Potential Playoff Preview - Does the Opponent Matter?
As we delve into the rest of September/October, there are about 23 games left for the teams in the playoff hunt. For the most part, the AL races have been decided; the Twins have the lowest percentage chance of making the playoffs out of all the leaders and they currently sit at 94.1%, while the Yankees, Rays and Rangers are all above 97%. Outside of a miracle, these are the 4 playoff teams. The Rangers are done with the AL West and have been in coast mode as they try to get healthy for their first division title in over a decade. The Twins are playing solid baseball as they usually do in the stretch run. So for excitement, that leaves us to watch the Rays/Yankees beat each other up for the right to claim the division title.
Right now, the Rays are in position to claim the Wild Card berth with a record of 84-55, as the Yankees have an even better record of 87-53 (2.5 game lead, 2 in the loss column). Two and a half games isn't very much and with seven games left in head-to-head match ups - and considering the Rays have an easier schedule down the stretch - the division title could be anyone's to win.
So the question stands: who would the Rays rather face in the first round, Minnesota or Texas? This is not to say you don't try to win as many as possible and take the division, giving you have home field advantage throughout the playoffs. Home field advantage is important in the postseason, especially in the ALCS, and would especially help versus the Rangers, who are a poor road team (33-37). But ignoring that, for the five-game ALDS, who would the Rays stand a better chance beating: Cliff Lee and the Rangers or Joe Mauer and the Twins?
Line-ups on September 8, 2010:
| Twins | BA | OBP | SLG | Rangers | BA | OBP | SLG | |
| Span | 0.267 | 0.334 | 0.350 | Kinsler | 0.296 | 0.380 | 0.425 | |
| Hudson | 0.282 | 0.353 | 0.393 | Young | 0.292 | 0.342 | 0.465 | |
| Mauer | 0.325 | 0.403 | 0.469 | Cruz | 0.310 | 0.367 | 0.564 | |
| Kubel | 0.257 | 0.334 | 0.440 | Guerrero | 0.298 | 0.342 | 0.498 | |
| Cuddyer | 0.273 | 0.338 | 0.420 | Francouer | 0.240 | 0.294 | 0.368 | |
| Young | 0.301 | 0.332 | 0.485 | Murphy | 0.286 | 0.353 | 0.434 | |
| Morales | 0.200 | 0.278 | 0.200 | Cantu | 0.253 | 0.304 | 0.386 | |
| Hardy | 0.266 | 0.316 | 0.396 | Molina | 0.237 | 0.289 | 0.318 | |
| Tolbert | 0.242 | 0.325 | 0.424 | Guzman | 0.266 | 0.312 | 0.338 | |
| Thome | 0.278 | 0.407 | 0.635 | Hamilton | 0.361 | 0.414 | 0.635 | |
| Valencia | 0.343 | 0.382 | 0.454 | Andrus | 0.276 | 0.355 | 0.315 |
The reason Thome+Valencia and Hamilton+Andrus are listed separately is because they figure to start, but weren't in today. Morneau is on the 60-Day DL and is not likely to make the starting postseason lineup.
For one, both teams have strong line-ups for the postseason. The Minnesota Twins have a more well-rounded line-up compared to the Rangers and would present a more difficult challenge in the playoffs. Since the Rays would play the Rangers at home compared to the Twins on the road, they would have an offensive advantage against the Rangers since Texas does not hit well away from Arlington:
Home---Away---wOBA
Twins: .289/.362/.427---.269/.332/.432---.340
Rangers: .290/.352/.455---.262/.322/.387---.332
Rays: .248/.338/.400---.253/.335/.415---.332
The fielding for both teams is a plus, but with the Twins again having the advantage over the Rangers. The Twins' UZR is 26.5 and a UZR/150 of 4.0, compared to the Rangers' 15.3 UZR and 2.9 UZR/150. To give a comparison, the Rays' UZR and UZR/150 are 37.0 and 6.6. This was definitely evident when the Rays played the Rangers at home. Granted the Rangers did not have all their starters during that series, but they did make numerous defensive errors that were costly to the team.
