Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Why The 2009 Rays Failed to Reach the Playoffs: The Defenders

No problems here.

The defense was excellent once more. For a direct comparison:

2009: 59.7 UZR (56.6 RngR, -1.8 ErrR) 2nd in majors

2008: 74.2 UZR (44.3 RngR, -2.7 ErrR) 1st in majors

Jason Bartlett (-5.8) and Carlos Pena (-3.9) will probably be in the running for their respective positional Gold Glove. They shouldn't be, but reputation matters more than performance. On the flip side, Carl Crawford (15.7), Evan Longoria (14.7), Ben Zobrist (14.4), and B.J. Upton (12.1) were well above average at their positions.

The season's not over, but the Rays currently have better everything except for Double Play Rate.

People will blame the defense for momentary lapses and whatnot, but at the end of the day, there's nothing more to expect from them. They played extremely well and if not for Seattle's resurgence (and dependence) on nothing but hardcore glovers, would've repeated as team UZR champs.

---

Next up: the rotation

Comment 184 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I fail to see WHO can actually beat Longoria for a GG @ 3B

He’s got the best defensive & offensive numbers @ 3B in the AL. CC you gotta hope that writers are high on him this year, because it’s tough to win a GG as a LF(JoePos actually had a decent SI article about LF GGs). Maybe his good offensive season and the ASG appearce can give him an edge, it took long enough.

by Transplanted on Sep 9, 2009 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

this is what i mean by manipulating stats

2009 23rd FPCT/ 9th Errors
2008 10th FPCT/ 23rd Erros

I dont know about you but, thats not very good this year.

by Hook85 on Sep 10, 2009 6:28 AM EDT reply actions  

of course i agree with that

but you know there are obvious errors and the Rays have had a bad season in that regard

and look at last night, when the DP wasn’t turned, not ruled an error but as bad as one

take a look at my analysis of the RS blog RJ posted below concerning the average RS per team—thanks

by sternfan1 on Sep 10, 2009 8:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

By calling you out?

You said “urdumb.” He pointed to a flaw in your argument. That is not a personal attack.

by rglass44 on Sep 10, 2009 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm tired of arguing with y'all

I’m a Rays fan, but i’m realistic

This may or may not be a good team

Who knows" One year proves little, and time will tell what happens

The fact this team is now 4 games under 500 v AL is alarming

I love reading all your stats, nut sometimes i think you become so enamored in them, you lose fact of the ultimate stat W/L

If you don’t agree “obvious ewrror” was a personal attack then we differ greatly

by sternfan1 on Sep 10, 2009 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think we all are realistic.

Generally, we tend to trust the FO because of their success. We also tend to look at underlying causes to explain why the W/L is the way it is. Without that, there is little to discuss. “Oh we won.” Is about the extent of the discussion there.

by rglass44 on Sep 10, 2009 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would argue you issue a dozen of similar attacks each day

have fun writing on the great Gabes and their wonderful wOBA while the team slowly sinks into the sea

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Sep 10, 2009 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Errors matter, but it should not be the sole determinant

UZR takes errors into account

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Sep 10, 2009 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

The "new" stats are cool

But I agree with Stern, you can’t overlook the increased number of errors. Sure, UZR does take them into account. OPS takes into account batting average – but BA does still matter.

The Rays were a good defensive team in 2009, but they weren’t as good as they were last year.

I think the stats shown here show that y’all are really both correct. Rays aren’t as good as last year, but D isn’t the reason we’re out of it.

by TallMatt on Sep 10, 2009 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

The Rays were not as good defensively, but still very good. Zobrist arguably saved the team defense.

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Sep 10, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

Did you read anything on this site before posting?

I’m not even being a jerk right now, I didn’t spend hours putting together the stat guide just so people wouldn’t use it.

by R.J. Anderson on Sep 10, 2009 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Is there a metric for measuring defense in high leverage situations?

Errors and other defensive lapses at critical junctures have been devastating, imo.

by zeng8r on Sep 10, 2009 9:47 AM EDT reply actions  

My bad,

 I thought that this discussion was about the Rays’ season, given that the article is titled “Why the 2009 Rays failed to make the playoffs”.

