Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Carmelo Anthony, Amar'e Stoudemire Vow To Fit In With Lin

In Defense of B.J. Upton (2010 Remix)

I don't really know who Clark Brooks is, but he says here he's done defending B.J. Upton. I'm not. It's easier to defend people when their performance is measured in every imaginable way and it's not about page hits or links. Joe Henderson wrote this:

He still battles with the strike zone; he struck out looking in one at-bat in this game. We've seen that before, too. Thirty-five percent of his strikeouts are of the caught-looking variety. The big-league average is 26 percent. He swings at the first pitch 41 percent of the time. The average is 28.

One problem here: Henderson's using statistics from both Upton's 2010 and his career. He's mix-matching and skewing the perspective on Upton by making things appear worse than Upton's 2010 actually is. That's dishonest or an honest mistake, but it's incorrect either way. The stats are mentioned are provided here and clear as day state that Upton is swinging at 41% of first pitches this season, which is above his career average. The stats also say he's being caught-looking 26% of the time ... or league average.

Further, Henderson conveniently ignored that Upton is walking 11.5% of the time. That Carlos Pena and Carl Crawford similarly swing at a ton of first pitches (Pena is at 40% this year, Crawford is at 37%).  That Upton swings out of the strike zone 25.3% of the time (league average is over 28%). That Upton swings 48.8% of the time (league average is 45.2%). That Upton sees 67.2% first pitch strikes (average is 58.5%) and maybe, just maybe, that's why he's more aggressive than he's ever been before in his career on first pitches. That Upton has one of the highest ISO on the Rays. That Upton has a .328 wOBA, which is above the league average mark of .325. That Upton has a .285 BABIP, which is well below his career .334 mark. And why is that? Because here's how Upton's BABIP splits match up:

 

BABIP GB LD FB
2010 0.179 0.686 0.18
2009 0.266 0.806 0.122
Career 0.275 0.765 0.138

 

You don't have to study sabermetrics to realize Upton's groundball and line drive BABIP are well below what he posted even last year, his worst offensive season. Maybe he's hitting the ball weaker, or maybe he's not. There's no way we can tell without hitfx or some assumptions that simply shouldn't be made without facts to back it up. Just like we shouldn't go around saying Jason Bartlett isn't hitting the ball as hard or that he's not fielding as well because, well, because.

This isn't just about Sunday's event - which I'm not defending. This is about being honest with analysis. His UZR is in the negative this year, yeah, and? It's less than a half season of fielding data. You shouldn't feel comfortable just using one season of offensive or defensive data to make true talent analysis from, and you certainly shouldn't run to the bank with half a season's worth of defensive data.

No matter what you think of Upton's effort level, he's been an above average hitter and baserunner this season with historically strong defense. In three of his four major league seasons since becoming a permanent major leaguer in 2007 he's posted above average offensive numbers. If he's lazy, then he's lazy, but he's been a good baseball player.

And yeah, I'm sure some will reply that I'm just an Upton fan and you're damn right I'm an Upton fan. I'm so much of an Upton fan that I'm ready for him to be traded just so I can attend games or watch them on television without having to hear about how my favorite player is a lazy bastard because he didn't catch a ball that landed ten feet ahead of him or because he took a ball he thought was a strike.

But I'm not asking for anyone to like him. I'm just saying be objective.

Oh, and be honest.

Comment 74 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'm more coming around to the camp(or my camp)

That maybe, despite BJ’s athletic ability, he’s just not that good and that what we see now is what he’ll generally be like.

He doesn’t seem to possess a high baseball IQ-not to say he’s dumb or lazy, but that he(or a lot of the Rays players sometimes) aren’t aware of the on-field situation.

PIZZA?!?

by Transplanted on Jun 28, 2010 11:17 PM EDT reply actions  

I do believe that he's better then what we're seeing out of him now...

…because his UZR is also at a career low for CF. But as for his offense, I have no idea if that possibly turns around while he continues to play for this team.

If he goes somewhere else though and starts knocking the cover off the ball, someone needs to pay.

I hope you understand how provocative and irritating a statement such as "baseball is played on the field not on paper" is. It is the kind of moronic critique that anti-sabermetric neanderthals use (along with the unfunny "mother’s basement" canard) to debunk what they do not understand.

by kericr on Jun 28, 2010 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I doubt his defense can get any better

So I am ignoring the UZR this year. Mostly it’s hitting or base running, he needs to polish his steal move

PIZZA?!?

by Transplanted on Jun 29, 2010 12:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm off riding him for getting picked off.

