The Rays Modern Era: A Look Back
I (like many of you no doubt) love looking forward to the next season and trying to anticipate what Friedman and Co will do to make the Rays exciting and competitive again next year; however, today we’re going to break from that and look back to what I call the "Modern Era" of Rays baseball.
I don’t know about you, but I’ve recently found myself only half-heartedly paying attention to the Post-Season, post Rays. While plenty of match-ups were intriguing (a la Lee v. Lincecum), on more than one occasion I sat at my computer with eyes drifting away from the HD and towards the computer screen and randomly browsing around ESPN.com and somehow clicking over to the final regular season standings and just admiring the Rays name being listed there on top, towering above other great teams. I’m not sure what started it, but I started comparing this season with the two prior. First with just some basic measures like home and road records and run differential, but then I just kept going.
First, some of the basics (
|
Win |
Loss |
RS |
RA |
Diff |
|
|
2008 |
97 |
65 |
774 (9) |
671 (2) |
+103 (2) |
|
2009 |
84 |
78 |
803 (5) |
754 (7) |
+49 (5) |
|
2010 |
96 |
66 |
802 (3) |
649 (2) |
+153 (2) |
We all know that the Rays won one more game in 2008 than this year, but I didn’t have a full appreciation of how successful the team was in scoring more runs while allowing less, resulting in a run differential that was 50 runs better than ’08. Also, it's interesting how similar the offensive output was to ’09 with all the improvement coming from the pitching.
Digging in a little further on the offensive side, it wasn’t a surprise to see that BB% and K% have both had small upticks over the 3-yr span (but still maintaining the same BB/K rate). Nor was it surprising to see that BA dropped from .263 to .247 last year, but good to see some of that potentially explained away by a 10pt drop in BABIP (after posting .302 and .303 in ’08 & ’09 it was .293 in ‘10).
The next set of stats unfortunately were all negative. OPS, wRC, wRAA & wOBA were all at three year lows (and yes, they are highly correlated):
OPS wRC wRAA wOBA 2008 0.762 798 38 0.336 2009 0.782 821 76 0.343 2010 0.736 756 36 0.328
Not what you'd expect after scoring only one fewer run than 2009.
The last offensive metric that jumped out was the RAys' swing percentage on balls out of the zone. While almost all other swing% metrics stayed within a reasonable margin of the past two years (like swing% staying exactly the same as 2009 at 44.2%), the Rays decided to go Vlad-Guerrero-style and increased their O-Swing% by 4.1% from '09 (4.8% above '08). Hopefully Brignac and S-Rod can hang out with Jaso a little over the off season and calm down. This all seemed to be a good case of some advanced metrics matching up with my eyes; while the Rays' offense didn't seem as pretty as the past years, they continued to score runs.
On the pitching front, the advanced stats matched the results; what materialized as the best year for the Rays staff, was also the strongest by numerous measures.
|
K/BB |
|||||
|
2008 |
2.17 |
4.22 |
4.40 |
10.70 |
115.10 |
|
2009 |
2.18 |
4.37 |
4.36 |
1.62 |
106.56 |
|
2010 |
2.49 |
4.09 |
4.18 |
15.58 |
112.85 |
Since we don't expect a lot of change in the rotation, I'm not sure we can be hopeful for much of a change on that measure in 2011.
So what is it that you expect or want to see change in 2011? While I'm hopeful to see less hacks at sliders down and away and our pitchers keep the ball on the ground, I'm hoping it's not too long before I can stare at the Rays name in the same spot in the standings as it is today.
For those with questions on the stats above, please visit the Saber Library.
20 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
So basically...our offense wasn't that good and we managed to eek out a lot of runs.
Huh, that’s quite a dramatic drop-off from 2009 to 2010, considering that CC and Upton both had better years, and we got better production from our catching spot. I guess Evan was about status quo, Pena was far down, Bartlett was far down, and Zobrist was far down.
I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously.
by Steve Slowinski on Nov 4, 2010 10:23 AM EDT reply actions
Sorry to be offtopic
But I didn’t see a Pythagorean Win % calculator at the library, and Bill Baer at Crashburn Alley made one this year:
http://www.crashburnalley.com/pwl.html
Rays/Cubs fan - AnotherCubsBlog.net
Cool, good call.
