The Rays Tank: Yonder Alsono Off The Market, Helloooo Anthony Rizzo
As I'm sure most of you hear, Yonder Alonso is now off the trade market. He was dealt this past weekend to the San Diego Padres in a trade for Matt Latos, and it appears that the Padres intend to use him as their first baseman of the future. The Reds had to pay a high price to get Latos, though, and the final package -- Alonso, Grandal, Volquez, and Boxberger -- was probably about what the Rays would hope to get back for Shields.
But thankfully, there's another young first base target we can all lust over: Anthony Rizzo. As Tommy Rancel notes over at ESPN Florida, this trade suggests that the Padres have essentially given up on Rizzo and are planning to store him down in Triple-A or trade him. The Rays have already been rumored to be interested in Rizzo, so this whole situation might work out even better for the Rays.
There were two other tidbits of Rays news/rumors this weekend. The Rays were mentioned as one of the teams interested in Carlos Beltran, and while I'm sure they've kicked the tires on him, I can't see the Rays putting together a competitive offer for Beltran that matches what the Red Sox or Cardinals are willing to put up.
Also, Andrew Friedman talked with Marc Topkin this weekend, and he mentioned that he's content with the bullpen arms he has now. Then again, that could merely be Friedman double-talk, as he also implies that the he would like to add one more high-lev reliever if possible. Could that be code for Joel Zumaya?
Extra Links:
- The winning bid for Yu Darvish is rumored to exceed the record $51.1 million posting bid for Dice-K. The winner should be announced tomorrow, and it appears that there are only two clubs that could have won the bid: the Rangers or Blue Jays.
- There's an article by Wendy Thurm over at Baseball Nation about MLB's contradictory messages about sex in the new CBA. One on hand, MLB makes a progressive statement; on the other....eh, not so much.
- Grant Brisbee has a really fun take on why the Rays and Padres should just hook up already. They're a match made in heaven, so the trick is just figuring out what sort of deal both sides is willing to do.
96 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Kubel off the market -- went to Arizona on a 2 yr deal with a 3rd year option
I'm not a fanboy, I'm an awesome dude
and it's an odd fit
Either he’s platooning with Goldschmidt or he’s taking away playing time from Parra in the field. As good as Parra is in left field, giving Kubel glove time at his expense seems puzzling to say the least.
I'm not a fanboy, I'm an awesome dude
by Jason Collette on Dec 19, 2011 8:46 AM EST up reply actions
link please
"I don't always post off-topic, but when I do, I post at http://ottotd.com" - $tinky $tu
A Rosenthal tweet
and since the damn twitter links don’t work here….
I'm not a fanboy, I'm an awesome dude
by Jason Collette on Dec 19, 2011 8:48 AM EST up reply actions
My grand daughter loves reading DRB--watch the language
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
by sternfan1 on Dec 19, 2011 8:50 AM EST up reply actions 8 recs
Damn, that's rec worthy
I'm not a fanboy, I'm an awesome dude
by Jason Collette on Dec 19, 2011 8:52 AM EST up reply actions
Oh God.
I AM THE MONSTER - The big SCARY monsta
by sc_monsta1015 on Dec 19, 2011 10:31 AM EST up reply actions
per Heyman, Kubel got 2 yrs/ $15
Pretty much a Burrell contract which should help frame where the Rays are looking financially to fill the roster.
3/30 for Cuddyer
3/24 for Willingham
2/15 for Kubel
I'm not a fanboy, I'm an awesome dude
by Jason Collette on Dec 19, 2011 8:55 AM EST up reply actions
that's an especially terrible deal for the Diamondbacks
and it probably means that a Luke Scott signing will have to wait until late January, because a) there’s very little difference between Scott and Kubel, but b) I don’t see any team willing to go 2/15 on Scott.
by AndrewTorrez on Dec 19, 2011 9:01 AM EST up reply actions
Agreed, I don't like that for Arizona financially or how it affects their roster
2 things there: Kubel is four years younger and is not coming off major surgery. Scott may get 2 years, but not sure both are guaranteed like this was for Kubel.

I'm not a fanboy, I'm an awesome dude
by Jason Collette on Dec 19, 2011 9:04 AM EST up reply actions
.

I wouldn’t go 2 guaranteed on any one of them. I’d go 1 year on Damon, and 1 yr with team option on the other two. Anything more than $5M for the 2012 base value and I pass on all 3 because Drew’s attractiveness would be keeping him healthy DH’ing rather than playing the field heavily at age 36
I'm not a fanboy, I'm an awesome dude
by Jason Collette on Dec 19, 2011 9:10 AM EST up reply actions
I like that. I might add some incentive clauses for Scott and Drew that vest an option for '13 if attained
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
Has the team done vested options in the past?
I can’t recall – I guess there’s a first time for anything & I’d be willing to try it with Scott.
