The Rays Tank: The Trading Wade Davis And David Price Edition
MLB Chatter
There were a couple big pieces of news yesterday, although none of them directly or indirectly touched upon the Rays. The Royals traded Melky Cabrera to the Giants for Jonathan Sanchez, and the Twins fired their GM Bill Smith. Sanchez isn't a great pitcher, but then again, Melky Cabrera isn't necessarily a great outfielder. For my own sake, I hope this doesn't preclude Brandon Belt actually getting in the Giants' lineup (he's one of my keepers), but I'm sure it probably will.
Also, the Twins fire Bill Smith after only four seasons? That seems like short time frame to get a handle on a GM, especially when this was the only poor year under his tenure. Twins fans seem quite happy about the news, though, so I probably just haven't looked at Smith's transaction log long enough.
In other news, everyone on the internet seemingly went goo-goo eyed over Cuban prospect Yoennis Cespedes yesterday morning. The scouting video provided by Kevin Goldstein (BPro) got taken down, but I'll be sure to post it if I see another copy. In the meantime, here's a bit about Cespedes. It appears the Marlins are the front-runners to get him.
Bill Petti from Beyond the Boxscore interviewed MLB Network's Brian Kenny yesterday about a new show he's hosting called Clubhouse Confidential. The show's supposedly going to take a saber-slant, and I found the interview rather interesting.
An underappreciated part of player salaries: taxes. Certain states have higher or lower income taxes, and it's worth noting that Florida is one of three states that doesn't impose a statewide personal income tax. That means players retain more of their salary if they primarily play in Florida, which is a fact I hope Friedman has used in negotiations.
Rays Talk
John Gregg over at Rays Digest is posting a three-part interview with prospect Mikie Mahtook, and the first part is already up. Gregg runs a fine site over at RD and he asked Mahtook some great questions, so I'd be sure to check it out.
Yesterday, I wrote about David Price's potentially exorbitant arbitration cost, and why the Rays might decide to trade him as early as next offseason. It's not a fun scenario to imagine, but we'd better start getting used to the idea.
The most recent Rays-related rumor suggests that the Rays would prefer to trade Wade Davis this offseason instead of James Shields. I could definitely see this happening -- trade Davis, hold onto Shields and Price for one last go-around together -- although the Rays obviously would get a weaker return package. If they trade Davis, how do they fill their current roster holes?
Here's a heartwarming story about Reid Brignac helping out in his local community. There's so much gossipy stuff written about athletes, but I wish stories like this would get more attention.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't want to acknowledge that Price might leave 12 months from now.
As you can always expect come from behind victory is when you least expect it.
It's not a fun pill to swallow. I'm hoping they can work out an extension or something, but I don't see Price's motivation for it.
Unless he really likes the team and wants to remain a Ray.
I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously. -- @steveslow
by Steve Slowinski on Nov 8, 2011 11:02 AM EST up reply actions
I find the tax information really intriguing.
I do wonder how much players consider all that when deciding who to sign with. It’d make sense that they’d look at how much comes back to their pocket, but I’m not sure how many actually take that extra step.
Certainly would make the Rays’ money go further if players considered it, though.
I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously. -- @steveslow
by Steve Slowinski on Nov 8, 2011 11:03 AM EST reply actions
Davis has great trade value
because whatever he gets from another team is just in addition to a likely rotation spot for Matt Moore
Under construction
Am I crazy to think
that Jeff Niemann’s trade value ought to be roughly equivalent to Shaun Marcum, 2010?
For whatever it means, I would rather have Marcum
I don’t see Neimann getting a Lawrie type.
Under construction
I thought you were crazy until I looked it up.
Marcum was never as good as I thought he was pre-2010. Granted, Niemann’s 2011 wasn’t quite as good as Marcum’s 2010, but they really are not all that dissimilar.
They refused Myers for Jurjjiens (I can't even pretend to spell that)
No way they trade him for Neimann
Under construction
KC has a reputation for being very, very difficult trade partners
for whatever that’s worth
This could make for a fun comparison post. Interesting.
I’d have said he was crazy as well.
I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously. -- @steveslow
by Steve Slowinski on Nov 8, 2011 2:29 PM EST up reply actions


























