Could the Rays Trade Pat Burrell for Milton Bradley?
In theory? Sure.
A swap of disappointing sluggers, Milton Bradley and Pat Burrell, seems like a good idea on paper. Burrell has underachieved all season with the Rays and has struggled in his adjustment to the designated hitter role and the American League. Given the National League resurgence of failed AL sluggers Jason Giambi and Matt Holliday, Burrell seems like he may fit in that category.
Bradley has struggled on and off the field in Chicago. However, he is just a year removed from a career year in which he flourished as a DH in the AL. The Rays courted Bradley this offseason and were believed to be a finalist for his services before the Cubs swooped in with a 3 yr/$30 million dollar deal that was perceived to be too rich for the Rays blood; and that's where the problem lies.
It appears that there's more than a little interest in Chicago Cubs right fielder Milton Bradley. A source with knowledge of the situation said that the Tampa Bay Rays are very interested in bringing the beleaguered outfielder to Florida.Tampa Bay was the most aggressive team to pursue Bradley in the offseason before he signed with Chicago in January. It is not known if the teams have exchanged names, but it does appear that the Rays would like to move the contract of Pat Burrell. The former Philadelphia Phillies outfielder has one year left on his contract at $9 million after signing a two-year, $16 million deal with the Rays last winter.
More on a potential Burrell/Bradley swap after the jump
|
Burrell |
2009 |
Bradley |
|
0.225 |
BA |
0.257 |
|
0.322 |
OBP |
0.378 |
|
0.374 |
SLG |
0.397 |
|
0.311 |
wOBA |
0.345 |
|
29.3 |
K% |
24.2 |
|
12.4 |
BB% |
14.4 |
|
-0.3 |
WAR |
1.2 |
While the match seems to be made in heaven, the economics just don't match. In 2010, Burrell will be in the final year of a 2 yr/$16 million dollar contract and is guaranteed $9 million dollars. Bradley is also due to make $9 million dollars which would be perfect had he not had another year on that contract. Because he didn't spend 75 days on the DL and is not on the DL to end the season, his $12 million dollar salary in 2011 is still due. The Rays shed Scott Kazmir's $22.5 million dollar tag and could trade Carlos Pena or Carl Crawford at some point in the next year to free up more cash. Adding Bradley, his perceived behavioral problems, injury history, and $21 million dollars just doesn't match up to the team's salary structure.
Depending on the Rays interest in Bradley, things could still happen to get a deal done. The Cubs could agree to eat some of Bradley's contract in order to rid themselves of the headache. Or the Cubs could take on a Dan Wheeler-esque contract to help off set some of the salary constraints. Either way, I find it hard to see the Rays taking on the full $21 million dollars owed to Bradley.
There is also the little minor detail of the Cubs actually wanting Burrell in return. Remember, he's coming off his worst season in the bigs; he's getting older and he can't play defense. Still, if you believe the words of Jim Hendry, the Cubs maybe willing to bite the Burrell bullet in order to stop playing Bradley's games (I'm sorry).
0 recs |
54 comments
|
Comments
Something in my head is telling me, you started with the Milton Bradley boardgame reference and built your article from there.
by Marky Mark's Third Nipple on Sep 29, 2009 2:44 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Thoughts of Bradley monopolize his time
It’s a risky stratego, and it boggles the mind, but if you can properly pull off the operation, then it provides everyone with a clue about his psyche.
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
by Brickhaus on Sep 29, 2009 8:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A few of reasons as to why I don't see this making too much sense
1. Attitude-Rays have gone out of their way to make sure there are no bad influences in the clubhouse, Bradley coming in is counterproductive to that philosophy.
2. Salary-There would have to be a whole lot of salary juggling going on to make this work. Someone has to eat that 2011 money and it won’t be the Rays, so how much will or can the Cubs eat.
3. Usefulness-Burrell is basically 1 year away from having is career end unless he accepts a much smaller role. The Cubs brought in Bradley to play RF and for his switch hitting abilities(they needed a LHH for balance). As we have seen this year, Burrell can’t play the OF basically at all anymore, as he is extremely slow and has seen his hitting diminish. What’s worrisome is not that he is hitting poorly, but it looks like he won’t get any better. Lets face it, Chicago will not be a friendly place to play either. I can’t see a NL switch making much difference. Hitting in the NL is pretty even, only the pitching isn’t as good in the NL, but he’s struggled to hit anyone in the AL, and with his streakiness, would you trust him to be helpful.
by Transplanted on Sep 29, 2009 3:58 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wait, how can you say he's truggled to hit anyone in the AL? He was a monster playing for Texas in 2008
find god buddy you need him. i'll pray for you
by Top Gun Numba 1 on Sep 29, 2009 9:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why do we have to do this?
Screw both of them.
Maybe I’m just an old fashioned BJ suck-off-er. (Good call Sandy)
by Lurch's Lobbyists on Sep 29, 2009 4:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Geez, i remember posing the question that Burrell might struggle as a DH
given his poor nunbers in inter-league when he was used as one.
