Speaking of the Strong and Adaptable
Falling out of the playoff race is the absolute worst thing for this website. I don't mean in terms of visits, clicks, and views either. The network worries about those things, I don't. Right now, there are three daily content choices, 1) write about a current trend or observation, 2) write about something that may happen in the off-season, 3) do not write at all. Usually I fall in between 1 and 2 and it's a fine line to walk. The off-season is a long, dark, lonely cave. Wasting all the matches now gives less hope for survival. Being such, I'll spark one today and tackle an underlining question about next year's team: who will the fourth outfielder be?
Gabe Kapler is not what you think he is. He looks like the epitome of the dumb jock. Bald head, huge muscles, expressionless face 99% of the time. Then you hear him talk, or read some of his quotes, or talk to people who talk to him, and he's not that guy. Unlike his play, he seems very in control of his thoughts and emotions. This is a bit surprising to say the least and I couldn't believe Jonah Keri when he first shared this experience until I witnessed it myself.
Sure, he encompasses gritty play and sometimes his ballerina act in the outfield gets tiresome, but I've grown to enjoy his play more often than not. Mostly because he kills left-handed pitching like he should. In 143 plate appearances against southpaws to date, Kapler has 35 hits (21 of which are of the extra base variety), 23 walks (only 15 strikeouts), and a line of .299/.406/.590. That is phenomenal and when you add that his defense isn't half bad either, you have a bargain for the million-plus the Rays paid him.
Now, Kapler has struggled in limited exposure against righties. A .115/.164/.115 is repulsive, still his BABIP against them is .167, a figure unlikely to sustain. A week ago he turned 34-years-old and I'm sure the line of suitors for him will be decent if he so chooses to continue playing. Or he could return.
The problem with this is that the Rays outfield is again stacked. It's funny how these things work out. Three years ago, the Rays had too many outfielders: Carl Crawford, Rocco Baldelli, Delmon Young, Elijah Dukes, Jonny Gomes - okay, "outfielder" - and the transitioning B.J. Upton. Last year people said they didn't have enough and they had to acquire Nathan Haynes and Gabe Gross during the season, plus sign Eric Hinske. Now, the Rays are right back to the point where it's overkill. Crawford and Upton remain, the rest are long gone, and Matt Joyce, Desmond Jennings, Gross, and Fernando Perez are presumably looking for roster spots on the 2010 team.
That doesn't leave a ton of room for a 34-year-old whose best utility is his ability to do what most of the baseball corner outfield population can do: hit lefties. You figure Joyce sticks, Jennings goes to Durham, Gross changes addresses, and that leaves Kapler/Perez fighting for the outfield bench spot. This battle, if it comes to be, drips of intrigue.
I'm not going to compare Kapler's intelligence to Perez' -- just as I'm unlikely to compare Perez' body fat percentage to Kapler's -- but I think I'm reasonable in stating that both would finish in an upper percentile if MLB were to hold a league-wide IQ testing ‘contest'. Given Perez' history in center field and his speed and range combination, he figures to be a plus defender, probably edging Kapler by a few runs over a full season. Perez is coming off a wrist injury and even prior to that there were murmurs the Rays didn't like him switch-hitting. In a little over 600 Triple-A plate appearances Perez has hit.287/.363/.391 and since 2005 has hit .299/.368/.470 against southpaws.
It's fair to say Kapler is the superior hitter and Perez the superior fielder. So where do you draw the line on either? As mentioned, Perez is younger - cheaper too - and not yet out of options. This means, he can be sent up and down next season as the Rays please without being offered to waivers.
Okay, so let's look at the numbers. In statistical terms, if we assume Kapler will OPS .950 (Ed note: Kapler's last three years actually have him with a .965 OPS against lefties, but I wanted to prove my point by contracting the difference into something more reasonable and round) and Perez .800 in 200 plate appearances, then Perez must be 12 runs better defensively to register as the better player. Let's say Perez is +8 on defense and the difference is four runs. That's a pretty marginal difference, all told, but since wins are worth about 4.84 million, and this is 0.4 of a win, we can see that Kapler is worth 1.94 million more than Perez - at least based on our projections which I'm not claiming are anywhere near accurate. That means our logical test on whether Kapler should be re-signed or not is pretty simple. It comes down to this equation:
X - 400,000 = 1.94 million
Where X is Kapler's proposed salary, 400,000 is Perez' salary, and 1.94 million is the predetermined value of the performance gap. The Rays could go cost efficient and just say to heck with Kapler, or they could keep him around and reap the quantitative and qualitative benefits.
