Rays Beat Boston, 4-3 – Now Just 3.0 Games Back
Dave Cameron is right. The pressure is on the Tampa Bay Rays, not the Boston Red Sox. Ignore the collapse talk; ignore the "hot" narrative; ignore everything but the incredible odds against the Tampa Bay Rays right now. Because that will make the magic of this season only greater.
Jeff Niemann (W, 11-7) threw 89 pitches through 5.0 innings, but limited the Red Sox (87-64) to only 2 runs, giving the Rays (84-67) a narrowed 3-game deficit in the Wild Card race. Niemann walked only 2 Red Sox batters and struck out an uncharacteristic 6 hitters, including a K to Adrian Gonzalez and Dustin Pedroia (whom Niemann also picked off to finish the 5th inning).
Then, eschewing the common approach, manager Joe Maddon pulled Neimann for the 6th inning and sent rookie and top pitching prospect Matt Moore into the game. Moore started his appearance by busting the radar gun, hitting 98 mph in his second and third pitches and earning praise from temporary closer Joel Peralta:
"Watching him was great," veteran reliever Joel Peralta said. "First two pitches and it's like, 'Daddy's here.'" — MLB.com
And Daddy went on to pitch 3.0 innings, striking out 2, walking 2, and allowing only 2 singles which led to an RBI ground out in the 7th. Moore then handed the ball to Peralta, who apparently doesn't care much for closer mentality talk. Peralta struck out two batters and didn't let the ball leave the infield en route to collecting his 4th save and giving the Rays a 4-3 win.
Offensively, the Rays started properly with a Fenway Special, a 300ish ft. Ben Zobrist home run to left, giving them a 2-0 lead in the top of the first. Desmond Jennings pushed the lead to 3-0 in the third, doubling, moving to third on a ground out, and then scoring on a wild ball four to Evan Longoria. Then, in the fifth, Longo added an insurance run on an RBI single to right field.
Notes:
- Some may criticize Maddon of over-managing or getting "too cute" (is such a problem even possible?) in pulling Niemann after five, but I laud the move. Niemann, on his career, has allowed an .800 OPS when the order turns over for the third time (despite a .600 OPS the first two times through). For comparison, hitters have a .700ish OPS against James Shields regardless of how many times they've seen him.
Meanwhile, Moore is pretty much an unscouted pitching phenom, and the Red Sox are loaded with lefties. It was a brilliant, daring move, and Moore rewarded Maddon with three innings of stifled Sox offense. - Former Devil Ray, Joey Gathright, got his first steal of the season, and his first MLB steal in two years. Congrats Joey; we still remember you fondly here.
- Jon Lester and Brian Knight went 7.0 innings, limiting the Rays to 9 base runners. The lefty-umpire duo combined for 4 strikeouts and 4 walks, a surprising feat considering their impressive zone construction:
- Here are the Wild Card standings as of tonight:
58 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
DAN JOHNSON FAN CLUB UPDATE:
No news to report.
A DRaysBay and FanGraphs writer from Cubs Stats and Twitter @BradleyWoodrum
He's Here
Good luck charm. Period.!!!
Go Danjo!
by MrNegative1 on Sep 18, 2011 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions
at least we don't really have to worry about the Angels anymore
because if they catch us, we aren’t catching the Sox. Pending a 2-9 type finish from them and the Orioles aren’t that hot.
also anyone have any video on Moore's innings
I wasn’t able to watch the game and because it was on regular Fox there won’t be a replay (I assume).
if you have mlb package
it may be archived today?
by MrNegative1 on Sep 18, 2011 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions
Initially i questioned the use of Matt Moore against the Sox in a close game, with their ability to see plenty of pitches
As it turned out, the only run was on a questionable wild pitch/passed ball.
Today is the defining moment in David Price’s career. He has yo dominate, no Jake Fox cutters
follow me on twitter @sternfan10
Defining moment of his career...
or do you just have a nickname lined up for him if he dares to lose to the Red Sox?