 My point is that, as a team, defensive mistakes have often: a) come at the worst possible critical moment or b) be immediately followed by a bad pitch which results in a huge inning for the opposition. The second occurrence is also a pitching problem, of course, but it’s the misplay on the field that often flusters whoever’s on the mound.

by zeng8r on Sep 10, 2009 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

MVB's declining defense is of HUGE concern to me.

One of the key reasons I’d like to trade him this offseason.

by rglass44 on Sep 10, 2009 10:13 AM EDT reply actions  

What's MVB's contract look like?

If the Rays have someone who can fill in and perform adequately with average offense and (as RJ says) 0 < x < 5 defense, who is ~ 2 WAR, who is 1/5 the cost, dont you at least explore it?

www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer

by Buc Wild on Sep 10, 2009 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Brignac is still a under control for longer though, correct?

I know Brignac has SSS at the MLB level, can we derive anything from a look at MVB, his contract/cost and age compared to Brignac.

The Rays can’t afford to be stuck holding the bag on declining aging players (I think we all know that, just re-stating the obvious). No one is suggesting to go nuts and trade everyone. But if I had any say in the discussion, I’d be fielding and making calls as often as possible to gauge interest on some guys. You obviously dont move a Longo, but with MVB, Pena, etc you never know when you might get a great offer that could replace their production.

www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer

by Buc Wild on Sep 10, 2009 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Brignac's under control for roughly six seasons.

And a post on shortstop options is coming next week. I tried holding it off til the off-season but … well.

by R.J. Anderson on Sep 10, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good

that saves me the time of trying to hack through numbers and look at Brignac and MVB (and I assume S-Rod)

www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer

by Buc Wild on Sep 10, 2009 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

The argument for team defense being a larger factor

When looking at the overall field, there were only two of seven positions with UZR improvements (Zobrist’s two main positions. Here are the year over year positional changes:

1B: -10.9
2B: 5.9
3B: -6.3
SS: -4
RF: 13.7
CF: -5.5
LF: -10.7

The left side of the diamond had a net change of -23.75 (inc/ half of CF)

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Sep 10, 2009 10:55 AM EDT reply actions  

Of course it was still highly positive at 17.75 on the left side

but a big drop of 41.5 a year ago.

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Sep 10, 2009 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Jesus

CC and Longo saw that much fall of.

I realize it might be picking nits with the +17.75 you posted, but didn’t realize it fell of that much.

www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer

by Buc Wild on Sep 10, 2009 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

JP's problems

Did anyone read what JP Howell said about his recent problems? It was in todays Times.

Gary Williams for President!
Put Rose in the Hall of Fame

by terp12 on Sep 10, 2009 12:12 PM EDT reply actions  

Sorry, it was in the Trib

He said,“It’s just one of those things where it hit me.” “I hit a tough spell in August, fatigue-wise, and tried to manipulate my body a different way. It worked for a little bit, and now I’m feeling pretty healthy at this point and I’m off mechanically.” Howell tried to compensate for his diminishing strength by altering his motion, and ended up falling off the mound toward third base on a regular basis, his front leg giving way as he delivered the pitch. “Its like I’m throwing towards the right-handed batters box instead of throwing towards home.”

I made a previous post on my observation of this exact mechanical problem and was ridiculed for it. I have been reading and participating on this blog for a few weeks and have learned a lot, and have a lot more to learn with regards to deep stat analysis and how a team with such budget constraints is able to compete. I try to keep an open mind when I read stats that sometimes seem arguable as to their relevance. Others should sometimes keep an open mind that they can learn something too.

Gary Williams for President!
Put Rose in the Hall of Fame

by terp12 on Sep 10, 2009 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did anyone read this in today's paper?

If he figures out his control issues, that could be a big deal.

Gary Williams for President!
Put Rose in the Hall of Fame

by terp12 on Sep 10, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

What is wrong with you people!

A couple of articles on this blog have hypothesized about what has happened to JP and the record of the bullpen. JP gets quoted in today’s paper about the very topic that has had many of you guessing, and everyone would rather discuss the lack of someone’s ability to write coherent sentences. I don’t get it.

Gary Williams for President!
Put Rose in the Hall of Fame

by terp12 on Sep 10, 2009 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

am i wrong to disagree

seems like people get very offended on here if you disagree with thier post or comments. is this not a blog site?

by Hook85 on Sep 10, 2009 12:12 PM EDT reply actions  

last warning

is there some rule for where i am going to be kicked off this site. or are you saying your gonna put me on blast for being a huge idiot

by Hook85 on Sep 10, 2009 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

There is a rule for using proper grammar.

