James Shields and the Homerun: What Gives?
Here's a blatantly obvious statement: James Shields has a homerun problem this season. Right now, Shields is the major league leader in homeruns allowed with 28 (one less than he allowed all last season) and in homerun per flyball percentage with 16%. The league average HR/FB rate is typically around 10.6% and Shields's career average (including this season) is 11.9%. No matter how you look at it, Shields has let up an inordinate amount of flyballs turn into homeruns this season and his performance has suffered as a result. It's tough to keep runs from crossing the plate when you're averaging 1.20 homeruns allowed every start.
After Shields's latest homerun binge this past Saturday, I can't help but wonder: what gives? Is there something to his homerun problem that we should be concerned about? Last week, FreeZo tackled one possible variable, looking at Shields's quality of opponents and how that affected his homerun rate. In the process, he brought up a great point on the fickle nature of homeruns:
A key principal of sabermetrics is that pitchers have little control over the percentage of fly-balls that leave the yard, but do have some control over batted ball type. Fluctuations away from the mean for HR/FB are typically dismissed as luck, or as I prefer random variation, with little correlation year-over-year. Over the course of a season, one would think that the outliers made fewer or greater number of mistakes, but the greater influence is when those pitchers made the mistakes and if they were taken advantage of.
According to the most recent research, we shouldn't expect Shields's homerun problem to continue; going forward, we should still expect his homerun rate to look more like his career rate than his current rate. We've been saying that for a while, though, and it's easy to get frustrated and impatient. Remember, outlier seasons do happen - evaluating pitchers is a tough thing to do, and a pitcher's homerun rate doesn't stabilize over the course of a single season. It's small comfort to us now, watching Shields get blasted apart every five days, but long-term he's still a valuable pitcher.
I don't want to stop my analysis there, though. What if there is some underlying problem with Shields this season? Is there one pitch that is more homer happy? Is he having velocity issues? Control issues? His homerun rate may stabilize over time, but that doesn't mean that in a small time period, he could be having mechanical or control issues that need to be corrected. To try and answer some of these questions, let's dig into our best available tool: the Pitch f/x data.
If there's an underlying problem, it should show up in the data repeatedly. In other words, what do Shields's homeruns have in common? Is there anything that we can point to as a problem spot, or do the homeruns seem truly random?
|
Pitch Type |
Homeruns |
|
Four-Seam |
14 |
|
Two-Seam |
6 |
|
Cutter |
1 |
|
Slider |
3 |
|
Curve |
1 |
|
Change-up |
3 |
So Shields has a problem with his fastballs, especially the four-seamer. Of course, he also throws his four-seam and two-seam fastballs more frequently than other pitches, but when you break them down by percentages, his fastballs are still the largest problem area. Surprisingly, despite all the flak that Shields's cutter has gotten this season, it's only been hit out of the park once.
|
Pitch Count |
Homeruns Allowed |
|
<25 |
3 |
|
26-50 |
7 |
|
51-75 |
8 |
|
76-100+ |
10 |
Okay, so Shields tires as the game wears on. We already knew this, but it's good to see that reinforced. It's not because of velocity loss, however. Velocity is an easy variable to check and although radar guns vary from park to park, there doesn't seem to be a noticeable difference between Shields' best pitches and worst pitches. This season, his fastballs that generated swinging strikes averaged 91.2 MPH; his fastballs that were hit for homeruns averaged 91.6 MPH. This relationship holds true for all of Shields's other pitches, so cross velocity concerns off the list.
We now know that his fastball is the largest offender and Shields lets up more homeruns late in the game. Although Shields does lose speed as the game goes along, his fastball's velocity doesn't appear to be an issue with his homeruns allowed. What does that leave us with? Location.
Here's a look at Shields's first-pitch fastball location, plotting his homeruns allowed (green) and swinging strikes (red):
Shields has let up a disproportionate amount of first-pitch homeruns (10), and it's easy to see why. When spotted on the corners or slightly above the strike zone, Shields's fastball succeed; when he misses over the middle of the plate and high, though, it gets hit a long way.
