Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage of 2012 Coke 600

"#Rays closing in on a major-league deal with INF Jeff Keppinger, likely to be finalized by end of the week."

4 months ago Me_tiny John Gregg 316 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

ugh

"Please break your typewriter and computer and never come out of your ass cave again"

by pudieron89 on Jan 25, 2012 5:47 PM EST reply actions  

welp... helliot gets DFA's 4sure now

molina
pena
zobrist
longo
reid
jennings
upton
joyce
scott
s-rod
chiriton
fuld
canzler/guyer

though i guess you could platoon joyce and keppinger.

by rglass44 on Jan 25, 2012 5:48 PM EST reply actions  

yep, sayonara helliot

"Please break your typewriter and computer and never come out of your ass cave again"

by pudieron89 on Jan 25, 2012 5:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Looks like Canzler/Guyer are out

October 28th, 2011-- a date which will live in infamy--

OTTOTD.com

by Sveet on Jan 25, 2012 6:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Unless Brignac is traded.

joeybw, on why he was banned for half a day:

"Might of been grammar I keep getting that "would have" thing wrong

Not on purpose, mods, wish it was….."

Classic.

by sc_monsta1015 on Jan 25, 2012 7:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Part of a Davis/Niemann package, I mean

joeybw, on why he was banned for half a day:

"Might of been grammar I keep getting that "would have" thing wrong

Not on purpose, mods, wish it was….."

Classic.

by sc_monsta1015 on Jan 25, 2012 7:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Which is why this signing is confusing

joeybw, on why he was banned for half a day:

"Might of been grammar I keep getting that "would have" thing wrong

Not on purpose, mods, wish it was….."

Classic.

by sc_monsta1015 on Jan 25, 2012 7:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Keppinger turned down at least $2.5 mil earlier this year in arbitration

so how much are the Rays spending here? any way you slice it, seems like a lack of faith in brignac

by d.russ on Jan 25, 2012 5:51 PM EST reply actions  

he didn't turn it down, he was non tendered

"Please break your typewriter and computer and never come out of your ass cave again"

by pudieron89 on Jan 25, 2012 5:57 PM EST up reply actions  

it was the giants saying "you aren't worth more than 2.3m"

so hopefully the Rays get him under $2m.

"Please break your typewriter and computer and never come out of your ass cave again"

by pudieron89 on Jan 25, 2012 5:58 PM EST up reply actions  

I dont see this having anything to do with Reid

I don’t expect JK to play much SS. He is more competition with Guyer to platoon with Joyce with JK at 2B. As long as Srod is around there is no need for JK at SS

by Dbullsfan on Jan 25, 2012 6:40 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I think you've analzyed this correctly

I’d rather have Guyer off the bench and in RF vs. lefties than Keppinger at 2B and Zobrist in RF, of course.

by AndrewTorrez on Jan 25, 2012 6:42 PM EST up reply actions  

i would too

I don’t get this at all, I hope this is a very cheap contract or part of some other deal not yet announced.

by Dbullsfan on Jan 25, 2012 6:47 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Yup. Topkins just tweeted this.

“Keppinger’s appeal to #Rays: a career .324 / .371 / .481 / .852 line vs. LHPs "

Didn’t look up myself, but if true then gonna see some platoon action somewhere I guess.

"I don't believe in just being out there and just grinding away. Let's do it intelligently, let's do it quickly, let's get it done. And then move on." ----Joe Maddon

Rays Digest
Rays Digest Twitter

by John Gregg on Jan 25, 2012 5:54 PM EST up reply actions  

IOW, he is good at what S-Rod already provides

I mean, he’s a step up from Helliot, but it reminds me of when we carried Navi & Shop at C. Two guys who don’t complement each other.

Use the force, Lueke

by nomoredevil on Jan 25, 2012 6:05 PM EST up reply actions  

He's an improvement at pinch-hitting off the bench

and more useful vs LHP. Helliot struck out in 1/3rd of his PAs vs LHP w/ a .293 wOBA

Keppinger struck out 4 times in 96 PA vs LHP last season

by Jason Collette on Jan 25, 2012 6:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I was about to comment on this point.

On a team with a like of K machines, Keppinger does not strike out much-6.2% for his career. That sets up a lot of situational pinch hitting possibilities.

I initially figured Guyer to be pretty much a lock to make the team, but many have pointed out the inadvisability of having him sit on the bench a lot. Perhaps he is sent to Durham to keep sharp and ready if/when needed. If they are loath to keep Guyer in the majors, Keppinger fills a need for a particular kind of RH bat.

e.g. Late in a tie game, runner(s) in scoring position, whom do you prefer to PH for Brignac vs. LH pitcher-Keppinger or Rodriguez?

by bobr on Jan 25, 2012 6:30 PM EST up reply actions  

a 25th man as a PH/UTIL?

