DRaysBay: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

Could the Rays Trade Pat Burrell for Milton Bradley?

Photo

More photos » by David Zalubowski - AP

In theory? Sure. 

A swap of disappointing sluggers, Milton Bradley and Pat Burrell, seems like a good idea on paper. Burrell has underachieved all season with the Rays and has struggled in his adjustment to the designated hitter role and the American League. Given the National League resurgence of failed AL sluggers Jason Giambi and Matt Holliday, Burrell seems like he may fit in that category.

Bradley has struggled on and off the field in Chicago. However, he is just a year removed from a career year in which he flourished as a DH in the AL. The Rays courted Bradley this offseason and were believed to be a finalist for his services before the Cubs swooped in with a 3 yr/$30 million dollar deal that was perceived to be too rich for the Rays blood; and that's where the problem lies.

It appears that there's more than a little interest in Chicago Cubs right fielder Milton Bradley. A source with knowledge of the situation said that the Tampa Bay Rays are very interested in bringing the beleaguered outfielder to Florida.

Tampa Bay was the most aggressive team to pursue Bradley in the offseason before he signed with Chicago in January. It is not known if the teams have exchanged names, but it does appear that the Rays would like to move the contract of Pat Burrell. The former Philadelphia Phillies outfielder has one year left on his contract at $9 million after signing a two-year, $16 million deal with the Rays last winter.

.--ESPNChicago.com

 More on a potential Burrell/Bradley swap after the jump

Star-divide

Burrell

2009

Bradley

0.225

BA

0.257

0.322

OBP

0.378

0.374

SLG

0.397

0.311

wOBA

0.345

29.3

K%

24.2

12.4

BB%

14.4

-0.3

WAR

1.2

While the match seems to be made in heaven, the economics just don't match. In 2010, Burrell will be in the final year of a 2 yr/$16 million dollar contract and is guaranteed $9 million dollars. Bradley is also due to make $9 million dollars which would be perfect had he not had another year on that contract. Because he didn't spend 75 days on the DL and is not on the DL to end the season, his $12 million dollar salary in 2011 is still due. The Rays shed Scott Kazmir's $22.5 million dollar tag and could trade Carlos Pena or Carl Crawford at some point in the next year to free up more cash. Adding Bradley, his perceived behavioral problems, injury history, and $21 million dollars just doesn't match up to the team's salary structure.  

Depending on the Rays interest in Bradley, things could still happen to get a deal done. The Cubs could agree to eat some of Bradley's contract in order to rid themselves of the headache. Or the Cubs could take on a Dan Wheeler-esque contract to help off set some of the salary constraints. Either way, I find it hard to see the Rays taking on the full $21 million dollars owed to Bradley.

There is also the little minor detail of the Cubs actually wanting Burrell in return. Remember, he's coming off his worst season in the bigs; he's getting older and he can't play defense. Still, if you believe the words of Jim Hendry, the Cubs maybe willing to bite the Burrell bullet in order to stop playing Bradley's games (I'm sorry).

0 recs  |  Comment 54 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Thoughts of Bradley monopolize his time

It’s a risky stratego, and it boggles the mind, but if you can properly pull off the operation, then it provides everyone with a clue about his psyche.

Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."

by Brickhaus on Sep 29, 2009 8:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A few of reasons as to why I don't see this making too much sense

1. Attitude-Rays have gone out of their way to make sure there are no bad influences in the clubhouse, Bradley coming in is counterproductive to that philosophy.

2. Salary-There would have to be a whole lot of salary juggling going on to make this work. Someone has to eat that 2011 money and it won’t be the Rays, so how much will or can the Cubs eat.

3. Usefulness-Burrell is basically 1 year away from having is career end unless he accepts a much smaller role. The Cubs brought in Bradley to play RF and for his switch hitting abilities(they needed a LHH for balance). As we have seen this year, Burrell can’t play the OF basically at all anymore, as he is extremely slow and has seen his hitting diminish. What’s worrisome is not that he is hitting poorly, but it looks like he won’t get any better. Lets face it, Chicago will not be a friendly place to play either. I can’t see a NL switch making much difference. Hitting in the NL is pretty even, only the pitching isn’t as good in the NL, but he’s struggled to hit anyone in the AL, and with his streakiness, would you trust him to be helpful.

by Transplanted on Sep 29, 2009 3:58 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Why do we have to do this?

Screw both of them.

Maybe I’m just an old fashioned BJ suck-off-er. (Good call Sandy)

by Lurch's Lobbyists on Sep 29, 2009 4:28 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This

Rarely is the question asked: Is our children learning?

by acablue on Sep 29, 2009 6:10 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Geez, i remember posing the question that Burrell might struggle as a DH

given his poor nunbers in inter-league when he was used as one.

