Best and worst case projections for the new Rays on offense

Kim Klement-USA TODAY Sports

Baseball Prospectus has published their 10-Year Projections, UPSIDE grades, Percentiles for performance, and Comparables. It's been a glorious morning, whether you love PECOTA or hate it, as this is certainly some of the most fun you can have with player projections.

Here's some definitions of each category from Rob McQuown:

10-Year Forecast: A projection of player performance over the next decade.

UPSIDE: Not all players with the same projection have the same potential for greatness. UPSIDE gives us a way to distinguish between them.

Comparable Players: The "heart" of PECOTA. The player cards display each player's 100 closest comparables.

Percentile Forecast: The 10th- through 90th-percentile projections for each player, encompassing the full range of projected performance from worst case to best case.

Diagnostics: As also seen on the PECOTA weighted-means spreadsheet, each player's Breakout Rate, Improvement Rate, Collapse Rate, MLB%, and Attrition Rate, based on the weighted similarities of his most-comparable players.

Like I said, absolutely glorious. All of this is pay-for-use data so I can't give away all the spoilers, but I would like to point out a few best and worst case scenarios from the PECOTA projections using the Percentile Forecast for the new bats on the Rays roster.

Projecting performance is the reason I grew to love baseball, thanks to a brief appearance by Nate Silver on Countdown with Keith Olbermann that I happened to stumble upon, where he declared the Rays would be headed to the World Series. Carlos Pena had stirred my emotions the year before with the best hit show the Rays had seen in years, but this had me lit up with excitement months before the season started.

Projecting performance to a single stat line, however, is quite possibly a futile task. This is the joy of PECOTA, the "more" tab on Baseball Prospectus. Using these tools, we can identify best and wort case scenarios for a few key role players for the Rays next season.

One important distinction before we dive in: PECOTA and Baseball Prospectus employ True Average (TAv), a linear weight-based metric that's scaled to batting average, as opposed to wOBA which is more similar to on base percentage.

20140305_jla_sv7_028Photo credit: Kim Klement-USA TODAY Sports

Brandon Guyer

You knew this was coming.

The perfect platoon option available for left field is a plus-defender that bats the opposite side of starting fielder David DeJesus, and who has the speed to make an impact from the bench (unlike S-Rod and Forsythe are expected to... or Molina). Guyer can be used wisely, and should add value.

Earlier this off-season I projected Guyer to add 0.5 WAR to what Sean Rodriguez might have offered while paired with DeJesus, and that might have been conservative.*

Baseball Prospectus's version of wins above replacement (WARP) is notoriously strict with it's consideration of replacement value, and tends to suppress WAR figures. That said, PECOTA already projects Guyer to a 2.0 win season with a .279 TAv, and a batting line of .271/.329/.421 over 269 plate appearances. By comparison, Rodriguez held a .257 TAv over 388 PA's last season, and has a mean projection of .262 in 2014. Guyer is already projected to be an upgrade.

The important qualifier here is context. It's great for Guyer to have a solid projection, but within what range is the mean? Guyer's 80th percentile projection is 3.0 WARP and a solid .303 TAv, which was Evan Longoria's mark last season. Of course, this is the top of the range, no one is putting bets on Guyer batting like he's the best player on the team. However, it is encouraging that Guyer's bottom of the spectrum, his 20th percentile projection, is 0.9 WARP with a .246 TAv, which is in line with Rodriguez's 40th percentile projection.

PECOTA tells us there is a more than likely opportunity that Guyer is offensively better than what you might expect, which is points in his favor, even if he misses a few flyballs in the sunlight this Spring.

*In the end, PECOTA gives Guyer a 0.4 WARP edge at the mean, a 0.3 WARP edge in the 80th percentile, and a 0.6 WARP edge in the 20th percentile. Guyer's 90th percentile is a .318 TAv and 3.8 WARP.

20140215_mje_db1_758
Photo credit: Jonathan Dyer-USA TODAY Sports

David DeJesus

It would be unfair to discuss one side of the coin without acknowledging the other. DeJesus is not exactly new, as was the goal of this article, but it's still important to build familiarity. DeJesus was brought in by the front office at the trade deadline last season and contributed in the playoffs. In the off-season, the Rays extended DeJesus on a two year deal, with an option for 2016.