I guess it really comes down to one thing: whether Sunburst Entertainment wants to pursue poetry and classical music or muscle shirts and hunk calendars.
0 recs |
47 comments
|
Comments
For me i'd rather see Joyce get a chance to play v LHP
and with Kapler’s splits so lopsided, i’d guess they let him walk
by sternfan1 on Sep 8, 2009 10:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
So, Perez for the reserve outfielder spot?
by R.J. Anderson on Sep 8, 2009 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd say Perez
Kapler may be the superior bat, but I have a hard time believing that Perez’s offensive output next year wouldn’t eclipse Kapler’s this year. Perez is going to be making pretty much league minimum. This is a good place where the Rays can save money.
I can't wait until we trade him for a reliever.
by kericr on Sep 8, 2009 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kap has killed LHP, just hasn't had many AB and way too many vs RHP
Having said that since it is the lesser of a platoon, I’d go with Nando. Nando’s Pinch Running plays into it too.
Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla
by FreeZorilla on Sep 8, 2009 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's also nice when he just lays down a bunt
*yawn*
by raysfan81 on Sep 8, 2009 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe--but they may try Rodriguez in that role
as super UTL
I’m thinking they may move Aybar
by sternfan1 on Sep 8, 2009 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unfortunately they might not get much for him. After this year, I'm sure that every team in the league is going to be scared shitless of his D.
I can't wait until we trade him for a reliever.
by kericr on Sep 8, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And yet Yuniesky Betancourt brought back two decent arms.
by R.J. Anderson on Sep 8, 2009 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sort of unfair though, playing multiple positions well takes a rare breed
by sternfan1 on Sep 8, 2009 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, but he hasn't really played any position well this year.
I’m hoping that he proves me right by playing some solid 1B like I suggested when Pena was in his megaslump and someone sees him as a power-hitting 1B and takes a gamble.
I can't wait until we trade him for a reliever.
by kericr on Sep 8, 2009 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or better yet, we keep Aybar and unload Pena if this happens.
That smile alone is worth a sandwich pick.
I can't wait until we trade him for a reliever.
by kericr on Sep 8, 2009 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You'd have to wait until Pena's a FA to get a pick.
by R.J. Anderson on Sep 8, 2009 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I probably shouldn't have used the word 'sandwich', but it was a joke.
I can't wait until we trade him for a reliever.
by kericr on Sep 8, 2009 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No real reason to move Aybar.
His still got a good bat. I think he’s average at 1B or 3B and he’s relatively cheap. Aybar, Rodriguez and Zobrist give you a lot of flexibilty on a roster.
www.draysbay.com
by Tommy Rancel on Sep 8, 2009 11:20 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
It's time to see how the market reacts to a team that is good, but not good enough.
This is truly an unprecedented situation for the market: A winning season without the playoffs.
"That's not baseball. Little numbers in a newspaper is...So-dookie, or whatever."
by Orlando Rays on Sep 8, 2009 11:01 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
X - 400,000 = 1.94 million
“x” is almost $2.4 million. I think this is a pretty inefficient use of resources. Granted it is the “value” of the additional benefit, but it ignores what that $2 million could be used for. I’d guess Friedman and co. could get a bit more benefit out of that chunk than the additional utility provided by Kapler. Throw in the versatility gained by Nando (particularly in the case of injury) and his options, and I think he’s the choice. He can also PR for Burrell as well.
by rglass44 on Sep 8, 2009 12:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What if Kapler agrees to come back for 1.5 million?
by R.J. Anderson on Sep 8, 2009 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then maybe.
Depends on how else the funds could be allocated.
