Could the Rays Trade Pat Burrell for Milton Bradley?

In theory? Sure. 

A swap of disappointing sluggers, Milton Bradley and Pat Burrell, seems like a good idea on paper. Burrell has underachieved all season with the Rays and has struggled in his adjustment to the designated hitter role and the American League. Given the National League resurgence of failed AL sluggers Jason Giambi and Matt Holliday, Burrell seems like he may fit in that category.

Bradley has struggled on and off the field in Chicago. However, he is just a year removed from a career year in which he flourished as a DH in the AL. The Rays courted Bradley this offseason and were believed to be a finalist for his services before the Cubs swooped in with a 3 yr/$30 million dollar deal that was perceived to be too rich for the Rays blood; and that's where the problem lies.

It appears that there's more than a little interest in Chicago Cubs right fielder Milton Bradley. A source with knowledge of the situation said that the Tampa Bay Rays are very interested in bringing the beleaguered outfielder to Florida.

Tampa Bay was the most aggressive team to pursue Bradley in the offseason before he signed with Chicago in January. It is not known if the teams have exchanged names, but it does appear that the Rays would like to move the contract of Pat Burrell. The former Philadelphia Phillies outfielder has one year left on his contract at $9 million after signing a two-year, $16 million deal with the Rays last winter.

.--ESPNChicago.com

 More on a potential Burrell/Bradley swap after the jump

Burrell

2009

Bradley

0.225

BA

0.257

0.322

OBP

0.378

0.374

SLG

0.397

0.311

wOBA

0.345

29.3

K%

24.2

12.4

BB%

14.4

-0.3

WAR

1.2

While the match seems to be made in heaven, the economics just don't match. In 2010, Burrell will be in the final year of a 2 yr/$16 million dollar contract and is guaranteed $9 million dollars. Bradley is also due to make $9 million dollars which would be perfect had he not had another year on that contract. Because he didn't spend 75 days on the DL and is not on the DL to end the season, his $12 million dollar salary in 2011 is still due. The Rays shed Scott Kazmir's $22.5 million dollar tag and could trade Carlos Pena or Carl Crawford at some point in the next year to free up more cash. Adding Bradley, his perceived behavioral problems, injury history, and $21 million dollars just doesn't match up to the team's salary structure.  

Depending on the Rays interest in Bradley, things could still happen to get a deal done. The Cubs could agree to eat some of Bradley's contract in order to rid themselves of the headache. Or the Cubs could take on a Dan Wheeler-esque contract to help off set some of the salary constraints. Either way, I find it hard to see the Rays taking on the full $21 million dollars owed to Bradley.

There is also the little minor detail of the Cubs actually wanting Burrell in return. Remember, he's coming off his worst season in the bigs; he's getting older and he can't play defense. Still, if you believe the words of Jim Hendry, the Cubs maybe willing to bite the Burrell bullet in order to stop playing Bradley's games (I'm sorry).

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join DRaysBay

You must be a member of DRaysBay to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at DRaysBay. You should read them.

Join DRaysBay

You must be a member of DRaysBay to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at DRaysBay. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9351_tracker