The answers i got were if i was suggesting the earth was flat
by sternfan1 on Sep 29, 2009 6:39 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Haha ok this made me chuckle
Maybe I’m just an old fashioned BJ suck-off-er. (Good call Sandy)
by Lurch's Lobbyists on Sep 29, 2009 8:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's just one season man, small sample size
Let’s run him out there another 3-4 years until everything comes into balance.
Embrace Eternity
by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 29, 2009 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
3 or 4 years!?
No. I would be willing to give him next year to turn it around. And even then, there may be better/cheaper options for the 2011 season.
by Deepdoodle on Sep 29, 2009 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who the hell is "John" Hendry?
you believe the words of John Hendry,
by sternfan1 on Sep 29, 2009 7:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Known to his friends and the public as
Jim Hendry….
the ghost of stokes, camp, lugo strikes TB-sept 2009
by CubFanRaysaddict on Sep 29, 2009 8:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well sir, their names are spelled and pronounced differently
find god buddy you need him. i'll pray for you
by Top Gun Numba 1 on Sep 29, 2009 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's not have FreeZorilla search all your typos
www.draysbay.com
by Tommy Rancel on Sep 29, 2009 8:11 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
i'm not a writer, editor, or chief bottle washer for this blog
by sternfan1 on Sep 29, 2009 8:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What's a bottle-washer?
Embrace Eternity
by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 29, 2009 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gayjoke
find god buddy you need him. i'll pray for you
by Top Gun Numba 1 on Sep 29, 2009 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I never get those
I guess it takes one to know one
Embrace Eternity
by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 29, 2009 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and most say i never read an entire thread before posting
by sternfan1 on Sep 29, 2009 8:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're all riled up this morning
www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer
by Buc Wild on Sep 29, 2009 8:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
this morning??
nah, Tommy knows why i post those mistakes of his
just funnin
by sternfan1 on Sep 29, 2009 8:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is it because he isn't part of the heart-and-soul of DRB?
Embrace Eternity
by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 29, 2009 9:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Zing!
www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer
by Buc Wild on Sep 29, 2009 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You son of a bitch
find god buddy you need him. i'll pray for you
by Top Gun Numba 1 on Sep 29, 2009 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Bradley would do well in the relative obscurity of Tampa Bay
Just like he did at Arlington.
I was a big advocate of bringing Bradley in this previous offseason, and now we have a chance to make two situations right. The worst thing that can happen is that neither situation changes. At best, it’s a win-win.
"That's not baseball. Little numbers in a newspaper is...So-dookie, or whatever."
by Orlando Rays on Sep 29, 2009 8:21 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I know saying Arlington is obscure smacks of an oxymoron
But in baseball terms, it is.
"That's not baseball. Little numbers in a newspaper is...So-dookie, or whatever."
by Orlando Rays on Sep 29, 2009 8:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd much rather have Burrell than Bradley in the clubhouse
And I’d rather not have to dump another good player because we need to pay Bradley for an extra year. So I think the worst thing that can happen is that it makes things worse, not that the situation doesn’t change.
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
by Brickhaus on Sep 29, 2009 8:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bradley didn't have much trouble with the Rangers
Save for the almost-incident with the one reporter that goaded him into it.
Okay, new best case scenario: Steve Duemig or Dan Sileo goads him, and Milton beats whichever to a bloody pulp.
"That's not baseball. Little numbers in a newspaper is...So-dookie, or whatever."
by Orlando Rays on Sep 29, 2009 8:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was against bringing Bradley in
until you raised this tantalizing possibility. Hmmmm…..
by Deepdoodle on Sep 29, 2009 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
according to all reports
the Cubs will have to be responsible for picking up the majority of Bradley’s contract. No one wants to pay a headcase that much money, especially if they may be in the Cubs position a year from now and want to get rid of him. Some places have even reported the Cubs may have to pay up to 19 of the 21 mil remaining.
I think there will be a lot of interest in bradley if that team will only be on the hook for 5-6 mil for 2 seasons, it may work. I think the Cubs may even have interest in Burrell, esp in a contract year.
If Rays net risk after trading a Burrell and/or Wheeler is 5-6 mil for 2 seasons, it is a good risk. That is worth rolling the dice on.
by raysfaninminnesota on Sep 29, 2009 9:33 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Plate Appearances last 10 Years PtB v. MtN
Difference
Year G PA OPS+ wOBA
2000 69 303 53 0.082
2001 78 356 50 0.070
2002 59 326 53 0.070
2003 45 148 -57 (0.079)
2004 -14 -63 -1 0.006
2005 79 354 10 0.026
2006 48 162 8 0.021
2007 94 354 -26 (0.008)
2008 31 136 -38 (0.044)
2009 -6 -12 -20 (0.037)
Positive means Burrell had more of whichever it is, negative means Bradley had more.