I was annoyed at first but it makes more sense the more I think about it. And of course Guyer doesn’t have much else to prove in Durham but 1) this is $tu, they’ll keep his arb clock from ticking and 2) better for him to get reps every day than be the next Dillionaire.

"Please break your typewriter and computer and never come out of your ass cave again"

by pudieron89 on Jan 25, 2012 7:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Too bad Moore got extended.

Might have cost us the 2012 #servicetimechamps.

by jtmorgan on Jan 25, 2012 7:55 PM EST up reply actions  

he'll be traded once he gets expensive.

"Please break your typewriter and computer and never come out of your ass cave again"

by pudieron89 on Jan 25, 2012 7:58 PM EST up reply actions  

He's going to be leaving his prime by the time he gets expensive.

I doubt he’s unaffordable through arb, and by that time, anyway, the Rays will have a new tv deal, no?

FREE GUYER!

by SandalsNoPants on Jan 25, 2012 8:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I think this is a case where we can over-think the move.

Essentially, it seems to come down to some judgments the Rays make.

1. Do they want Guyer to be a platoon/bench player or to play regularly and be available should he be needed? Can we be certain there is a right answer to this? Aren’t there legitimate reasons for either option?

2. Is it useful to have a contact hitting RH on the bench who is versatile enough to play almost any position and has a good record against lefties? We are not talking about a starter or about someone replacing a real prospect (in that role, I mean). We are probably looking at Keppinger vs. E. Johnson. If the Rays want such a 25th man, who is preferable?

In the end, we are considering the acquisition of a 25th man, and so the question might really be what sort of player Maddon might best use, what sort of skills he feels this particular team needs most.

by bobr on Jan 25, 2012 8:17 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

for the twelvety-billionth time

arguing “X is better than Elliot Johnson, therefore the Rays should sign X” is basically an argument for the entire free agent pool.

EJ was never going to make the 2012 roster. This move says that the Rays think Keppinger is better suited for the bench than Guyer (which you seem to get in point 1). That’s why it’s so weird. Not completely indefensible — people have made the arguments in this thread — but it seems to me, still wrong.

by AndrewTorrez on Jan 25, 2012 8:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I know, that's why I don't like it

but eh, I guess Friedman doesn’t make moves based on what makes me happy.

by AndrewTorrez on Jan 25, 2012 8:38 PM EST up reply actions  

i feel like a trade might be brewing

because why would they need to wait until the end of the week to make an official offer/sign him? its a 1 year 1-2 million dollar deal. those types of deals can be done in seconds.

Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.

by James Westfall on Jan 25, 2012 8:39 PM EST up reply actions  

an interesting point

I’m coming around to the idea that they want a platoon partner for Pena more so than Joyce, and didn’t trust Canzler’s defense.

by AndrewTorrez on Jan 25, 2012 8:41 PM EST up reply actions  

i like that idea as well.

Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.

by James Westfall on Jan 25, 2012 8:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I think you're off on this.

Not sure on an infielder knocks an OFer off the roster. It was always going to be Fuld or Guyer for the OF spot.

I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously.

by Steve Slowinski on Jan 25, 2012 8:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks. I knew that.

Oops.

"I don't believe in just being out there and just grinding away. Let's do it intelligently, let's do it quickly, let's get it done. And then move on." ----Joe Maddon

Rays Digest
Rays Digest Twitter

by John Gregg on Jan 25, 2012 6:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Topskin

"Please break your typewriter and computer and never come out of your ass cave again"

by pudieron89 on Jan 25, 2012 7:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Massive? Better to have him get 150-200 PA against mostly lefties? I like the idea of giving Joyce a shot to be fulltime to start the year

If he tanks then you still can promote Guyer later after someone else has shaken out to be a non-viable option

†††If you love Jesus Chris and are 100% proud of it, copy this and make it your signature!†††

by Sandy Kazmir on Jan 25, 2012 9:53 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

career wRC+ 124, .368 wOBA

however, 600 career ABs vs lefties in 7 years in the majors. 93 coming last year. weren’t we worried about saying anything about danjo’s putrid 91 ABs?

"Please break your typewriter and computer and never come out of your ass cave again"

by pudieron89 on Jan 25, 2012 6:14 PM EST up reply actions  

you would have to believe

1) that Keppinger really is a lefty-masher, and 2) that Guyer can’t come off the bench or play part-time.

I’m not convinced of either of those, but that’d be the argument.

by AndrewTorrez on Jan 25, 2012 6:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Or that Guyer is better served by more time in Durham.

This FO never lets win now get in the way of win later.

by Whelk on Jan 25, 2012 7:08 PM EST up reply actions  

again, what is Guyer going to learn at Durham?

If I thought a year there would double his walk rate or something, I’d be all for it, but that’s not exactly realistic. He’s already shown he can hit AAA pitching.

by AndrewTorrez on Jan 25, 2012 7:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe he can improve his walk rate.

