Grant Balfour: Doing More With Less (Speed)
So with J.P. Howell now out for a year, the Rays will have to rely more on the pitchers they already have in the pen. Grant Balfour is one. This season in 17.1 innings, Balfour has a slightly better Fielding Independent Pitching (FIP) at 2.11 than he had in 2008 (2.22 FIP). Whether it lasts or not is another story, but something is definitely different with Balfour's pitches this year.
Using MLBAM's Pitch F/x data, here is a histogram of Balfour's fastball by season since 2008:
Balfour's average velocity is the lowest in his career this season by one mile per hour, yet he is still pitching very well. Of course he has dropped his fastball usage a bit and is working in his off speed pitches more, but the fastball is working well when it is used. At least, that's what run values (AKA pitch type linear weights) says.
Here are the run values of Balfour's fastball based on velocity and separated by season:

Remember that negative run values are good for the pitcher. So far this season, Balfour is better than he was last season when his fastball is 93 mph and below. Of course it isn't just velocity that makes a pitch; location and pitch selection are also keys to success. They're harder to analyze right now without a full season's worth of data, but let's take a quick look at Balfour's slider.
If hitters start catching up to the fastball, Balfour should throw his next best pitch more often, the slider, which he's done an excellent job of locating this season.

That's precision.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
What does 'density' mean in the first graph?
Are you saying he should become fashionable or elitist or snarky or condescending? Is he supposed to adopt logical fallacies as his core technique of debate? Is he supposed to bleat religious proclamations and claim they are "proved" by statistics when they aren’t?
by Top Gun Numba 1 on May 21, 2010 10:52 AM EDT reply actions
thanks, that makes a ton more sense now. really easy to read graph!
Regressing to the mean streets of St. Pete
by stpetelawyer on May 21, 2010 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions
I think he means destiny.
As in: “Lorraine, you are my destiny”
Sign lady must die.
by EminenceFront on May 21, 2010 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions
Destiny is not quantifiable
Are you saying he should become fashionable or elitist or snarky or condescending? Is he supposed to adopt logical fallacies as his core technique of debate? Is he supposed to bleat religious proclamations and claim they are "proved" by statistics when they aren’t?
by Top Gun Numba 1 on May 21, 2010 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions
But hoverboards don't work over water.
Explain that!
Sign lady must die.
by EminenceFront on May 21, 2010 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions
Hello, anybody home? Think McFly think!
As you can always expect come from behind victory is when you least expect it.
Cool work, but 2008 and 2009 are much larger samplings...
…which is relevant since Balfour gains speed as the season develops: http://www.draysbay.com/2010/3/25/1388658/on-balfour-velocity-progression
Too bad we don’t have pitchfx for Balfour in Durham in April 2008.
by Lurch's Lobbyists on May 21, 2010 12:43 PM EDT reply actions
Yes 2008 and 2009 are larger samples
that is why the regression line is a little smoother than this season.
Fuzz
by RZ on May 21, 2010 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions
That wasn't what interested me
It was the potential for his 2010 distribution to move to the right by the end of the season given his track record of warming up with the summer. Balfour averaged 92.75 through May 2009. He’s at 92.3 now. So I would agree he’s throwing a little slower, but where light blue is plotting could be due to sampling bias. Whatever, I’ll definitely take the improved control.
by Lurch's Lobbyists on May 21, 2010 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs

by 





















