Tampa Bay Rays Officially Designate Pat Burrell for Assigment; Select Hank Blalock from Triple-A
After a few days and a few hours of speculation, what was first reported on this site early this morning is official; the Rays have called up Hank Blalock. To make room for Blalock, Pat Burrell has been designated for assignment.
We've spoke at length on Blalock in recent days. His career OPS against righties of .846 is a shinny number - especially compared to the production from the DH spot over the last year plus. Not to rain on Blalock's parade, but that OPS against righties has been just .740 over the past three seasons.
That said, I'm all for giving Blalock an opportunity. He seems healthy, and mashed down in Durham. The comparisons to Carlos Pena will come, and there are some similarities, but expecting 2007 Pena like production is unfair. However, if he does, I'll accept that. All along, I have maintained if Blalock becomes the next Eric Hinske or Ty Wigginton, I'll by glad with that..
As for Pat Burrell, there isn't much I can say that hasn't already been said, but here we go.
In my opinion, the Burrell signing is classified as a good process/bad result. The Rays needed a DH for the 2009 season, and their first choice was Bobby Abreu. The team went as far as offering Abreu a two-year deal when every other team offered one. For whatever reason, Abreu picked the Angels and the Rays moved on to Burrell.
At the time, a Burrell/Rays marriage seemed perfect. Even now-Rays employee, Peter Bendix called it a "steal of a deal." Burrell was a right-handed power bat that excelled at hitting left-handed pitching; two areas that the Rays could use upgrades at. Two-years and $16 million dollars for Pat the Bat seemed like an absolute bargain considering his 2008 salary was nearly $16 million alone.
Meanwhile, we now know the Bat didn't accompany Pat Burrell to Tampa Bay. Whether there was something in the numbers everyone missed, or something in scouting reports nobody saw, I don't know. But I do know that not many thought things ending this poorly.
In every bad there is some good. For all the genius moves Andrew Friedman has made, the Burrell signing will be looked upon by some as epic failure. However, as we saw with the Troy Percival deal, Friedman is a quick learner. It is almost certain that we will not see a free agent reliever signed to a long-term deal any time soon - unless he is truly elite - and in that case he'll likely be too pricey. Going forward, I'm willing to bet if the Rays sign an aging DH-type, it will be on a year-to-year basis.
Friedman signed the deal, so there is some blame to be had. On the other hand, I take solace in the fact that he has admitted his mistakes (Burrell DFA, sending Percy home), and that his though process remains sound.
Good luck to Pat Burrell in whatever life holds for him next. And welcome Hank Blalock. Your time, sir, is now!
Ed. Note: Hat tip to our own FreeZorilla for breaking the story. In this age of instant information, it is hard to decipher what is truth and what is rumor, and Zo made the correct call. For a non-mainstream media outlet, any scoop is a risky one. For all the correct stories we have broken over the years, it takes only one bad one to wipe all credibility away. Meanwhile, a larger outlet can be wrong multiple times, but hey who's counting. Afterall, we're just fans, bloggers, internet chatter-ers. Job well done, Zo
29 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It is hard to say if the Rays really missed something
There may have been some magic indicator for Pat in 2008 that showed he was going to have a massive decline, but I doubt it.
I think it was a risky move that didn’t pan out. And lets make that clear; it was a risky move. Sometimes when you make a risky move it pays great dividends and sometimes it flops. This one flopped.
It is the risk you take when you take on an aging slugger that has always struggled at DHing.
There is no one to blame. The downside tail risk was there, and unfortunately in this case that is exactly what happened.
Go Gators!!
Well, Bobby Abreu is really to blame.
www.draysbay.com, www.bloombergsports.mlblogs.com, Twitter @trancel
by Tommy Rancel on May 15, 2010 3:00 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
that and he was who they wanted last year but signed with the Angels instead
R.I.P. Scott Kazmir 2005-2008
I think the only reason he signed with LAA
Was because they were the last team standing
PIZZA?!?
by Transplanted on May 15, 2010 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Abreu
Any clues why Abreu turned down a 2 year deal in Tampa for a one year at Anaheim? Did he want to try free agency again in 2010? Dislike Tampa? Any thoughts?
by kimo from kauai on May 15, 2010 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions
He thought he could do better than 2/16
He didn’t
PIZZA?!?
by Transplanted on May 15, 2010 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions
I actually agree
This wasn’t a bad move at all because if the “real” Burrell had shown up he would have hit 33 hr and 105 rbi. It was truly based on upside but unfortunately it didn’t work.