I didn’t see how he got picked, but I got angry about it early in the year because he was getting very sloppy and he proceeded to clean it up. Teams look to him more to steal then other players because he has a propensity to get picked; any attempt to ‘polish his move’ will likely involve having him curb his attempts. Combined Steals vs. Attempts/POs, he’s still over 75% on the year, which is better then he was last year.

I hope you understand how provocative and irritating a statement such as "baseball is played on the field not on paper" is. It is the kind of moronic critique that anti-sabermetric neanderthals use (along with the unfunny "mother’s basement" canard) to debunk what they do not understand.

by kericr on Jun 29, 2010 12:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

He gets caught leaning a lot

I think a better 1st step could help him avoid some of the outs

PIZZA?!?

by Transplanted on Jun 29, 2010 12:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

He's been picked off 3 times this year, the last time before yesterday was in the middle of April. Those would be the only times this year he'd be caught leaning.

I hope you understand how provocative and irritating a statement such as "baseball is played on the field not on paper" is. It is the kind of moronic critique that anti-sabermetric neanderthals use (along with the unfunny "mother’s basement" canard) to debunk what they do not understand.

by kericr on Jun 29, 2010 12:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think you're missing a chart, R33J

I agree on being honest and a big part of that is removing emotion on both sides. I root for Beej to put it together because we’re really good when he’s contributing with the stick.

And if one has a problem using stats to prove a point, then use your eyes.

by Sandy Kazmir on Jun 28, 2010 11:23 PM EDT reply actions  

When BJ is hitting

The offense is unstoppable almost

PIZZA?!?

by Transplanted on Jun 28, 2010 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think to be honest there might be a quibble in here

And that is using a wOBA .003 above league average to draw the conclusion he’s an above average hitter this year.

It’s a bit of a stretch to say that average is defined by the small handful of guys at exactly the league average. “Average” in this verbal context probably has a slightly larger range attached – say the middle quintile of players – in which I’d suggest it’s likely BJ firmly resides.

But that’s semantics.

The main fact I’d take issue with is that SB’s are component of wOBA, and BJ is exceptional in this regard. I’d wager that without this component part of the stat – which has nothing at all to do with hitting – he’d very possibly be a below average hitter from the pure mathematical standpoint.

But again, that’s semantics. What you could more correctly have claimed is that BJ is numerically above average as an offensive player. Barely. And largely due to his basestealing.

Plus I want to emphasize the seasonality of this – on a career basis the facts stand more firmly behind your argument.

by nyyfaninlaaland on Jun 28, 2010 11:37 PM EDT reply actions  

I wouldn't disagree with them for saying average hitter.

I’m using “above average” in the directional sense rather than the subjective sense.

And the point about SB/CS and wOBA is fair, although you still have to take that value into account somewhere. May as well make it hitting.

by R.J. Anderson on Jun 28, 2010 11:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

To be fairer and more honest

I just saw you hinted at this exact point yesterday in the Keri string.

I guess my point is wOBA is an offense value measuring stat, of which baserunning is a component. I don’t think it’s really accurate to call baserunning hitting. And it seems with BJ the concern is simply with his hitting.

Which you very rightly point out with the BABIP discussion is likely to improve.

by nyyfaninlaaland on Jun 29, 2010 12:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

BJ is a fantastic talent when he feels like it

Unfortunately it is obvious when BJ does not “feel” like playing. When motivated he is a great player but at least 30% of the time he seems like he is working rather than having fun.

by Raysball Fan on Jun 29, 2010 12:02 AM EDT reply actions  

are you his psychologist?

This is dumb. Baseless postulating about the psyche of BJ Upton.

by pudieron89 on Jun 29, 2010 12:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

No but I am a healthcare provider

And watching him it is obvious he is not having fun at times.

by Raysball Fan on Jun 29, 2010 4:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Who do you want a comment on?

 I am not a Sabre metric person but I enjoy watching the attitude and effort on the field. All sports/athletics dominated by emotions-interesting to watch. The early Yankee series which we swept was a great example of how well a confident team may perform. Bartlett looked unstoppable. Since his hamstring injury he lost his swagger.

by Raysball Fan on Jun 29, 2010 8:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

I cannot understand this kind of statement.

