Q&A With Rays Executive Vice President Andrew Friedman
As the title suggests, Andrew Friedman was kind enough to lend some of his times to answering a few questions about the 2011 season and a variety of other topics. Enjoy.
Erik Hahmann: The team making the playoffs this season was obviously a great achievement. The general consensus in the national media, and around here, was an ~85 win season. How surprised were you, if at all, by the team's success?
Andrew Friedman: We felt going into the season that we had a very good chance of playing meaningful games in September and if things broke right, making the playoffs. Despite the losses we'd sustained over the winter, we had confidence in our group. Of course, playing in the AL East made the postseason less likely but we felt that we had a contending club with a lot of talent. Between our slow start and some tough breaks throughout the summer, our chances started to look more remote. What happened in September was obviously very unlikely. But looking at the season as a whole, the talent was there to do what we did, and to their credit, our players never stopped believing that even when they fell behind.
EH: Could you describe your emotions from the time Dan Johnson stepped to the plate in the bottom of the ninth inning in game 162 to the moments after Longoria's home run cleared the low wall in left?
AF: That whole evening was an emotional roller coaster unlike anything I've experienced in baseball, and I can't imagine it will ever be duplicated. On top of coming back from seven down to tie the game with two outs and two strikes in the ninth, those three extra innings were unreal. At one point the Yankees had runners at the corners with nobody out, and Papelbon was one out from a 1-2-3 save in Baltimore. A few minutes later, we were in the playoffs. It was such an emotional swing that it was literally hard to believe it had happened.
EH: Can you give us an update on how the facility in Brazil is going?
AF: We're very excited about the long-term potential of our efforts in Brazil - even as it will take many years for our work to come fully to fruition. The process of identifying and developing talent has already begun.
EH: Over the last five seasons the team has been the best defensive club in baseball. The players always seem to be lined up in the perfect position for every batter. Do you look at some type of Field F/x data to help properly position players, or is it more dependent on the coaching? A combination of both?
AF: It's a point of pride for us to have our players in the right spots as often as possible. As Joe often says, we catch line drives. We'll use every piece of relevant information in deciding where to position our guys, and we rely on the coaching staff not just to convey that information, but to adjust on the fly when necessary.
EH: Could you walk us through the process behind releasing Cory Wade? It seems a spot could have been made for him, and his minor league numbers looked impressive. Was this a case where the stats didn't match the scouting?
AF: At that point, we didn't see a fit for Cory in our bullpen. We had multiple relievers coming off of surgery and hoped to keep our bullpen strong through October and so having a long man who could pick up a starter after a bad outing and go sixty or seventy pitches was important to us. Given how he performed with the Yankees, perhaps we should have found a way to fit him but we didn't think we could configure the bullpen properly.
EH: You've had an incredible string of success in keeping your starting pitchers healthy. What do you attribute this streak to? Theo Epstein recently mentioned in Sports Illustrated that keeping pitchers healthy is a sort of new "market inefficiency." Do you agree with that, and should we all be thanking our lucky stars that you got to James Click first?
AF: There's no question that the health of our starters has been a huge factor in how we have competed over the last several years. Since we have a homegrown rotation, that's a process that starts well before they get to the big leagues, and a lot of people deserve credit for it: our medical staff, our strength coaches and our pitching coaches, both in Tampa Bay and throughout our system. And of course you have to credit the starters themselves. They take pride in what they do and in working hard both in the offseason and between starts. Coming up here and seeing how hard James Shields works, and then seeing that pay off with double-digit complete games, helps our young pitchers immeasurably.
EH: Recently there was a study by Mike Fast at Baseball Prospectus on a catchers' ability to frame pitches and how many runs that can save/cost a team over the course of a season. A catcher being able to frame a pitch so that it switches a ball into a strike on a close pitch was worth 0.13 runs on average. The best can save their team many runs a year while the worst cost their team runs by turning strikes into balls. Is this a study you've looked at, and is receiving the ball and framing a pitch a skill that is valued and taught within the organization?
AF: We place a huge emphasis on how our catchers receive the ball. Jamie Nelson, our catching coordinator, pays close attention to each catcher's technique from day one, and he and our catching instructors have drills to address different issues in that area. As with any skill, some players have to work more at it than others. The recent studies confirm what baseball people have been saying for decades: technique matters, and there's more to catcher defense than throwing runners out.
EH: What factors are put into play when determining which players to pursue pre-arbitration deals with, such as the ones signed by Longoria and Davis?
AF: There are a lot of different factors that go into the long-term deals we sign, and it can be a complex process. But first, there are a couple of things that have to be in place. First, the player has to feel that it's right for him. The security of that first long-term contract is something that almost no player ever regrets, but it's an individual decision. Second, we need to feel good about the player, and the person, in whom we're investing. Character, work ethic and competitive drive are important to us and a long-term guarantee on our part represents our confidence in those attributes.
EH: Is it tougher to develop pitching or hitting prospects? The organization has turned out a slew of good arms over the past few years but has seemingly struggled with the bats.