I’m actually collecting links today over at BtB, so I’ll throw that over there for me to reference later. I hadn’t seen that one before.
I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously.
by Steve Slowinski on Nov 4, 2010 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions
Cool ill put the rest in the BtB thread if I find any
Rays/Cubs fan - AnotherCubsBlog.net
Ooh, wow. PythagPat (the best Pythag out there) has us
at a .553 win %. Our actual was .593. I think we definitely need to improve our offense if we want to repeat 95+ wins in 2011.
A DRaysBay writer from Cubs Stats and Twitter @BradleyWoodrum
Yeah, I'm surprised how bad our offense actually was this year.
It makes me wonder how we scored that many runs…I feel like baserunning can only explain so much of it.
I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously.
by Steve Slowinski on Nov 4, 2010 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Variation
We scored a lot and a little more than most teams. Some of which might be explainable by having so many hitters of similar profiles.
Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla
Yeah, our offensive variation was insane this year - literally all or nothing sort of team.
I’d be interested to see if that is a result of our hitters having similar weaknesses/strengths – if so, it would give us an idea of what sort of hitter we should look for to balance ourselves out.
Intuitively, I feel like we could use some low K, high BA types.
I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously.
by Steve Slowinski on Nov 4, 2010 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions
If you look at our batting component of fWAR...
CC and Longoria were great, Jaso/Joyce/Upton were okay (and two of them were essentially platooned), Zobrist and Pena were right around average, and everyone else sucked. (our middle IFs and DHs were especially poor)
I think you have to credit Maddon with clumping our best players at the top of the lineup, including his platoons of having Bartlett and Upton vs lefties and Zobrist and Jaso vs Righties.
Rays/Cubs fan - AnotherCubsBlog.net
And I don't think our baserunning was that much better
They stole 22 less bases than 2009, although Spd score for the team was 6.0 vs 5.8 in 2009.
BP's EqBRR has the Rays...
At 12.7 in 2010, 4.0 in 2009. More to it than just speed and SBs.
Rays/Cubs fan - AnotherCubsBlog.net
How about RISP production
2010 – 1822 PA’s, for 266/368/422 resulting in 622 runs
2009 – 1757 PA’s, for 269/370/425 resulting in 589 runs
So while the team had less men on-base in 2010, they had more chances with them in scoring position, and with virtually the same rate production scored 33 more runs.
2008 – 1726 PA’s, for 246/346/398 resulting in 577 runs
Wow, that's an impressive amount of extra plate appearances with RISP.
And it certainly doesn’t help that we seem to have out-performed out overall average in those situations.
I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously.
by Steve Slowinski on Nov 4, 2010 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Inconsistency
Make no mistake, the Rays won 96 games because of their pitching. The hitting was inconsistent for much of the season. yes, they had streaks of scoring a ton of runs but they also struggled for weeks, offensively, here and there. Just like their record against lefties may have been very good they also didn’t hit well in many games against lefties( and again won because of their stellar pitching). The main culprit was the design of their line-up which had average OBP guys in the 1/2 slot but failed to to have high OPS numbers. When you combine the numbers for the 5-9 batting order,(no slugging average over .400 and only two spots with OPS over .717(5th and 8th..715) you see where all the production came from. Only Crawford and Longoria put up production numbers in the line-up.
Add the fact that everyone in the line-up struck out an enormous amount of times and you have a team that scored runs in bunches(within games and within stretches of games) but overall struggled to consistently have an effective offensive line-up.
Jeter had 100 runs last year, problem solved
Heyman’d
Hell yeah it is.
Any amount of points can be scored week to week. well, besides 1 point. Any number is as likely to be reached as another, since there’s only one of each number, each has the same chance to be hit. IT’s how the syetemof averages works.
by waltermercier on Sep 21, 2010 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions
by Andy Hellicksonstine on Nov 4, 2010 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions

by 






















