Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Is Hellickson Getting Squeezed?

Jeremy Hellickson has been walking more batters this year (3.45 BB/9) than he did last year (1.98 BB/9). For a pitcher who's calling card is command, this is a lot (MLB average is around 3.3 BB/9). A quick look at his Fangraphs plate discipline numbers show that he's actually throwing slightly more pitches in the zone this year (47.8%) than last year (46.6%). Opposing players are swinging at less pitches (39.8% compared to 48.3%), and also whiffing less, which might indicate that he's not fooling players the way he did previously, but the decrease in swing rate is spread evenly between pitches in and out of the zone. If he has lost some trickery, I would have thought that it would show up more in the swing percentage outside the zone, not as a difference overall.

On the other hand, it's seemed to me that umpires are squeezing Hellickson, not giving him the called third strikes that more experienced control pitchers are rumored to be awarded. My first thought was to compare Hellickson's strike percentage with his zone percentage. And while he's in the zone more this year than last, he is in fact getting fewer strikes - 63.7% last year, compared to 59.5% this year. This doesn't, however, answer the question I'm trying to ask: Are umpires not awarding Hellickson strike calls on pitches in or near the zone that they gave him last year?

My second thought was that given that I'm sometimes called upon at work to act as a database analyst, and given the easy availability of good pitch f/x data, it's fairly ridiculous that I've never gotten set up to be able to answer that question for myself. After resolving to get the raw data when I went home and then not yet doing so, here's my third thought. Let's look at some pictures.

Star-divide

This Hellickson's location graph from last year.

4764512010010120110101aaaaastrikezone_medium

via pitchfx.texasleaguers.com

 

 

And is the location for this year so far.

4764512011010120110501aaaaastrikezone_medium

via pitchfx.texasleaguers.com


It's pretty clear to see that Hellickson isn't getting the calls on the bottom part of the strike zone the way he used, and the way Rays fans would like. Now I suppose that it's possible that there's a difference in pitch f/x calibration from year to year, or even that he's faced an abnormal amount of long-shinned batters so far in 2011, but the top, left, and right margins of those graphs look pretty similar to me, with only the bottom changing with the year.

I can't yet say why Hellboy is being gypped, or even if it's by enough of a margin to explain the whole rise in walk total, but he definitely is being squeezed this year, compared to last.

This post was written by a member of the DRaysBay community and does not necessarily express the views or opinions of DRaysBay staff.

Comment 6 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

20 pitches in the K zone not called strikes

if even a small % of those are on 3-ball counts, out of such a small sample size, could definitely explain the rise in walk totals

by davidsmarch on May 3, 2011 1:23 AM EDT reply actions  

I think 11 of those in the zone balls came in the Boston game

The zone was attrocious in that start, and he was not rewarded the bottom of the zone all game. With the sample size being as small as it is right now taking that game out probably makes a significant difference to his walk numbers

by Gareth Rees on May 3, 2011 8:56 AM EDT reply actions  

Without the first two games (Sorry 4/6 vs. LAA)

Walk totals are down, but still not getting the bottom of the zone.

by Whelk on May 3, 2011 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks

I think there’s a lot more that can be looked at about what gets called a ball inside the rulebook zone. I’d like to build some strikezone heat maps for pitchers, catchers, and batters to try and see who’s good at convincing/fooling umps and who isn’t.

by Whelk on May 3, 2011 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Founded in 2005, DRaysBay is home to, "Progressive statistical analysis and reasoned argument."

Please read our Community Guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Spts-shelton_small
Which Red Sox Fan Are You?
Spts-shelton_small
The Opportunity of the Century
Ryu_small
This one goes out to all the chicken littles
Small
MLB needs to help bring All-Star game to Bay Area
Small
Who's That in My Old Seats?

Recent FanPosts

Untitled4_small
The Rays Should 'Retaliate' By Winning
Whelk_small
Rays 7, Sox 4; Immediate Reactions
Images_small
Post-Game (Over)Reactions here
Small
Proposal: Rays play a series in Durham each year
Ag_-_hector_gomez_-_63_small
Visiting Tampa Bay from Colorado
Images_small
Immediate Reactions: Rays Win, But Likely Lose Another Guy

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Catch For the Ages
Brandon Guyer out for season
Other Side of the Coin: Rodney's Fortune on Called Strikes
Does anyone have any information on Josh Sale? He doubled in a run in his...
Orlando Hudson released
Rays sign Garko to minor league...
Baseball Card Fans...check out my Ebay Auctions
Cameron Seitzer Growing Up Baseball
Longo injury apparently is apparently not good
Hak-Ju Lee, SS, Rays (Double-A Montgomery) Lee had a breakout year in...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Friends of the Site

DRB Suggestion Box

Drb4_medium

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Slowsky__1__small Steve Slowinski

Images_small Jason Collette

Brad_small BWoodrum

Price_small Erik Hahmann

Analysts

Small td32

Rutg_uakjmedjwh9ndzd4lkll_small Imperialism32

100_1952_small MrNegative1

Steak-with-crown_small CBJones

Whelk_small Whelk

Scaled_php_small mr. maniac

Tampa_theatre_small jcmitchell

Me_small John Gregg

Small SGrauer