Okay, so the Twins are the better team when batting and fielding the ball, but what about pitching?
| Twins | ERA | FIP | xFIP | Rangers | ERA | FIP | xFIP | |
| Liriano | 3.24 | 2.37 | 3.05 | Lee | 3.37 | 2.63 | 3.24 | |
| Pavano | 3.52 | 3.71 | 3.96 | Wilson | 3.10 | 3.60 | 4.28 | |
| Duensing | 2.09 | 3.67 | 4.14 | Lewis | 3.96 | 3.69 | 3.99 |
This is where the balance of the series becomes difficult. Both teams have a #1 starter that is a potentially dominating LHP (who doesn't have one of these nowadays though?). Although Fransisco Liriano has been the better starting pitcher so far this season, Cliff Lee (when healthy) has been dominant on a level that's rarely seen; in a five game series, he could easily be the difference between a series victory or less. Even though the Rays have gotten to Lee three times this season, all three were close games until the eighth inning, who knows how many more times they can keep scratching a run across.
After Lee, though, the Rangers still have two very strong pitchers. C.J. Wilson and Colby Lewis have been putting up solid numbers all season and the Rays haven't seen much of them. Facing those two and Cliff Lee in the same series would make Texas a tough opponent, even with home-field advantage. The Twins have an easier rotation* after Liriano; Carl Pavano and Brian Duensing don't overpower the opposition as much, but will still pose a challenge.
*Slowey and Baker are currently injured, so I'm not going to put them into the top three just yet.
In the bullpen, it's Matt Capps against Neftali Feliz. One throws 100+ and the other doesn't (hint: Feliz is really, really good). The Rays have had success against both bullpens though, but moreso against Minnesota. And as for stadiums, comparing Arlington to Target Field is a tough at this point, considering how new Target Field is. It doesn't seem to be as difficult place to play in as the Metrodome and it's tougher for a ball to leave the park, while Texas is the opposite.
So overall, it's hard to figure which way the Rays may be better off. Both teams are well balanced, and the games will likely be close regardless of who the Rays play. Minnesota would probably allow more offense than Texas, but they're also a better all-around team. The Rays don't have a specific advantage against either team, so we should expect the games to be what postseason baseball should be: hard-fought and enjoyable.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Providing we don't fall further behind this weekend
i’d say we need to go 5-2 v NY to catch them. Considering it’s a four game series there, a sweep here is probably what it’s going to take
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
I would say that 5-2 is ambitious, but may be what is necessary to take them over.
However, consider each team’s last 9 games. Ours is relatively “easy” and the NYY have Bos, Tor, Bos I think.
So 5-2 is desirable but I’d say even 3-4 keeps us alive.
Do you realize Betty White is a milf for me? Ouch
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
by sternfan1 on Sep 3, 2010 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Here's my formula for winning the division
23 games remain
11 road 3@TOR 4@NY 4@ KCR
7-4 is a must
12 home 3 v NYY, LAA, SEA and BAL
9-3 is our goal
This gives us a record of 100-62 and forces the NYY to go 13-9 to tie, but by virtue of us winning the season series which i lay out in an above post we win the ALE
Pretty simple, now let’s start out with a win tonight where we owe the Jays a lesson or two
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
Now i realize asking this team to play 9 games above 500 in the final 23 is no easy task, considering we're only 9 games above in our last 79, but to win the ALE it will be needed
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
correction 9 games above 500 (52-43) in our last 95
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
SF1 trying to be positive?
I’m surprised you didnt say limp into playoffs or IF we get into the playoffs or not.
I'm NOT surprised you failed to use the reply button to post your comment--it's very difficult and not user friendly at all
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
by sternfan1 on Sep 10, 2010 8:23 AM EDT up reply actions 7 recs
lol
where are my gifs? is this a new thread? you guys are litl fucking sluts. uck you guys. i bet you guys tmpons in the womines bathromms and pay 75 cents for each ne. fuck you
by daveh33 on Sep 3, 2010 11:09 PM EDT reply actions
by PriceMultiCyYoungs on Sep 10, 2010 8:34 AM EDT up reply actions
Burned!
I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously.
by Steve Slowinski on Sep 10, 2010 8:41 AM EDT up reply actions
I'm not surprised you fail at reading comprehension.
Because I clearly wasn’t trying to reply to your comments about best case scenario, rather just pointing out an observation.
by DaPriceIsRight on Sep 10, 2010 8:47 AM EDT up reply actions
Sure you were
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
I meant to link to this in the article...
For more on the subject, read RJ’s great post from The Process Report.
I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously.
by Steve Slowinski on Sep 10, 2010 8:18 AM EDT reply actions
Looks like Dueinsing and Pavano are looking at some serious regression
moving forward
follow me on twitter @sternfan10

by 





