Embrace Eternity
by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 29, 2009 9:37 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Bradley for Burrell, Wheeler, and Aki
And if the Cubs kick in 2 mil or so…that sounds like a great deal to me.
by raysfaninminnesota on Sep 29, 2009 9:39 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
2M so we owe him like 18M over 2 years?
No thanks
Embrace Eternity
by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 29, 2009 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
wow,not good at math this morning, huh?
Burrell = 9 mil, Wheeler = 3.5 mil + 1mil 2011 buyout, Aki = .25 buyout = 13.75 mil + 2mil = 15.75mil
Bradley = 21 mil – 15.75mil = 5.25 mil
Doesn’t that sound better?
by raysfaninminnesota on Sep 29, 2009 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're still paying him 9M a year
Plus what you have to pay the guys that replace Wheeler and Aki. I just say no to Bradley.
Embrace Eternity
by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 29, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wheeler is overpaid
Bradley cost is 21 mil – Cubs 7 mil = 16 mil left
Rays have 9 mil for Burrell. They will have to pay that no matter what. Bradley cost after that = 7 mil.
Aki buyout = .25…so cost = 6.75 mil
Wheeler cost if for 1 year is 4.5mil. Replacement cost should be around 3mil (like a Mike Gonzalez). Cost savings = 1.5mil…cost = 5.25mil
I suppose when you examine it, perhaps the Cubs would need to kick in a little more. But also remember you are upgrading 2 positions with this trade. I’d rather have a Gonzalez over Wheeler. I’d rather have Bradley over Burrell. But there needs to be a way for it to be a 1 year shot, rather than have to have money on the hook for 2011. IF the Rays can do it without having to have more than 2-3mil on the 2011, then it’s an ok deal.
by raysfaninminnesota on Sep 29, 2009 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Since when does 21-7=16, did I miss a step?
Is Bradley an upgrade over Burrell? I’d rather have Pat get 500 PA than Bradley be slightly better at 350 PA
Embrace Eternity
by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 29, 2009 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i guess i can't add today either
So the Rays cost for 2011 would be 3.25 mil.
Bradley had over 400 AB last year and was healthy enough to do the same this year, and even pass last year’s totals.
And while he didn’t have a great year, his numbers were not horrible either…still better than Burrell’s. Both players would benefit from returning to their respective leagues.
And the Rays would have additional money to upgrade the pen, and upgrade over Wheeler.
I’d rather have slightly less AB if it means more production.
by raysfaninminnesota on Sep 29, 2009 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and even if no cost savings for Wheeler
I’d rather have Mike Gonzalez or someone like that for same money as Wheeler. a 2 year 6-8 mil deal sounds about right (It’s what Affeldt got last year from SF)
by raysfaninminnesota on Sep 29, 2009 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Burrell PA
474
618
684
599
534
669
567
598
645
461
Bradley Pa
171
262
358
451
597
315
405
244
509
473
Embrace Eternity
by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 29, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bradley has had one full season of PA's in 10 years
The nature of his injuries are always some freak accident that you can’t predict. I hate not knowing if he would be on the field or not. As for all the numbers you listed, they are pure speculation. Yeah it could be like that or it could be completely not like that.
Embrace Eternity
by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 29, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
numbers i listed were not exactly speculation
Because if the Cubs do not pick up most of his contract, we are not even having this conversation. This market is oversaturated with DH types. Jim Thome, Jermaine Dye, Vladimir Guererro, etc. The only way Bradley gets traded is if they take on someone else’s bad contract, or eat most of his salary.
Pat the Bat will have to be included in any deal because they play the same position and gives a bat that Lou might like.
If the Rays include Wheeler or Aki is speculation, but, if they don’t, then the Cubs will still have to eat all but about 3-5 mil of the 2011 portion of Bradley’s salary to make this work.
But I suppose for anyone this can be viewed as a horse a piece. Do I want to count on Burrell to rebound or Bradley’s health or ability to stay out of trouble?
Bradley does better without the spotlight, so I do believe Tampa would be a good fit for him. I think both would do well with a change of scenary.
by raysfaninminnesota on Sep 29, 2009 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Burrell for Bradley?
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
2009 Rays Baseball: Welp.....we'll try again in 2010
2009 FSU Football: The most inconsistent team in the country
Be a TRUE Seminole: http://www.seminoles.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/071509aab.html
by JMB on Sep 29, 2009 10:18 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
agree'd
he’ll just call the Tampa Bay fans miserable and racist as well
"Doesn't Manny Ramirez look like the monster from Predator??" - Will Farrell as Harry Carey
by Gone Phishing on Sep 29, 2009 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What would you call the miserable, racist Tampa Bay fans?
"Typical negro, laying down on the job." -R.J. Anderson
by steve-o1285 on Sep 29, 2009 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pinella said Cubs want to replace Bradley with
a “big bat.” Pat the BAT
www.draysbay.com
by Tommy Rancel on Sep 29, 2009 1:36 PM EDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Soriano regression syndrome would help
Embrace Eternity
by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 29, 2009 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