If you would’ve read any of the literature upon signing up here, you would know this. It’s really not hard to use the shift key every few words.

by R.J. Anderson on Sep 10, 2009 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

No one has a problem with a disagreement or another opinion

but opinions should be stated as such (“in my opinion”) and other arguments should be properly backed up. Use stats where applicable. Not just inflammatory comments (not you specifically). Read kericr’s guide on how not to get banned, that should help.

www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer

by Buc Wild on Sep 10, 2009 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

im not anti-stat

i love this sites stats on new upcoming players, and underated players that someone may have not realized how good they are, i was just stating a lot of times i think IN MY OPINION the stats are a reach, as if you want to disagree with maintream media just becuase you can.

by Hook85 on Sep 10, 2009 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know

tRA, I’m assuming he agrees with me about it not being truly fielding independ. so long as IP is used

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Sep 10, 2009 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Can you elaborate?

This is the type of stuff I’m looking for.

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Sep 10, 2009 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

From the tRA primer at statcorner:
tRA is built around knowing how many runs and outs each of these events are worth. These individual factors differ from year to year and from league to league as we account for different run-scoring environments. Using play by play data we can, in any given year, determine the average number of outs that was made on a given type of play by simply going through each play and counting the number of outs made on each type of play and dividing by the total number of plays for that type. Fairly straightforward, although a small correction factor has to be introduced to deal with outs made on the bases. An example table for 2008 is shown below:

by rglass44 on Sep 10, 2009 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Excellent, thanks

so xOuts is based solely on batted ball type and Ks, not counting for the individual team defense. Is there a form adjusted for a specific team’s defense?

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Sep 10, 2009 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'll just answer here

The FIP coefficients are derived from the run/out values of walks, hbp, hr, and strikeouts. Since they all have out values of 1 or 0, it essentially becomes a matter of weighting the run values of the FIP inputs relative to one another, which is where 13 (HR), 3 (BB), and -2(K) come from.

Using IP is definitely bad, though.

by Graham MacAree on Sep 10, 2009 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is there a reccomended adjustment that can be made to FIP without having to use batted ball type out values?

I only ask b/c of the simplicity in quickly calculating FIPs vs tRA. I understand it would take it off the ERA scale, but it would still be apples to apples which is what really matters.

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Sep 10, 2009 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here is what I would do for the adjustment:

Take league average of the following function as your expected outs per ball in play.

lg_xO/BIP = 1-(H-SF-S-HR-DP-2*TP)/(PA-HR-SF-BB-HBP-S-K)

Then the pitcher-specific FIP version of xIP would be:

xIP = K+(TBF-HR-BB-K)*lg_xO/BIP

I haven’t put any thought into this beforehand, so this might not be the best way to go about it. I hope that’s at least a little helpful.

by Graham MacAree on Sep 10, 2009 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks for your help

I was toying with the notion of something based on a % of TBF versus per 9 Innings.

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Sep 10, 2009 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

What is wrong with this?

It would seem using the pitcher’s 10% of the pitcher’s FB%, along with K% and BB% could make a tidier little picture of defensive indep. ability.

(13 * 10% * Flyballs as a % of PA) +(3 * (uBB% +HBP%) – (2 * K%) would give a truly defensive indep. #. Granted it takes it off the ERA scale, but it still is apples to apples across pitchers. I know I’m kind of thinking out loud here. Any thoughts?

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Sep 10, 2009 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just curious

what makes the stats so valuable on up and coming players, but useless on established players

www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer

by Buc Wild on Sep 10, 2009 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

i never said that

i dont think comparing an established player to another established player is fair to simply say “oh this one or two stats make this person better” lets disregard all the other things that normal people would use in arguing the worth of a player.

by Hook85 on Sep 10, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

i dont know if skewing is the right word

but as an example ur stat says this years defense was on track with last year, i dont think im the only one to disagree that was a reach

by Hook85 on Sep 10, 2009 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

"ur"

Stop that.