I'm not a fanboy, I'm an awesome dude
by Jason Collette on Dec 19, 2011 9:38 AM EST up reply actions
let's get age 22 JD Drew
"I don't always post off-topic, but when I do, I post at http://ottotd.com" - $tinky $tu
pretty good 41 PAs
"I don't always post off-topic, but when I do, I post at http://ottotd.com" - $tinky $tu
2/20 for Beltran with an option based on games played
Now if the Cards get in on Fielder, it would be one step closer.
as the link in the story above states?
I'm not a fanboy, I'm an awesome dude
by Jason Collette on Dec 19, 2011 8:51 AM EST up reply actions
This would be a great pickup for the lineup.
And can afford to keep his knees healthy by not playing him on the turf and DHing at home.
Nice quick read on sac bunts
http://highheatstats.blogspot.com/2011/12/sacrifice-bunts-horrible-decision-by.html
I'm not a fanboy, I'm an awesome dude
As i mentioned Saturday, some here felt the Rays could have mabe the same deal for Shields the Pads did
I dunno. I think the Pads taking Volquez was a must. The Rays have no use or want for him as he isn’t very good and is already arby2
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
Reds were entertaining the idea of using Volquez in the back end of the pen
That would have been the use here. Shields would have been one less year of control for the Reds which likely means the return package could have not been what the Padres got for him. In the long run, I really like the deal for San Diego if Grandal hits his projections, Alonso becomes serviceable, and Boxberger becomes their next Adams/Gregerson type guy.
I'm not a fanboy, I'm an awesome dude
by Jason Collette on Dec 19, 2011 9:07 AM EST up reply actions
I don't want Beltran unless he gets that mole removed. Won't be able to take 162 of it.
Maddon's Mission
Make you want to kill him, then make you want to love him. Sly.
by Jonah Keri on Jun 19, 2010 10:31 PM EDT
The hype around Rizzo's availability is making me doubt Davis or Niemz is enough
by Ben Tumbling on Dec 19, 2011 9:33 AM EST up reply actions
The only thing that might push his value down
is that he struggled in limited time with the big league club. Im high on him though, his home runs have increased every year in the minors and think he hit something like 26 in 97 games at AAA last year.
Plus he is only 22!
by OneTonneBaby on Dec 19, 2011 9:44 AM EST up reply actions
If we get two
SD is probably going to want Guyer or a similar player that fits their OF better. They clearly want to give a full time spot to Fuld!!
Might take a Colome type throw in with Davis/Niems
by benderbrodriguez on Dec 19, 2011 12:33 PM EST up reply actions
Rizzo and Jesus
Jesus for now, Rizzo for the future. That leaves the team with DH still to fill or just allow Joyce, Zo, and Guyer to fill 2 positions.
I've long said that many of the Rays could benefit from the addition of Jesus.
@RealNolenBailey
by Hatfield on Dec 19, 2011 1:30 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Guzman could be a very interesting pick-up and could probably be had for cash or a C prospect
If the Pads keep Alonso and Rizzo, Guzman is the odd man out. Always a .300 hitter in the minors with a 15% K rate, he hit very well in 271 AB’s last year. Small sample but his splits and situational hitting were equally impressive in a very tough place to hit. Might not have enough power and at 27 may not be the long term answer but one never knows. His defense seems adequate at 1st, although most of his minor league experience has been at 3rd base.
his impressive 2011 was on the heels of a .360 babip and he's projected for a kotch-like 10 HR next season, pass.
"I don't always post off-topic, but when I do, I post at http://ottotd.com" - $tinky $tu
Rizzo value
When Jim Thome was brought up by the Indians, once in 1991 as a 21 year old and in 1992 as a 21/22 year old he hit a combined: .228/.285/.330 with 3 HR in 235 PAs.
I would take a risk on Rizzo but don’t see why the Padres wouldn’t at least hold on to him in AAA. Long season, Alonso could turn out to be Kotchman Jr and Rizzo could be Thome Jr. Or, injuries could open the door for him.
I think the risk of holding on to Rizzo outweighs anything the Padres could get for him this winter. As they say, sometimes the best deals are the ones you don’t make.
And if the Rays do obtain this Lou Gehrig Jr as some here suggest, would you turn 1B over to him?
Not i, and i highly doubt Friedman would as he always states deals he makes are for the present, but heavy on the future
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
Just a thought
Move Joyce to 1st, see what Arizona’s asking price is for Parra. An OF of Jennings/Upton/Parra would be near stallionarish.
I'm not a fanboy, I'm an awesome dude
by Jason Collette on Dec 19, 2011 11:54 AM EST reply actions
I don't think Parra is good enough to be in our OF over Guyer/Mahtook (eventually)
by benderbrodriguez on Dec 19, 2011 12:35 PM EST up reply actions
For it to be worth acquiring him I mean
by benderbrodriguez on Dec 19, 2011 12:36 PM EST up reply actions
and this. would bump Guyer out, it seems like a mostly lateral move except we'd have to give up a B/B+ prospect. no thanks.