AF: It's not easy developing prospects, period. Once a player gets to the big leagues and has success it may seem easy in retrospect but there are so many things that can go wrong on the way, and so many people who had a hand in making it go right. We've certainly had tremendous success with our pitching program, but we've developed good position players over the years as well, and there are a number of players in our system right now who have a chance to impact our big league club.
EH: In 2008 you mentioned the team would like to get to the point of an 11 man pitching staff. With the starters you have right now, are you there? Or have things changed?
AF: We're always thinking about how we can do things better. To this point, we've found that twelve pitchers has made the most sense. Having twelve allows us to make the right tactical moves on a nightly basis to win games while still supporting our starters and keeping them strong.
Thanks again to Andrew for taking the time to join us.
56 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
AF's answer to question three?
very random indeed
by d.russ on Nov 9, 2011 10:06 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Love his takes even if he can only give very vague responses.
A few things stuck out to me:
And of course you have to credit the starters themselves. They take pride in what they do and in working hard both in the offseason and between starts. Coming up here and seeing how hard James Shields works, and then seeing that pay off with double-digit complete games, helps our young pitchers immeasurably.
Second, we need to feel good about the player, and the person, in whom we’re investing. Character, work ethic and competitive drive are important to us and a long-term guarantee on our part represents our confidence in those attributes.
by rglass44 on Nov 9, 2011 10:35 AM EST reply actions 2 recs
I think this speaks well to Moore/Joyce extensions as both seem like those kind of players.
Also speaks well to keeping Shields around as the anchor of the staff. He embodies the “Rays’ way.” It’s funny how much stock they put in to character (and I think taht is particularly relevant for drafting developing more so than veterans).
by rglass44 on Nov 9, 2011 10:37 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Sorry stat boys--no thank you to the 11 man staff
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
by sternfan1 on Nov 9, 2011 10:36 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
i also didnt realize that was a "statboy" thing.
by rglass44 on Nov 9, 2011 10:39 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
it is in the twitter world
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
by sternfan1 on Nov 9, 2011 10:40 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Dear MR. Sternfan
Do the stat-boys have a fantasy site in the twitter world were we can get information on a players character and work ethic. Or do they just think that those things have no effect on a players value?
by Landlord on Nov 9, 2011 10:48 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Mention clubhouse presence and they stroke
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
by sternfan1 on Nov 9, 2011 10:49 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
glassman--let's not forget I am the original
there are many imitators but i stand alone
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
by sternfan1 on Nov 9, 2011 10:53 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
btw--you'll be happy to hear that my target this off season
IF HEALTHY is Kendry Morales
put him in the middle of the order with numbers he had in ‘09 and i’m happy
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
by sternfan1 on Nov 9, 2011 10:56 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
id be fine with that. great buy-low candidate, but i fear the angels would be hesitant to sell low.
by rglass44 on Nov 9, 2011 10:57 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
a SP fhould get it done as they'll need to replace Piniero
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
by sternfan1 on Nov 9, 2011 11:02 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Dear Mr. Sternfan
In regard to your Kendrys comment.
Maybe the reason AF was having dinner with the Angel-boys was in regard to this situation,instead of the sites suggestion that AF was on the move. The Angels may have to move Trumbo if they bring back Kendrys. You can also throw Abrue in there I believe. Both Trumbo and Morales have foot issues. It is amazing how Trumbo performed with a broken foot.
Trumbo saved his foot by rarely getting on base.
I’d also love to know why AF didn’t just ring the ‘Angel-boys’ if it was simply a trade discussion? Re: Abreu, he costs too much and weighs too much to be ‘thrown’ anywhere as well.
'That is an absurd username.' - Steve Slowinski.
by Concretepiggy on Nov 9, 2011 11:54 AM EST up reply actions
please don't be disrespectful in baseball threads
I could care less about your graduate degree-I was a full professor at Harvard at 34 and am a full professor at Columbia now in a theoretical field whose main tool is statistical mechanics. So can can come down from your high place.
by Buzzy on Sep 24, 2011 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions
by pudieron89 on Nov 9, 2011 1:54 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Who had clubhouse presence on the 2011 roster?
I'm not a fanboy, I'm a _______
by Jason Collette on Nov 9, 2011 10:57 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I think I saw in 1 time in the clubhouse post-game all season.
Damon had the most “presencey” moment of the season to me. After Cobb came up and threw that one game and was sent down, Damon walked over after we were done chatting to Cobb and thanked the kid for the effort and told him to stay sharp down in Durham because the team was going to need his help to get to the playoffs.
I'm not a fanboy, I'm a _______
by Jason Collette on Nov 9, 2011 11:00 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Damon--you don't hink his experience and how
he conveyed staying the course didn’t help when the team easily could have caved?
Joe sure thought so
How’d you miss it/
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
by sternfan1 on Nov 9, 2011 11:01 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I didn't miss it -- was soliciting opinions
see my story above your post
I'm not a fanboy, I'm a _______
by Jason Collette on Nov 9, 2011 11:22 AM EST up reply actions
THIS IS ALL DUMB. OF COURSE DAMON IS A VETERAN LEADER,
Scott Boros told me so.
