Grant Balfour's Slider
Last season, Grant Balfour threw 1,027 pitches. 938 of those pitches were classified as fastballs. This year, 996 pitches and 820 are fastballs. That's 82% versus 91%, the difference is in Balfour's slider usage, which is at 12.5%. Most impressively is the results the pitch is producing.
It goes without saying that Balfour's best (and only, for the most part) pitch was his fastball last season. FanGraphs pitch type run values have his fastball worth 23.4 runs overall and 2.53 per 100. Every other pitch was in the negative, which is a bad thing. His slider was worth -1.45 runs per 100. That's bad. This year, his fastball has been worth 6.6 runs overall and 0.86 per 100, not as good as last year, but still pretty good. His slider though, has been worth 1.8 runs and 1.57 per 100.
These numbers are defensive dependent, so maybe his slider is getting hammered and Carl Crawford/Evan Longoria are making phenomenal plays every time he throws it, but I really doubt that's the case. It's too small of a sample to state that Balfour has developed a dependable second pitch moving forward. It isn't too small of a sample to say he's done a far better job of throwing another quality pitch this year, even if the sustainability of the results are up in the air for now.
I wanted to touch on the fastball run value a little more too. In his career he's posted a per-100 fastball run value under 1.00 only once, and that was -1.68 in 2007. Every other season has been well above a run gained per 100 fastballs. His velocity is down a bit as is his horizontal movement (about a seventh of an inch) so maybe that's a reason for decline. If we simply work off the prior three seasons as a future prediction, Balfour's fastball should bounce back next year.
Frankly, I'd love to see Balfour's 2009 slider with a bit better fastball.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I haven't see the data recently
so maybe this is off, but it seems that thanks to the slider Balfour was getting more ground balls which is always a good thing. BALFOUR FOR CLOSER!
www.draysbay.com
by Tommy Rancel on Aug 28, 2009 6:57 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
As much as he's not one of my favorites, might as well try it
with Howell serving up gophers on a nightly basis as he is presently
I think the solution for closer might be more of a match up situation for the rest of the season
I have been thinking this for a while, and I too wish I had the time to fully check into the numbers..
It just seems he has better “closer” stuff than Howell. Plus we all know Grant performs better in high-leverage situations. Yes, he’s been putting guys on base a little more than we were used to seeing last year, but he rarely lets them get the whole way around (when given the chance to clean up his own mess, that is).
His HR/9 is right where it was last (regular) season, and is obviously a lot lower than J.P.‘s. (0.47 VS 1.04), and they’re both walking guys at about 3.8 per 9 as well.
If we have to have a closer (and despite what Joe says, you know he wants one) then I think Balf is the guy. Designate J.P. as the “relief ace” that Grant semi-offiially had last year and if, come the 9th, J.P. hasn’t been in the game and the lefties are up, there’s always the option of going to him for the close…
(And of course it must be mentioned, 2008 was an outlier year for Grant … hell, it would have been an outlier year for most relievers. The best thing is, 2009 still shows a lot more of 2008 than any of his previous years, so while he’s regressing, he’s not completely reverting to the pitcher the Twins, Reds and Brewers had…)
Different process, similar results?
2008: 58.1 IP, 24 BB, 82 K, 3 HR, 2.22 FIP
2009: 57.1 IP, 24 BB, 58 K, 3 HR, 3.10 FIP
Same number of walks and HRs; 25 more hits allowed and 24 fewer K’s probably due to the mentioned fastball decline mixed with a little bad luck on balls in play?
Your source for replacement level commentary
On the slider...
Earlier in the season you could see he wasn’t confident in the slider, and his arm was slowing down far too much when he tried to deliver it. If I could see it, you know the guys at the plate could see it, and his stats from April and May back this up.
Then at some point he got more confidence in it and started throwing it hard, and it became a much more effective pitch. I don’t know exactly when this point was, otherwise I’d consider looking at the numbers before and after, but I’d dare to guess that his slider since this point is making up for some negative run- values prior to…
Bal4
AussieGriff… love the logo, that’s awesome. Thanks.

by 


