"I don't always post off-topic, but when I do, I post at http://ottotd.com" - $tinky $tu
stallionairish*
"I don't always post off-topic, but when I do, I post at http://ottotd.com" - $tinky $tu
The issue I have with Rizzo is that it doesn't help (much) the 2012 club.
Rizzo would start the year in the minors, so the Rays would still have to get another 1b.
Why would he start the year in the minors?
I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously.
Follow @steveslow
by Steve Slowinski on Dec 19, 2011 11:59 AM EST up reply actions
#servicetimechamps
I'm not a fanboy, I'm an awesome dude
by Jason Collette on Dec 19, 2011 12:01 PM EST up reply actions
Because he isn't MLB ready?
Lets see how he does in the International league. Judging from his MLB time last year, he wasn’t close to ready. His K rates in the minors also point to him not being ready. The kid is young, and if he is to reach his true talent level, he needs more time in the minors.
I get that he struggled in the majors last year.
But I don’t see what more time in Triple-A is going to help him with. 20% k rate in Triple-A, with great plate discipline and power. Unless there’s some reason to believe his swing is messed up and will never translate to the majors (in which case, he becomes a much riskier bet anyway), I don’t see what else he has to do in the minors.
I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously.
Follow @steveslow
by Steve Slowinski on Dec 19, 2011 12:15 PM EST up reply actions
In the minor leagues, Ks are much more important than in MLB.
They are a prime sign of weakness and that the player has significant risk. If he is hitting so well in the minor leagues with a still fairly high K rate (21-22%), that shows that he probably isn’t ready (or worse, that he has some hole in his swing or approach).
For example, I would consider Yonder Alonso more ready than Rizzo. In the minors, Alonso was striking out around less than 15%.
Another 1B prospect was Eric Hosmer of the Royals, if we are looking for a guy with great power. Hosmer consistently stuck out in the low teen in the minor leagues.
Jesus Montero has been sticking out in the teens in the minors.
These are just some examples I am trying to bring up. I’m not saying Rizzo is far away, but that he could probably use a few months in Durham to get his Ks down to the mid-teens before being called up.
You're comparing him to guys that are going to be .300 hitters.
Rizzo will never do that, but if he can keep his K-rate at 25% he’ll be fine. His power is insane.
Can you think of a suitable comparison?
He is just so much mroe risky, and the Rays should play it safe with him.
Mike Stanton?
I'm confused. Why is SandalsNoPants still posting?
shouldnt he have been banned by now?
by Yankees10 on Dec 18, 2011 4:00 PM CST
by SandalsNoPants on Dec 19, 2011 1:19 PM EST up reply actions
That is the one guy I saw who posted high K rates but has still done well.
But then again, Stanton is on another level.
Ryan Howard?
I'm confused. Why is SandalsNoPants still posting?
shouldnt he have been banned by now?
by Yankees10 on Dec 18, 2011 4:00 PM CST
by SandalsNoPants on Dec 19, 2011 1:22 PM EST up reply actions
I don't think he was ready when they brought him up
And I think the results showed. This could happen to Rizzo if he is rushed. That was the comp I was trying to make.
what the data shows on Ks

I'm not a fanboy, I'm an awesome dude
by Jason Collette on Dec 19, 2011 2:17 PM EST up reply actions
full read
http://www.minorleagueball.com/2011/4/22/2123847/the-significance-of-minor-league-k-rates
I'm not a fanboy, I'm an awesome dude
by Jason Collette on Dec 19, 2011 2:18 PM EST up reply actions
the guy has 93 games in aaa. it isnt like hes years away.
i also would much, much rather target a guy with HUGE power that may be a little bit further away than a guy whose upside is limited but is closer.
That's fair, I'm on board with that.
And I agree with Glass, in that I’d rather acquire him even if he’s not ready immediately. The k-rate thing is a good point.
I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously.
Follow @steveslow
by Steve Slowinski on Dec 19, 2011 12:36 PM EST up reply actions
Hey if the Rays feel like trading for Konerko
and moving him to DH when they deem Rizzo ready for the majors, I wont stop them.
Until then, I guess that would be Joyce at DH and Guyer in RF.
Under construction
It pretty much long-term solves the 1B problem though
And that (and DH) is the only position we don’t have someone either entrenched in almost ready to play at
by benderbrodriguez on Dec 19, 2011 12:38 PM EST up reply actions
btw, Rays Top 10 list from BA comes out on Wednesday
I'm not a fanboy, I'm an awesome dude
by Jason Collette on Dec 19, 2011 12:10 PM EST reply actions
Mike Cameron signs with Nationals
I can’t believe they’re going to go with a Bernardina/Cameron situation in CF. Platoon or no platoon
I'm not a fanboy, I'm an awesome dude



