'That is an absurd username.' - Steve Slowinski.
by Concretepiggy on Sep 18, 2011 7:26 AM EDT up reply actions
soon to be David OverPriced, no doubt
I'm not a fanboy, I'm a _______
by Jason Collette on Sep 18, 2011 8:08 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
No, I was predicting your next name for him
I'm not a fanboy, I'm a _______
by Jason Collette on Sep 18, 2011 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions
Cason
you are a visionary. In a few years the DavidOVERPriced nickname will be genius. Let’s hope by the time Evan/Price are set to earn those nicknames the new stadium issue is resolved and the Rays can go all Minnesota and lock the two up (Mauer/Morneau) but with better results.
by MrNegative1 on Sep 18, 2011 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions
No it isn't.
It is one game. He may pitch well and lose; that will not mean he can’t rise to the occasion. He may do terribly. No matter the injuries, Boston has a fearsome lineup that can make any pitcher look bad. Or as he is not a robot, Price may simply not have it today.
To be clear, I am not preparing for him to lose. He may also be brilliant as he has often been in the past. That too will not define him except for those with blinkered vision. Sometimes Sandy Alomar Jr. hits a home run off Mariano Rivera in a crucial playoff game. That defined neither player. Sometimes Rivera makes an error and then gives up a double to Tony Womack!! that ties the 7th game of a World Series, and then loses the game on a single by Gonzalez. Again, nobody is defined by one game except in the popular imagination.
It is just this kind of assertion that led me to post on another thread criticizing the nickname game you play. Price is a young pitcher who has shown more than flashes of excellence and has also had some disappointing moments. The greatest players in the game-Cobb, Ruth, Mantle, Ted Williams, Mays-have had similar ups and downs. All are defined by their careers, not by individual games or at bats.
If you are simply projecting how the fan base will feel about Price should he not win, you may be right, but so what. I don’t think it is the mission of this site to feed that sort of nonsense. If you really think Price should be defined by one performance, I think you are terribly mistaken. If you are simply expressing your emotional response-in advance of anything happening-I think you are allowing irrationality to overcome your reason.
Parenthetically, I think it is “defining moment” approach that underlies the enthusiasm for Jack Morris’s HOF candidacy. And while the argument there is more complicated, to the extent that one game is often mentioned, I think the argument is fallacious.
by bobr on Sep 18, 2011 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions 7 recs
This post has got me all hot and bothered.
@ptSuttery
by Suttree on Sep 18, 2011 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
The pressure is not on the Rays
The pressure is on Boston. That’s the fact. Whether or not we should use coolstandings as our pressure gauge is irrelevant. Pressure is emotion and sometimes may be irrational. Check out the Boston players. Check out their fans. They are about to inflict a gun shot wound to their temple. The pressure is huge, and I was up there this whole week so I saw/felt it first hand.
If there is any pressure on any Ray it is Price. He semi gagged last week vs the Orioles. Today he is going against Wake. The Red Sox fans have no confidence in Lestah winning big games…here’s to hoping Davd and Astro do not get into that territory.
Have to beat Wake.
I thank Draysbay for proving that Loose Change fanatics exist in mainstream America, and more importantly for Chik-fil-A spicy chicken recommendations. My life is forever changed
by matthan on Sep 18, 2011 8:25 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Pressure is on Rays
Rays can not afford “a” loss while the Red Sox can afford up to 3 losses.
by MrNegative1 on Sep 18, 2011 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions
Pressure is both ways
But the Rays are playing with house money. Red Sox are much tighter.
Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla
by FreeZorilla on Sep 18, 2011 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions
More pressure on redsux
If they lose ,that 12 year old kid will kick the crap out of pedy again.
hey Matthan
A story on ESPN.com you may enjoy:
by MrNegative1 on Sep 18, 2011 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions
Great article Woody
You hit the nail on the head. I am sick of hearing all this analysis from these so called unbiased onlookers like Camaroon. The funiest one I heard all weekend was from so called unbiased TV comentator Tim McCarver
Big Crapie hits a flyball to B.J. 40 feet from the wall. The camera guy pans the bullpen where he thinks the ball will land. Timmy says " In the summertime thats a Homerun ,this time of year it’s an out" HAHAHAHA
Reminded me of this one....
What can I say? I tip my hat and call the Yankees my daddy.
-Pedro Martinez
by ChiBurbRaysFan on Sep 18, 2011 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions
Matt Moore could be an ace in the hole for Joe
He pitched 3 innings Saturday. Will he mound up on Wed. against the yanks,with 3 days rest?. I say it improves his ability to pitch Wed. because Joe has pressure tested him. I don’t think the 3 innings fatigues him.