They kept Joyce down forever, and when he came up, he was ready. Just saying that it fits with their MO of keeping players down until their absolutely ready.

by Whelk on Jan 25, 2012 7:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Joyce was 24; Guyer will be 26

I’d hate to waste his peak years in the International League.

by AndrewTorrez on Jan 25, 2012 7:22 PM EST up reply actions  

The Reej speaks:
Joyce’s first full season in the majors was 2011. He was 26.

I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously.

by Steve Slowinski on Jan 25, 2012 7:42 PM EST up reply actions  

but that is attributed to injuries, no?

"Please break your typewriter and computer and never come out of your ass cave again"

by pudieron89 on Jan 25, 2012 7:58 PM EST up reply actions  

that's just dumb

this plan puts Guyer in AAA during his age-26 season.

by AndrewTorrez on Jan 25, 2012 8:00 PM EST up reply actions  

It's about development, not age.

If giving Guyer more time in Triple-A this season means he’s more likely to be a valuable contributing player in 2013 once Upton leaves, I’m okay with it.

I love Casey Fossum. Now try and take me seriously.

by Steve Slowinski on Jan 25, 2012 8:04 PM EST up reply actions  

He was pushed fairly aggressively until he was traded here...

it would not kill him to spend a little more time in AAA

Boom. Outta Here.

by Ryan Gilliss on Jan 25, 2012 8:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't think this is a service time issue.

Seems to me that the point made that he will be under team control during his peak is correct, so why wait. I do think it may be a reluctance to let him get stale on the major league bench. And some of that decision may have to do with the Rays knowledge of Guyer himself.

I suppose if someone is really impressed by Guyer’s potential it is frustrating. But given the current roster, I do think it makes sense as he won’t be a starter barring an injury.

by bobr on Jan 25, 2012 8:24 PM EST up reply actions  

According to multiple defensive ratings systems he is terrible at 2B

and SS. Who knows where they intend on playing him, maybe 1B, OF, DH. It is clearly about the bat against LHP w/ low K%.

by Sticky Bandit on Jan 25, 2012 6:19 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Troof

†††If you love Dan Johnson and are 100% proud of it, copy this and make it your signature!†††

by mattc286 on Jan 25, 2012 6:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm trying to find some reason why this makes any sense.

He can’t defend and he isn’t an inspiring hitter either. I’m just not seeing anything.

by mr. maniac on Jan 25, 2012 6:39 PM EST reply actions  

He'll play IF against lefties

Sending Joyce or Pena to the bench. He’s a much better hitter than Pena/Joyce against lefthanders. Basically, he’s a better fit than Helliot.

by Barnacles on Jan 25, 2012 7:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm getting a projected/regressed wOBA against LHPs of .351 (.304 against RHP)

That’ll do. Not sure we should expect better than that from Guyer.

by Whelk on Jan 25, 2012 7:15 PM EST up reply actions  

In the absolute, yes.

But Pena, Scott, and Joyce mean we want someone who can hit lefties well off the bench. Keppinger can. Brignac, Zobrist, and S-Rod mean we don’t need someone as a defensive replacement off the bench, so it doesn’t matter that Keppinger can’t.

If I’m honest with myself, I’m more confident in that .350 wOBA against lefties from Keppinger than I am from Guyer, or probably Canzler.

by Whelk on Jan 25, 2012 7:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't think the intention is for him to be a defensive sub.

He is on the bench for his bat vs. LH, a particular kind of bat.

It seems the bench will be Catcher, Brignac, Fuld, Keppinger. Brignac and Fuld are essentially there for IF and OF defense, with Fuld in particular possibly hitting against RH and possibly Brignac starting vs RH leaving Sean Rodriguez on the bench.

So Keppinger is not critical for late inning defense or even for much starting time but rather to hit lefties.

by bobr on Jan 25, 2012 8:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Just thowing it out there though not likely

Maybe they intend to keep Guyer and get rid of Fuld.

Could go Kep at 1b, Zo at 2b, Guyer at RF vs LHP.

October 28th, 2011-- a date which will live in infamy--

OTTOTD.com

by Sveet on Jan 25, 2012 6:49 PM EST up reply actions  

but they aren't, and they won't.

"Please break your typewriter and computer and never come out of your ass cave again"

by pudieron89 on Jan 25, 2012 7:38 PM EST up reply actions  

more likely they won't keep Briggy

October 28th, 2011-- a date which will live in infamy--

OTTOTD.com

by Sveet on Jan 25, 2012 7:52 PM EST up reply actions  

lol

unless he’s traded, wrong again.

