How the Rays offense improved BABIP in 2013

Kim Klement-USA TODAY Sports

Last off-season I had serious concerns that the Rays had a problem with luck.

For two seasons, the Rays had out performed their in-play batting average by posting offensive metrics above league average, even though the offense had the second lowest BABIP in all of baseball in 2011, and third lowest in 2012. These were levels we hadn't seen since Andrew Friedman took over in 2006.

Season Team BABIP wOBA wRC+ WAR
2006 Devil Rays .285 .316 89 10.2
2007 Devil Rays .318 .335 103 17.3
2008 Rays .302 .335 105 30.4
2009 Rays .303 .342 109 32.8
2010 Rays .293 .326 106 30.5
2011 Rays .281 .319 103 28.8
2012 Rays .284 .311 100 21.2

My biggest concern was that this trend of above average performance despite poor BABIP was unsustainable and I believed that the Rays could improve their offense greatly (and remove their dependence on superior pitching) by adjusting for luck.

While making adjustments to mitigate the risk of luck is somewhat like trying to catch lightning in a bottle, some research last season indicated that such a thing was possible.

At last year's Sloan Analytics Conference, Dan Rosenheck presented pitching research that showed how aspects of BABIP can be directly impacted by specific batted ball tendencies and the plate disciplines of hitters, which he discussed further on Fangraphs.

Rosenheck's observation was that the future BABIP production of pitchers can be correlated to their past performance in contact rates inside the strikezone and their infield flyball rates. Transitively, this logic is applicable for the luck of hitters as well.

Based on this research, I postulated that if the Rays could improve their contact rate on swings inside the strike zone (Z-Contact%, which the Rays were league-worst in 2012) and infield flyball rates (IFFB%, second worst), then the Rays' in-play batting average (BABIP) would improve overall. In fact, my observation was that the Rays had already made the moves necessary.

Instead of signing blame to defenses faced, ballparks played in, or talent of the batters, I suggested last March that the Rays would improve on each of those metrics, based on the changes the team made around the diamond.

Here's how that played out, with a comparison of 2012's role players to 2013's:

First Base PA Z-Contact% IFFB%
Carlos Pena 600 75.5% 16.5%
James Loney 598 92.0% 6.0%

Last off-season I had this to say about Loney's potential to increase the Rays' performance in batting:

When the Rays signed Loney, we knew the first baseman boasted a strong glove, one third the strikeouts of Pena, an inability to hit southpaws, and not a huge fall off for on base percentage. In 2012 the league average wOBA for first baseman was .329, Loney's same mark in 2011 and giving him bounce-back potential for 2013.

Loney not only delivered what the Rays needed by bouncing back from his career lows in 2012, but also proved he wasn't a platoon bat by hitting well against same-handed pitching. He exceeded expectations by delivering a .339 wOBA. He even improved his phenomenal contact outside the strike zone, offering at 32.4% of pitches beyond the zone and making contact on 85%. His O-Contact% was the fifth best in baseball, and only Victor Martinez offered at more pitches with a higher contact rate than Loney.

This offensive complement to his defensive game (which was nominated for a gold glove, with the rest of the infield) gave the Rays enough confidence to hand him the largest free agent contract ever under Andrew Friedman.

UTIL PA Z-Contact% IFFB%
Jeff Keppinger 418 95.6% 11.2%
Kelly Johnson 407 85.8% 12.1%

In 2012, Keppinger filled in at second base while Ben Zobrist primarily manned right field. In 2013, Zobrist returned to the infield and Keppinger's at bats were effectively replaced by Kelly Johnson. My expectation was that this would be a wash in transition, with Johnson posting lower contact but lower infield flies. However, Johnson was unable to keep his IFFB% down and his luck suffered because of it.

Kepp's .332 BABIP and .352 wOBA were replaced by Johnson's .276 BABIP and .314 wOBA -- a fall from rather above average to somewhat below. Johnson played primarily in left field, which is not his traditional position.

The bat performed well enough in the first half of the season, in spite of these peripherals, but his playing time diminished as Wil Myers transitioned into the line up. Matt Joyce moved to left field, and then injuries and the acquisition of David DeJesus effectively ended his playing time all together. This is the upgrade worth focusing on.

After 291 plate appearances in the first half, Johnson would only find 116 more across the rest of the year. By comparison, in the second half, DeJesus picked up 117 plate appearances and displayed a 93.5 Z-Contact% and 5.7 IFFB%.

DeJesus was featured prominently in the postseason run as the Rays' lead-off hitter, and looks to have earned his spot in the rotation for at least two more seasons. This offseason, the Rays let Johnson walk (to the Yankees, no less) and then signed DeJesus to a two year extension with an option for a third.

Short Stop PA Z-Contact% IFFB%
Elliot Johnson 331 84.9% 14.5%
Sean Rodriguez 301 81.8% 17.6%
Yunel Escobar 578 90.2% 6.8%

The other significant replacement on the roster was Yunel Escobar, our other substantial improvement in luck. After a slow start in April, Yunel was able to put together a .297 BABIP performance from May through the end of the season.

Escobar gave consistency to what was a revolving door for the Rays in 2012, and there is an argument to be made that Escobar has become the best overall shortstop in the American League. Part of that is his successful approach at the plate, one that mitigates the risk of luck as much as possible.

Third Base PA Z-Contact% IFFB%
Evan Longoria 312 85.8% 4.6%
Ryan Roberts 209 86.7% 12.3%
Evan Longoria 693 83.4% 4.4%

Finally, the other significant improvement was having Longoria healthy for a full year.

Due to a hamstring injury which would require surgery, Longoria was limited to 312 plate appearances in 2012. Removing his .313 BABIP was not helpful in improving the team's overall luck. At the time of Longoria's injury the Rays were last in batting average in all of baseball, and those peripherals did not suggest hope for it to improve.

Longoria was indeed able to play a full season with 693 PA's in 2013, posting similar numbers to his career averages.

Conclusion

After consecutive years of ranking among the worst in categories related to luck, the Rays offense was able to significantly improve in-play batting average to a mark of .295, comparable to the MLB average of .297.

Season Team BABIP wOBA wRC+ WAR
2011 Rays .281 .319 103 28.8
2012 Rays .284 .311 100 21.2
2013 Rays .295 .324 108 30.3

In kind, the offense improved from the tenth best offense by WAR in 2012 to the second best overall in 2013.

The improvement was just in time, as the pitching that ranked third overall in 2012 had injuries throughout the rotation in 2013, falling to fourteenth in WAR. If there was a time for the offense to step up and carry the team's production, it was last season, and the team delivered with another post season run.

Perhaps much of that was a result of the adjustments made to improve in-play batting average.

Latest News

In This Article

Teams
X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join DRaysBay

You must be a member of DRaysBay to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at DRaysBay. You should read them.

Join DRaysBay

You must be a member of DRaysBay to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at DRaysBay. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9351_tracker