The Value of Being Hot
Much to my chagrin, this is not a post about Mark Walhberg. Instead, I've been wondering for the past few weeks about the playoffs. The Rays seem to already have a grasp of at least some post-season slot. We are now only waiting to see which town gets to print the first set of tickets, New York City or St. Petersburg. But, with each passing day, I become more worried. Specifically, I worry the Rays need to play much better --- not for the need of a playoff spot, but for the need of being hot going in to the playoffs.
Perhaps my innate desire for this sources from last year's events, when the Yankees seemed unstoppable in the final two months of baseball, or from watching football, where lately the only important playoff element is the size of a teams' injury list.
So, I have been scouring teh onlinez to see what kind of research is already available in this area. From what I can tell, most analysts discount momentum. Instead, they focus on roster construction: Tom Tango et al. (the non "Secret Saucers") think the best overall team has the best chance, whereas Nate Silver et al. (the "Secret Saucers") think it takes a Secret Sauce of (a) high strikeout pitchers, (b) stud closers, and (c) great defense.
But these limited findings did not sate my concerns. So I began searching websites and sacred tomes for some sort of statistics on the matter. To my dismay, I could not find an easy means of culling comprehensive data on the matter, so I'm doing the next best/easiest thing: looking at the last five World Series winners. What did they look like in September?
Well let's find out...
The last five world champs are as follows:
- 2009: the New York Yankees
- 2008: the Philadelphia Phillies
- 2007: the Boston Red Sox
- 2006: the St. Louis Cardinals
- 2005: the Chicago White Sox
Why did I pick the champs? Well, first of all, it was easiest. Secondly, and more importantly, the object of this research is to see if playing bad in September negatively affects how we play in October (that is, the playoffs). Future research could probably benefit, however, from examining each team that reached the playoffs.
Here's how these teams did:
| Team | Sept W-L% | Post W-L% |
| 2009 NYY | 0.679 | 0.733 |
| 2008 PHI | 0.680 | 0.786 |
| 2007 BOS | 0.593 | 0.786 |
| 2006 STL | 0.429 | 0.688 |
| 2005 CHW | 0.586 | 0.917 |
(source: Baseball-Reference.com)
I must admit the results of these teams shocked me when I first saw them. The White Sox -- who lost only one game in the entire playoffs (.917) -- had the second worst winning percentage in September (.586). Meanwhile the Yankees -- who seemed unstoppable in September -- played well in October, but not as well as Boston or Chicago, who played markedly worse in September. Also, St. Louis had a losing percentage (they were below .500!) in September.
Here's a graphical representation of that data, plus their full regular season W-L%.
In the current playoff system, a team must win 11 games to win the World Series -- without losing more than 8. Therefore, the lowest possible W-L% to win the World Series is .579. Of course, the sequencing of those wins and losses matter a lot -- a team cannot start by losing 8 really quickly and then snapping off 11 straight; they'd be home with a beer in hand after the first 3. This is important to note that none of these teams just scraped by in the playoffs -- most of them did much better than necessary, except for the Cardinal who may have been the worst team to win the World Series in the last decade.
Altogether, these championship teams did not fair as well in September as they did in October:
| Combined Sept W-L% | 0.591 |
| Combined Post W-L% | 0.764 |
(source: Baseball-Reference.com)
However, their overall, combined record was .585, so they still played -- on average -- well in September. Were they hot? Some were. Were they cold? Some were.
Interestingly, their season halves were almost almost identical:
| Combined First Half | 0.588 |
| Combined Second Half | 0.581 |
(source: Baseball-Reference.com)
If anything, these championship teams were slightly colder in the second half than the first half.
So what does this mean for the Rays? So far in September, we've teetered along the edge of .500, but with a higher Pythagorean W-L than .500. That means we've played better than our record indicates. But would it really matter? We see here that two teams (NYY and PHI) both played better in September than their season record, two played worse (STL and CHW), and one played right on (BOS).
This data leads me to suspect that, instead of stressing about how Carlos Pena is swinging or how Jeff Niemann is pitching, I should simply sit back and enjoy the ride. At this point -- assuming we don't asplode and miss the playoffs -- there's little more that can affect our fate than fate itself.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
In the case of both the '05 Sox and '06 Cards they had fairly large leads, although challenged at the end, were at no real risk of missing the playoffs
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
I'd give up a toe to play in either of those divisions, then and now.
The great thing about baseball is that it requires careful observation not simply attendance and it rewards the analytical person while consistently befuddling the superficial.
Help others while helping yourself by purchasing this Trade Deadline Primer:
http://dockoftherays.com/2010/07/03/2010-trade-deadline-primer/
by Andy Hellicksonstine on Sep 20, 2010 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions
Is this not the case for us, either?