You used fielding percentage, I used UZR. If you don’t understand which is better, either read the stat guide or find some place that embraces the 1960s way of analyzing baseball.

by R.J. Anderson on Sep 10, 2009 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

well...

i dont know what to tell you? i enjoy this site and if you have a problem with me disagreeing with you then go ahead and find a reason to kick me off. i give you props this site is well informed and you know your stuff. i wasnt trying to take a shot at you, or a low blow. im just telling you that i think.

by Hook85 on Sep 10, 2009 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm having a problem with you refusing to use the shift key.

If you haven’t noticed, I have little problems with disagreements.

by R.J. Anderson on Sep 10, 2009 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

so you can be banned for not using the shift key?

ill try to type better, to make sure it all makes sens. somtimes i just type what im thinking without rereading. but if you want to ban me for having bad grammar, then i could care less. if you can understand what im saying i dont see what the difference is? i have enough grammar check and spell checks when i am at work.

by Hook85 on Sep 10, 2009 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm pretty sure you mean "couldn't care less".

And if you can’t re-read your own comments, then why in the hell should I have to read them?

by R.J. Anderson on Sep 10, 2009 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

ok RJ

im not upset, but i have this feeling you are upset. besides the grammar, becuase im pretty sure you are not really upset becuase i dont type to your standard. basically i said you manipulate your readers with stats that are true but clearly make your argument one sided. is somthing there more that may have offended you that i over looked?

by Hook85 on Sep 10, 2009 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes. You blatantly ignoring my warning five times.

People like you make writing for sites like this a torture. You drag down the comments section because you’re too damn lazy to read over the 100 words you just wrote and then when someone (the site admin in this case) asks for you to follow the rules you ignore them.

I’ve always said this site growing would be the thing to push me away from it. People like you are exactly why.

by R.J. Anderson on Sep 10, 2009 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's the Internet, man!

Only my grandpa still uses proper grammar and punctuation.

by Teej on Sep 10, 2009 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

well im sorry my grammar bothers you

my original thought was… maybe people were thinking i was way off and maybe i had no idea what i was talking about, but to me what i said made sense so i was all ears.
but your getting pist becuase i dont type the way you want me to, thats a petty thing to be angry over. your gonna have a heart attack at a young age if you worrie over such little things.
and its not that im lazy to not reread my comment its just a bad habbit i guess from casual chatting in other blogs or chatrooms. and i dont see anywhere in the guidelines where it says you have to use the shift key. it pretty much says dont talk in text form and make sure it is readable

by Hook85 on Sep 10, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

So, again, you have enlightened no one and continue to show your ignorance

I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

Embrace Eternity

by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 10, 2009 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

There's something to be said about a site with higher standards than "casual chatting in other blogs or chatrooms."

Writing in a clear manner shows respect for other readers, showing them that you care enough about what you’re writing to make it presentable and digestible. When I see a comment that looks like it was typed on a T9 phone, I have a hard time taking it seriously, because reading it becomes a strain. There might be some good information in there, but I’m not going to hurt my eyes and brain trying to find it.

Spelling, punctuation, etc. — these things are important when you want to communicate with another literate person. It’s not just some Draconian rule only enforced by pedantic mods trying to flex their power. I give an e-high-five to any site that tries to set some sort of standard.

by Teej on Sep 10, 2009 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just type semi intelligently

Decent English is a pretty simple request. Lord knows a few folks on this board get on my ass for literally nothing but it’s never been for grammar. And honestly I probably screw my grammar up the most. Part of that is mobile commenting and part of it is a lack of proof reading, but as long as you make a tiny bit of effort to have well constructed thoughts then nobody will get on your case.

Can we get robots for umpires and a computer to make in game strategy decisions? I'm sick of inconsistently bad umpiring and Joe's pitiful in game management. Oh and Navi (and BJ) need some PED's. BenZo, Bartlett, and Pena do not.

by matthan on Sep 10, 2009 7:19 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Hook you may be right, but as far as I know there hasn't been any research in clutch fielding

And I’ll be shocked stronger than what a lightning bolt could do if there was anything more than random variation involved with clutch defense. In other words it’s not controllable. So if it even exists it may have an impact over the small sample size of a season but over the long run that clutch factor would be the same across all fielders.

Can we get robots for umpires and a computer to make in game strategy decisions? I'm sick of inconsistently bad umpiring and Joe's pitiful in game management. Oh and Navi (and BJ) need some PED's. BenZo, Bartlett, and Pena do not.

by matthan on Sep 10, 2009 7:25 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

It's the weather.