Is this the problem? I'm torn. Shields does let up a large number of homeruns on fastballs over the middle of the plate. However, depending on the situation and the pitch sequencing, that same pitch can sometimes be effective for him. Consider:
If Shields leaves his fastball over the middle of the plate, he will get swinging strikes occasionally, but he's still more likely to have it hit for a homerun. He seems to be very effective whenever he locates his fastball low or inside to right-handed batters (outside to lefties). If he wants to improve, he should work on the location of his fastball slightly more, trying to reduce the times he throws it high in the zone and over the plate. Maybe Shields loses a bit of his control as the game wears on, so he ends up grooving more pitches in an effort to keep throwing strikes. It's tough to say, but in the end, it doesn't matter who you throw a meatball to - major league hitters will hit a mistake a long way.
All data courtesy of Joe Lefkowitz's Pitch F/X Tool.
52 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
thats what happens
when you throw a 91 mph straight fastball.. especially when you overuse it!… here’s an idea.. cutter, slider, changeup.. less use of the fastball.
The issue is will less use of the fastball make the change lesss effective
Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla
he does have 4 plus pitches that he can go to aside from the fastball.
if you recall that start against the white sox when he and peavy both got shelled… he threw a first pitch fastball to almost every hitter.. sparingly used the change.. and he got hammered. Pitch selection, and missing all the scouting reports on who he is facing is part of the problem.
How do you know he's missing the scouting reports?
And he’s actually using his fastball only 44% of the time…very low for a starting pitcher. 8th lowest in the majors. He can’t use it much less without making his other pitches much less effective.
Also, please capitalize a bit more consistently.
I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously.
by Steve Slowinski on Aug 9, 2010 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Couple things:
1. Throwing less FB, CT, and CB will make those pitches more effective
2. Just looking at pitch values it is pretty clear that adding a few % of change ups to at the expense of FB should add quite a bit of value to his arsenal. You aren’t going to see a swing of “30 units” of pitch value on those changes to swing it in the FBs favor (currently -20 for FB, 10 for CH).
Go Gators!!
I'd like more change-ups too...when he's been at his best this season, he's throw the change a lot.
I just hesitate to say the answer is to slash his fastball usage. Maybe decrease it a little more, but it’s a fine line…I don’t claim to know where his optimal point is.
I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously.
by Steve Slowinski on Aug 9, 2010 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions
I remember him mentioning in 08 that he thought he struggled in 07 because he exposed his change-up too much.
IDK if that’s actually backed by anything t hough.
So I should just change my sig to
I hate everyone of color, along with invalids, the old, and the retarded?
by firemangreg on Jul 21, 2010 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Do you mean 2006?
That was his rookie year and that is when he used the change the most. It has decreased dramatically over time, and it has bottomed out this year and last.
2007/2008 were his two best seasons. He may have overexposed his change slightly in 2006, but I’d attribute his season more to being a rookie than throwing too many change ups.
I’m not sure if the move is for him to throw it at 2006 levels again (34-35%). Personally I’d rather him throw it in the upper 20’s, 2007 (30%) 2006 (26.3%) rather than the 23.5% he throws it now.
Fangraphs has his cutter taking the spot of his change up; not his fastball. Probably take it with a grain of salt for the earlier years…
Go Gators!!
I was speaking of the Chicago start on 5/30
There are some games when he just gets hit really hard (10+ hits) I watched that game and noticed he was throwing his fastball in the wrong counts, etc etc… it just seemed to me like he completely avoided the scouting reports that day.
So what?
I’d rather have him throwing a slightly less effective change up a bit more than him throwing a putrid fastball.
Go Gators!!
Optimal usage rates should really be the next step in the statistical frontier
It would probably take a boatload of time, but my guess is that one could find out the rate of declines (increases) of certain pitches based on the increase (decrease) of use of another pitch. If you can determine that, then you can tweak a pitchers pitch selection based upon the pitch values of their arsenal into their optimal usage.
Go Gators!!
If he can avoid centerplate fastballs it will be fine.