A few weeks ago you were saying we were going to limp into the playoffs; however, we have a pretty large lead over Boston for the Wild Card.
by DaPriceIsRight on Sep 20, 2010 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions
IF limp limp limp
The caller said the boy, after removing the bulb from its socket, left the building and threw the bulb on the ground. When the bulb broke, the caller said the boy screamed "To be the best, you have to beat the best…"
by Top Gun Numba 1 on Sep 20, 2010 10:14 AM EDT reply actions
With a line like this, I expected the title to be "Come on swing it, come on swing it, yo, come on swing it"
Much to my chagrin, this is not a post about Mark Walhberg.
The caller said the boy, after removing the bulb from its socket, left the building and threw the bulb on the ground. When the bulb broke, the caller said the boy screamed "To be the best, you have to beat the best…"
by Top Gun Numba 1 on Sep 20, 2010 10:25 AM EDT reply actions
When it comes to questions like this, I think we need to go to the source
http://tampabay.rays.mlb.com/tb/ticketing/summer_concerts.jsp?partnerId=ed-4126576-158020464
The great thing about baseball is that it requires careful observation not simply attendance and it rewards the analytical person while consistently befuddling the superficial.
Help others while helping yourself by purchasing this Trade Deadline Primer:
http://dockoftherays.com/2010/07/03/2010-trade-deadline-primer/
by Andy Hellicksonstine on Sep 20, 2010 10:34 AM EDT reply actions
We'd probably go on a run if we got a little more consistent
And we had a couple of guys step up with big months.
Like that Tulo guy. I heardz he’s gud
PIZZA?!?
That's the thing. What my little bit of research suggests is that
September and October don’t have discernible correlation. This coincides with The Book‘s assertion that hot and cold streaks begin and end instantly — there’s no way to predict them. For all we know, Ben Zobrist will his 10 homeruns in October.
Sound crazy? Well, does anyone remember how BJ Upton did in 2008’s post season?
A DRaysBay writer from Cubs Stats and Twitter @BradleyWoodrum
OHW will not hit 10 homers the rest of his career.
The great thing about baseball is that it requires careful observation not simply attendance and it rewards the analytical person while consistently befuddling the superficial.
Help others while helping yourself by purchasing this Trade Deadline Primer:
http://dockoftherays.com/2010/07/03/2010-trade-deadline-primer/
by Andy Hellicksonstine on Sep 20, 2010 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions
Hahaha! At first I really thought SF1 wrote this!
A DRaysBay writer from Cubs Stats and Twitter @BradleyWoodrum
Pena is due for a stretch of 10HRs
October would be a nice time for them
PIZZA?!?
by Transplanted on Sep 20, 2010 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions
the yanks lose 8 of 10 and a series at the trop
then rattle off a sweep of Bmore. Shocking to me that they did not continue to lose every series because they had demonstrated a recent pattern of failure.
the handwringing here is unnecessary.
i'll tweet that prick right now
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
by sternfan1 on Aug 21, 2010 8:42 PM PDT up reply actions
by PlayOnWords on Sep 20, 2010 11:52 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
They didn't sweep in Baltimore.
But who are you saying is hand-wringing? I hope it’s not me. I’ve reached an Office Space-level peace with the baseball universe.
A DRaysBay writer from Cubs Stats and Twitter @BradleyWoodrum
some on this site are and it will get worse after nys and this article could be a launching pad for paranoia
i'll tweet that prick right now
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
by sternfan1 on Aug 21, 2010 8:42 PM PDT up reply actions
by PlayOnWords on Sep 20, 2010 12:02 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
He probably just forgot how to win.
Or maybe wasn’t veteran enough that night. One of the two.
A DRaysBay writer from Cubs Stats and Twitter @BradleyWoodrum
oh word? didnt check scores or tv after the rays "contest"
i'll tweet that prick right now
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
by sternfan1 on Aug 21, 2010 8:42 PM PDT up reply actions
by PlayOnWords on Sep 20, 2010 12:02 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
they lost the game during our postgame show
but luke scott tied it up in the bottom of hte 9th with a pinch hit hr, which happened right about the end of the game here
Geez.
I just did the math on Dan Johnson. He’s got a .196 BABIP right now, but a .300 Dutton xBABIP. If he even goes to a .250 BABIP, what does his wRC go to? Does it realistically go from 139 (where it is now) to the 150s or 160s?
Dude is for realz. That much I believe.
A DRaysBay writer from Cubs Stats and Twitter @BradleyWoodrum
that doesnt take into account all the home runs hes going to smash
he has been pretty good with those lately
Hold your horses
Keep in mind that Pena the last two years (08 and 09 that is) has had wRC+s of around 130. a wRC+ is Pujolsian territory (seriously, dude has a 162 wRC+). The thing is, DJ probably will NOT have a BB% of 20.4 or a HR/FB of 20.7% (although the latter is certainly possible). I’d project a wRC+ of 120-125, but 130-135 is certainly possible. I don’t think we see him being above 150 going forward, although it is possible.

by 






















