The Rays Tank: Logan Morrison 'Off Limits', Copious Marlins Love Editiion
MLB Chatter
Technically, the big news yesterday was that the Phillies are close to signing Ryan Madson to a 4 year, $44 million contract. Considering his last deal was for 3 years, $12 million, that "established closer" tag got him a heck of a payday.
The big news to me, though, was that the Florida Marlins are going streaking this offseason. With their new stadium as a selling point, the Marlins seem to be making a big push toward competitiveness. They met with Mark Buehrle yesterday and are meeting with Jose Reyes today, and they have sent a contingent to the Dominican to make a hard sell to Yoennis Cespedes. As Jeff Sullivan notes, they are essentially recreating their team this offseason, attempting to turn into a mid-market powerhouse.
Oh, and the Marlins have supposedly declared Logan Morrison "off limits"...except if trading for Shields. As Michael Jong fleshed out in the link provided, I'm not taking this rumor at face value. I think this is the Marlins playing hard to get, and trying to raise the value of Morrison in relation to Shields. The Rays likely want more than just LoMo for Shields, and the Marlins likely don't want to give up anyone else. The dance begins.
Things I had forgotten about: there is a contingent of major league players "barnstorming" in Taiwan.
Rays Talk
If you read the first part of the Mikie Mahtook interview from Rays Digest, the second part is now live. Take it for what you will, but he raves about Tim Beckham's work ethic.
BurGi over at Rays Prospects is running a series of prospect profiles, and he recently looked at Kyle Lobstein, Ty Morrison, and Nevin Ashley. Nevin!
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thanks for the link ...
… but it’s mostly Kevin and me only helping out on some days! Nevertheless, we are glad if you like what we are doing.
Oh ... and by the way:
How much money do the Phillies have? Enough to throw it out of the window, obviously (while the Madson signing is WAY less head scratching than the Howard extension!)
A couple of other intriguing Cuban defectors too:
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2011/11/more-potential-cuban-free-agents.html
19-year-old outfielder Jorge Soler and 23-year-old right-hander Armando Rivero participated in a showcase at the Yankees’ complex in Boca Chica last week. Like Cespedes, both players are in the process of becoming eligible to play in the United States.
One year ago, Baseball America’s John Manuel had this to say about Soler: “Soler has a strapping 6-foot-3, 205-pound body, is 18 and has five-tool potential. Soler has bat speed and what one scout called ‘explosive power’ to go with above-average arm strength.” He’s on the Yankees’ radar, according to George A. King III of the New York Post. Sanchez writes that Rivero “features a slider, split-finger fastball, sinker and changeup in his repertoire and reached 98 mph with his fastball in the showcase.” King says he’s viewed as a reliever.
I’d like to see us make a play at both these guys (especially the OF).
has Soler played professionally?
obviously a 19-year-old OF with good tools should have you drooling
by AndrewTorrez on Nov 9, 2011 10:13 AM EST up reply actions
Any word on what they may receive bonus wise?
Both are very interesting. Doubt the Rays get either though, Other teams can outbid them for these guys.
No matter how much they are hyped, my teams always find a way to disappoint.
by thedudeofdudes on Nov 9, 2011 10:13 PM EST up reply actions
Agree re: LoMo
and again, I think the high end of the market has already been established for Shields, and it’s a lot more than just Morrison.
Teams should look it as it will take an untouchable and then some to get Shields
LoMo may be untouchable but he wouldn’t be enough for Shields by himself.
Under construction
LoMo is untouchable?
I thought we used to reserve that for great players who were affordable and who had years left in cotro. LoMo is good, but he isn’t a 5-7 WAR player of the #1 overall prospect.
It's posturing using definitive statements..
Same deal when Maddon declared that Garza will be pitching for the Rays during the peak of trade rumors.
by Ben Tumbling on Nov 9, 2011 12:01 PM EST up reply actions
They are just playing hardball
LoMo is almost destined to go to 1B. Marlins wants either Fielder or Pujols, and they already have Gaby Sanchez. LoMo is clubhouse cancer for Marlins. There aren’t too many teams interested in 1B and have enough packages to lure him. I would say.. about 5 teams? I still think Upton + Niemann <> LoMo + B-(Say, Chad James?) prospect sounds like perfect deal for both side. They can fill up the much needed CF and they have money and willingness to extend Upton as well. Niemann would add great strength to their rotation. AL East to NL East, could happen Vasquez transition since Niemann was a lot better pitcher than Vasquez in AL East.
by Patrick Relano Kim on Nov 9, 2011 11:53 AM EST reply actions
I don't like it
We may of been as close as 1 hitter away from winning that Texas series, we need to add a hitter, not trade one for another one. Plus, I really think BJ Upton is the kind of guy you want in his first ever FA season. Might only be for a year, but we may finally see those great numbers that people keep saying he will put up every season.
Under construction
In long term
I do not think another playoff will make any differences in this market, even if it is the ring since we stuck at this stadium issue. LoMo would be valuable asset in cheap prices for many years to come. And we can still contend with or without Upton for sure.
by Patrick Relano Kim on Nov 9, 2011 1:09 PM EST up reply actions
1 year of Upton, 3 years of Niemann vs 5 years of LoMo
yeah, I’m for Upton staying next year, but if this is the only way we can get LoMo outside of trading Shields, I’ll make that deal.
by raysfaninminnesota on Nov 9, 2011 1:22 PM EST up reply actions
We do not need Niemann
We have more than enough on pitching side and have to create spots for Cobb and Moore. Also saving 9m and allocate it on other needed position. Say, DH/C/SS/RP.
by Patrick Relano Kim on Nov 9, 2011 2:56 PM EST up reply actions
*may have
the expressions “should of” “would of” “could of” “may of” do not exist
They all contain the word have instead
by benderbrodriguez on Nov 9, 2011 3:54 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs






