You Brits are already so depressed with the rain and flannel that you can’t stand this strong-minded individuals unwillingness to bend to your whim. In the Sunshine State with bikini-clad coeds, we just have sex… on the BEACH!

by rglass44 on Sep 10, 2009 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

You got me

Now I’m going to kill myself :(

by Graham MacAree on Sep 10, 2009 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

ok buddy

im sorry to offend you too

by Hook85 on Sep 10, 2009 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

You haven't offended me at all.

Generally people know about it when that happens

by Graham MacAree on Sep 10, 2009 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I couldn't care less

I am sorry, but saying, “I could care less”, means that you actually do care. It’s like saying that, “you could care less than you do.” Pet peeve.

Gary Williams for President!
Put Rose in the Hall of Fame

by terp12 on Sep 10, 2009 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Except nobody cares what you think because you haven't expressed anything of intelligence.

You can’t be some geek off the street, you gotta be handy with the stats if you know what I mean.

Embrace Eternity

by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 10, 2009 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

You can be perfectly baseball intelligent as a non-sabermetrics first guy

But in order to see problems with analytical things you have to understand them in the first place.

by Graham MacAree on Sep 10, 2009 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

If you are baseball intelligent, regardless of your statistical abilities, you would still have a tree to cling to

when the tide rises. I’m fine with people that can argue something from a different perspective. I am not fine with people acting as if their opinion is above all and then proceed to shoot their fool mouth off without providing any sort of backbone to it.

Embrace Eternity

by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 10, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, I'm not disagreeing at all

I personally would rather have a (real) scouting report than set of data on a player if I had to pick between the too but my goodness having both is so much better.

by Graham MacAree on Sep 10, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah you is

Agreed, and it’s not like you have to pick one over the other in this day and age.

Embrace Eternity

by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 10, 2009 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

im lost

is all to me or someone else?

by Hook85 on Sep 10, 2009 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Finally the missing link

Neither the Scientists nor the Catholics are right. The universe revolves around DRB user Hook85
Also, I love the irony that the only capital you have ever used is in your name.

Embrace Eternity

by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 10, 2009 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the advanced defensive stats show the rays aren't as good defensively as last year

But yes they are still good. Nobody is saying they are as good as last year. It is hard to complain about a top 5 defense…and the rays definitely are that. However in comparing 08 to 09 we have to look beyond relative rank and look at the absolute drop…which was significant. So while the rays defense was again excellent the drop of from 2008 is at least partially to explain the drop in record

Can we get robots for umpires and a computer to make in game strategy decisions? I'm sick of inconsistently bad umpiring and Joe's pitiful in game management. Oh and Navi (and BJ) need some PED's. BenZo, Bartlett, and Pena do not.

by matthan on Sep 10, 2009 7:04 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I fundamentally disagree with the idea that prefacing something with 'in my opinion' somehow makes it ok

If it’s my opinion that the Bucs will only score points (they’re an Am Football team right?) via field goals this season that opinion is clearly insane and should be pointed out and ridiculed.

by Graham MacAree on Sep 10, 2009 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, but presenting your opinion as such instead of as fact

makes a WORLD of different.

“My opinion is the Bucs will win 10 games” is different than “The Bucs will win 10 games” or “The Bucs won 9 games last year so they will win 10 this year”. opinions are your personal thoughts (unless you vomit what the talking heads tell you to). Just present them as such.

www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer

by Buc Wild on Sep 10, 2009 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think I agree with Graham

the words I think can lead to a pandoras box of nonsense and that should not be encouraged

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Sep 10, 2009 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just staying true to the "How not to get banned guide"
Because of the variety of the words in the English language, reading comprehension is paramount. It is critically important that you are absolutely clear with the words that you use when posting. There is a considerable, substantial difference between a statement of opinion and a statement of fact:

I don’t like Grant Balfour. I think he walks too many people to be an effective reliever.

This is a matter of opinion. You’re free to have an opinion on this site. Nobody here will take any real offense to what you say, as long as you put some logic behind your point of view. That being said, people are free to disagree with you. You need to be prepared to defend your opinion. How does the number of walks Grant Balfour gives up inversely affect his ability to pitch? How does it hurt the team? If nothing else, do you just hate relievers that walk people? That’s fine. Approaching defense to your opinion in any one of these ways is perfectly acceptable.