"Please break your typewriter and computer and never come out of your ass cave again"

by pudieron89 on Jan 25, 2012 7:59 PM EST up reply actions  

He could start the season in Durham, if need be. I'm not very high on Brignac making the opening day roster

†††If you love Jesus Chris and are 100% proud of it, copy this and make it your signature!†††

by Sandy Kazmir on Jan 25, 2012 10:03 PM EST up reply actions  

But Keppinger in an awful fielder?

That is like saying Canzler can play 2B, 3B, and COF.

by mr. maniac on Jan 25, 2012 7:28 PM EST up reply actions  

How is he an awful fielder?

He was roughly average at 2B for his career apart from last year and I don’t think we can say that with any confidence based upon how small the sample sizes are.

by Barnacles on Jan 25, 2012 7:40 PM EST up reply actions  

-3.5 UZR/150 career.

Only Dan Uggla was worse defensively last year at 2B.

by mr. maniac on Jan 25, 2012 7:43 PM EST up reply actions  

A) Small sample size

B) You can live with -3.5 UZR/150 if you put up a 850 OPS. Dan Uggla is a good example of that, so is Robinson Cano.

I’m not saying play the guy 150 games and he’ll be a star but he’s an upgrade in the role the Rays want him to play.

by Barnacles on Jan 25, 2012 7:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes - he's comparable defensively (that's not a good thing) and as the weak side of a platoon

“I’m not saying play the guy 150 games and he’ll be a star but he’s an upgrade in the role the Rays want him to play”.

by Barnacles on Jan 25, 2012 8:09 PM EST up reply actions  

offensively, yes

defensively, no

October 28th, 2011-- a date which will live in infamy--

OTTOTD.com

by Sveet on Jan 25, 2012 7:09 PM EST up reply actions  

for the eleventy billionth time

Elliot wasn’t going to make this roster anyway.

by AndrewTorrez on Jan 25, 2012 7:18 PM EST up reply actions  

bench

C (Lobaton/Molina)
IF (Brignac/S-Rod)
lefty PH (Fuld)
righty PH (Guyer/Canzler/Chirinos/now Keppinger)

There was never going to be space for EJ in 2012, and never any need for it.

by AndrewTorrez on Jan 25, 2012 7:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't think the Rays were ever going to carry just one IF reserve

and I don’t think the Rays have any confidence in Canzler’s defense even at 1B. They obviously wanted a backup infielder – thus the Keppinger signing.

by Barnacles on Jan 25, 2012 7:38 PM EST up reply actions  

on a team with Brignac, S-Rod, and Zobrist

you really think they need a backup, backup shortstop? That’s madness.

by AndrewTorrez on Jan 25, 2012 7:57 PM EST up reply actions  

our SSs are not all that impressive.

still hoping for a briggy bounceback and i know you are too.

"Please break your typewriter and computer and never come out of your ass cave again"

by pudieron89 on Jan 25, 2012 8:00 PM EST up reply actions  

oh yeah

I’m just saying that whatever the situation is, you don’t need a 4th guy on the bench to play short in an emergency. Christ, even if there were some sort of 19-inning marathon with multiple ejections, it’s not like Evan couldn’t be your emergency, backup, backup shortstop for an inning or two.

by AndrewTorrez on Jan 25, 2012 8:13 PM EST up reply actions  

No, they want a bench player

who can hit lefties, a contact hitter perhaps, and one who is not wasted on the bench.

by bobr on Jan 25, 2012 8:33 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

or his son

Reid Brignac

Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.

by James Westfall on Jan 25, 2012 7:50 PM EST up reply actions  

If there is a situation in the OF, and the Rays need Fuld as an everyday player for a while

like what happened in 2011, he can be a decent bat, albeit below average, with amazing defense.

If something happens and Keppinger is forced to be a longterm sub in the IF, he’s going to be a decent bat but below average in the field.

Ugh.

You have been issued a warning.
Personal attacks have no place ~Alzheimer reference~ --sternfan1
In order to continue participating on DRaysBay you must acknowledge your warning by pressing the OK button below.

by SandalsNoPants on Jan 25, 2012 7:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, it's fine for what we would need him for.

You have been issued a warning.
Personal attacks have no place ~Alzheimer reference~ --sternfan1
In order to continue participating on DRaysBay you must acknowledge your warning by pressing the OK button below.

by SandalsNoPants on Jan 25, 2012 7:48 PM EST up reply actions  

you can platoon every position

"Please break your typewriter and computer and never come out of your ass cave again"

by pudieron89 on Jan 25, 2012 7:40 PM EST up reply actions  

So, is things stay how they are, Zobrist/Scott at 1B whenever Pena isn't?

joeybw, on why he was banned for half a day:

"Might of been grammar I keep getting that "would have" thing wrong

Not on purpose, mods, wish it was….."

Classic.

by sc_monsta1015 on Jan 25, 2012 7:38 PM EST reply actions  

Even if we project Scott at the optimistic .360 wOBA overall.

