, I cannot account for which swinging strikes were in and out of the zone. Here is the formula:
K%=(ClStr%*.9)+(Foul%*.5)+(InPly%*-.9)+(InZSwStr%*1.1)+(OZSwStr%*1.5)
Since I can't account for out of the zone swings, I will err on the side of caution and consider every swinging strike in the zone. That produces an expected K% of 24.6% which is still higher than his AAA K%. If we assume half the whiffs were out of the zone that pushes it up to 27.2%. Another factor to consider, matthan's formula was based on MLB #'s so its not apples to apples. I would imagine a AAA formula would result in an even larger Expected K%.
In summary, I am extremely bullish on Jeremy Hellickson. Concerns of hittability appear to be overblown. Injuries have been a concern in the minors, so I hope the Rays find a way to utilize him before the sum of the injuries take too large a toll. His command is already major league ready. If the reports of little projection are true, the Rays may be best served in terms of value maximization by clearing some room on the big league squad for Hellickson by the trading deadline of next year.
Stats from Statcorner, FanGraphs, minorleaguesplits, milb.com
62 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Davis is Vinz Clortho to Hellickson's Zuul.
So long, Sweet Lime!
Let's tweet our meats together; @mrmalapropism
Hans Loebel's #1 Fan and #1 Favorite Top Person of All Time. There's no stopping our love, not even rainbows made of ice and steel.
Which leads to the obvious question
where does he rank on the nickname scale and what is his peer group?
www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer
at least one spot
behind the Cajun God of Baseball—-Brignac, and the Cuban Cigar of Death-Morlan.
Kaz/Shields/Garza/Sonny/Price/Davis/Hellickson-necessitate a drool cup or a 7 man rotation
by CubFanRaysaddict on Aug 20, 2009 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Can you understand magic? Or God? Can you comprehend what happens after the singularity?
So long, Sweet Lime!
Let's tweet our meats together; @mrmalapropism
Hans Loebel's #1 Fan and #1 Favorite Top Person of All Time. There's no stopping our love, not even rainbows made of ice and steel.
Any reason for his concern watching bis K/BB decline last four years
or is that attributed to the level of competition increasing?
www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer
?
If anything, he’s shown an ability to adapt and improve.
So long, Sweet Lime!
Let's tweet our meats together; @mrmalapropism
Hans Loebel's #1 Fan and #1 Favorite Top Person of All Time. There's no stopping our love, not even rainbows made of ice and steel.
Level of competition mainly
Though I think it should rise through the end of the year (see the matthan formula)
Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla
I don't think he's been that size since he was drafted
Don’t know for sure, but I’ve heard he looks closer to 6’1" 185.
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
So that article has a YouTube video in it, I clicked to read the comments, and....
“He sits at 91-93 on his FB. I love Hellickson’s poise and command, though. He’s gotta get out of Tampa Bay, as there’s no room for him in the rotation.”
What a tard
At some point next season, Davis will graduate so Hell Boy can finally be our #1 SP spect
I am thinking at some point next season, McGee will be a RP in Durham and him closing games for Hellickson is so awesome
1. James Shields 2. Scott Kazmir 3. Matt Garza 4. David Price 5. Jeff Niemann
Also, great profile.
concerns about hittability are indeed overblown.
It does seem, however, that the BB/9 of 0.59 in A+ was a bit fluky. Otherwise he seems to be about a 2 BB/9 type of pitcher which would put him at a about a 4 K/BB ratio, which is of course still really good.
The AAA stats for the pitchers displayed are not all that unlike
so when it comes to translating to MLB—Who knows?
Yes, the point of the article is that
1. Hellickson is anymore hittable than anyone else, if anything he is less hittable
and
2. Hellickson should regarded among the elite pitching prospects in all of baseball.
I don't think that comparison works because Hellickson's fastball rates well on the "stuff" level.
Sonnanstine’s obviously doesn’t from velocity alone.
by R.J. Anderson on Aug 20, 2009 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm just being an ass.
I like Hellickson, but I’m hesitant to think he’ll be the stud some here think he’ll be. Shields, maybe, but not an elite starter.
Yeah, him turning into Shields would suck.
by R.J. Anderson on Aug 20, 2009 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Cy Young
I can't help that I make some things look easier than they really are.
by Sandy Kazmir on Aug 20, 2009 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions
I wonder if we can teach him the Fossum Flip
then he would actually be unhittable
or the complete opposite of that. I’m not sure
Bring Your Z-Game!
Don't be silly.
Of course we’d love another 3.8 FIP pitcher, but he doesn’t have the elite level projection to him.
He doesn't have to have the elite level projection.
That’s what Price is for.
by R.J. Anderson on Aug 20, 2009 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't really know who said he was turning into an elite MLB starter.
by R.J. Anderson on Aug 20, 2009 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions
I just realized we have Hellickson as the ~5th starter in 2011 most likely.
Hot damn.
by R.J. Anderson on Aug 20, 2009 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions
You mean Davis will be the #5 starter
;-)
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
Hellickson >>> Sonnanstine
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
FWIW
Sonny’s performance in the minors was better. But he was older, and doesn’t have as good of stuff as Hellickson. Then again, Sonny didn’t scratch any top 100 lists, so I’m not saying anything too groundbreaking.
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
in the future, yeah, probably (hopefully, a 4.2 FIP is great and all, but I would like a bit more), but right now?
not a chance. (at least in my opinion)
I meant long-term
Right this minute, it’s probably a toss up, and the fact that Hellickson could probably use some more development time means I’d rather call Sonny up first if those were the only two choices.
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
if someone said the rays needed a win and put a gun to my head and made me choose between sonny and hellboy to start
I’d pick Hellickson. But I think Hellickson could use more seasoning so I would agree with Brick about Sonny getting the call if we need to promote someone.
by RaysTheRoof on Aug 20, 2009 11:20 PM EDT up reply actions
hmm I said he was good lol and he is doing it again tonight
I didn’t say he was going to be an elite star either. I said I thought he should be considered a slightly lower prospect than Tommy Hanson was because if you look at their numbers throughout the minors except the 08 outlier they are nearly dead even. The biggest difference is the size.
16
Narwhal exploded his man juice all over that lineup tonight
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."

by 





