If a team wins, it looks good. It appears to be trying, to be having fun, to be focused, whatever you like. If a team loses, it appears to be back on its heels, to be without confidence or swagger, to be in a fog. When a team has a slump, the question of attitude seems even more clear, and fans get frustrated because we just know this team should win but isn’t trying hard enough.

Isn’t that rather silly? I am not dismissing attitude and effort as part of the picture, but to assess it from a distance or by some mystical insight into body language makes no sense. There are multiple reasons why a team may fail to perform, and to allege that it is lack of effort or laziness or any other such thing without intimate knowledge is rank speculation. It could just as well be that they are trying too hard.

by bobr on Jun 29, 2010 8:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think you are confusing demeanor with attitude and effort

Some guys have a different way of expressing their attitude through their outward behavior or facial appearance. Just because Rafael Soriano doesn’t pull a Papeldick and celebrate like he won the World Series after striking out a batter with nobody on and a 4 run lead in April, doesn’t mean that Soriano isn’t having as much “fun.” It doesn’t mean he has a poor attitude. Players express their emotions differently, but this shouldn’t be an insight into their attitude and effort or lack-thereof.

by Travis Lee on Jun 29, 2010 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

OT: Is this an interesting comparison or what?



And if one has a problem using stats to prove a point, then use your eyes.

by Sandy Kazmir on Jun 29, 2010 12:43 AM EDT reply actions  

Love the new avatar

Great we tied a country who eat their young
by sternfan1 on Jun 26, 2010 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions

by Top Gun Numba 1 on Jun 29, 2010 1:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

It's Beej and Longo

And if one has a problem using stats to prove a point, then use your eyes.

by Sandy Kazmir on Jun 29, 2010 9:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

So are you suggesting the Rays should trade for Winn?

He’d be cheaper. Gotta say he looked kind of awful in NY this year.

If he follows suit, De Jesus has 4 okay seasons ahead. I don’t recall if you were in on it, but where did you come down on Keri’s approach? Guess I could look that up though.

And why did you go back to Sandy K?

by nyyfaninlaaland on Jun 29, 2010 1:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

Randy Winn would give us so many punny stories to post after we win(n) plus he's the greatest player in our history.

I didn’t even realize he got traded until I saw him tearing it up in the NL. Is it that easy over there, because the Rays have sure made it look not that way. I just kind of thought that their games were/are pretty similar, not trying to make any bold forecasting claims. Your back and forth with Jonah actually prompted me looking this up, because I love DeJesus, but people need to realize that he’s a nice role player.

I showed up late to the party on the Jonah thread so I didn’t really put any thought into it. He’s a smart guy so I liked a lot of his ideas, some not as much, but let’s see you, me, or some other guy come up with 10 ways to improve the Rays, even if 3 of them could have been filed under jettisoning dead weight, I’d still struggle. Nice to see ya back around, any thoughts on trading Davis for a Cliff Lee/A-Gon type of deal? I went back to the old name after getting banned for saying the score of the U.S. v. Slovenia game. Plus most other sites that I comment on use this name, just keepin it real dawg.

And if one has a problem using stats to prove a point, then use your eyes.

by Sandy Kazmir on Jun 29, 2010 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Since you said "be honest"

I am not a fan of BJ. His defense is amazing (despite his UZR this year), but the offense has not been there since 07. To me, the only value BJ has is in his stolen bases and defense. I dont see why we would keep BJ when DJ can put up similar, if not better, numbers. I say trade BJ. Use the money we’re going to save and give it to Crawford.

I know its a longshot to re-sign Crawford but we could do it AND reduce payroll next year. Between Pena, Soriano, and Burrell, and Wheeler, we will have like 30 million coming off the books next year. Trade BJ and that number jumps to around 33. Give Crawford 15-18 mil a year. They could even increase his payroll over time which would give Stu and the boys time to get a new stadium and create a bigger revenue. If the stadium fails, Stu said he’ll sell the team so he wouldnt have to worry about the contract then either.

by dannythegreat on Jun 29, 2010 1:06 AM EDT reply actions  

Y not

The rest of the team would be affordable for a couple more years. That would give them time to get more revenue.

by dannythegreat on Jun 29, 2010 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

This is not an argument

This is a naked opinion stated as if it were settled fact.

by Not Whole View Gang survivor on Jun 29, 2010 1:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Because there are 24 other players that need to paid

Stretching 35-45M among those 24 could be difficult, and highly risky long-term.