We would have Keppinger better against lefties – .335 to .351.

by Whelk on Jan 25, 2012 7:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't get this.

Poor fielder, only hits lefties, doesn’t walk (doesn’t K either, though).

I hope it’s not a guaranteed deal, and I hope he doesn’t make the team.

You have been issued a warning.
Personal attacks have no place ~Alzheimer reference~ --sternfan1
In order to continue participating on DRaysBay you must acknowledge your warning by pressing the OK button below.

by SandalsNoPants on Jan 25, 2012 7:39 PM EST reply actions  

We can take 30 starts vs. lefties and PH, right?

I don’t mind it, I just would have liked to see the fourth bench spot belong to Guyer

joeybw, on why he was banned for half a day:

"Might of been grammar I keep getting that "would have" thing wrong

Not on purpose, mods, wish it was….."

Classic.

by sc_monsta1015 on Jan 25, 2012 7:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Probably more than 30, but still

joeybw, on why he was banned for half a day:

"Might of been grammar I keep getting that "would have" thing wrong

Not on purpose, mods, wish it was….."

Classic.

by sc_monsta1015 on Jan 25, 2012 7:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Who does he replace in the lineup against lefties?

We already have 1 util IF lefty masher.

You have been issued a warning.
Personal attacks have no place ~Alzheimer reference~ --sternfan1
In order to continue participating on DRaysBay you must acknowledge your warning by pressing the OK button below.

by SandalsNoPants on Jan 25, 2012 7:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Zobrist to RF, Srod at SS, Kepp at 2B?

I like that vs. LHP

joeybw, on why he was banned for half a day:

"Might of been grammar I keep getting that "would have" thing wrong

Not on purpose, mods, wish it was….."

Classic.

by sc_monsta1015 on Jan 25, 2012 7:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Though he apparently is horrible defensively

joeybw, on why he was banned for half a day:

"Might of been grammar I keep getting that "would have" thing wrong

Not on purpose, mods, wish it was….."

Classic.

by sc_monsta1015 on Jan 25, 2012 7:46 PM EST up reply actions  

UZR (whatever that's worth) has him essentially at 0, or average, at 2B over the last 3 years

I’m not sure where people are getting the idea that he is horrible there.

†††If you love Jesus Chris and are 100% proud of it, copy this and make it your signature!†††

by Sandy Kazmir on Jan 25, 2012 10:11 PM EST up reply actions  

HOW ABOUT GUYER!?

You have been issued a warning.
Personal attacks have no place ~Alzheimer reference~ --sternfan1
In order to continue participating on DRaysBay you must acknowledge your warning by pressing the OK button below.

by SandalsNoPants on Jan 25, 2012 7:48 PM EST up reply actions  

yup

joeybw, on why he was banned for half a day:

"Might of been grammar I keep getting that "would have" thing wrong

Not on purpose, mods, wish it was….."

Classic.

by sc_monsta1015 on Jan 25, 2012 7:49 PM EST up reply actions  

As some have pointed out it's better for Guyer to start in AAA than platoon with Joyce

If the Rays have plans of using Guyer in the OF in 2013 especially with the pending departure of Upton after 2012 it’s best he gets work everyday rather than platooning.

by rickrays on Jan 25, 2012 7:54 PM EST up reply actions  

+2, even

this is so right I can stop posting

by AndrewTorrez on Jan 25, 2012 7:58 PM EST up reply actions  

This is possible, too.

Frankly, I have no idea what Guyer needs, but I think this move makes it clear the Rays think he’s better served in AAA.

by Whelk on Jan 25, 2012 7:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I suppose.

This is a crappy signing, though. I’m really disappointed. Keppinger literally offers next to nothing. I don’t want him playing the field ever.

FREE GUYER!

by SandalsNoPants on Jan 25, 2012 8:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I think that's the idea

and it’s a good one. I read the other day the Rays faced left-handed starters in 28% of the games last year so it’s not like using Keppinger is going to make a big impact in 2012. Bottom line is Keppinger overall a better player than Elliot Johnson but that isn’t saying much.

by rickrays on Jan 25, 2012 7:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Keppinger

is nothing more than an empty batting average and poor infield defense…there is a reason the giants kept mike fontenot over him.

Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.

by James Westfall on Jan 25, 2012 7:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I see nothing wrong with Keppinger's career splits vs his left handed pitching

Elliot Johnson does not belong on the Rays or any MLB club. Having Elliot on the postseason roster was a sad joke.

by rickrays on Jan 25, 2012 8:05 PM EST up reply actions  

keppinger is a perfect backup

i agree and he has value hitting lefties…but that is basically it.

Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.

by James Westfall on Jan 25, 2012 8:06 PM EST up reply actions  

obviously sabean isnt AF, but

not going to arb with keppinger was a good call. keppinger is not worth 2 million dollars.

Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.

by James Westfall on Jan 25, 2012 8:08 PM EST up reply actions  

3.1 WAR over the past 3 years

1 WAR for 2 million? Nick Punto got a 2 year deal!

by Barnacles on Jan 25, 2012 8:13 PM EST up reply actions  

I do agree with you completely

that the Red Sox signing Nick Punto (and then giving him the everyday SS job!) was unbelievably stupid.

by AndrewTorrez on Jan 25, 2012 8:14 PM EST up reply actions  

i thought 1 WAR

was worth 4-5 million on the FA market?

Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.

by James Westfall on Jan 25, 2012 8:16 PM EST up reply actions  

thats what i thought

so if keppinger can produce .5 WAR this will be a surplus of value if he signs below 2 million….not as bad as it sounds.

Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.

by James Westfall on Jan 25, 2012 8:22 PM EST up reply actions  

i agree

but i am just saying its not as bad as it seems…its not great but its not terrible.

Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.

by James Westfall on Jan 25, 2012 8:25 PM EST up reply actions  

oh, sure, it's not a horrible move

I just disagree with it. Kind of like Fernando Rodney.

by AndrewTorrez on Jan 25, 2012 8:32 PM EST up reply actions  

here here

Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.

by James Westfall on Jan 25, 2012 8:32 PM EST up reply actions  

One has track record of hitting quite well vs left handed pitching

The other has no track record at all and doesn’t even belong in MLB.

by rickrays on Jan 25, 2012 7:57 PM EST up reply actions  

the question is which is which

hahaha

Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.

by James Westfall on Jan 25, 2012 7:58 PM EST up reply actions  

good point.

but if you can get keppinger for less than 2 million and he can play serviceable defense and put up .324 /.371 /.481 against lefties its a decent risk to take…plus he rarely strikes out and isnt afraid to take a walk.

he is mediocre but at a decent price say 1.5 million with 100k in incentives he might be able to squeeze out some value.

Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.

by James Westfall on Jan 25, 2012 8:05 PM EST up reply actions  

The Rays obviously don't want to carry 2 reserve OF

This isn’t Guyer vs. Keppinger, it’s Keppinger vs. EJ.

by Barnacles on Jan 25, 2012 8:11 PM EST up reply actions  

LOL I'm sorry I forgot to include citations on my Internet Message Board Postings

It’s the only way this move makes sense. Also, the Rays were expressing interest in Edgar Renteria – a similar player to Keppinger. They clearly wanted to upgrade the backup IF position to someone who can hit left handed pitching.

by Barnacles on Jan 25, 2012 8:16 PM EST up reply actions  

it's not "the only way the move makes sense"

since about a dozen people have offered alternative explanations (i.e., that the Rays trust Keppinger to PH versus lefties more than they trust Guyer, or that they want Guyer to work on something at AAA).

Renteria would have been an Adam Kennedy move.

by AndrewTorrez on Jan 25, 2012 8:17 PM EST up reply actions  

It's not like the Rays have a thing against trusting rookies, especially for a bench role.

They aren’t the Giants. And maybe they just want Guyer to play everyday regularly but I doubt they really see him as that important – plus he’s like 25. He’s pretty much a fully formed player at this point.

by Barnacles on Jan 25, 2012 8:25 PM EST up reply actions  

isn't that an argument for my position?

Guyer is what he’s going to be, so you might as well get that value at the MLB level instead of sending him back down to destroy the starting staff of the likes of the Lehigh Valley Iron Pigs.

by AndrewTorrez on Jan 25, 2012 8:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Well I disagree with that line of thought

I was just saying it’s possible. But my explanation still seems more likely to me.

by Barnacles on Jan 25, 2012 8:30 PM EST up reply actions  

The Rays *do* have something against trusting rookies

When was the last time an unproven (<50 MLB PA) rookie PP broke camp in a starting role with the Rays?

by benderbrodriguez on Jan 25, 2012 8:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm going 100% Elliot Johnson on this.

And I think the Rays should be putting together the best team possible, and that team has Guyer on it as of right now. In fact, if they NEED another IF, Canzler is probably a better option than Keppinger.

FREE GUYER!

by SandalsNoPants on Jan 25, 2012 8:13 PM EST up reply actions  

2 questions

1) Besides arbitration proximity, why is Brainiac favored over Elliot Johnson? At least EJ can steal bases and has had a good hitting season more recently than 2006. Is his defense really worth it?
2) An .852 against the 30% of pitchers and bad defense is not worth 2 mil. I think you guys have gotten too used to terrible offense. a PHer with bad defense should be able to OPS 900 if he’s gonna be handling the shorter end of a platoon.