And there is room to fix pitch sequencing as well. He can probably reduce the fastball usage somewhat with increased changes, but if you rarely use the fastball, the change will be less effective. No one disputes placement and sequencing, but its not a pitch you can avoid without losing Shields’ strength.
Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla
I'm lumping fastballs in with cutters for this discussion. I want to see their cumulative use decrease and change up use increase.
Whether it is the FB or CT decreasing doesn’t matter too much to me.
Go Gators!!
No, home run is a ridiculous statistic and they are separated by one point, this is Steve with an agenda.
So I should just change my sig to
I hate everyone of color, along with invalids, the old, and the retarded?
by firemangreg on Jul 21, 2010 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions
by kericr on Aug 9, 2010 10:14 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
What about the count?
Shields has given up 10 HRs on the first pitch. The rest of the team has given up 11. He’s also given up 5 with a full count. That accounts for 16 of 28 HRs. So he’s given up 57% of his HRs in those states that make up 26% of his total PAs. It seems that these are two times when the opposing hitter is going to be guessing fastball.
bring back michel hernandez!!
Shields was most effective with Michel Hernandez calling his game… let him be Shields personal catcher lol
great analysis
would definitely love to see that four-seamer at the bottom of the plate going forward. seems like KK gets to go on “cookie” rants whenever that thing is thrown down the middle of the zone.
I love White Men Can't Jump. Now try and take me seriously.
It's possible, but I feel this would be one of the first things the Rays would correct.
Easy to diagnose, easy to fix.
I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously.
by Steve Slowinski on Aug 9, 2010 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Good post
First and foremost, Shields HR rate is way out of line. It is at the extreme.
That doesn’t mean Shields doesn’t have a fundamental problem. It just so happens that the ‘random variation’ within this fundamental problem is at an extreme.
Shields has been throwing less and less change ups over the years. I pointed this out last year with my analysis on Jim Hickey, pitchers focus on certain pitches at the expense of other pitches under Hickey. It is a philosophy of Hickey and seemingly has been embraced by Shields and the team.
Whether or not this philosophy is good or bad to the overall staff is irrelevant to this conversation and is up to your own analysis.
However since the change up is Shields’ best pitch it would seem he would be best served to use it a bit more.
Obviously no matter the case, Shields needs to work on location.
So no matter what, expect the homer rate to decline. If Shields continues to love the fastball/cutter/curve at the expense of his changeup then the decline will be less dramatic. If he goes back to his bread and butter, then I wouldn’t be shocked if he settles into a slightly below average homer rate
(’07, ’08…he produced more ground balls and less line drives than any other season in his career…CH usage was slightly less than 7% and 3% more than it is this year)
Go Gators!!
This is not a problem for this season only
He now leads all AL pitchers over the last three seasons in HR allowed
Why is it a given he’ll come back to his career average HR/FB%?
And even so, when will it occur? Next April is not good enough
16% HR/FB ratio isn't sustainable long-term...not for anyone.
Last season, only one pitcher even came close to that mark, and all the pitchers that were on the high side have since regressed to more normal rates around 10%. Shields has had a continuous problem, but he can’t continue to be this bad.
I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously.
by Steve Slowinski on Aug 9, 2010 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions
Shields has other problems too
his LD% ius above 20, and as usual his H/IP is among the league leaders
The Catcher might be the problem
I don’t think it’s a mechanical issue.. I think it’s the pitch calling of Jaso and Shoppach ( for him anyway)… With Jaso behind the plate for 12 starts this year his ERA is 6.65… with Shoppach it is a more respectable 3.86 ( similar to his ERA when being caught by Navarro)… He pitched at his best with Michel Hernandez behind the plate (10 Starts era under 3)… It’s definitely a pitch selection and execution issue more so than a mechanical issue. I know no one is questioning his mechanics, so that’s a non issue.
It's not that he can't throw his fastball..
But it’s got to be in the right count, to the right hitter, in the right spot… If you look at statistics alone. When Jaso catches Shields gets shelled. Most of his starts which he allows an absurd amount of hits or runs.. Jaso is behind the plate.
