How Jeremy Hellickson Gets His Popups
Jeremy Hellickson is a flyball pitcher. This season he allowed flies on 46.4% of all balls put in play. Normally I would consider this a warning sign, as while groundballs tend to become outs (sometimes double plays) or singles, flyballs also go for doubles, triples, and home runs, and only very rarely turn into double plays. However, as Tommy Rancel pointed out in his Rays Insider piece on 1040 ESPN Tampa Bay, Jeremy Hellickson gets a lot of infield flyballs. Infield flyballs almost always become outs, and what's more, there's some evidence that inducing high infield flyball rates is a repeatable skill, most often shown by extreme flyball pitchers, like Hellickson. Hellickson's infield flyball rate (IFFB%) for this season is 14.2%, meaning that 30.0% of his flyballs have been popups. (Note: My numbers come courtesy of Joe Lefkowitz. They're slightly different than Fangraphs, which I think is what Tommy Rancel used. I'm really not sure why.)
It's of course far too early in his career to say for sure if Hellickson is just getting lucky, or if he does in fact have a special skill for generating popups, but I think it's worth taking a close look at how he's getting them.
Hellickson has induced infield flyballs at a much higher rate from left handed hitters than he has from right handed hitters. Lefties have hit 44 infield flies and 74 outfield flies compared with 20 infield flies and 72 outfield flies to righties. Much of this discrepancy comes from the changeup, which Hellickson throws to hitters of either handedness, but which got him 14 popups against lefties but only two against righties. Here's a complete breakdown of Hellickson's flyballs by pitch type. Note that the relatively small percentage on the changeup are due to it's lack of effectiveness in inducing popups to right handed batters.
|
Pitch Type |
Infield Popup |
Outfield Fly |
Percent |
|
FF |
30 |
65 |
31.6% |
|
FT |
8 |
14 |
36.4% |
|
CU |
10 |
13 |
43.4% |
|
CH |
16 |
53 |
17.4% |
In terms of location, height does seem to matter. The average height in the strike zone of one of Hellickson's infield popups was 2.7 inches higher than that of his outfield flies. Also, fastballs inside created more popups than outside fastballs. I find this interesting, as it seems to suggest that Helly is successful by pretending he's a power pitcher and busting players up and in with his modest fastball. It makes me wonder if it's not so much that velocity allows a pitcher to succeed up and in, but rather that velocity gives a pitcher the confidence to live up and in to batters, where he can succeed.
I've created a Tableau worksheet for you to play around in. You can control what data is being shown by changing which boxes are checked. Go ahead and post any interesting patterns you uncover.
15 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Let me know if the Tableau widget doesn't work for you.
It works for me fine, and I thought it was too cool to pass up, but if lots of people have technical problems with it I’ll avoid interactive graphs in the future.
Works fine here
If you can't say something to someone's face then it's not worthy of being said behind their back.
by Sandy Kazmir on Sep 8, 2011 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions
This is really awesome, Whelk. Great job, man. Curious to see if the average height being higher for PU compared to FB is the same for other pitchers
Or if there is some sort of sequencing effect here between the low change and seeing a high fastball. Certainly makes it seem like a repeatable skill vs. the pure luck that some seem to think.
If you can't say something to someone's face then it's not worthy of being said behind their back.
Haven't broken it down by individual pitchers, but just checked on the league.
Overall, popups are 2.2 inches than outfield flies.
It's intuitive and not something you can really pitch towards, but very awesome to see that confirmation
If you can't say something to someone's face then it's not worthy of being said behind their back.
Doesn't mean there isn't a sequencing effect too.
That’s just a little bit more difficult to identify. Just brainstorming: what if I looked at the IFFB/FB for every pitcher, and compared that to the average height of all of their fly balls. If there are guys underperforming or overperforming what would be expected based on average height, would that be evidence of a sequencing effect and would that identify a useful group to look for similarities between?
How would I try to verify that it wasn’t just noise? Is there a better way to look at it than averages?
I'd try to bucket it by some profile of pitchers, split out lefties and righties first, then look at guys with similar arsenals (pitch values would probably work)
Try to group guys by FA/SL, FA/CH, FA/CU as primary good/bad pitches and see if there is any difference across that. This could give you a nice proxy for pitch sequencing as similar repertoire’s should be seeing similar sequencing/location. It’d probably be a lot of work, so maybe you could just pick like 5 guys from each repertoire or something.
If you can't say something to someone's face then it's not worthy of being said behind their back.
Very much like Jered Weaver
Weaver’s delivery is different but both locate high fastballs very well and their changeups have tremendous deception and depth to them
I'm not a fanboy, I'm a _______
by Jason Collette on Sep 8, 2011 12:46 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
What I noticed:
He gets popups up and in with the fastball to both LHB and RHB (which was mentioned in the article) and down and away with the changeup, especially to LHB. If he has good arm speed on his changeup and will mix it in at any point, this would create the popups with the fastball. However, I’m not sure why he gets so many with his changeup. Isn’t that a pitch you usually get on top of, not underneath?
Unless you're out in front of it and it finds a funny spot on the bat
I'm not a fanboy, I'm a _______
by Jason Collette on Sep 8, 2011 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Well, I was thinking about the changeup.
And it’s a funny pitch, in that it usually has positive rise, but we perceive that it drops because it’s slower than the fastball, and gravity has more time to act on it. On the other hand, that extra time also means that a changeup with the same rise as a fastball will rise more due to it’s spin than the fastball would.
I’m not sure what to make of this, but when I looked at BJ Upton’s taking of strikes, the changeup behaved more similarly to the fastball than to sliders and curves, the other pitches that seem to dive, but that actually do.
Sidespin vs. back spin, changes and fastballs should have armside run while breaking balls and cutters should have gloveside run
If you can't say something to someone's face then it's not worthy of being said behind their back.
Awesome stuff
Going to be great to see what contributes to this being a repeatable skill going forward.

by 








![Another wallpaper I decided to randomly make. Enjoy guys =]
Here's the direct link
http://i713.photobucket.com/albums/ww131/thermagraphics/hellboy2.jpg](http://cdn2.sbnation.com/fan_shot_images/199585/hellboy2_small.jpg)