Ok, so the second one wasn’t a question.

by XrayYankeeZulu on Jan 25, 2012 7:42 PM EST reply actions  

2 answers

1) Oliver (which I use because of it’s better MLEs) has Elliot Johnson projected at .282 wOBA and Brignac at a .270 wOBA. Oliver uses a three year weighted average, so it doesn’t see the higher ceiling Brignac has based on his earlier minors performance. Brignac is favored because Elliot’s probable superiority is marginal while Brignac’s possible superiority is substantial.

2) Why? We pay for production the absolute, not how well players fit some arbitrary mold. Also, how much that pinch hitter is worth depends on your spot on the win curve. For us, marginal value is worth a lot.

by Whelk on Jan 25, 2012 7:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Are you arguing that EJ should be valued over Brignac or that Brignac is probably poor offensively?

Because you’re right about the latter, but 2006 is still relevant to the former.

by Whelk on Jan 25, 2012 8:02 PM EST up reply actions  

that 2006 is virtually irrelevant.

and if it is relevant, it means that he should be sent back to AAA. In fact, given that he fell 100 OPS points and then 200 the next yr upon moving to AA, he was clearly not adjusted when he was moved to AAA the following yr. i.e., he’s not going to hit well in the bigs.
EJ’s floor is a lot higher than Brignac’s, also. I’d put EJ on the roster and send down Brignac. He has options, yeah?

by XrayYankeeZulu on Jan 25, 2012 8:08 PM EST up reply actions  

ok, maybe not "a lot" higher, but higher

again, SBs, and defensive flexibility.

plus he’s ugly. all that together = grit

by XrayYankeeZulu on Jan 25, 2012 8:09 PM EST up reply actions  

two can play this game

Brignac had a .203 wOBA.
Excuse me while I cleanse my eyes by looking at some Frank Thomas stats

by XrayYankeeZulu on Jan 25, 2012 8:12 PM EST up reply actions  

We should expect a .312 wOBA against righties from S-Rod (I used a .326 wOBA overall to get taht)

With S-Rod on this team, having proved (me wrong that) he can play SS, neither of their floors matter.

by Whelk on Jan 25, 2012 8:22 PM EST up reply actions  

if they can get Keppinger

for less than 2 million this is a risk worth taking. somebody needs to strike fear into CC Sabathia and Keppinger is that somebody.

Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.

by James Westfall on Jan 25, 2012 7:53 PM EST reply actions  

Good point

joeybw, on why he was banned for half a day:

"Might of been grammar I keep getting that "would have" thing wrong

Not on purpose, mods, wish it was….."

Classic.

by sc_monsta1015 on Jan 25, 2012 7:55 PM EST up reply actions  

considering it seems we r adding JK for his bat only

Anyone else worried about his park factors, dude has played in some good ballparks for RH.hitters and now.has to go to the trop

by Dbullsfan on Jan 25, 2012 8:09 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

This is an extremely good point

Although the giants’ park is also not very hitter friendly

by benderbrodriguez on Jan 25, 2012 8:09 PM EST up reply actions  

that is a misconception actually.

Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.

by James Westfall on Jan 25, 2012 8:12 PM EST up reply actions  

?

.737 park factor last year, worst in MLB per ESPN

by benderbrodriguez on Jan 25, 2012 8:16 PM EST up reply actions  

that actually has a lot to do with their offense

if you look back further through the park factors it hasnt been as bad…believe me i was shocked too and they are my home team.

Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.

by James Westfall on Jan 25, 2012 8:18 PM EST up reply actions  

of his 582 career hits

about 75% have been singles. so a single is a single is a single. mostly.

Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.

by James Westfall on Jan 25, 2012 8:13 PM EST up reply actions  

There is no chance he gets regular time at 2B

Unless there is an injury. I’m fine with this deal as it provides a good bat against lefties and it likely won’t cost them more than $1.5 mil. Is he not what you would hope Canzler to be? At least he is proven at the ML level.

by Sticky Bandit on Jan 25, 2012 8:11 PM EST reply actions  

at 1.5 this is an ok deal.

keppinger is a good super-sub.

Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.

by James Westfall on Jan 25, 2012 8:14 PM EST up reply actions  

S-Rod at SS and Keppinger at 2nd verus lefties means the up the middle defense takes a hit

S-Rod is average at best at SS and Keppinger becomes the worst 2nd baseman on the team. And 2nd base is his best position. Not bad as the 25th guy on the roster but questionable if he is viewed as defensive asset (even in terms of flexibility)and PH’er late. His numbers against lefties have been regressing the last 4 seasons, despite an uptick last season…. but in only 93 AB’s.

