FanPost

"Fan loyalty"

I just typed up these numbers in response to one of my friends (who happens to be a Phillie's fan) making a comment about how the Rays' fans are bandwagoners.  I know I shouldn't get annoyed after hearing this all year, but I can't help but still get annoyed.  Anyway, I found some interesting things...

 

Tampa Bay Philly
Record Atten./game Record Atten./game
2008 97-65 22,370 92-70 42,254
2007 66-96 17,131 89-73 38,374
2006 61-101 16,901 85-77 33,356
2005 67-95 14,095 88-74 32,905
2004 70-91 15,936 86-76 40,125
2003 63-99 13,070 86-77 27,901
2002 55-106 13,157 80-81 20,231
2001 62-100 16,029 86-76 22,001
2000 69-92 18,121 65-97 19,911
1999 69-93 19,294 77-85 22,535
1998 63-99 30,942 75-87 21,182
Population: 2,700,000 Population: 5,800,000
Attendance/game Adjusted by Regional Population (%)
Rays Phillies
2008 0.829 0.729
2007 0.634 0.662
2006 0.626 0.575
2005 0.522 0.567
2004 0.590 0.692
2003 0.484 0.481
2002 0.487 0.349
2001 0.594 0.379
2000 0.671 0.343
1999 0.715 0.389
1998 1.146 0.365

 

To find this last metric, I simply divided each year's attend/game numbers by the metropolitan area population for each city and then multiplied by 100.  Obviously it's not a perfect metric, but it's kinda interesting at the same time.

Also, I just find it really funny that while Philly fans are uber loyal, they also didn't draw that many fans when they stunk.  Their turnaround from a 65-97 record in 2000 to a 86-76 record in 2001 is comparable to our turnaround this year, but their attendance increased much less between those two years than our's did this year.  But anyway, I think this pretty much proves that "fan loyalty" (as presented by the media and opposing fans) is not tied to attendance figures, but to length of a team's existence.

This post was written by a member of the DRaysBay community and does not necessarily express the views or opinions of DRaysBay staff.