The answers i got were if i was suggesting the earth was flat

by sternfan1 on Sep 29, 2009 6:39 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Haha ok this made me chuckle

Maybe I’m just an old fashioned BJ suck-off-er. (Good call Sandy)

by Lurch's Lobbyists on Sep 29, 2009 8:16 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's just one season man, small sample size

Let’s run him out there another 3-4 years until everything comes into balance.

Embrace Eternity

by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 29, 2009 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

3 or 4 years!?

No. I would be willing to give him next year to turn it around. And even then, there may be better/cheaper options for the 2011 season.

by Deepdoodle on Sep 29, 2009 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who the hell is "John" Hendry?

you believe the words of John Hendry,

by sternfan1 on Sep 29, 2009 7:02 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

You're all riled up this morning

www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer

by Buc Wild on Sep 29, 2009 8:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

this morning??

nah, Tommy knows why i post those mistakes of his

just funnin

by sternfan1 on Sep 29, 2009 8:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Zing!

www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer

by Buc Wild on Sep 29, 2009 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You son of a bitch

find god buddy you need him. i'll pray for you

by Top Gun Numba 1 on Sep 29, 2009 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Bradley would do well in the relative obscurity of Tampa Bay

Just like he did at Arlington.

I was a big advocate of bringing Bradley in this previous offseason, and now we have a chance to make two situations right. The worst thing that can happen is that neither situation changes. At best, it’s a win-win.

"That's not baseball. Little numbers in a newspaper is...So-dookie, or whatever."

by Orlando Rays on Sep 29, 2009 8:21 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I know saying Arlington is obscure smacks of an oxymoron

But in baseball terms, it is.

"That's not baseball. Little numbers in a newspaper is...So-dookie, or whatever."

by Orlando Rays on Sep 29, 2009 8:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd much rather have Burrell than Bradley in the clubhouse

And I’d rather not have to dump another good player because we need to pay Bradley for an extra year. So I think the worst thing that can happen is that it makes things worse, not that the situation doesn’t change.

Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."

by Brickhaus on Sep 29, 2009 8:24 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bradley didn't have much trouble with the Rangers

Save for the almost-incident with the one reporter that goaded him into it.

Okay, new best case scenario: Steve Duemig or Dan Sileo goads him, and Milton beats whichever to a bloody pulp.

"That's not baseball. Little numbers in a newspaper is...So-dookie, or whatever."

by Orlando Rays on Sep 29, 2009 8:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was against bringing Bradley in

until you raised this tantalizing possibility. Hmmmm…..

by Deepdoodle on Sep 29, 2009 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

according to all reports

 the Cubs will have to be responsible for picking up the majority of Bradley’s contract. No one wants to pay a headcase that much money, especially if they may be in the Cubs position a year from now and want to get rid of him. Some places have even reported the Cubs may have to pay up to 19 of the 21 mil remaining.

I think there will be a lot of interest in bradley if that team will only be on the hook for 5-6 mil for 2 seasons, it may work. I think the Cubs may even have interest in Burrell, esp in a contract year.

If Rays net risk after trading a Burrell and/or Wheeler is 5-6 mil for 2 seasons, it is a good risk. That is worth rolling the dice on.

by raysfaninminnesota on Sep 29, 2009 9:33 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Plate Appearances last 10 Years PtB v. MtN

                 Difference
Year G PA OPS+ wOBA
2000 69 303 53 0.082
2001 78 356 50 0.070
2002 59 326 53 0.070
2003 45 148 -57 (0.079)
2004 -14 -63 -1 0.006
2005 79 354 10 0.026
2006 48 162 8 0.021
2007 94 354 -26 (0.008)
2008 31 136 -38 (0.044)
2009 -6 -12 -20 (0.037)

Positive means Burrell had more of whichever it is, negative means Bradley had more.

Embrace Eternity

by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 29, 2009 9:37 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Bradley for Burrell, Wheeler, and Aki

And if the Cubs kick in 2 mil or so…that sounds like a great deal to me.

by raysfaninminnesota on Sep 29, 2009 9:39 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

wow,not good at math this morning, huh?

Burrell = 9 mil, Wheeler = 3.5 mil + 1mil 2011 buyout, Aki = .25 buyout = 13.75 mil + 2mil = 15.75mil

Bradley = 21 mil – 15.75mil = 5.25 mil

Doesn’t that sound better?

by raysfaninminnesota on Sep 29, 2009 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're still paying him 9M a year

Plus what you have to pay the guys that replace Wheeler and Aki. I just say no to Bradley.