PIZZA?!?

by Transplanted on Jun 29, 2010 2:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

the other 24 players would be cheap for awhile

and longterm, stu said he’d sell the team if they couldnt get a new stadium. so either he gets his stadium (which will bring enough revenue) or he sells the team and leaves the contract for the new owner (i hated typing that).

by dannythegreat on Jun 29, 2010 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

For the record

I dont want BJ traded because he’s lazy or stupid. I think he’s been overrated (especially by the members of this site). We could replace his production (or lack thereof) with Jennings easily. Thereby saving millions.

by dannythegreat on Jun 29, 2010 1:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

What if Jennings falters, as most rookies do upon promotion?

And if one has a problem using stats to prove a point, then use your eyes.

by Sandy Kazmir on Jun 29, 2010 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Jennings cant do worse than BJ

Defensively he’ll be equal and he might be better stealing bases. That alone would make him equal to BJ. Anything more with the bat and he’d be head and shoulders over him.

by dannythegreat on Jun 29, 2010 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think it's unrealistic to expect Jennings to hit at the level that Beej has this year, if it's a push defensively and on the bases then why do it?

Beej has been an average-above average hitter this year, on the whole. It’s a lot to ask a rookie to step in and do that. Look at Mike Stanton, he’s going through some pains. Jason Heyward is a freak, most guys can’t do that.

And if one has a problem using stats to prove a point, then use your eyes.

by Sandy Kazmir on Jun 29, 2010 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

He has not been an above average hitter

I dont care what stat says it. The only reason he’s considered average is because of his .328 wOBA, and even that is mostly due to his stolen bases. Not his bat. What is it that BJ does so well that Deezy couldnt? Defense is equal, stolen bases is equal, drawing walks is equal. Sure BJ has more power potential, but he hasnt shown any signs of power since the 08 playoffs.

I think it would be more likely that Deezy gets seriously injured then sucking at a worse level than BJ does with the bat.

by dannythegreat on Jun 29, 2010 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Using OPS, 6 CFs below Beej
  1. 12 in ISO among CF’s if you want to look solely at power.

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Jun 29, 2010 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes
I think it would be more likely that Deezy gets seriously injured then sucking at a worse level than BJ does with the bat.

by dannythegreat on Jun 29, 2010 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions

Average does not suck

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Jun 29, 2010 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'll admit saying he sucks is wrong

But being average is not too great either. You’d think he was the next Barry Bonds the way some people on here talk about him. All I’m saying is, I think Deezy could come in and be at least average too. We’d get the same production (basically) for much less.

by dannythegreat on Jun 29, 2010 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

It is when you have demonstrated that you are an elite defensive CF

There is no way that Jennings comes up and hits league average out of the box

And if one has a problem using stats to prove a point, then use your eyes.

by Sandy Kazmir on Jun 29, 2010 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

You dont know that

Deezy has hit well everywhere he’s been in the minors. Injuries are the only thing thats held him back. And I bet you by his 4th full season in the majors, deezy will be hitting better than league average (barring injuries).

by dannythegreat on Jun 29, 2010 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

He can do worse

Absolutely, BJ is currently 17th of 25 qualified CF in wOBA and is elite defensively. Names behind him include Adam Jones, Matt Kemp, Michael Bourn, etc. This goes back to my point. Relative to replacement CFs he is fine. Its failing to reach what many considered his potential that makes it seem worse.

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Jun 29, 2010 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Craw will leave this town so fast, he hates playing on the turf, which is another byproduct of our shit field.

Bill Foster hates Carl Crawford’s knees and wants to see him be a Yankee.

And if one has a problem using stats to prove a point, then use your eyes.

by Sandy Kazmir on Jun 29, 2010 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

There's (at least) two different issues going on here.

There’s BJ’s apparent talent vs. BJ’s batting production, and there’s BJ’s apparent attitude/lack of hustle/laziness/call it whatever you want.

Here at DRB we supposedly believe that process is more important than simple results, and that if the process is sound the results should follow. And as RJ’s stats demonstrate, there’s not much inherently wrong with BJ’s process. The results aren’t following so far this year, and they didn’t follow last year either. (At a certain point results failing to follow process should make one question the premise that the process is more important, but that’s a bigger point than I’m interested in tackling right now.)

