For What It's Worth
An odd source to report this, but I suppose it's newsworthy none the less; Phil Rogers of the Chicago Tribune did a piece on shortstops and included this line:
Jake will be the first to tell you the Chicago media is awful and I tend to think this report cannot be correct, it clearly wasn't the plan last year -- the team had Harris move to second base down the stretch for a reason -- and I'd rather acquire a defensive shortstop with Harris being the first guy off the bench rather than becoming the next Ty Wigginton and being overused in positions he has no business being in or at.

Some other links and notes:
A Cubs fan thinks the Rays - Cubs could hook up on a Cedeno + Hill for Crawford deal -- it would take more than that.
From Eli's MLB Rumors
I have no idea how credible the guy is, but he seems to have a load of interviews with baseball folk. Wilson (08:$6.5M, 09:$7.25M, 10:$8.4M club option ($0.6M buyout) is pretty expensive for a guy who's .790 OPS was the highest since 2004; he's got a good glove though.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: For What It's Worth
Definitely
by R.J. Anderson on Nov 11, 2007 10:12 PM EST up reply actions
Hard to tell
by Patrick L. Kennedy on Nov 11, 2007 10:53 PM EST up reply actions
I don't think the Cubs fan was proposing that deal
You're right
by R.J. Anderson on Nov 11, 2007 11:07 PM EST up reply actions
Re: For What It's Worth
There are no credible free agent shortstops, which means a trade or possibly Japan (Tomohiro Nioka?). So lets assume for a second that the Rays cant acquire a shortstop at a decent price. Who is the '08 shortstop?
Josh Wilson? No
Ben Zobrist? The liability with the bat is not worth what is only a slight upgrade in glove.
That leave Harris. Harris was moved to second bc the team wanted to see if somebody else could handle short (Wilson or Zobrist). Neither did.
So, in the end Phil Rogers is correct. Acquire a new shortstop or Brendan Harris. His defense is a liability and yes the team would prefer a better glove, but at least the team would know they can count on offensive production.
by RaysIndex on Nov 11, 2007 11:15 PM EST reply actions
Re: For What It's Worth
They've got to improve the defense
by Patrick L. Kennedy on Nov 11, 2007 11:51 PM EST up reply actions

by 



