DeJesus is projected to be the long side of the platoon in Left Field in 2014, and expected to bat lead off when he's in the line up, as he did last season. Over 117 plate appearances for the Rays, DDJ gave his best with a .279 TAv. This season, PECOTA gives DeJesus a full set of 620 plate appearances with a mean projection of a 2.5 WARP and a batting line of .251/.325/.375, and a .264 TAv (not far off his career average).

As for the highs and lows, they are extreme. In the 80th percentile, DeJesus is given a 3.9 WARP and .283 TAv, which is more similar to Zobrist's contribution in 2013. In the 20th percentile, DeJesus is projected to a 1.1 WARP and .243 TAv, which is acceptable for a player that needs to be platooned. And that's the rub.

DeJesus is already expected to be strictly platooned, which is not something PECOTA is giving credit for in these projections. It's for that reason I'm more inclined to give more weight to a percentile above the mean than below, and makes DDJ's 80th percentile batting line of .271/.348/.406 not so unreasonable, particularly when that already closely resembles his performance against right handed pitching in 2013.

20140310_jla_aw3_023
Photo credit: Andrew Weber-USA TODAY Sports

Ryan Hanigan

Hanigan was another player acquired and then extended by the Rays, with an option for 2017 and the expectation of being the Rays' primary catcher. And the Rays generally know what they're getting in Hanigan: an increible game caller who takes his art very seriously, who excels at pitch framing, and is competent at the plate.

Relying on a simple projection for his offense, and building expectations at the plate in 2014, are not so simple. Hanigan missed significant playing time last year after injuries to his hand and side that brought down his performance. So, what does PECOTA do with a player returning from a season full of injury? The answer is not as detrimental as you'd think. PECOTA has been giving preference to Albert Pujols for years because of past success, and should likewise be fair to Hanigan's past.

Still, it's best to look at the full range. As a starting point, Hanigan's career TAv is a .260, but he notched a .219 over 260 plate appearances last season. The mean projection for Hanigan is a .259 TAv with a .250/.343/.327 batting line, which is closer to career averages. That's a top-20 on base percentage, using last year's performance.

On the extremes, Hangian's 80th percentile batting line is .275/.373/.360 with a .281 TAv, which would be a top-10 performance among catchers, while his 20th percentile batting line is .219/.305/.285 with a .230 TAv, slightly better than his injured performance last year.

20140310_jla_aw3_135
Photo credit: Andrew Weber-USA TODAY Sports

Logan Forsythe

In Forsythe we have the opposite projection problem than with Hanigan, where we don't know which season was the outlier. Forsythe had his own injuries in 2013 that held him down, but the year before that he raked. Forsythe will also be carefully platooned, and has a career batting line of .290/.363/.430 against left handed pitching. For PECOTA comparisons, his 2013 TAv was .234, while his 2012 mark was .272.

Forsythe will be in competition with Rodriguez and Guyer for two-of-three projected starting platoon rolls off the bench, among which Forsythe likely has the least respected defense. Like these two players, PECOTA has Forsythe projected to a back up role, with a mean projection of .245/.326/.382 over 290 plate appearances, with a 0.9 WARP and .267 TAv. I am once again partial to take an over on this mean, due to the incredible likelihood that Forsythe will face only opposite handed pitching, but for him the sky is not the limit.

In the 80th percentile, Forsythe is given a .269/.354/.420 batting line and .290 TAv, with a double impact of 1.8 WARP for 326 PA's. Better performance always comes with a few more plate appearances in the percentiles, and visa versa. Forsythe isn't given the same defensive nod as S-Rod in the system, who has a 2.7 WARP 80th percentile, but the TAv's are similar to his competition: .284 for Rodriguez, .303 for Guyer.

The plantar fascitis has subsided, and presumably his accompanying right knee soreness as well, but if not we may see something similar to his 20th percentile: .214/.288/.333 with a .236 TAv, comparable to .232 for Rodriguez, and .246 for Guyer.

In short, Forsythe has the most to lose in below-mean performance, given his below expectation on defense in comparison to Rodriguez, and Guyer's superior projected offense. Health for Forsythe -- and Guyer -- will be the key.

Jerry Sands?

Alright, no more.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join DRaysBay

You must be a member of DRaysBay to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at DRaysBay. You should read them.

Join DRaysBay

You must be a member of DRaysBay to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at DRaysBay. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9351_tracker