Embrace Eternity

by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 29, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wheeler is overpaid

Bradley cost is 21 mil – Cubs 7 mil = 16 mil left
Rays have 9 mil for Burrell. They will have to pay that no matter what. Bradley cost after that = 7 mil.

Aki buyout = .25…so cost = 6.75 mil
Wheeler cost if for 1 year is 4.5mil. Replacement cost should be around 3mil (like a Mike Gonzalez). Cost savings = 1.5mil…cost = 5.25mil

I suppose when you examine it, perhaps the Cubs would need to kick in a little more. But also remember you are upgrading 2 positions with this trade. I’d rather have a Gonzalez over Wheeler. I’d rather have Bradley over Burrell. But there needs to be a way for it to be a 1 year shot, rather than have to have money on the hook for 2011. IF the Rays can do it without having to have more than 2-3mil on the 2011, then it’s an ok deal.

by raysfaninminnesota on Sep 29, 2009 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Since when does 21-7=16, did I miss a step?

Is Bradley an upgrade over Burrell? I’d rather have Pat get 500 PA than Bradley be slightly better at 350 PA

Embrace Eternity

by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 29, 2009 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i guess i can't add today either

So the Rays cost for 2011 would be 3.25 mil.

Bradley had over 400 AB last year and was healthy enough to do the same this year, and even pass last year’s totals.

And while he didn’t have a great year, his numbers were not horrible either…still better than Burrell’s. Both players would benefit from returning to their respective leagues.

And the Rays would have additional money to upgrade the pen, and upgrade over Wheeler.

I’d rather have slightly less AB if it means more production.

by raysfaninminnesota on Sep 29, 2009 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

and even if no cost savings for Wheeler

I’d rather have Mike Gonzalez or someone like that for same money as Wheeler. a 2 year 6-8 mil deal sounds about right (It’s what Affeldt got last year from SF)

by raysfaninminnesota on Sep 29, 2009 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Burrell PA

474
618
684
599
534
669
567
598
645
461

Bradley Pa

171
262
358
451
597
315
405
244
509
473

Embrace Eternity

by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 29, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bradley has had one full season of PA's in 10 years

The nature of his injuries are always some freak accident that you can’t predict. I hate not knowing if he would be on the field or not. As for all the numbers you listed, they are pure speculation. Yeah it could be like that or it could be completely not like that.

Embrace Eternity

by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 29, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

numbers i listed were not exactly speculation

Because if the Cubs do not pick up most of his contract, we are not even having this conversation. This market is oversaturated with DH types. Jim Thome, Jermaine Dye, Vladimir Guererro, etc. The only way Bradley gets traded is if they take on someone else’s bad contract, or eat most of his salary.

Pat the Bat will have to be included in any deal because they play the same position and gives a bat that Lou might like.

If the Rays include Wheeler or Aki is speculation, but, if they don’t, then the Cubs will still have to eat all but about 3-5 mil of the 2011 portion of Bradley’s salary to make this work.

But I suppose for anyone this can be viewed as a horse a piece. Do I want to count on Burrell to rebound or Bradley’s health or ability to stay out of trouble?

Bradley does better without the spotlight, so I do believe Tampa would be a good fit for him. I think both would do well with a change of scenary.

by raysfaninminnesota on Sep 29, 2009 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Burrell for Bradley?

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

2009 Rays Baseball: Welp.....we'll try again in 2010
2009 FSU Football: The most inconsistent team in the country
Be a TRUE Seminole: http://www.seminoles.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/071509aab.html

by JMB on Sep 29, 2009 10:18 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

agree'd

he’ll just call the Tampa Bay fans miserable and racist as well

"Doesn't Manny Ramirez look like the monster from Predator??" - Will Farrell as Harry Carey

by Gone Phishing on Sep 29, 2009 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What would you call the miserable, racist Tampa Bay fans?

"Typical negro, laying down on the job." -R.J. Anderson

by steve-o1285 on Sep 29, 2009 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Founded in 2005. DRaysBay is home to "progressive statistical analysis and reasoned argument."
Start posting about the Rays »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Desmond Jennings Makes the Tops AA-All-Stars
ABC Coalition to Vote on Draft Report Today.
Fan page for Dick Bosman, Rays minor league pitching coordinator
Upton's Struggles vs Lefties
Evan Longoria wins the Silver Slugger Award
09 Minor Leaguers File for Free Agency
Longoria on the MLB 2k10 cover?
Thank you Tim Marchman.
Longo's Slugcon by Location
Longo wins Silver Slugger

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


VPs of Baseball Operations

Nando_small R.J. Anderson

Raysring1_small Tommy Rancel

Zorilla_small FreeZorilla

Price_small Erik Hahmann

Ticket Account Executive

Rays_small Steve Slowinski