Catcher ERA is a poor way of evaluating a catcher/pitcher
People have done research and basically, it’s very unreliable and fluctuates like crazy. It falls into the small sample size trap. My bet is pitch calling comes more from scouting reports than anything else.
I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously.
by Steve Slowinski on Aug 9, 2010 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions
Well, duh.
But it also doesn’t mean it’s worth talking about. Why speculate on things we can’t quantify when there’s plenty to look at that we can?
I really doubt cERA has much to do with it
The pitcher makes the final call in throwing and Shields is intelligent enough to realize when something isn’t working.
I love White Men Can't Jump. Now try and take me seriously.
I think it may be a a non-negligible factor
How often do you see Shields shake off Jaso? Although pitchers do have the final say, they won’t act on it every time they disagree.
I didn't blame it on Jaso.
I said it might be a non-negligible factor.
"Fluctuations away from the mean for HR/FB are typically dismissed as luck, or as I prefer random variation, with little correlation year-over-year."
^ saber at its worst right there ^ Glad the rest of the article dug deeper.
Shields batting practice-like numbers seem to be caused by several factors. I agree that whether you blame him or his catcher, his pitch selection has not been great. Unlike in past years, he doesn’t seem to be using sequence and location in a manner that keeps hitters guessing.
Shields doesn’t have the dazzling stuff necessary to just go out there and let it fly. To be effective, he has to know when and where to use each pitch against each opposing batter, and he also has to have enough command of each pitch to execute his plan. It all hasn’t come together very often this season. Last year, either, for that matter.
If you don't like what you see,
VOLUNTEER
"Saber at its worst"? How come?
It’s a fact proved by research. Disagree with it all you want, that doesn’t change it from being true…HR/FB rate is subject to random variation and is little in the control of pitchers.
What’s your problem with it? I’m curious.
I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously.
by Steve Slowinski on Aug 9, 2010 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions
I can't speak for "the other steve", but as I have mentioned before, i do not believe in luck has as much to do with outcomes
I understand that there is a certain amount of luck in baseball, just not as much as many on this site think. It is funny how luck is often brought up as a likleyhood for future regression to a norm, yet many of the articles go on to show other data that refutes the luck argument. Shields location has been bad at times this year. When it is bad, home runs happen. Doesn’t sound like luck to me. Luck would be the difference between balls hit to the warning track as compared to those that go out of the stadium. Shields could improve to a better home run rate, but that could be because he is locating his pitches better, or other reasons within his control. Something is wrong when guys are teeing off on a pitcher throughout a season. It is not bad luck. How hard batters are hitting your pitches is somewhat within your control as a pitcher. Keeping batters off balance by location, pitch speed, movement, etc. will have a significant impact on how hard a ball is hit.
Sure
The reason there is so much luck involved with the stat is all about timing. The probability of each individual pitch being a home run is somewhat in the pitcher’s control. The location and pitch type of the home runs is a good indicator. The variation comes from who you make the mistake too and what they can do with it. Thats why I don’t the term luck. Making a mistake to Pena is far more likely to result in a HR than making the mistake to Bartlett. The sequencing of pitchers’ mistakes causes the # to fall in a tight range over large samples. It didn’t help Shields that his worst start came against the top slugging team. Had his location been so poor against Seattle, he would have most likely allowed fewer home runs.
Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla
Luck or Repeatable Skill
We’ve gone through this before, and it’s most likely just preference, but a repeatable skill (or lack there of) may be a better way to characterize it.
Agree with everything else.
"I agree with the original Steve, because he says that it's not my fault." Love, J. Shields
To say that there is not element of chance or “luck” in baseball outcomes would be foolish. On the other hand, to claim that pitchers have “little control” over HR/FB % is also foolish.
If you don't like what you see,
VOLUNTEER
by the other steve on Aug 9, 2010 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Pick 5 pitchers and look up career HR/FB%
I didn’t say they don’t control whether an individual pitch will be a HR, I’m talking about the % of fly balls that go for home runs.
Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla
Eric Milton was pretty good about giving up homeruns consistently.
An extreme example, but he tended to hover around 9-10% his entire career.