I would also like to give a BIG THUMBS UP to Joel Peralta. Not only has he been great on the mound,but he has given Matt some advice on how to come out ready out of the pen. I also like his media comments. Great Job Joel.
We have a double header Wed
I am thinking Helly and Moore
oic I misread the pitchers
I think it should come down to a game day decision than to see how he feels, you could go with Shields on 3 days rest as well.
This is what I would do with Shields on 3 days rest and pushing Niemann back to set up Price v NYY last game of the year (possibly setting up Niems vs Bos in playoff and he has dominated them this year)
NYY
Davis
Shields/Hellickson
Moore
Tor
Price
Niemann
Davis
NYY
Shields
Hellickson
Price
I do like the look of that.
According the mlb.com right now, though, the probables list Niemann for Thursday.
I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously. -- @steveslow
by Steve Slowinski on Sep 18, 2011 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions
yea I saw that I think they are just assuming everyone goes in order
Maddon has shown he isn’t afraid to tinker with that already to set up match-ups.
Is there a tie breaker
or do we win because of heads up wins?
I thought I read Mr. Sternfan
mention a heads up tie breaker.
well I would trust his word a lot more than mine
I am far from certain on this topic so this is good news to me.
I am not sure on this
My first thought was a playoff game. Maybe somebody that knows for sure would way in.
Last I heard
We get Homefield because of heads up. They were using coin flip for Homefield ,but changed it to heads up. I don’t know if things have changed again
Mr Sternfan said there is not one
but there is one….and it would be at Tropicana Field
If two or more Clubs in a League are tied in determining the Wild Card Club with identical winning percentages at the conclusion of the championship season as originally scheduled, including all rescheduled games and discounting additional games to determine the Division champion, as set forth in Rule 33©(2), the Commissioner shall determine the Wild Card Club as follows:
(A) Two-Club Tie. If two Clubs are tied for the Wild Card designation then the championship season shall be extended to include one additional game between such Clubs. Such game shall be played the day after the conclusion of the championship season as originally scheduled. The site of the game may be determined by mutual agreement among the Clubs and the Commissioner to keep travel at a minimum. In the absence of such an agreement, the Commissioner shall determine the site of the additional game between the tied Clubs by one toss of a coin. The Commissioner shall declare the winner of the additional game to be the Wild Card Club.
I'm not a fanboy, I'm a _______
by Jason Collette on Sep 18, 2011 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Thank you for clearing this up Jason
I guess we can just add this to the list of things that you have corrected for Mr. Sternfan
I would love to win outright (even if its super unlikely)
but how amazing would it be to have a one game playoff and to go in to boston, or st pete, and destroy the sox.
it would be an exciting game to say the least.
I would fully recommend a Meat Up if this happens.
i love baseball.
Yeah, I don't see Badancil turning out well.
@dobbertweets
by blackraven on Jun 27, 2011 5:08 PM PDT
No Zobrist Tuesday against New York.
Leaving team after game to be with wife for birth of child. Return to team Wednesday.
as he should
call up Beckham :)
I'm not a fanboy, I'm a _______
by Jason Collette on Sep 18, 2011 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions
GOod for Zo.
Seriously, not many players would do that in a race. SF1 won’t mind being without OHW, thats for sure.
Follow Me on Twitter @FreeZorilla
by FreeZorilla on Sep 18, 2011 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions
Why doesn't the doctor schedule the birth
for Monday. The stars are aligned better for a Monday birth.
Baby Jesus #2
I’m expecting Ben to go beast mode when he returns.
Maddon's Mission
Make you want to kill him, then make you want to love him. Sly.
by Jonah Keri on Jun 19, 2010 10:31 PM EDT
Cool segment on CBS Sunday morning
Sponsor homes for Hudson Renegades players
Cisco, Rice and Partridge this season
In the past the couple has sponsored Hamilton, Longoria and Dempster
follow me on twitter @sternfan10

by 







![Zobrist wallpaper I made :]
Actual Link: http://i1207.photobucket.com/albums/bb472/lewiedesigns/Wallpapers/Zobristwallpaper.jpg](http://cdn1.sbnation.com/fan_shot_images/237766/Zobristwallpaper_small.jpg)

















