| REP | BAT | FLD | POS | Runs | Wins |
| 20 | -15 | 0 | 7 | 12 | 1.2 |
| 20 | -15 | 5 | 7 | 17 | 1.7 |
| 20 | -15 | 10 | 7 | 22 | 2.2 |
| 20 | -15 | 15 | 7 | 27 | 2.7 |
| 20 | -10 | 0 | 7 | 17 | 1.7 |
| 20 | -10 | 5 | 7 | 22 | 2.2 |
| 20 | -10 | 10 | 7 | 27 | 2.7 |
| 20 | -10 | 15 | 7 | 32 | 3.2 |
| 20 | -5 | 0 | 7 | 22 | 2.2 |
| 20 | -5 | 5 | 7 | 27 | 2.7 |
| 20 | -5 | 10 | 7 | 32 | 3.2 |
| 20 | -5 | 15 | 7 | 37 | 3.7 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 27 | 2.7 |
| 20 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 32 | 3.2 |
| 20 | 0 | 10 | 7 | 37 | 3.7 |
| 20 | 0 | 15 | 7 | 42 | 4.2 |
Jason Bartlett has averaged 2.6 wins over the last three years. As you can see, Brignac has the chance to top that, even if his offense is -15 runs, which by the way, would have to be pretty damn awful. If league average hitting is around .330 and Brignac had a wOBA of .305, he'd be better than -15 runs. CHONE has him pegged for -14.5 if he were to take over in 2009.
I'm not suggesting Brignac should dethrone Bartlett as the starter next year, but 2010 should be interesting.