BJ’s attitude/whatever is galling to some, annoying to others, an unforgivable sin to yet others, and no big deal to some. I believe it plays a very small part in why his results have not consistently followed his process. At some level, hustle creates better results – when a fielder bobbles, or rushes, or on bang-bang infield hits, for example. BJ records outs on those plays when, if he hustled, he might record some hits. So that drags down his results. But to what extent? Is it statistically significant? Or just anecdotally signficant, because it annoys so many fans when the extreme examples occur?

I am not a BJ fan. I loathe players who fail to hustle, even while I recognize the limited overall importance of hustle. It remains the one factor over which a player has 100% control, and I cannot forgive players who give less than all-out effort on more than just isolated occurrences. But at the same time, I do not believe that getting rid of BJ would improve the Rays. I do not believe that Desmond Jennings is ready to be an adequate replacement. In short, BJ is not the problem. He’s just part of a team-wide slump and he’s joined the unfortunate team-wide streak of awful luck/bad approach/I don’t know what with RISP over the past month or so.

To me, Sunday sucked, it should never have happened, I’m glad Longo got in BJ’s face, but in the end it’s Much Ado About Nothing. A lot of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

I’m in favor of just staying the course and waiting for the Rays’ luck to even out. They were absurdly lucky in April, mixed in May, and absurdly unlucky in June. Sooner or later they should have a month with simply average luck. And when they do, they’ll win more than they lose because through it all the Rays are a more talented team than the overwhelming majority of their opponents.

by Not Whole View Gang survivor on Jun 29, 2010 1:29 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

This is a pretty good take

When a player with all the potential in the world has an issue with mental lapses, its frustrating. His production is still worthwhile, but what hurts is he is capable of more. I don’t think his issues affect him at the plate any more than the fact that his GB BABIP would be higher if he ran out of the box hard consistently. The difference is a handful of singles and in the grand scheme of things fairly negligible.

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Jun 29, 2010 6:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed that a little more hustle doesn't produce a large change in the stats

but, do you think there could be a psychological effect on an entire team when your center fielder gives up on a play? I think Maddon was trying to create a mindset when he required hustle to 1st base. Call it team grit or whatever, I think it erodes team unity, and can be a problem larger than a few plays.

by terp12 on Jun 29, 2010 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think so on a winning team

For a team playing meaningless games sure. As always, winning cures all.

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Jun 29, 2010 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Any psychological effect is speculative

What shouldn’t be up to debate is that a player who relies on speed will hurt his game by not giving 100%

by GomesSweetGomes on Jun 29, 2010 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not a large change, but significant

For a 600 AB season, that is 6 months long (reasonable assumptions) the difference between a .280 hitter and a .300 hitter is 2 hits per month. It can certainly be argued that more hustle could result in one extra hit every 50 AB’s. That is why beating out slow rollers or ground balls to the hole does become statistically significant.
One bunt base hit a month raises your average by 10 points at the end of the year. Carlos Mendoza can you hear me?

by srqraysfan on Jun 29, 2010 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

I've always though Beej was more of the Bernie Williams build, where he doesn't have the acceleration of a Crawford (no one does), but

once he gets the long strides going he’s really fast. This is why his SLG gets elevated because he can get a double where most guys get a single, but also why he gets picked off because he has to cheat slightly to make up for his poor acceleration.

And if one has a problem using stats to prove a point, then use your eyes.

by Sandy Kazmir on Jun 29, 2010 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Have you noticed how he leads off?

He leans towards 2nd and cocks his knee, so that his weight distribution is towards 2nd base. Odd. Most good base stealers are more balanced. Maybe he does that knowing he lacks the initial burst of speed. I think it makes him susceptible to being picked off. He also sometimes makes crossover steps while taking his lead, rather than what most good base stealers do, which is kind of a side to side slide step.

by terp12 on Jun 29, 2010 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

At this point I'm waiting for Oliver Stone to make a movie about Upton's struggles

The analysis continues to provide a rational basis for some hope, but damn it’s tiring to root for a player who has such glaring moments of dogging it out there.

by Lurch's Lobbyists on Jun 29, 2010 4:39 AM EDT reply actions  

Rj you said it best in a post after Sunday's game, and i'll paraphrase

‘worst thing BJ did was have a 387 wOBA in ’07, thus setting the bar too high’

And i’ll add, a bar he’ll never sniff again

by sternfan1 on Jun 29, 2010 10:03 AM EDT reply actions  

Sounds like you've already been to the bar this morning.

There’s no way to know what he will do in the future, but I’m betting on him instead of against him, and figure he will have at least one more crazy good season before he hangs them up with a bunch of good-really good seasons in between.