What if that $1.5 mill. had to go to Balfour or Kapler? I’d rather use it to build up the BP in all honesty. We’ll see what the cost is, and if he comes back I’d have no issue. I would like to see how Nando does with some semi-regular ABs though.
by rglass44 on Sep 8, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather go the cheap route with the pen.
Tommy mentioned Joaquin Benoit a few days back, he seems like a cheap type to add.
by R.J. Anderson on Sep 8, 2009 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is relatively cheap.
I just would like to see them willing to use some of the SP depth in the pen. Talbot, Sonny, etc. in the pen with a rotation of Shields, Garza, Price, Niemann, and Davis. Hellickson could be called up to start or one of the guys in the pen could swing for a start. The pen could look somethink like this:
Howell
Balfour
Wheeler
Sonny
Talbot
Loogy
??? (Thayer, Cormier, FA option?)
I also wouldn’t be opposed to going after someone like Juan Cruz from last year. Granted he was type A, but a guy that might be $2/3 million a year that will likely be a little better. Then, hopefully Joe will slot them as they pitch.
by rglass44 on Sep 8, 2009 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kiko Calero is interesting to me.
by R.J. Anderson on Sep 8, 2009 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes.
So is Kelvim Escobar.
Injury risks? Absolutely, but if they come for cheap I’d love’em.
Kiko has a 69% contact rate. <3
by R.J. Anderson on Sep 8, 2009 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Escobar in the BP or org. fodder?
Would we bring him in in the Penny/Smoltz mold? I wouldn’t be for that, but if he was willing to work out of the BP I would.
Just looked it up, and Kiki has been great this year. I’d be totally fine with using him when healthy. We have enough arms to protect us if he isn’t.
by rglass44 on Sep 8, 2009 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Escobar would be in the pen.
Until his arm fell off.
by R.J. Anderson on Sep 8, 2009 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There's nothing in that line-up that doesn't suggest more of the same in 2010
by sternfan1 on Sep 8, 2009 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do people actually believe the bullpen is the reason we underachieved?
by R.J. Anderson on Sep 8, 2009 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It certainly plays a factor in the current melt down
If it would have stayed the course we’d still be in the chase
by sternfan1 on Sep 8, 2009 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The bullpen, rotation, and offense/defense each had bad months.
by R.J. Anderson on Sep 8, 2009 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What?
I’m saying each unit had a poor month that you can trademark as “reasons for downfall”.
by R.J. Anderson on Sep 8, 2009 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Correct, and when you asked if people believe the pen is the reason, i answered in like manner
by sternfan1 on Sep 8, 2009 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They aren't the reason though.
The sole reason at least.
by R.J. Anderson on Sep 8, 2009 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Doesn't everyone?
Your love affair with Balfour and Sonny is silly
by sternfan1 on Sep 8, 2009 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, everyone does.
But how many of those exist?
I don’t have a love affair with Sonny. He was underrated and discarded last year despite pitching well. There’s no excuse for his poor pitching this year.
by R.J. Anderson on Sep 8, 2009 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's completely lost his confidence, and that's why the BB is out of control
he’s nibbling, afraid to challenge
by sternfan1 on Sep 8, 2009 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like some of the arms the Indians got in deals
C, Perez, Todd and Masterson if they put him back in the pen where he belongs
by sternfan1 on Sep 8, 2009 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK so how do you propose we acquire talent like that?
BTW, C. Perez walks almost 4.5 an IP for his career don’t you? Balfour’s is 4.7 for his career.
Masterson has a ton of trouble getting lefties out, and he walks 4 per 9.
Do you ever bother with facts?
by rglass44 on Sep 8, 2009 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ask the Indians if they'd trade Perez or Masterson for Balfour straight up
I’m aware of their BB issues, but as i stated Masterson needs to go back to the pen, and Perez had some early jitters but has figured it out for the most part
Balfour is a career minor leaguer, who for one year got it done (sans playoffs)
by sternfan1 on Sep 8, 2009 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why would they trade a young starter for a non-elite reliever?
What team would do that? I wouldn’t trade Wade Davis for any reliever.
by R.J. Anderson on Sep 8, 2009 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
thats dumb
he was above average this year
Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla
by FreeZorilla on Sep 8, 2009 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 





