Meh!

by budman3 on Jan 25, 2012 8:13 PM EST reply actions  

this seems exactly like a rays move

Squeezing some value out of someone who appears to have very little. They will hide his defense somewhere if his bat can play up.

by Sticky Bandit on Jan 25, 2012 8:22 PM EST up reply actions  

with Zobrist and S-Rod

I don’t think he would see 2B outside of an emergency.

by Sticky Bandit on Jan 25, 2012 8:18 PM EST up reply actions  

as I think about it

maybe this means the Rays view Keppinger as Pena’s platoon-mate? That way, they get the (presumed) lefty-hitting abilities plus (presumed) good defense at 1B, which is something you can’t get from Canzler or Guyer.

by AndrewTorrez on Jan 25, 2012 8:22 PM EST up reply actions  

thats a good point

Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.

by James Westfall on Jan 25, 2012 8:24 PM EST up reply actions  

He doesn't have to be good at 1B

He just need to be not awful. Why can’t he DH instead of Scott? There’s many options.

by Sticky Bandit on Jan 25, 2012 8:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Keppinger as the DH?

I’m hoping I’ve misread you somehow.

by AndrewTorrez on Jan 25, 2012 8:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Versus Lefties?

Why not. If he is the worst defender, put him at DH. He is really just a bat only guy, as silly as it sounds, that provides insurance as well.

by Sticky Bandit on Jan 25, 2012 8:31 PM EST up reply actions  

he's fine vs. LHP
#Rays: a career .324 / .371 / .481 / .852 line vs. LHPs

Even regessed, that looks great compared to what we have gotten in the past.

by Sticky Bandit on Jan 25, 2012 8:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Those are scewed over his career.

The last three seasons his slash against lefties is .302/.345/.453/.798

by budman3 on Jan 25, 2012 8:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Hmm

What’re the 13 PP then?
Pena, Scott, Molina, Zobrist, Rodriguez, Brignac, Longoria, Jennings, Upton, Joyce, Chirinos are locks.
Keppinger, Canzler, Guyer, Elliot duking it out for the last two ends up with Keppinger and Canzler? Am I missing someone?

by benderbrodriguez on Jan 25, 2012 8:25 PM EST up reply actions  

here's the 13, no competition now

C: Molina and one of Lobaton/Chrinos
1B: Pena
2B: Zobrist
SS: Brignac, S-Rod
3B: Longoria
OF: Jennings, Upton, Joyce, Fuld
DH: Scott
?: Keppinger

by AndrewTorrez on Jan 25, 2012 8:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah it seems like a done deal

Unless someone convinces Maddon to only carry 11 pitchers. Someone should point out that he carried Sonnanstine around all last year just so he could throw 35 awful innings.

by Barnacles on Jan 25, 2012 8:40 PM EST up reply actions  

so its not always sonny?

Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.

by James Westfall on Jan 25, 2012 8:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I think that's a great idea

Particularly if the 6th reliever is a former starter (Niemann/Davis/Torres/Cobb) — the 2012 Rays absolutely could get away with a 6-man bullpen. I don’t think it’s likely, though.

by AndrewTorrez on Jan 25, 2012 8:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

Not to mention that Cobb and Torres will likely be ready to be called up from Durham.

by Barnacles on Jan 25, 2012 8:46 PM EST up reply actions  

NEW ARTICLE POSTED BY SLOWINSKI

Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.

by James Westfall on Jan 25, 2012 8:45 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Founded in 2005, DRaysBay is home to, "Progressive statistical analysis and reasoned argument."

Please read our Community Guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Spts-shelton_small
Which Red Sox Fan Are You?
Spts-shelton_small
The Opportunity of the Century
Ryu_small
This one goes out to all the chicken littles
Small
MLB needs to help bring All-Star game to Bay Area
Small
Who's That in My Old Seats?

Recent FanPosts

Untitled4_small
The Rays Should 'Retaliate' By Winning
Whelk_small
Rays 7, Sox 4; Immediate Reactions
Images_small
Post-Game (Over)Reactions here
Small
Proposal: Rays play a series in Durham each year
Ag_-_hector_gomez_-_63_small
Visiting Tampa Bay from Colorado
Images_small
Immediate Reactions: Rays Win, But Likely Lose Another Guy

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Catch For the Ages
Brandon Guyer out for season
Other Side of the Coin: Rodney's Fortune on Called Strikes
Does anyone have any information on Josh Sale? He doubled in a run in his...
Orlando Hudson released
Rays sign Garko to minor league...
Baseball Card Fans...check out my Ebay Auctions
Cameron Seitzer Growing Up Baseball
Longo injury apparently is apparently not good
Hak-Ju Lee, SS, Rays (Double-A Montgomery) Lee had a breakout year in...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Friends of the Site

DRB Suggestion Box

Drb4_medium

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Slowsky__1__small Steve Slowinski

Images_small Jason Collette

Brad_small BWoodrum

Price_small Erik Hahmann

Analysts

Small td32

Rutg_uakjmedjwh9ndzd4lkll_small Imperialism32

100_1952_small MrNegative1

Steak-with-crown_small CBJones

Whelk_small Whelk

Scaled_php_small mr. maniac

Tampa_theatre_small jcmitchell

Me_small John Gregg

Small SGrauer