And if one has a problem using stats to prove a point, then use your eyes.

by Sandy Kazmir on Jun 29, 2010 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm with SF1

You’re setting yourself up for more disappointment instead of enjoying his contributions for what he is. Not to say .360 is unreasonable, but with his contact issues I don’t see .387.

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Jun 29, 2010 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

He'll be 26 in 2 months, he's just now starting to enter his hypothetical prime

He has shown it before and he will do it again. Perhaps I’m setting myself up for disappointment, but I’d rather have hope and enjoy the meantime, than lower the bar and enjoy conservative results. He looks like a mess right now, but remember June of last year or even the stretches he’s enjoyed this year that have worked to inflate his numbers slightly. When he’s on he looks like a completely different guy in the box, I’m not sure if the good stretches are a product of guessing correctly, but mechanically, he looks totally different. Over the last week I’ve become a bigger fan of B33J than ever before because I now actively root for him to put all this behind him. People are so quick to bury a guy, but redemption is one of the finest qualities a human being can display, and one of the few that separates us from the animals.

And if one has a problem using stats to prove a point, then use your eyes.

by Sandy Kazmir on Jun 29, 2010 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Burying and lowering the bar are not the same thing

ZIPS has him the rest of the way at .338. He is young but he doesn’t have the major league adjustments to make anymore. The way a 26 year old called up might. He had a shoulder injury which could explain some of the production dropoff. Its really tough to project anything above .350 at this point for Beej.

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Jun 29, 2010 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

That's the problem with ZIPS at the individual level, regression can get so heavy-handed that it's impossible for it to predict a breakout season

At the team level I think it’s not bad, but I prefer the deciles that someone else used last year. There might only be a 10% chance of him putting up a wOBA of .370, but there is a chance and everything could fall into place, much as it did the last time he was that good. You need a lot to go right, but it happens. ZIPS is a fun little tool, but they really should have some standard deviations or error bars or something showing that it is a density of probabilities.

And if one has a problem using stats to prove a point, then use your eyes.

by Sandy Kazmir on Jun 29, 2010 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

I do present projected quintiles for the regular projections (for example, before the season, ZiPS gave Upton a 22% chance of being in the top 20% of starting centerfielders offensively and a 5% chance of being in the worst quintile). It’s kind of hard to do those in-season.

--
Dan Szymborski
BTF
Dan on ESPN Insider

by D.Szymborski on Jun 29, 2010 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

You are absolutely right about how he looks when he is on, he looks different.

Mechanically, when he is on, he looks smooth and his swing looks easily repeatable. The only thing I see with his approach that could be screwing with an overall smooth swing is his toe tap. His swing is nice, his balance is fine, but sometimes his timing looks like crap. I am not sure how you consistently hit the ball when you go through a toe tap ritual before each pitch. Sure it is a timing mechanism, but how do you adjust if you are looking fastball and you get a curve or vice-versa. You would either be too early or too late. It may even be the reason he looks at perfect strikes. His body went through the process for the wrong pitch or even wrong location. When he is on, he is also driving the ball towards right center. By doing that it gives him a bit longer to recognize the pitch and go through his approach to the ball.

by terp12 on Jun 29, 2010 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: BJs Hustle

I think it is reasonable as a fan to expect hustle. Players can control it and they should so it. However we should understand that is literally impossible for a human to give 100% effort all the time. Every player takes a play off. Navi was horrible at moving his body to block balls, Evan didn’t run to 1st after a K to potentially end the game, Pena didn’t chase a ball, and we can go on and on.

A player should always try to give 100% but fans should be reasonable. As long as it isn’t chronic it isn’t a problem. Once or twice a year isn’t chronic.

My feeling is that a certain talk radio has bashed BJ so much over the past few years and now it is engrained into the public mind. We ignore others loafing and focus on BJ. We question BJ when he Ks looking and ignore others.

BJ isn’t a great player, heck he is just okay, but it’s not a work ethic problem. It’s not a hustle problem. It’s a talent problem.

Go Gators!!

by matthan on Jun 29, 2010 1:13 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Why?

I think all of them are equally as bad. It is process over results. Sometimes a lack of hustle results in a lost base, and sometimes it doesn’t.

All I’m asking for is consistency.

Longo not running and BJ not running were both due to the same assumption: that it didn’t matter. BJ thought it was a double, and Longo figured he was thrown out.