R.I.P. Scott Kazmir 2005-2008
Yep, we rolled the dice on the upside and got burnt
That doesn’t mean it was a bad attempt though. Far too often we get locked in on what a player should do instead of focusing in the probability and the range of what they might do. Nobody deserves a cookie or deserves blame based upon where that player falls in their probability range. Burrell had major tail risk. He still had the upside, the downside was there. It happened. It’ll happen again. And again. And again. Any one of our players can put up an absolute clunker of a year, and if it happens it certainly isn’t Andrew’s fault. Burrell just had a higher probability of that clunker of a year, and it happened.
The Blalock era begins
Go Gators!!
It wasn't a bad deal
Thats why we had Blalock, Johnson, Ruggiano, ect. in case Burrell just didn’t produce. I love this organizational depth.
R.I.P. Scott Kazmir 2005-2008
It was actually a very solid move
The odds of what happening is extremely large. Yes some regression was expected, bigger park, tougher pitching, 1yr older, but to have a career .500 SLG vs LHP & not even be able to hit above the mendoza line in his time here-no one could see that coming.
PIZZA?!?
by Transplanted on May 15, 2010 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Care to relay some talking points?
Hey, Surly only looks out for one guy...Surly!
by Andy Hellicksonstine on May 15, 2010 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions
He wasn't really asked about Burrell at all.
He mainly focused on Blalock. He said that it was actually a close decision between Blalock and Dan Johnson — “a good problem to have.” Blalock was chosen in part because he hits left-handed. He said Derek Shelton had taken a look at Blalock’s swing and said there were some things there that could be improved upon. This was said in justification of the idea that Blalock can return to some of his past strong performances if some tweaks were made. The recent struggles by Upton, Pena, et. al. were described as short term and he said they’ll turn things around any day now.
Seconding Andy's suggestuon
I’d greatly appreciate it as well
by sattp on May 15, 2010 3:48 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
i cant believe they did it
I had my doubts about them actually doing it, but I’m happy they did. Now we will see if Blalock can hit the curveball…..go Rays
I did like 3 weeks ago to Jobu...
and then the spirit of Pedro Cerrano invaded Carlos Pena’s body, and now he can’t hit a curve ball. I don’t know who drank Jobu’s rum, but I think it was BJ.
by Blue or CONKZILLA on May 15, 2010 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Blalock starts vs RH. Aybar vs LH.
www.draysbay.com, www.bloombergsports.mlblogs.com, Twitter @trancel
by Tommy Rancel on May 15, 2010 7:57 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Is there any chance...
that PtB accepts his assignment to try fixing whatever issues he’s having in AAA? I mean, from what i understand about baseball contracts, he’s got 9mil and goes to play for another team for free basically. So perhaps he’s frustrated enough hisself to accept it and try to sort out his problems….be it his swing, stance, or whatever. Everybody assumes he’s a FA, but he could very well accept the assignment too.
I could be thinking about a different scenario with the contracts (in effect for trades instead?) and he would get additional money if another team signed him to the prorated vertern minimum. But still, he could end up in the same boat as Blalock and not find any sniffs and decide to accept it.
You usually don't see 11 year vets like him take the assignment.
Heck guys with half the time he does will refuse it. I remember a few years back the Yankees were going to send down Giambi, but he puled his vet with the same team card and didn’t go down. Nobody knows Pat’s game more than he does and he has to know he lacks his former bat speed. No matter how much time he puts in at AAA he wont get it back. Plus there’s the whole ego thing. In his mind he’s a long time vet who has produced and has only spent 2 season in the minors. I think he’ll clear waivers and refuse assignment and try to hitch on with another team. But is he better than Jermain Dye? Heck is he better than Gary Sheffield?
Yeah, I have no idea what Burrell taking the assignment could do for this team.
Bonus coverage from the Times:
Reached on his cell phone Saturday, Burrell hung up on a Times reporter and texted back that the reporter should “lose” his number.
Well gee, that was rude of him. Maybe it had something to do with the fact that the Times took all of about a minute to bury him after his release. If you honestly think that signing Pat Burrell was worse then Juan Guzman, you’re retarded.
Jesus Didn't Tap.
Good news. Now if BJ would start hitting more and Navi gets shipped out when Shoppach comes back, maybe we'll no longer have any black holes in the batting order.
My O's fan buddy laughed at me when I said the Rays were a 90-win team on opening day. He's right, they're looking more like a 105-win team.
Pena
Regressing to the mean streets of St. Pete
by stpetelawyer on May 16, 2010 4:48 AM EDT up reply actions
I wasn't sure what the better name was/is
for Pena, Upton, Burrell – the black hole or bermuda triangle – where the rally just disappears…
Hell, we’re complaining about a 25-11 team…
by tampa_edski on May 16, 2010 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions
You're complaining about a 25-11 team.
Don’t lump me in with you martians.
Hey, Surly only looks out for one guy...Surly!
by Andy Hellicksonstine on May 16, 2010 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions

by 





