Yowsers
And the FB% is the more repeatable skill. I hae no problem with that language.
Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla
Josh Beckett must not have very good stuff because in 2006 he gave up 36 HRs.
Good for second in the majors.
A good location to stop
a hitter from hitting a homerun,is at his head.I agree with the posters that attribute shields problems to location and sequence.I liked James Shields better when he was boxing with Coco Crisp.
This argument is way to restrictive
and if expanded upon some might be a little more willing to see the problem is bigger than just homeruns and budluck. Its not JUST the homerun thats a problem with Shields fastball. If teams aren’t putting his fastballs over the fences they are consistently driving those fastballs into the rest of the park. His fastballs have become VERY hittable and this problem didnt just happen this season, he struggled with teams slugging his fastballs LAST season too so you can see why many fans are doubting when we are told this is just bad luck and that a regression to his norm will eventually help out. Maybe this is the norm for Shields until something changes to keep teams from teeing off on his fastballs. Looking at Shields last season and what we have seen this season is it that difficult to think something is not right here. This isn’t just a statistical anomily. Teams are driving his fastballs all over the yard, not just over the fences. OK the stats that are SCREAMING out for anybody that wants to look at it realisticly.
Shields best two seasons 2007-08 his LD% was at 16…. Last two seasons over 20%
Per fangraphs the value of his fastball is 2007 -8.0 2008 -1.5 2009 -13.1 2010 -20.8
Just for yuks here is the value for his change up 2007 25.8 2008 9.0 2009 12.6 2010 11.6
Obviously the change is his bread and butter. His fastball doesn’t even have to be great with all the value he has from the change up but the fastball has been his undoing . Last year was bad, this year its getting worse. Its a frustrating trend. For whatever reason teams are finding Shields fastball hittable and are feasting on it.
There is one stat that I could not find. There was some nice work here about a month ago that brokedown the whole Rays staff and the slugging percentage for each pitch they throw. I can not find were to get up to date stats for this, if anybody could point me in the right direction for this stat it would be appreciated. Anyway the slugging percentages for Shields fastball at that time were the worst for any pitch of any pitcher on the staff. It was bad. But sadly it appears it was glossed over. THAT would make a nice writeup… comparing the slugging percentage of Shields fastball compared to there rest of his pitches and the rest of the staffs pitches.
I think dismissing Shields troubles and expecting something different is an error. Sure he will get a lot of K’s with the changeup and he wont walk many but he will consistently give up more runs than average if he cant keep teams off his fastball.
Now this is a good post.
As to your query about SLG by pitch type, the only way I can think to do it is through play-by-play data. Someone here (I hope) has all the team’s starts in Excel, and that will make it easy to determine his SLG. You can pull that data from mlb.com I believe, though I haven’t done it since last offseason.
Thanks
Glad to see somebody enjoyed the post. If I get some time I will try and run the data through a spreadsheet and share if anybody is interested. Dont know how soon, backed up on some work. I like that breakdown from the link Sandy Kazmir listed below… didnt know it took that much work to come up with. I just though I was missing “that place” on the net with the goldmine of stats lol.
That'd be awesome...love to see it.
If you need help, give a shout to any of the authors here or to Sandy. Glad to help if we can.
I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously.
by Steve Slowinski on Aug 11, 2010 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions
Here's the article I believe you were talking about
http://www.draysbay.com/2010/7/9/1560307/rating-the-starters-pitches
To me, it comes to locating the fastball. Just stop using the cutter altogether, but he needs to work harder to spot the fastball. Against the Yankees, and all of his best starts, he can hit the corners or keep it off the plate. In his bad starts it’s all over the place, including down the pipe. Maybe he works the change so much on the side to keep it fresh that it hampers his ability to throw the fastball where he needs to.
If we consider ourselves a master team then we have to act like a master team, not degenerates.
2010 Trade Deadline Primer --> http://dockoftherays.com/2010/07/03/2010-trade-deadline-primer/
by Sandy Kazmir on Aug 10, 2010 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions






