Go Gators!!

by matthan on Jun 29, 2010 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Urgency is the difference. But I agree, the effort should always be there.

Blocking a pitch is a split second lapse and can even be attributed to bad technique, not running to first is bad, but the outcome is much more likely. Both are examples of lapses, but I don’t see BJ jogging for about 100 or more feet on a gaper in the outfield to be the same. BTW, his excuse wasn’t that he thought the runner was stopping at second. He said he thought Joyce was closer and would get the ball. It should have been evident within the first 10-20 feet Joyce would not be making that play. Assuming the runner would stop at second on a ball hit in the deepest part of the stadium and the outfielders not close is just dumb.

Personally, I think he was just upset at how things were going for him and the Rays, and just gave up on the play. Obviously, I have no way of knowing, but that is what it looked like to me.

by terp12 on Jun 29, 2010 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wasn't someone on base which means you can't run

with regards to Longo?

I might be wrong on that rule.

by SRQman on Jun 29, 2010 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

FIFY

Navi was horrible at moving his body to block balls,

Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla

by FreeZorilla on Jun 29, 2010 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

This article proves I know NOTHING about sabermetrics.

Because I can’t understand, by watching every game like I have, how Upton has “been an above average hitter” this season.

This is not an indictment on your fine article. I’m just saying I don’t get it

by PullingGuardGator on Jun 29, 2010 5:15 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't understand all the hub-bub

.328 wOBA vs .325 league average at 300 plate appearances (roughly Upton’s year-to-date) equates to less than 1 run generated by Upton above the league average hitter. That’s it. While normally a fine fielder, he has been at best average over the past year. League average salary is $3.3 million, which is roughly Upton’s. You’re talking about a LEAGUE AVERAGE PLAYER. Maybe he has great potential. maybe he doesn’t. He is AVERAGE. I’m sure the league average player also had a really nice two or three week stretch back several years ago as well….

by SamRay on Jun 29, 2010 5:22 PM EDT reply actions  

If people treated him as a league average player then there wouldn't be posts like this.

He has been vilified as some kind of monster that can’t hit, field, throw, or run and this is simply not the case. I carry a torch for B.J. because of all the people that don’t even see him as league average at a position that is tough to fill. I don’t think R.J., myself, or anyone else on here is making him out to be greater than he is, but there are plenty of people that are making him out to be worse than he is.

And if one has a problem using stats to prove a point, then use your eyes.

by Sandy Kazmir on Jun 30, 2010 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Founded in 2005, DRaysBay is home to, "Progressive statistical analysis and reasoned argument."

Please read our Community Guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Zobrist vs Pedroia vs Cano
Scaled_php_small
Rays Community Prospect #31 Runoff

Recent FanPosts

Small
Joe Maddon Town Hall meeting on the Ron and Ian show. Any ideas for questions I should ask?
Scaled_php_small
Rays Community Prospect #37
Scaled_php_small
Rays Community Prospect #35
Scaled_php_small
Rays Community Prospect #34
Scaled_php_small
Rays Community Prospect #33
Scaled_php_small
Rays Community Prospect #32
Scaled_php_small
Rays Community Prospect #31
Scaled_php_small
Rays Community Prospect #30 (Again)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Jeff Bagwell, Fred McGriff, The Hall of Fame, and 400 Home Runs
ESPN Chat with Matt Moore
Danny Clyburn: 1974-2012
Joe Maddon Town Hall Contest
Hickey said as of now all of the starters -- Wade Davis, Jeff Niemann,...
White Sox sign Dan Johnson
Indians acquire Canzler
Justin Ruggiano to Elect Free Agency
Dougdirt over at MinorLeagueBall compiled John Sickels' rankings with WAR values from Victor Wang's research.

Thread here.
The increasingly desperate search for offense has caused some teams to...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

DRB Fantasy Baseball

Friends of the Site

DRB Suggestion Box

Drb4_medium


Managers

Slowsky__1__small Steve Slowinski

Dad_small Jason Collette

Brad_small BWoodrum

Price_small Erik Hahmann

Analysts

Lob-city_design_small rglass44

Untitled_small EminenceFront

Small Mulva

Rutg_uakjmedjwh9ndzd4lkll_small Imperialism32

100_1952_small MrNegative1

Steak-with-crown_small CBJones

Whelk_small Whelk

Small PGP

Scaled_php_small mr. maniac

Tampa_theatre_small jcmitchell

Me_small John Gregg