/snicker
A DRaysBay and FanGraphs writer from Cubs Stats and Twitter @BradleyWoodrum
Boros
lol
i support casual racism
by Boddington on Sep 19, 2011 6:10 PM PDT up reply actions
I literally wish I had killed myself on the train station after I got laid off
by Sean O on Sep 28, 2011 7:49 PM PDT
I want a BUC'N criminal investigation.
Over the Monster -- SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Site
USG
by Ben Buchanan on Sep 28, 2011 7:48 PM PDT
by internet commenter on Nov 9, 2011 2:41 PM EST up reply actions
Do the non-statboys have insight in to the character and work ethic of players? the difference is the statboys dont think we know.
by rglass44 on Nov 9, 2011 10:50 AM EST up reply actions 4 recs
i love the saber stats, but don't see them as the end all
and from their moves neither do Friedman & Maddon
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
by sternfan1 on Nov 9, 2011 10:52 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
i dont think anyone does. i also dont think they depart from the saber-line that often.
i wouldnt even point to kotch as an example because he was exactly what we preach: buy-low, good defense, possible rebound candidate. the saber folks that didnt like him (speaking for myself here) had a ton more to do with the attributes prescribed to him (hometown boy, coach’s kid, etc.) that caused an irrational love (not to mention his awkwardness, ugliness, etc). the deification is what we railed against.
by rglass44 on Nov 9, 2011 10:56 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
you've for some reason brought Kotch up twice in this thread--hmmm
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
by sternfan1 on Nov 9, 2011 11:03 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Character, work ethic and competitiveness....
Now we know why BJ wasn’t signed long term.
by playjoyce on Nov 9, 2011 10:36 AM EST via mobile reply actions 7 recs
dumb comment
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
by sternfan1 on Nov 9, 2011 10:41 AM EST up reply actions 7 recs
I agree Mr. Sternfan
Mr. playjoyce has no clue about B.J.
by Landlord on Nov 9, 2011 10:50 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
No clue whatsoever
In fact you’re right; BJ is the epitome of hard work. Look at how he’s changed his swing mechanics! In fact, has the current Rays regime ever signed an African-American to a long term deal? I see a trend with this ownership……
by playjoyce on Nov 9, 2011 4:02 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
The one token to CC in 06 when they started is all I can come
by playjoyce on Nov 9, 2011 4:28 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
THE FO DOESN'T WANT TO SIGN STALLIONAIRES LONG TERM
Where in Pasco are you from?
I could care less about your graduate degree-I was a full professor at Harvard at 34 and am a full professor at Columbia now in a theoretical field whose main tool is statistical mechanics. So can can come down from your high place.
by Buzzy on Sep 24, 2011 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions
I see this site is now THE HEATER LITE
www.ottotd.com
Contact me! putupyourDUKES@dhazebay.com
END THE FED! Google Ron Paul!
†††If you love Jesus Christ and are 100% proud of it, copy this and make it your signature!†††
by putupyourDUKES on Nov 9, 2011 11:18 AM EST up reply actions 9 recs
Or, more along the lines of his first two points
First, the player has to feel that it’s right for him. The security of that first long-term contract is something that almost no player ever regrets, but it’s an individual decision.
Translation: We give team-friendly long-term deals to players who will sign team-friendly long-term deals.
exactly
Bonus babies won’t be signing them because they are already financially secure (see Upton, Price, Beckham).
Not to the same extent.
Longo received a $3 million bonus in 2006. Price received $5.6, Beej got $4.6 (in 2002), and Beckham got $6.15. Longo also got offered an extension before his first big league AB while Beej was under the old ownership until he came up.
Kaz and CC were too, to lesser degrees
2.15M for kaz, 1.55M for CC
by benderbrodriguez on Nov 9, 2011 4:16 PM EST up reply actions
This used to be bannable.
@RealNolenBailey
by Hatfield on Nov 9, 2011 1:30 PM EST via mobile up reply actions 2 recs
R.I.P R.J Anderson
You heard it from me.
by multiple sources on Nov 9, 2011 1:33 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
As for Cory 'HR' Wade--he winds up actually helping the Rays make the playoffs afterall
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
by sternfan1 on Nov 9, 2011 11:04 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
I thought Wade being the guy to give up the HR
… in the 9th was one of lesser talked about “oddities” of game 162.
by Political_Man on Nov 9, 2011 1:43 PM EST via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
Who is the one going down the list rec-ing all the posts?
I AM THE MONSTER - The big SCARY monsta
by sc_monsta1015 on Nov 9, 2011 12:12 PM EST reply actions 9 recs
Interesting interview.
I wasnt aware of that study on catchers, but he seemed to be all over it.
As you can always expect come from behind victory is when you least expect it.
by Buc Wild on Nov 9, 2011 5:04 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Google 'Mike Fast catchers'
Or something along those lines and you should find it on BP. I’m pretty sure it was free.
by Erik Hahmann on Nov 10, 2011 8:13 AM EST up reply actions

by 






















