OT: SI Article 2003
This isn't much, but I was just reading through some old stuff and found an old article/poll that SI did where they had players vote on different categories of their fellow MLB'ers. This was in 2003, and looking back on it, that was really the last peak of the steriods. Remember, this was players voting about other players and issues. Its a small sample size, but it's ironic to see these numbers.
| 20. The current drug-testing policy ... | |
| Is adequate as is | 40.7% |
| Should be more stringent | 36.5% |
| Don't know | 15.2% |
| Should be abolished | 7.6% |
| Inside the Numbers | |
| • Pitchers (41.4 %) favor more stringent testing more than hitters (31.5%). • Among players with one year of experience or less, 54.5% want more stringent testing. • Among players who earn $10 million or more a year, 50.0% think the system is adequate as is. |
|
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/si_online/news/2003/07/01/survey/
Look at that. Almost half of major leaguers thought the weak drug testing system was fine and another 23 percent are on the same lines. Thats 63 percent of major league ball players were fine with the system or wanted a weaker system. Also, look at that footnotes at the bottom. Pitchers were more in favor of harder testing than hitters(big surprise). It looks like pitchers knew these guys were on steroids(and the ones that voted no to harder testing were probably on something themselves) and were trying to say something through these numbers. More on the footnotes, the next two bullet points are very good reads as well. Players who were just entering in the league, to me it looks like they realized they were outmatched by these beefed up players and wanted to make it fair play without going on PED's themselves. The last footnote, is kind of interesting. Those making the money it looks like they fell 50/50 with god gifted talent, and PED's. If you look back to 2003's top paid players most of them, not all mentioned in the public but are under suspicion, were on PED's. Heres the list.
http://content.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/salaries/top25.aspx?year=2003
Now, like I said before, not all of those guys have been caught for PED's. This is my own judgment here, but I see at least 17 players that either I know they took PED's, or I could make a huge argument that they did, remember I said in my own opinion.
I know it was off topic, but it's interesting to me that a lot of people were so oblivious to what was going on, mostly in part that it really brought baseball back after the strike, and the MLB's front office exec's weren't hollering either because they saw how popular baseball became during those years. Now that baseball is back, they now know they have to get it back to a fair playing field. Anyways, hopefully you guys find it interesting too. Oh, and the "Devil Rays" had the best players club house!
This post was written by a member of the DRaysBay community and does not necessarily express the views or opinions of DRaysBay staff.
1 comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Interesting stuff, Jombari.
I think the most interesting thing is the last of highest paid players. Although, I wonder if we looked at a list of median-paid players: a) could we recognize any names and if so b) how many of them would be guilty of PED use?
My basic thought is that even the median- and low-paid player groups would have around 50% steroid users (a lower percentage than the top-paid group, but still a large percentage) because these players are merely on different levels of their careers or not as gifted in non-strength skills.
from Cubs Stats and Twitter @BradleyWoodrum

by 




