On the other hand:

Grant Balfour sucks, his ERA is nearly 5.

This is not a matter of opinion, this is you presenting your opinion as a statement of fact, and using a broken statistical metric as your ‘evidence.’ You have not approached this statement in any significant way as to invite any legitimate exchange. You’re going to get flamed, and either I’m going to ban you because you interpreted someone’s sarcasm as a personal attack and responded with one of your own, or you’re going to be so disruptive on the site that I’ll have no choice.

Phrases like “I think”, “my eyes tell me”, “in my opinion” or any variety of the sort, go so far here. If it’s your opinion, make it known that it’s an opinion. Presenting your opinion as fact is pretentious. More then likely, you have zero right to be pretentious, and it’s a pretty good way to find yourself being shown the door.

www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer

by Buc Wild on Sep 10, 2009 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh I know

I don’t really care. None if it really bothers me

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Sep 10, 2009 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

But... but... but...

my spreadheet says he’s kindhearted! SCOUTING VERSUS STATS!

by rglass44 on Sep 10, 2009 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did you bring a hooker to the game so that you could drive in the HOV lane?

Larry David, is that you?

As for naming kids, yeah, absolutely, I’m renaming all my illegitimate kids after the 2008 team. IF THEY CAN FIND ME THAT IS BAHAHAHAHAHA

Embrace Eternity

by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 10, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Within "I think and my opinions"...

Are legitimate hypothesizing as well as total bullshit. Unfortunately the two often get blended together but hypothesizing should be very encouraged on this site. Without it no advancedments would be made. Of course one has to do the work beyond the opinion.

Can we get robots for umpires and a computer to make in game strategy decisions? I'm sick of inconsistently bad umpiring and Joe's pitiful in game management. Oh and Navi (and BJ) need some PED's. BenZo, Bartlett, and Pena do not.

by matthan on Sep 10, 2009 7:08 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

This is exactly why I said last week that the DRB hegemony should ban alphabetic characters.

Binary only. 1101001100001110101, amir8?

Lead singer, songwriter, and caterer for the band Suicide Phoenix. We play sitar-based anthems on real estate law. Available for weddings, birthdays (13+, please), and LAN parties.

by PlayOnWords on Sep 10, 2009 1:09 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Founded in 2005, DRaysBay is home to, "Progressive statistical analysis and reasoned argument."

Please read our Community Guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Spts-shelton_small
Which Red Sox Fan Are You?
Spts-shelton_small
The Opportunity of the Century
Ryu_small
This one goes out to all the chicken littles
Small
MLB needs to help bring All-Star game to Bay Area
Small
Who's That in My Old Seats?

Recent FanPosts

Untitled4_small
The Rays Should 'Retaliate' By Winning
Whelk_small
Rays 7, Sox 4; Immediate Reactions
Images_small
Post-Game (Over)Reactions here
Small
Proposal: Rays play a series in Durham each year
Ag_-_hector_gomez_-_63_small
Visiting Tampa Bay from Colorado
Images_small
Immediate Reactions: Rays Win, But Likely Lose Another Guy

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Catch For the Ages
Brandon Guyer out for season
Other Side of the Coin: Rodney's Fortune on Called Strikes
Does anyone have any information on Josh Sale? He doubled in a run in his...
Orlando Hudson released
Rays sign Garko to minor league...
Baseball Card Fans...check out my Ebay Auctions
Cameron Seitzer Growing Up Baseball
Longo injury apparently is apparently not good
Hak-Ju Lee, SS, Rays (Double-A Montgomery) Lee had a breakout year in...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Friends of the Site

DRB Suggestion Box

Drb4_medium

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Slowsky__1__small Steve Slowinski

Images_small Jason Collette

Brad_small BWoodrum

Price_small Erik Hahmann

Analysts

Small td32

Rutg_uakjmedjwh9ndzd4lkll_small Imperialism32

100_1952_small MrNegative1

Steak-with-crown_small CBJones

Whelk_small Whelk

Scaled_php_small mr. maniac

Tampa_theatre_small jcmitchell

Me_small John Gregg

Small SGrauer